24 votes

Okay, I Have To Ask!

What happened to the post about the fake blood on that woman in Boston just now? AND shall I be banned for asking?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Said it once and I'll say it again.

Poe's Law ftw.

EDIT: And I just reread it again and laughed even harder. He has the capitalization down perfect.

Eric Hoffer

ecorob's picture

This censorship of the DP will cause members to leave...

I can promise you that.

My own personal opinion?

The blood, quite possibly, was located on the OUTSIDE of the bag and the "before" pictures of the lady did show a slight smudge of blood on the left side of her face/cheek/forehead. To be honest, those "before" pictures of her head were of very poor quality and at a bad angle to actually provide definitive evidence.

So, with me, the jury was still out. But how in the hell can we come to an informed opinion of the truth if we face censorship?

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

deacon's picture

i totally agree my friend

although i have not followed the boston bombing,i have followed
the opinions and the comments from long time users here
what i find after being gone for almost a week is distressing
and disheartening,almost to the point that this place is almost
unrecognizable (to me),but what was an eye opener was the bannings
here for long time members
the gov lives and feeds off from censorship,freedom cannot stand and
it withers and dies

setting your expectations to high,can cause depressiuon


No one paid any attention, but I was actually the person who provided a legitimate explanation for the lack of blood loss in Bauman. My husband was a paramedic, and told me there is a way to cut an artery where is goes into a spasm, and clamps itself nearly shut. It is rare, but possible. Asking where there is so little blood is ABSOLUTELY REASONABLE. Ask ANY paramedic, EMT, ER nurse or doctor, "How fast will a severed femoral arteries bilaterally will die of blood loss?" and they will tell you "Really, really fast." To ask why Jeff did not bleed out is medical curiosity - was he lucky enough to have both arteries go into spasm? What happened? It is not claiming he faked anything, it is human nature - when one sees something they do not understand, they seek an explanation.
I'll go take a closer look at the woman's photos, but I am coming around to "THE QUESTION" for me: Was there a drill going on that day or not? I want to KNOW that, I want to know if that coach is disinfo, and if he is, who he works for. I want to know if there was a drill and if he is just the only one to speak out. Remember Kurt Haskell? How many people saw what he saw? Yet he was the only one to speak up.
Maybe when Nystrom gets back we can ask him to hit the streets, see if he knows of any other witnesses who heard drill announcements. More likely, it would be a forbidden question in Boston, he'd be hated for even asking. Controlling how a crowd reacts is a skill our masters learned long ago.
On my trip to Boston, my boss did something, just for lulz. It turns out, it was an interesting barometer of the "mass-mind" of Bostonians. In Boise, there is a retired baseball player named Bill Buckner or something like that. He played for Boston, and lost a World Series for them. My boss said his name on a bus full of locals, they all started booing. It had been more than ten years since the game.
I don't think Boston has the taste for self examination any more than NYC. When it hits home, literally, we cling to those who shared the suffering, and have disdain for anyone who dares to question the validity of that suffering.
They are good at what they do, and what they do is pull strings.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:

I Noticed That Too

Those pics are blurry and at a bad angle and while viewing them I had the same thoughts you just described, BUT, I like the chance to make that decision on my own and NOT HAVE THEM DELETED! By deleting that post the mods have made me feel like they are burning books to keep me from thinking.


ecorob's picture

you are exactly right, skippy d....

shining light will expose the truth

covering it up ONLY causes us to question even more

covering it up makes me think it WAS fake blood when, at first glance, I had questions to its authenticity

also, whomever voted you down (I voted you back up to even) is a shill/troll as you asked a VERY good question

I couldn't imagine someone down voting you.

UPDATE...I had to vote myself back up, too. Someone here (wolfe) doesn't appreciate free speech.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.


I have noticed that I was up to 15 upvotes and am now down to 10. I don't care about votes but this shows how people on DP feel about either the subject or the debate. Not sure.


Looks like our resident whiney butt tattletale struck again...

...in the mod suggestion thread.

I'm not taking a stand whether there was fakery or not at the Boston incident(s), but when it is known that there were drills, it's not out of the realm of possibility, and even strikes me as quite likely, that there may have been people participating in drills, as with actors and fake blood.

So since we have yet ANOTHER instance where drills coincide with actual attacks, I don't understand this business of lambasting discussion of it.

If people participating in drills are being passed off as real victims to the public, or even if they became victims, with all the other bs we've seen with the Boston incident, as with FBI pretending like they didn't know who the Tsarnaev brothers are when they actually did, and telling people not to look at any other pictures besides what they want the public to look at, the oddities do seem to merit discussion. jmo

re: FBI

The FBI/Tsarnev angle is the ticket, IMO. After all, it has been proven (and even admitted) that the FBI has set up/goaded people into doing things they normally wouldn't.

I don't know if that's the case here, but it makes more sense to me than having fake this and fake that.

A signature used to be here!

wolfe's picture

f*ing morons.

I rarely go so far as to make a statement like that, but quite frankly, you have all proven yourselves to be incapable of basic reasoning and understanding.

