The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!
5 votes

Corrupt Government Officials Use the Most Extreme Forms of Religion to Divide and Conquer Us

May 4, 2013 by Washington's Blog

Preface: Fundamentalist Christians, Jews and Muslims all think they are in a “holy war” against the other guy. As shown below, fundamentalists are being manipulated by the powers-that-be – many of whom are actually atheists – as part of a divide-and-conquer strategy to disempower people.

The 2,000 Year Old Strategy

The strategy of dividing and conquering one’s foes is ancient.

Ancient Roman emperor Julius Cesar successfully used it thousands of years ago.

The application of the strategy in controlling one’s own people – divide and rule – has been used for just as long. As Wikipedia notes:

Elements of this technique involve:

*Creating or encouraging divisions among the subjects to prevent alliances that could challenge the sovereign

*Aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate with the sovereign

*Fostering distrust and enmity between local rulers [or groups]
encouraging meaningless expenditures that reduce the capability for political [organization or opposition] …..

In discussing the use of “divide and rule” in the U.S., Wikipedia discusses the “Use of left-right politics“.

Indeed – even though the Founding Fathers warned us against the danger of a two-party system to divide the nation – left-right partisan divisions have successfully been deployed to distract and weaken the American people for centuries.

Religion has been used for the same purpose:

England invaded Ireland in 1170, but for the first 439 years it was a conquest in name only. In 1609, however, James I founded the Plantation of Ulster, imported 20,000 Protestant settlers, and introduced religious strife as a political tactic. By favoring Protestants over the native Catholics in politics and economics-the so-called “Ulster Privilege-the English pitted both groups against one another.

The tactic was enormously successful, and England used it throughout its colonial empire. Nowhere were the British so successful in transplanting the Irish model than in India.


As prime minister [Churchill] once said that he hoped that the tension between Hindus and Muslims would remain “A bulwark of British rule in India.”

The British were not alone in using religion as a tactic to divide and conquer. The French employed it quite successfully in Lebanon and Vietnam. In the former, Paris favored Maronite Christians over Muslims (and Sunni Muslims over Shiite Muslims), and in the latter, Catholics over Buddhists.


Exploiting religious differences hardly ended with the demise of the great colonial empires.

The French continue to exploit religious divisions in Lebanon, and the U.S. is currently trying to cobble together a Sunni united front to confront Washington’s three opponents in the Middle East: Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Syria is mostly Sunni, but Bashar al-Assad’s regime is dominated by Alawites, a variety of Shiism. Some 60 percent of Lebanon is Shiite.

But Shiites only constitute about 12 percent of Islam, and while Washington talks of a “Shiia crescent” as if it constituted some kind of united front, in fact there are enormous differences between Arab Syria and Lebanon, and non-Arabic speaking Iran.


Religion is increasingly being used to ramp up the fear factor in international politics.

Indeed, ramping up hatred and fear of other religions is an easy way for any government to consolidate power and rationalize war.

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader

No wonder the powers-that-be in the U.S., Israel and Saudi Arabia do everything possible to whip up fear of foreign religions.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

A unity with the world isn't desirable

A unity with the world or worldly isn't desirable. Original writer starts out with errors in the premise - that greater collectivism is desirable, that fighting government - the other group, and earthly kingdoms is all there is to life, and it goes forward with some other errors from there.

All you will get that way is greater collectivism, greater compromise and unity with a whore, and less life for yourself. Instead, let's look at a traditional Christian approach, which leads to more life, more godliness, and more individuality.

First, separating yourself is similar to individuality. Hardly making yourself weaker, it is what lead to much of the founding of the original colonies of this country. They didn't stay in Europe with it's endless wars, they simply decided to separate themselves and lead a godly life away from the ungodly.

Second, if joining yourself together collectively - making a greater collective to fight the collective! Is all there is to life, you are doomed to unhappiness and failure. It's a logical error, and presumes that you can't have life until you defeat something that is outside your power to defeat. However, if you believe that life begins with yourself, nothing is stopping you from having that life right now. Furthermore, from a Christian point of view, that life doesn't depend on starting a greater collective to defeat the collective, but simply getting on your knees and praying to God. No one can keep you from having that life. Right now. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,,,

Third, division is desirable since in essence that is where all godliness and individuality comes from. The individual *is* the division, it is what makes you different from someone else.

Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. 35For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. 36And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

John 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

You neglected to mention both liberal (and moderate) Muslims..

and the fact that most of the 'heat' in Israel is due to the hot-heads of the Ultra-orthodox persuasion who will slash ambulance tires on the Sabbath, not the ordinary Israeli citizen....

"Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern." ~~C.S. Lewis
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

Jefferson's picture


didn't author this. This is not my blog.

I mainly avoid religious discussions here as they tend to get out of hand. My purpose in posting this was to hopefully provide some insight into HOW religion is used (just like the left/right paradigm) to divide and conquer us. How that many who instigate this type of conflict are not even part of a particular religion, or their religion is something completely different. (if that makes any sense)

I hope it brings some sense of unity and understanding, rather than opening a can of worms.

i apologize

That should have been obvious to me, but I was oblivious instead.

"Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern." ~~C.S. Lewis
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15