15 votes

Boston: Videos of odd behavior.

I am presenting the videos I found, any commentary in them is the opinion of the person who made the video. My questions and comments are posed here.
Video one is the seconds after the first blast.

http://youtu.be/cwZv_fsXEes
1. A man gets up, pulls at / rips his shorts, then sits down again. What is his story?
2. The woman in black appears to take a photo of Bauman, then put her camera away, then start helping people. That seems odd to me.
3. In the first frame, you see a man running from the scene. Everyone else in the area seems stunned, this man is running. It turns out, he is the Saudi National who was detained and is to be deported.

In this video, frames of the Saudi national running away are pieced together:
http://vimeo.com/64688037
The video makes some very good points about the circle of carnage around him. (Language warning.) If he had nothing to do with it, why was he at ground zero, the only one at ground zero apparently not shocked by the explosion, and why deport him?

This video shows a man throwing a bag of something dusty on victims.

http://youtu.be/u2fhCtccCBs
What is the substance, and why is he throwing it on people?

The thing is, I don't know what happened in Boston. The official story does not explain things to my satisfaction, and that leaves me with questions. Everyone and their dog has videos of that event, there is supposed to be video of a Tsarnaev kid dropping a backpack - why isn't that video circulating? Why does the official story deny (or ignore) the drill that was going on? Why is anyone who asks questions accused of "offering crazy theories?"

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
deacon's picture

sarcasm right?

:)

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

Damn DuaneK36

Wake up. People WERE hurt. 14 people had limbs blown off and removed. 3 people died.
http://www.today.com/health/different-reality-mother-daughte...

http://www.heavy.com/news/2013/04/heather-abbott-boston-bomb...

http://www.heavy.com/news/2013/04/adrianne-haslet-davis-bost...

http://www.nypost.com/r/nypost/2013/04/15/news/web_photos/Bo...

http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/files/2013/04/Boston-Marathon-bo...

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1324478.1366666928!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/gallery_635/boston-marathon-explosion.jpg

This site is full of

This site is full of disinformation agents who will vote down any attempt at sanity in order to intentionally discredit the movement. They cry conspiracy at everything, no matter how insane, and they discredit the entire movement. Instead of talking about crucial issues like the Federal Reserve and our foreign policy, which are both things you can point to indisputable evidence on so you can have an adult discussion trying to bring people to side of liberty, you first have to take 30 minutes to explain not all lovers of liberty are foil hate wearing loonballs.

All you need is a few of these shills and that's enough to attract countless kooks who think everything is a conspiracy.

"In reality, the Constitution itself is incapable of achieving what we would like in limiting government power, no matter how well written."

~ Ron Paul, End the Fed

One time

I seen this guy place a girl in a box and saw her in half.

Did you ever see 14 people

Did you ever see 14 people somehow "act" like they had a limb or limbs amputated for the rest of their entire life?!? Tell me how they pull that off?

That got me thinking

Initial reports spoke of 20+ limbs being blown off, but out of all the pictures and videos I've just seen the one guy with no legs. Where are the pictures of all these other leg less victims?

^

There's three others in my comments above this, headed Damn DuaneK36. I'm sure if you look you can find the rest.

In the real world, you don't really think they are gone.

Ask people who've been in combat and lost them and the people who've helped them. I've heard too many stories of this type of incident to accept that any such victim instantly recognizes they've lost limbs.

So if they looked like they just, ON THE SCENE, recognized they had lost limbs, then they were ACTING.

Joη's picture

he's referring to their limbless futures

Not the immediate aftermath, trained muscle memory, or phantom limb effects.

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?

LOL!

.

Ron Paul convert from the Heart of Dixie

The man who pulls

or rips and sits back down is also holding a knife.

SteveMT's picture

Different clip of same dust/smoke video.

Maybe this will add something; I cannot view from my location, so I'm just taking a guess.

http://youtu.be/p4ms5A6QH60

I Can't Tell

If it's dust or if the video is just so bad that it makes it look like dust but is really towels going through the air. It cuts off too fast to tell for sure. ?????

skippy

That is helpful

It looks like a white towel unraveling as it falls. The video quality is garbage. The "its all actors!!11!!" crowd won't be satisfied until all videos are shot in crystal clear hi-definition by multimillion dollar video cameras. They are a bunch of knuckleheads.

It's pretty apparent that it's not dust...

if you look closer at the slowed down video, you can see he is holding some sort of cloth in each hand, the "dust" are these cloths unfurling as they fall.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

It definitely does look like

It definitely does look like towels or cloths in his hands, but then it does look like powder when he tosses it. Your explanation makes more sense and seems right from what it looks like he has in his hands. I would like to see video that keeps recording and shows if his hands are empty or he has something still in his hand like an empty paper bag. Either way to me just because I don't understand what is going on doesn't make them "acting" by default. I have no idea how this supports the "actors" theory.

Not apparent to me.

