97 votes

A Major New Liberty TV Network Is On The Way!

Jennifer Grossman (formerly w/Cato Institute, now Senior VP at Dole Fruit) is heading up a liberty/libertarian television network along with Michael Strong (run’s John Mackey’s Conscious Capitalism org) and Ricky Ray Butler. (Plaid Media/Endorse Liberty PAC) Ricky Ray is also introducing Jennifer to the other tech geniuses/Silicon Valley creatives who were the motor behind that PAC that supported Ron Paul last year.

More information can be found by following these links -


http://youtu.be/q7fITwuzPoM

http://www.jagtv.com/#!the-network/c1mi2

The branding will evolve, and I've introduced the team to my friend Justin Machecek, who is the senior on air producer (and an Emmy winner) at an established network. Justin has experience branding something that's already on the air, and this will be much easier.

I've also been busy introducing the team to other great content creators and journalists like my friend Mark Basile, (who produces a show on Spike TV right now) Tyrel Ventura, (Jesse's son) Jill Trammell, (produces a show on Discovery) Josh Tolley and Ben Swann, as well as Hollywood heavyweights like Michael O'Donnell, (worked on Spiderman and Pirates of the Caribbean) Rick Probst (Hansel and Gretel and the latest Die Hard) and the libertarians who have to go to secret meetings just to keep their jobs at places like MGM.

What sets this network apart from Reason.TV, Infowars and the Next News Network? The vision for this network, is not for a libertarian version of Fox or MSNBC, but a full spectrum network with everything from reality TV, cartoons, movies, comedy, lifestyle shows, etc, as well as the evening news, with undercurrents of liberty throughout the programming. We’ll create something the general public will watch, be entertained by, and the liberty message will spread like never before. The existing liberty networks will grow with us. We also plan on making this available beyond the internet, and on satellite and cable. It’s what the other side has been doing for decades, and it’s time we turned the tables.

We're still looking for a few amazing and well known individuals to fill out the board of directors. We want people who have executive level experience in film and television, but we also want a few more people who are just passionate about the cause of liberty who have business experience. We're also still looking for 1. other investors 2. talent in front of and behind the camera. Filling out a weeks worth of live, original and compelling content is a tall order, but something we'll be able to pull off with the caliber of people we are bringing onto our team by the time we launch this fall.

It’s definitely a project long overdue. Please let me know if you’d like to know more and are interested in being involved.

We’re also going to be having a membership drive over the summer, and are looking for fun things and cool items to auction and raffle off to help spread the word. Your donation will be much appreciated and not forgotten!

Donated items and gift vouchers can be sent to

JAGTV c/o
Michelle Poswillo
26202 Fairside Rd.
Malibu, CA 90265

Viva la Liberty! Let's make it mainstream!

In Liberty, Zak Carter
zakrevolution@yahoo.com
206-551-8704



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

An update!

Michael O'Donnell - http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0640814/ - has recently agreed to be our program director, and we've added Gary Johnson's and Ron Paul's communication directors to the team! (Joe Hunter and Rachel Mills respectively)

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

I was just about to donate...

then I saw that Zonation dickhead. I'll hold off sending them cash until we see if this is legit.

I'm on a mission

To show you this is legit..launch in the fall is looking on target, and letters of intent with great liberty content creators like Josh Tolley have been signed!

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

Great news.

Good luck!

www.youtube.com/truefictions

I try to change people every day. Do You?

just as long as y'all know that this is basically the neoCon

Pajama Media's operation, 'upgraded.'

It's basically CATO/Reason-lite or Breitbart+, depending on what one prefers, IMO.

They're AIPAC-firsters.

As shown in their trailers, http://www.youtube.com/user/JAGTV2013/videos one of JAGtv's proposed shows/stars, Larry Elders, is NOT 'libertarian.' He's a statist neocon. Now that GWB's out of power, they're just pushing more 'libertarian'-sounding rhetoric.

just check out all their roster of stars:

http://www.youtube.com/user/Pajamasmedia/videos

always a quick check to see exactly where they stand with issues the R3VOLution cares about: http://www.youtube.com/user/Pajamasmedia/videos?query=Ron+Paul

Here are just two examples from the producers JAGtv:

Ron Paul's 9/11 Insanity: Why Ron Paul Is the Jeremiah Wright of the Right

http://youtu.be/N6fxDS3dBwo

Pajamasmedia
Uploaded on Dec 21, 2011

Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) is surging in the polls, but that doesn't prevent Zo from telling you why he isn't supporting this Texas congressman's presidential bid. Hear more.

====================================================================

Ron Paul is Fed Up, But Could the Federal Reserve Really Collapse?

http://youtu.be/_SIZ7AXmlys

Pajamasmedia
Published on Mar 2, 2012

Ron Paul thinks that the Federal Reserve will eventually self-destruct. Is this an actual possibility, or just campaign hyperbole? Find out as Allen Barton, Terry Jones and Yaron Brook discuss QE3 and the Fed, in addition to the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac bailouts.

See more at http://www.pjtv.com

Yaron Brooks, head of Ayn Rand Inst. is an outright Likudnik NeoCon rah-rah-AIPAC/Israel-firster.

And, he HATES Ron Paul and EVERYTHING r3VOLution stand for:

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/10/ayn-rand-instit...
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/yaron-brook-on-the-ay...
http://www.thestreet.com/video/11437252/what-if-ron-paul-is-...


http://youtu.be/_8lTFYLInhQ

Views on Ron Paul; Should Holocaust deniers be prosecuted?

He's tying Dr. Paul to "Holocaust Deniers" & "anti-Semites" by proxy, via parroting the usual RABID neocon rah-rah AIPAC-whore Israel-firster bulshiite line:

"Ron Paul is a little bit more complicated; I REALLY DISLIKE Ron Paul, STRONGLY....Ron Paul is the wrong kind of combination of libertarian."

Make of it what you will.

Not to say that they won't evolve out of KOCHtopus, but considering all the players involved, it's more 'by mere virtue of Glenn Beck claiming he's a libertarian...that he's a 'libertarian.''

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Yeah, I mean look at these Statists that are involved;p

Right on the team page -

http://www.jagtv.com/#!team-jag/c1zxm

Austin Petersen - former producer of Judge Nap's Freedom Watch

Justin Machacek - was spokesman of Evangelicals for Ron Paul 2012

Ricky Ray Butler - was one half of the duo behind the Endorse Liberty Super PAC, the biggest PAC that supported Ron Paul last year.

Stephen Gordon - former political director and communications director of the Libertarian National Committee, and worked for both Michael Badnarik and Aaron Russo back in the day.

Me!

And we want Ron Paul on the board of directors! We must be Neo-Con Statists!;p

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

Zak, I love you brother,

But like I said, as long as y'all know who's involved.

Some of us are aware who the behind the scenes players are: it is a Pajama Media operation. You know it, I know it. That much is clear.

And, one of your 'libertarian' stars, Larry Elders? Not libertarian: you know it, and I know it.

As much as I'm cool w/Austin Petersen, Judge Napolitano's former Freedom Watch producer and formerly (or still presently) of Freedom Works, and oft contributor to RT America's resident liberal douche and MSDNC wannabe, Thom Hartmann (though, whenever Austin does come on his show, it does make for great short debate segments; Austin is good at riling him up), is, as many R3VOL are concerned, 'with' the Jack Hunters of the world, post-Randpocalypse.

Some of us simply don't appreciate anyone who tried to 'engineer' a purge, especially among individualists; it's an abomination for a supposed libertarian or at least for those whom publicly professed to be libertarian-leaning, to dictate what range of opinions one should hold or express, or are palatable for political discourse, especially when those whom he tried to 'purge' are the good ones who are all against the corporatists and the warmachine/empire, and all practice the Golden Rule/NAA/NAP and hold the Doc's insanely high standard of principled integrity in very very high esteem: Milquetoasts, need not apply.

Worse, Austin and Jack Hunter both pulled the "If you say so and so, you MAKE US LOOK BAD!"-card, one too many times.

Seriously, um, like collectivist much?

Look, it's not as if even the 9/11Truth activists among us don't know 'where/when' it is 'politically appropriate'/feasible, etc. to discuss, to push/not push these issues.

The R3VOLution was and is, what it was and is, because we all somehow independently 'knew' to know what to do, without being told; we made a conscious decision to solely, specifically promote only those public issues that Dr. Paul publicly stood for, during the RP2008 and RP2012 campaign.

But apparently, Hunter and Petersen didn't get the Memo that some opinions were voluntarily tempered, by us, all on our own; we don't appreciate being told what NOT to think, or discuss, publicly.

So, as you can see, how obnoxious it was/is for Hunter and Petersen to come around and try to PURGE some of us, to 'clean the slate' for Rand2016.

And, no. We haven't forgotten.

Poor judgment.

Frankly, had Rand not endorsed Mutt, even if he still planned to, but not until much later, he literally could've still retained about 40~60% of r3VOL.