First, if a government is willing to commit a "false flag" to gain further control, then WHY, WHY on earth would they go through the tremendous effort to !fake! the event? Not only would it create a lot of loose ends and lose credibility, but the sheer fact that they would be willing to proves they have no value for human life.

Much easier for them to just kill a bunch of people, isn't it?

Furthermore, the "go to SOP" for ANY cover up is to kill people who may rat you out, not hire more people that can rat you out.

Lastly, anything presented to you to prove you are an idiot, you immediately disregard as "fake".

Which leaves only TWO possible explanations for your insane persistence. 1) You ARE in fact ABSOLUTE idiots which will likely manage to eliminate yourselves from the gene pool via a Darwin Award. or 2) You are not idiots, don't believe your own words and have another agenda.

Given the persistence, and behavior you all express, I actually would assume #2.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

Wolfe,I won't get into the


I won't get into the Boston 'hoax/actors' stuff as it's obviously an upsetting topic for some here at the DP...

but I will tell you one reason why the government MIGHT decide to use actors in ANY terrorist event...to CONTROL THE NARRATIVE. Take Sandy Hook for instance...how inconvenient would it have been for Obama if none of the parents wanted to go with him aboard Air Force One on his nationwide gun control tour?

Victims, and the families of victims, get lots of face time in the media. Congress also listens to them. If you can't control what these people say, that might be a problem.

Also, just because crisis actors might be used in ANY 'terrorist' attack, doesn't mean they are all actors. You could have real victims AND actors. Again...it's all about controlling the narrative.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

My Thread Has Nothing To Do With Whether Boston

was real or faked. It has to do with censorship!


wolfe's picture



Why do people keep thinking or responding to this as to be 100% acting or 100% real? I've always thought it was possibly be a little of both.

Makes a lot more sense when thought of like this.

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

wolfe's picture


It is logically consistent to claim the government was responsible for it and caused the deaths -or- it is logically consistent to claim the government was aware, -or- had no responsibility in it.

But it is NOT logically possible for the government to be both evil and concerned about human life at the same time. Use the logic skills that were stolen from you in public school for two minutes, and you might understand.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

Where did I say gov?

Please understand that I am not attacking you. Just asking questions. When there are no solid answers, all's one can do is ask questions.....

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

ecorob's picture

notice how his first comment...

has no negative votes?

even though he started it out as effing morons?

his second, however, and he should take note of this, has many down votes...he crossed the line, he infringed on your views instead of expressing his own

he/we should watch out for that

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

wolfe's picture

More likely.

Most of my subsequent posts were purely factual and none of them nearly as direct.

So it is far more likely that people prefer you guys get called what you are than for anyone to try and reason with you, the unreasonable.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

Linear thinking

It hurts more often than not

I see where you are confused.

He is attacking YOU. He does not approve of asking questions after he has swallowed the official story. Rather than debunk anything or offer alternative opinions, he chooses ad hominem attacks and insults.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:

lol! x-lent!

now printing. to be taped on wall. in my line of sight .


That was great. Favorited. Ralph please make a post on that. It would be nice if those card icons were available as inserts to insert into a conversation. Kinda clarifies stuff.

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

That is freakin' awesome!

That should be on the ceiling at the Sistine Chapel!

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:

I would much rather be

I would much rather be ridiculously more critical of my government than too trusting.

Again, I don't pretend to know anything, however why is it you feel the need to be so aggressive about people questioning our government/ media?

This is great personally! Hell if we are this critical about a sensitive situation like this, then half the legislative crap they try to pull will be caught by the masses (finally).

wolfe's picture


The question is, why do YOU give the government so much credit as to believe that they would !fake! people getting hurt and dying to protect people from really getting hurt and dying?

You are truly an idiot to believe such nonsense. Just as the truthers that think the planes were really diverted and passengers are alive, are IDIOTS.

I am tired of the moronic crap spewing from people like you. Either the government is evil, or it is not. If it is evil, then it will kill without regard for anyone when it does. Or it is not evil, and would not kill, or create a false flag.

You can't have both, and to claim you can is moronic. And maybe it's about time we started pointing it out instead of tip toeing around you folks like you have two brain cells to rub together.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -


It is part of the "drill." For one EMT test, I "faked" an injury. THAT IS HOW DRILLS ARE RUN.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:

I can attest to that...

I was hired along with a bunch of others by an actors and extras agency to travel to Fort Ord in Monterey, CA to provide 'real-life' scenarios for law enforcement cadets.

I was the 'high risk' pull over. They gave me a real unloaded gun, knee pads and a Chevy Caprice. I had to let them pull me over and go thru the motions of arresting me.

Others played victims of child abuse, and domestic violence - they were made-up to look bloody, bruised, etc.

I was paid $70 a day, and provided lunch.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift

Knee pads?

Reminds me of a blonde joke about taking a breathalyzer test... I'll leave it at that. LOL!
I was just a member of the previous class, so was a test "patient" for the newbies trying to certify. I got paid coffee and snacks, but playing in the moulage was fun.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked: