22 votes

I Think MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell is a Lying Sack of Excrement!

In the news segment that just aired at 10:50 PM on 4/30/2013 on MSNBC, Lawrence O'Donnell threw the "Liar" word around with great abandonment at Dr's Ron and Senator Rand Paul.

I know MSNBC is dying of poor ratings, but please don't tune into their channel looking for this kind of slander. Just wait a few minutes to find out the pertinent stories like this on Daily Paul and Infowars, and please don't waste your time on their other crap.

Here's the incriminating Lawrence O'Donnell segment;

Did Mr O'Donnell not see this easily obtainable Youtube video? Perhaps he doesn't know how to use the Internet?

Police perform house-to-house raids in Watertown MA ripping innocent families from

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

can some one confirm this for me?

i was searching some Ron Paul videos on youtube and came across this video "The Last Word - Rand Paul rewrites himself and his father" i disliked it 34 seconds in since i was pretty sure where they were going with this video. i proceeded into disliking it to realize it added a like? can anyone confirm if this is the case?...if so this is fucked up!


this one as well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNC9lGFprz8

and this one : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjOZETCmBrE

and this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnkjyTvbcCc

and: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUsYJktmTvU

I wouldn't worry

I think more people visit the Daily Paul on a daily basis than watch MSNBC in a week, especially Rachel Maddow and this lesbian.

Anybody remember this?

Anybody remember this? Lawrence O'Donnell at his propagandist best, disallowing Peter Schiff from even finishing a sentence. The most one sided interview in MSM history. THIS is Lawrenece O'Donnell, listen to him at your own risk:


I must be willing to give up what I am in order to become what I will be. Albert Einstein

The msnbc propaganda machine

The msnbc propaganda machine must view the pauls as a threat to their precious obama. They are in full attack mode. I don't know if there were any tanks in the street but there were definitely armored vehicles with guns. Isn't that just as bad if you are the one with a gun pointed at you.


Lawrence odonell may he rot in hell when the good lord chooses so.





"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

Pure Torture

Larry O'Curly N'Moe or Lawrence Uh Dunno - He only gets his information from MSM and thinks its real poor guy. He missed the tan tank that had a soldier pointing a weapon at the guy in the window. He once called Ron Paul meaningless and insignificant,Parenthesis( ) in 2012, He sure is giving him attention now. It figures MSM will bury themselves with no help from anyone else.
Laughable doo doo also said to the young reporter from "WeAreChange" when asked about Ron Paul, said he only talks about topics he is knowlegable in so he could not answer the question. He still has no clue.

SendThat Video to O'Donnell

The argument will be that only one house (or a few) underwent such a process. Probably suspected hideouts.

I liked Keith Olberman

I liked Keith Olberman better. And that's saying something.


Who else laughed when lawrence puts a picture up of a bradley fighting vehicle, and says, "This is a tank!"

If you do not know what a tank is please don't talk like you know what a tank is.

So Ron said tanks in the street, he should have said APC's....

If anyone who watched this trash and believes it, they are a lost cause anyhow.

Here's the incriminating

Here's the incriminating Lawrence O'Donnell segment;

The hatred and venom

flowing from both the left and the right at lovers of liberty and peace only shows they are scared to death, and that perhaps they will lose their power struggle and we will gain our liberty. My guess is that 90% of those who can be persuaded that FOX and MSNBC have been lying to them, need observe no more than the frothing mouths of these guys to start the question going in their own minds: Why do they hate Ron Paul so much?

Michael Nystrom's picture

I refuse to watch this video

I'm a "TV Zero" household. When people are surprised that I don't have cable, my response is, "No, that sewer doesn't dump into my house."

This is what I know: There are cumulative bad effects from too much exposure to media like that. People literally do become zombies. They seriously get hypnotized by those talking heads.

Even this guy Lawrence O'Donnel - judging from the comments, is driving you to all to hatred.

The point is to exhaust you. Don't let your buttons be pushed.

metalhed19's picture

Solid post M Nystrom. I dont

Solid post M Nystrom. I dont have TV service either, one less bill. And good call on telling people not to get too bent out of shape. How was the vaction with the Mrs????

*Wisconsin Constitution* Article I, Section 25 "The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security,defense,hunting,recreation or any other law-abiding purpose"

BMWJIM's picture

Thank you Michael. Now

I will go in the garden and tend to the Tomatoes (2-1/2 feet tall now), the peppers, beans, melons, etc...

Life is too short my friend and you seem to understand. I am so happy you and your wife are safe. I wish you the best.