Obviously, it would not be the same level of fervency as his father garnered, but at least it would've still been a better foundation to grow, than to ditch the 'RP Fringe' and moronically try to grow the neoCon Hannity and Beck's base to go our direction.

True, for those who still see the political process as a viable option, they may most likely support Rand in 2016, without hesitation.

But, I'm sure I don't need to tell you this: the difference between being INSPIRED to WANT to do something for someone is wholly different energy than 'reluctantly settling' to do something for someone.

While Rand doesn't fall entirely into the 'lesser of two evils' because he IS Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul's son, after all, and our Gray Champ didn't raise no fool, but to many of us, he's just a few notches above the 'lesser of two evils,' though much less so since his epic filibuster.

But, the likes of Hunter & Petersen?

At least among the grassroots, they de facto helped accelerate the dissolution of trust between disparate liberty factions, thereby trashed any good will left remaining for a coalition to stay together and/or grow; it was poor timing and too much of 'she doth protests too much.'

Frankly it made it all the worse, because Austin & Jack are essentially two PR people, who exhibited utter lack of public relations tact or skills to speak of, when it was needed the most.

To anyone paying attention, that kind of shiite memory simply don't fade away with slick media revamping.

So we are where we are.

Thus, as you may sense, some actually know what these characters did. We don't exactly have short memory, my friend.

Nevertheless, I commend ANYONE pursuing what they feel is right, and will always be better than nothing, if even 10% of your audience respond to seeds laid.

Like I said, my simple point is, as long as y'all are aware.

If you have no problem with it, no bigs.

But, at the same time, please don't insult r3VOL by referring to it as a new liberty media (alluding that it's 'libertarian-leaning' in r3VOL-parlance), when it's just an outgrowth/re-branding of the traditionally neoCon Pajama Media, and are promoting Larry Elders as 'libertarian.'

You've been here. So you should know that among some r3VOL, we all know who these players are.

I have no problem if this new venture by Pajama Media truly goes MUCH more in the liberty direction than Hot Air or TownHall, but you'll never be able to convince the hardcore among us that Larry Elders represents libertarianism.

And, you're actually surprised that some of us would NEVER consider someone like Elders a "libertarian?" It's like do you believe Glenn Beck when he says he's libertarian, just because he says so, considering this is the same douche who stated publicly on the record that 'Ron Paul supporters are domestic terrorists who should be locked up in GitMo'??

You don't get to pull rhetorical alchemical cape over on us. 'Tis all.

Besides, Zak, have you not seen people here debate ad infinitum over minarchism vs. anarcho-capitalism, Mises/Rothbard vs. CATO/Reason 'faketarians'? LOL.

Come on brother, you know the score xD

Since texts can never communicate properly as body language and facial expression or intonation and enunciation, so I must state this first: without ANY sarcasm, I truly, truly, wish you and your colleagues the very best on your venture.

Anything to promote liberty is a step in the right direction. But, of course, you have to know that some among us will always be a skeptical rabble-rousing ruffian bunch.oD

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Larry Elders is far from the only talent we've given a Letter

Of Intent... Ben Swann, Josh Tolley, Tatiana Moroz and Robin Koerner are on the list just to name a few...Jennifer just met with Penn & Tellers agent and we want them involved ...Sound like a Pajama Media lineup to you?

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

That, sounds great;

if and when, they're securely contracted, and on board; shall support you.

Despite the fluid nature of these type of ventures and media personality contract negotiations, at this point, it's still a letter of intent, no?

And, like I keep stressing: I wish you the sincerest of success on your venture; it is a gazillion times better to pursue a commercial platform that may open up the prospect of spreading good ideas, to thousands to millions more, than simply chatting back and forth to the DP choir.

That said, almost everyone in the trailer that you guys have made public so far, ARE Pajama Media personalities & crew & those who share their political views: the first opening shot, effects/filter/lighting immediately screams 'OMG, these are Pajama Media production guys!' to anyone familiar with their work, and the medium.

If wrong, please, simply correct me.

Not to mention, as you know, the Reason/CATO-KOCHtopus set, while some of us occasionally watch/tolerate, many of us don't, on principle, 'support'-support them.

Zak, I respect ya. So, we can go back and forth, but it still doesn't change the fact that Austin Petersen is seen as who he is, among some r3VOL, and JAGtv IS still a Pajama Media company's property, is it not??

If not, would you tell us, who 'owns' it, and/or are financing it?

As I keep stressing, I'm NOT AGAINST your current venture.

Nor, do I have any reason to 'start a campaign against it'; all I cited were obvious facts for 'caveat emptor,' for those who may not be too familiar with the involved players' background history. 'Tis all.