0:27 - looks like powdery stuff to me. It would be nice if someone could locate the guy and ask him what it was.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

1:33 in the video from Steve's comment:

You can see folded cloths in the man's hands, which he throws a second or two later.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

Then 3 seconds later

something is floating through the air like particles, not cloth.
I appreciate you simply stating what you see, even if it looks different to me. I do not think you are a blind, troll government shill for not seeing what I see. I appreciate that you have not accused me of promoting any "wild theories" for asking questions about what I see.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

I don't see anything floating through the air like particles...

I see two white blobs falling towards the ground.

Fullscreen the video and watch it from 1:25 - 1:38 a few times.

Take two folded white towels or other cloth, throw them and watch what happens after you release them, that's what it looks like to me.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

What is wrong with you people?

That guy isn't throwing powder on anyone. It's an optical illusion because the video quality is garbage and you're breaking it down into individual frames. What purpose would throwing white powder on people serve? Oh, right, none.

People who think the attack was fake, and conducted with actors, are retarded. The US government doesn't care about killing innocent civilians. So, why would they FAKE kill innocent civilians? Just to make things more difficult on themselves? Do you morons still check under your bed each night for the boogeyman? Grow the fuck up.

deacon's picture

the true mark of an idiot

name calling firstly
ad hom attacks on others
and i just don't believe a word you put you print
was the term idiot calling names? nope,just pointing out facts
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

"That guy isn't throwing powder on anyone.

It's an optical illusion because the video quality is garbage and you're breaking it down into individual frames. What purpose would throwing white powder on people serve?"

I don't know and that's why it should be investigated by the police, no? Why would anyone throw this powder on victims from a bomb blast? All the more reason to INVESTIGATE.

"People who think the attack was fake, and conducted with actors, are retarded. The US government doesn't care about killing innocent civilians."

Yeah! The US Government has NEVER done that:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2210415/Revealed-Arm...

"So, why would they FAKE kill innocent civilians? Just to make things more difficult on themselves? Do you morons still check under your bed each night for the boogeyman? Grow the fuck up."

Oh, I dunno. To get the public to support their illegal wars?

No WMD's in Iraq
www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8JGd74dmRM

No link between Al Qaeda and Iraq
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDz6e7CdmbA

No attack on USS Maddox from Vietnamese
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HODxnUrFX6k

I'd like to offer you advice that you so generously gave to someone else: "Grow the fuck up."

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

WTF are your links trying to prove?

Like I said, the US government doesnt care about killing innocent civilians. They do it all the time. I am well aware of all the unethical human experimentation that was conducted throughout US history. So, why are you linking me stories to what I already know? My point is that a government who doesnt care about killing innocents would never go through the trouble of FAKE killing innocents and using actors to cover the whole thing up. It would be a Hell of a lot easier to just kill the innocent civilians. Plus, they already do kill innocent civilians everyday. Thanks for proving my point, though. People who think the Boston bombing incident was fake, and the victims who were injured are actors, are retarded. It's exactly like believing the boogeyman will drag you under the bed while you sleep. It's a stupid theory that stupid people believe.

maybe "they" are concerned about blowback from "real" victims.

"My point is that a government who doesnt care about killing innocents would never go through the trouble of FAKE killing innocents and using actors to cover the whole thing up. It would be a Hell of a lot easier to just kill the innocent civilians."

Minimized the real victims and they minimize being targets for retribution. Just a thought.

Which came first, the mouth or the rectum?

Well thanks for the insult.

I can't tell you how good it feels to be called "stupid" by a fellow American.

The whole point of all of this is you shouldn't be closed minded when it comes to government corruption. Just because you interpret the evidence differently than Fishy and I doesn't make you right and vice versa. What WE are saying is that there are MORE THINGS that need to be INVESTIGATED. That's all.

My links prove that the criminal elements within the highest echelons of the US Government will do anything they want to get what their real constituents want.

If the President can be an actor (and, imo, this one is), why can't a massacre "victim" be one, too? Not out of the realm of possibility.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

OK....

If that explanation is good enough for you.... but I see a guy throwing powder. Telling me I don't see it did not convince me, sorry. You certainly extrapolate a lot - I did not put forth any theory at all, merely asked some questions about some video footage.

Love or fear? Chose again with every breath.

The mark of a disinfo agent, even a lone wolf, is someone

who immediately ascribes every crackpot theory they can to anyone who asks any little 'ole question.

Asking questions, as you know, about something that doesn't look right, doesn't automatically mean you subscribe to all sorts of far out theories. It simply means you see something that doesn't look right.

The over-reaction by the naysayers, tells me they either are very invested in the official story for their own mental well being, or, they are planted disinfo agents.

As the former, they are to be expected in any situation. But if the later, then their very presence proves the notion of inside job. A job that is NOT coming from the inside, has no need for disinfo agents.

Thus, if the "noise" of people trotting strawmen out before everyone against any and every question, is louder than normal - you can safely place a bet on the side of "inside job" at least to some degree.

Agreed

The odd behavior is on Daily Paul. Embarrassing.

Ĵīɣȩ Ɖåđşŏń

"Fully half the quotations found on the internet are either mis-attributed, or outright fabrications." - Abraham Lincoln