None of us knows what is really coming but I suspect you will survive for the goodness of your heart and the support of your wife. That is how I live my days. Susan keeps me somewhat grounded. Business is good but I come home and enjoy the really small things. When I tie a tomato plant up to the post and smell the odor that srteamlines its way to my nose it is like sex to a tomcat. I get excited and then comes the realization that all is good. The soil in my hands gives creedance to my love of this earth.

Damn, got lost in the moment, O'Donnel is just LOST. Nothing more and nothing less. He will perish with most in this country when it counts most. It is because he LOVES NOTHING but fame and himself. Love comes from loving the smallest of gifts GIVEN!

The DP keeps giving even when it doesn't seem too!

Peace my friend.


1976-1982 USMC, Having my hands in the soil keeps me from soiling my hands on useless politicians.

You are exactly right

You are exactly right Michael.

I study RSVP sequences (rapid visual serial presentation), and there are some amazing things you can do with that which would amount to hypnotizing people.

It is real. And, "they" are very interested in it.....

Exactly. Watching any of the

Exactly. Watching any of the talking head propagandists on MSNBC or Fox News is self inflicted torture and literally hazardous to your mental health. Why do it?

It's kinda like saying "Look, I stuck a needle in my eye and it hurts!"

I must be willing to give up what I am in order to become what I will be. Albert Einstein

While I may be personally

While I may be personally exhausted fighting the programming since the beginning of the Ron Paul movement in 2007, many new people with a lot more energy than I are joining the fight every day. That gives me hope.

PS Michael;
I'll try to remember to use that "I Think" in my opinion pieces in the future.

Secret Illuminati Training

Secret Illuminati Training Video? Illumicorp (full version)

for those who may not be familiar, MSDNC lies MORE than Faux!

no, really, really, oh yes indeedy:

Pew Research: Study finds MSNBC is 85% Opinion Commentary, not 'News'! Out-'foxing' FOX!

Submitted by AnCapMercenary on Wed, 03/20/2013 - 16:25

Here's the hilarious part: FauxNews is 'only' 55% in pure Onion opinion commentary! And CNN? 'Only' 46%!

The Changing TV News Landscape

by Mark Jurkowitz, Paul Hitlin, Amy Mitchell, Laura Santhanam, Steve Adams, Monica Anderson and Nancy Vogt of Pew Research Center

The news programs that Americans watch on national cable channels and their local television stations have changed significantly in recent years while the network evening newscasts have remained remarkably stable, according to a new study from the Pew Research Center.

On cable, the news structure of the three channels—the mix of interviews, packaged segments and live coverage—has changed. After relying on significantly distinct formats five years ago, the three rivals now look strikingly similar.

At the same time, some of the differences that demarcated daytime cable from prime time have also eroded in the past five years. Traditionally known for its attention to breaking news, daytime cable’s cuts in live event coverage and its growing reliance on interviews suggest it may be moving more toward the talk-oriented evening shows. This transition may cut the costs of having a crew and correspondent provide live event coverage.

CNN, which has branded itself around reporting resources and reach, cut back between 2007 and 2012 on two areas tied to that brand—in-depth story packages and live event coverage. Even so, CNN is the only one of the three big cable news channels to produce more straight reporting than commentary over all. At the other end of that spectrum lies MSNBC, where opinion fills a full 85% of the channel’s airtime.

Oh they "Lean[-ed] Foward" alright, to pure 100% Edward Bernays & Josef Goebbels la la land!

Not that we 'needed' any hard statistics to prove what all acute political observers have known, but here's just some data to backup what y'all have always intuited.

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

I tune into MSNBC just long enough

to see a train wreck of human doofusness. Just for my own amusement, like how some people take a peek at peopleofwalmart.com. It doesn't often take more than a minute to get my fix.

Defend Liberty!

Transcript of the vile piece:

>>> in tonight's "rewrite," a libertarian double feature. rand rewrites rand paul and rand paul rewrites ron paul. rand paul rewrote himself on drones after the boston marathon bombing:

>> "i've never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on. if someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, i don't care if a drone kills him or policeman kills him." -rand paul

>> hmm don't care huh? here was rand paul on the senate floor last month:

>> "no american should be killed by a drone on american soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court." -rand paul