Like I said, even if you guys sew 'liberty seeds' that 'grow by surprise' even in 10% of the not-typically-libertarian to libertarian-leaning-audience, it'd be a 100% success: frankly, that's all I expected and hoped for with the Judge's now defunct show'Freedom Watch,' as well, which despite being a Murder-doch's property, many of us supported, for that very same 'educational exposure'-factor alone.

Zak, if you can definitively answer that NO Pajama Media production team (non-senior level production crew, other than editors, typically have zero editorial control and it's a small biz, relatively, so one shouldn't really hold it against anyone who worked at company x,y,z for such history, alone), post-production, financing, senior editors, directors, producers, executive producers, et al are used, that will satisfy many more.

But frankly, it's irrelevant what I think of your venture; people who know all the background info I cited in this and the last two replies, will most likely remain skeptical, until they know for certain, that there are no Pajama Media editorial controls involved.

Be that as it may, and I stress, I DO NOT say this with any sarcasm or snarkiness: I sincerely wish you the greatest of luck, and all the success in the world, and hopefully, you guys truly accomplish your mission statement.

Peace and Love.

** end transmission **

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

The Pajama Media

People have nothing to do with financing this venture, and I know of no one on our team that has worked with them - we're still building the board of directors and the advisory board, and I want guys like Ron Paul, Jim Rogers and Peter Thiel to be a part of this, not neo-cons.

The acting CEO of Overstock.com and Dr. Walter Block are already on board!

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

I think you're right. These

I think you're right. These people are no friends to liberty or even common sense.

Resist the temptation to feed the trolls.

I'm no friend to liberty?

I'm on a mission to show you differently:)

(I'm the business development officer of this network)

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

This would be so awesome.

This would be so awesome. Would it actually be like an HBOish type of channel that we would have to pay a subscription to watch?

My hope..and why I asked Ricky Ray Butler

To be involved,(he really is an online video guru)is that this isn't just on cable and satellite, but also online and very interative...I also hope that it's free to watch for the general public, with memberships for additional features and benefits made available.

I've never had satellite or cable, so I definitely wouldn't want it to be something I couldn't watch at home!:)

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

In light of Jefferson's comment

I'll add my suggestions for what they're worth.

Have a diverse offering.
Keep the programming 70/30 70 Liberty oriented people, 30 other.
Have interactive segments and original content.
Use and exploit social media.
Keep the content hard hitting and current.
Engage other networks.

Change the name.
My suggestion for the name:
(National Gazette Network)
National Gazette was the anti federalist newspaper in the 1700's

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."

Click Here To See The Candidates On The Record

Thank you Verrater

Duly Noted!

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

You're welcome

I wish you the best of luck and hope this will turn out like everyone here would like. If you need anything, let me know and i'll do what i can to help.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."

Click Here To See The Candidates On The Record

Awesome!

Feel free to send me your resume and I'll get it to the HR team!

zakrevolution@yahoo.com

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

I('m as b9i9g a cyni9cal a-hole as anyone, b9ut...

W(e sh9ou9ld gladly su9pport a ch9annel li9ke th9i9s, u9nder certai9n condi9ti9ons:
a: Th9e cartoons mu9st b9e as good as Sou9th9 Park,
b9: Th9e comedy h9as to b9e as good as Dou99g Stanh9ope or Adam Carolla or Penn and Teller,
c: Religion h9as to b9e covered b9y someone li9ke Ch9r9i9stoph9er H(i9tch9ens,
d: Cu99ltu9re sh9ou99ld b9e ri9ght u9p James Randi9's alley,
e: Fi99cti9on as astu99te as Ku9r9t Vonnegu99t,
f: Letter to th9e edi9tor: Jerry Doyle,
g: H(i9story b9y Tom Woods,
h: Reali9ty TV wi9th9 Adam Kokesh9,
i: Law: Ju9d9ge Nap,
j: consu99mer advocate: Stossel,
k: i9nvesti9gati9ve jou9r99nali9sm: B(en Swann,
l: Fi9nanci9al News wi9th9 th9e li9kes of Sch9i9ff or Rogers,
m: and Ron Pau9l w9ith9 forei9gn affai9rs....
n: oh and Mojo Ni9xon does th9e music...
Tru9s9t b9ut veri9fy. Note th9at th9ese are not all 'perfect' li9bertari9ans, b9ut w9ho th9e f9ck i9s?

