0 votes

Benghazi: It Is About Obama/Clinton Running an Illegal War

First, we were told that some Muslims didn't like a YouTube video, so they killed some Americans. Now, even the Dems are not believing that lie.

Now, we are being told that it was "terrorists" who wanted to kill some American officials, but it was covered up so Obama could get re-elected.

That doesn't make any sense, either, because the American sheeple would be waving the flag if they knew upfront that Muslims were killing American officials. Why try to hide that? Makes no sense. And it probably makes no sense because it probably is not true.

The REAL story just might be that Obama and Clinton were running an illegal war both in Libya and Syria and that Chris Stevens was a central figure in the Iran-Contra style of illegal shipment of weapons from Libya to Turkey and Syria -- and that Obama/Clinton were doing this to SUPPORT "al Qaeda terrorists."

The story also involves General Paetreus, in that the REAL reason for his resignation was about Benghazi and not an affair.

Here are some stories with some background supporting evidence for this theory (note, skip down to the story with the title "The Real Story at Benghazi"):

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2013-05-07/benghazi-new...

And:

http://www.slideshare.net/kynize/the-real-benghazi-story-us-...

And (although the author does not believe it, he cites a general who claims it is true):

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/former-special-forces-comman...

This angle makes A LOT more sense for a cover-up, is consistent with what we know about black ops and CIA, is consistent with what we know about "The Database" (aka "al Qaeda"), explains why Hillary would get in such a hissy fit over any investigation (as head of the State Department, she would have been a KEY person in making the decision to do what was done), and explains why even the Repubs are sidetracking this issue to only discuss why there was no military response after the attack began.



Trending on the Web