>> so rand paul didnt just rewrite himself on drones, he lied about what he had previously said about drones. he was attacked online by some libertarians that realized he wasn't just lying about his previous statements, he was violating libertarian principles. "i disagree with shooting first and asking questions later. i am stunned by rand's statement, wrote another. but they shouldn't be stunned. as i have pointed out in this space before, inconsistency and lying are rand paul trademarks, as is forcing his senate staff to lie for him. his press secretary put out a statement retracting the senator's statement about killing liquor store robbery suspects with drones. the retraction said armed drones should not be used in normal crime situations. when asked if the senator was retracting his shoot to kill fleeing liquor store robbery suspects with drones nonsense, the press secretary was forced to lie. quote, "not retracting", end quote, is what she said. yesterday rand's father ron paul finally gave the world his long awaited take on law enforcement reaction to the bombing in an op-ed for a libertarian website entitled liberty was also attacked in boston. ron is a much more consistent libertarian than rand, who is surely the slowest student of libertarianism in the paul family, but ron lies just as much as his son, and just as blatantly, and always has. the first word of ron's op-ed piece is a lie. the first word! the first sentence is a lie, the first paragraph is a lie. let's count the lies in ron's first paragraph. forced lockdown of a city. let's listen to the governor announcing the forced lockdown:

>> "we're asking people to shelter in place, in other words, to stay indoors, with their doors locked and not to open the door for anyone other than a properly identified law enforcement officer and that applies here in watertown where we are right now, also cambridge, waltham, newton, belmont, and all of boston. all of boston."

>> do you see that? forced? he asked them to shelter in place. he didn't order anything to do anything. let's listen to the guy that stepped up to the microphone right after the governor, the boston police commissioner:

>> "mayor menino asked me to come here and tell you that the shelter in place recommendation has been extended through the city of boston."

>> the shelter in place recommendation. so forced is lie number one. let's look at lie number two. tanks. okay. there were no tanks in boston. the boston police don't have tanks. this is a tank. and this is the most fearsome vehicle that the boston police used in the manhunt. it is about as scary as the armored trucks that move cash to and from your neighborhood bank. it is not a tank. look at those tires on the police vehicle. now look at the tires on a tank. see? no tires on a tank. ron paul knows the difference. he served honorably in our military, he knows the difference between a tank and armored car, but for effect, he prefers the lie to the truth on that one. door to door armed searches without warrant. police don't need warrants. if property owners welcome them into their homes. families thrown out of their homes at gunpoint to be searched without probable cause. no guns were pointed at any families. some families vacated their homes in cambridge as police searched homes in that area, in the area of the suspect's home. i was on the street in cambridge talking to the residents who were very glad to be out of their homes for the few hours it took the police to be sure there were no bombs in or near the suspect's home. the street the police were searching was full of spectators and reporters watching the bomb search from what we hoped was a safe distance. none of the spec ta ters were following the recommendation to shelter in place, and no police officer told them to go home because no police officer had the authority to tell anyone to go home because there was no forced lockdown. no businesses were forced to close. that's another ron paul lie. no businesses. a wonderful cafe was doing a busy lunch business on the corner of the street being searched for bombs in cambridge. transport shut down. taxis were running most of the day, subways and buses were shut down. i will give ron paul that one. so the first paragraph has six sentences and five lies. he repeats lies, the shelter in place command, those are his words. there was no command. paramilitary troops terrorizing the public, those are the words he used. terrorizing the public. here is how the public reacted to being terrorized by their local police.

>> paramilitary police in tanks and pointing automatic weapons at innocent citizens. that's what ron paul wrote. what a vile lie. there were no tanks and there were no police pointing their weapons at innocent citizens. and you know who knows what a despicable lie that is? you know who knows how many police hating lies ron paul told in his op-ed piece? rand paul. rand paul knows. when he was issuing his nonretraction retraction about supporting drone use in liquor store robberies, rand paul said this. fighting terrorism and capturing terrorists must be done while preserving our constitutional protections. this was demonstrated last week in boston. i'm sorry, libertarians, you deserve better spokesmen than ron and rand. but until you get better libertarian advocates, you're going to have to continue to endure paranoid lying politicians in the paul family. [


Yes, but we already knew he was.

The problem is that presumably those who watch him aren't aware of it.

Integrity means having to say things that people don't want to hear & especially to say things that the regime doesnt want to hear -RonPaul

When he began his rant...

at first I smile knowing he was being paid to say that cramp. He is just a talking head. But then I wonder; how many jerks believes this b%llsh@t. Answer - too many! I will continue to educate people in the truth. Am I anti-govt - "No". I am anti-corrupt-govt - "Yes".

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."

Oh good grief

The people in Boston saw this, experienced it and accept it????


Don't fret, the Daily Paul

Don't fret, the Daily Paul has more, "viewers," than the daily dinosaur at MSNBC.

A major shift is taking place. Fox News came it at number 1, with a paltry 3 million viewers...

Who's the New Media now?

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.

I know. And FOX News's

I know. And FOX News's octogenarian viewers are literally dying by the thousands every day.