No.9?

does the illuminati own the

does the illuminati own the network ??

lawrence

Good question, bro. Ive

Good question, bro. Ive always believed the illuminati would eventually take over the libertarian movement. Luckily, principled libertarians reject the use of force, so when the anti christ comes, I can say mmmm no thanks and not be decapitated for it :-)

One world, under government, with power and money for the elite

Jefferson's picture

I got

to talk with Zak this afternoon. I spent several days with Zak when he stayed here in Austin. He is one of the most dedicated activists I have met through this campaign, and I have a great deal of respect for not only what he went through in Iraq and abroad, but more importantly what he's done since he's come home. The guy is a machine with a can do attitude, and the work ethic to back it up.

He is in a position to not only help shape the board of directors for this network but the CONTENT itself. He's even in a position to influence what the actual NAME of the network could be.

He's put this forward to harvest ideas since the DP is a great place to forge them. Instead of poking fun at the hosts, the name, or whatever, why not offer some suggestions or solutions and be a part of this growing idea?

This seems like a tremendous opportunity for ALL of us to have a say in how this goes forward, and it could have some serious backing as they are talking to some folks with some very deep wallets.

Some people complain about never being able to go "mainstream" but when the opportunity arises, they want to be the first to try and tear it down by saying "so and so isn't a true this or pure that."

I for one applaud Zak's efforts. It's a hell of a lot more than I am doing right now. I know that he is sincere and honest and will help however I can.

Use this opportunity to help by being a constructive outside perspective. Help shape the idea so when it does hit the "mainstream" it will be something that WE helped create and be something powerful.

If you have ideas for a name, or a slogan, or the type of content, or who you would like to see running or backing it. Now is your chance.

After all we were the ones who came up with the slogan "Restore America Now" (which I think was taken from here)

Whenever these brainstorming opportunities arise, I can't help but be reminded of the movie "crazy people."


http://youtu.be/2fIIqFpZdy0


http://youtu.be/OxZz-nXTeCs

FAN - Free America

FAN - Free America Network
Newscasts: FNN - Freedom News Network, "Truth to America"

We all say liberty, but the masses say freedom, and I think that resonates with the majority.

Jefferson's picture

F.A.R.T.

Free American Republic Television

(sorry I couldn't resist.....;)

On second thought, that may be JUST the acronym that the dumbed down idiocracy would gravitate toward.


http://youtu.be/wAg1r6zw7Bg

With the faux libertarians

With the faux libertarians you got.. you might as well add some progressives there too like Cenk Uyger or Ed Shultz

New Network

While I like the idea of a liberty news network, I am not at all excited about the cartoons, comedy, lifestyle, movies, etc on the network. TV has dominated too much of our lives. Television is actually hypnotic and deteriorates the outreach of people. We don't need more lifestyle, cartoons, etc. We do need a liberty news network, but not more hypnotic TV shows causing children to sit in front of TV all day long.

Liberty News YES !!!

Cartoons, Comedy, & Lifestyle NO, NO, NO. !!!!

We already have

Reason.TV, Infowars and The Next News Network...want more of that? Help them grow! I know Gary Franchi could use some help with his network!

As stated on our website "We need a cultural play. It is the only way"

I completely believe that too....I'm with fishyculture...

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

I disagree.

I hear you, understand your point, but for waking people up, a full slate of "programming" would be a very helpful tool.
And for me, I don't even have a TV, and I miss comedy. I like to laugh, still. I recently discovered "JoyCamp" youtube channel, and I love it. Some is better than others, but none of it is dumbed down, lie spewing BS. Although he is a little "lefty" I also like Lee Camp, he makes jokes of the truth, and I appreciate the laughter.
Having one hour a day of cartoons that are not "social engineering" would be a blessing for many mothers of young kids. Not all day, I agree, but a little time for Mom to do some housework, take a shower, even just sit down and relax herself - these are good things. The TV is the most vile mass hypnosis tool ever devised, but it does not have to be that way. I t could have been, and still can bave, the greatest tool for mass education ever devised.
Hey Zak, if you need a backyard garden correspondent, I'm your huckleberry - lol!

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

My Thoughts On The Promo

While I like the concept of having a "liberty TV" network, this promo repelled me more than win me over. It felt too much like a slimy mainstream media type thing. If the 2 hosts were doing this same ad for something like "Good Morning America", it wouldn't have seemed out of place.

If the idea is to broadcast to intelligent people w/ open-minds, why did they need to include all the (very annoying) glitzy production values?

tasmlab's picture

Yea, does it have to seem dumb to be considered legit?

Like does it have to look like what we're used to seeing in bad TV for it to be accepted?

(Rhetorical questions)

Currently consuming: Morehouse's "Better off free", FDR; Wii U; NEP Football