24 votes

Okay, I Have To Ask!

What happened to the post about the fake blood on that woman in Boston just now? AND shall I be banned for asking?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Yeah, LOL!

I had to get arrested like 20 times "Down on your Knees!!!!" The asphalt is painful.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift

Lol, I like the character

Lol, I like the character assumptions:

You assume the following:
- I believe the Boston incident was faked
- I am a truther

Also you feel the need to throw around insults, which don't necessarily help your argument.

Personally, again for the 100th time, I don't pretend to know enough about Boston to make the claim. Who is to say the government simply hurt it's own citizens? Maybe we didn't fake it at all?

Also, you make the claim that the government cannot "fake" a bombing (implying that is a "good" act) and kill its own people (implying that is bad) and because we make the claim the government is bad, that is doing a good act (the fake process) makes our claims invalid.

This is nonsense.

A government that would fake something is just as evil as a government who would do it.

Regardless, myself here on the DP refuse to take the media face value. Again to reiterate, I don't pretend to know what happened. However the people who assume that anyone who questions is "foolish", is foolish themselves in my humble opinion.

wolfe's picture


Not only are you unable to reason, but you are unable to read as well or deliberately misquote me.

I am not insulting you. To call you a moron is a compliment.

Moron = IQ 51–70
Idiot = IQ 26-50

And you have clearly proven below both of these standards.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

Nice fallacy.

Nice fallacy.

wolfe's picture

Do you know what fallacy means?

You have misused the word.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

An ad hominem (Latin for "to

An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of against their argument.[2] Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as an informal fallacy,[3][4][5] more precisely an irrelevance.[6]

wolfe's picture


I destroyed your argument, and you made no further attempt to respond. I did not call you an idiot as a response to your argument, I called you an idiot because you are for having even attempted your argument.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

Um you threw an insult, and

Um you threw an insult, and tried to imply that because I am a "moron" that my opinion is invalid. My argument was never "destroyed".

You also didn't realize that was a fallacy, apparently.

:) Have a nice day!

wolfe's picture


I called you an idiot for holding your opinion AFTER I destroyed it with REASON.

That is not a fallacy. Once again, look up what a logical fallacy is.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

ecorob's picture

the court of public opinion, wolfe...

says you are the idiot here!

I trust that trial by a jury of your peers here at the DP more than one man's opinion.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

wolfe's picture


a mob of idiots does not make any one in the mob smarter.

But once again, you show your inability to process basic logic.

100 idiots does not make any of the idiots smarter than the man who is right.

Maybe if we added the IQ points together, we could get a higher number from the mob, but they would still be using crayons to write their comments.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

ecorob's picture

you keep on telling yourself...

whatever you need to to help you sleep at night

everyone else is wrong but "I" am right

sometimes that is the case, most times, its not

your continued personal attacks ensure that you, actually, have no argument

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

wolfe's picture


You apparently can't read? I destroyed your bullshit arguments in a few sentences. To which none of you are able to respond.

And guess what, it's ok to call idiots out when you see them. I did not call you an idiot instead of logically proving you were an idiot.

I proved my point, and none of you have even had the balls to address a single one of my statements.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -

Thread was "unpublished" - I guess I wasn't paying attention

to what was happening with B*ston posts. ReviewManify does some very good videos - short, to the point and backed up with photos/videos etc. I will be more careful with the B-word when posting here.

God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it. – Daniel Webster

Phxarcher87's picture

Skippy D

you hurt more than help

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" - Mark Twain

Here's a serious question to

Here's a serious question to all those who are complaining about not being able to discuss Boston, which I don't think is the case. I believe it is just the Boston was faked theories that are being junked, not Boston altogether.

But please tell me what it would take for you guys to believe it was real bombs that really hurt and killed people? Because from what I've seen it is not possible to do in a forum post. Pictures of obviously badly hurt and dead people, before and after pictures of people with limbs amputated, lines of questioning that can't be answered, etc. just gets shrugged off. So what is it that proves to the hardcore "Boston was faked theorists", that it was not faked? Is it possible, or do you guys have to go to Boston and inspect amputation wounds?

Way I see it

Thinking the Boston bombings "just happened" is pretty naive.

How it was faked, and to what extent, can be debated endlessly.

The fact that it advances fascist agendas and enhances state power can't really be debated.

It's asinine to imagine that another random lunatic or two once again got around our trillion dollar national security gestapo... It's asinine to imagine these young men were this eager to cancel their futures just so they could validate the US war on terror.

Maybe the victims were real. Maybe the same people who don't mind killing little kids by the million overseas are experimenting with mocking up events so they can better control outcomes.

If you're taken in by a convincing TV production at this point, there's something wrong with you.

Nobody said "it just happened"

This isn't about any of the other bs you went off on there, it is about saying there were not real bombs and the people were just crisis actors. That cannot be debated endlessly. They have said 14 people had limbs amputated. That can be determined one way or another. Either 14 people that had all their limbs prior to the Boston Marathon still do, or they don't. That cannot be kept hidden forever.

Try to keep up

If you don't believe "it just happened" you suspect a conspiracy. If you don't suspect a conspiracy at some level, you're a fool.

Getting in a panic about this or that lost limb, as if some amount of real damage gives the event any validity as far as its political implications, is asinine.

Totally sane and logical to make guesses about the nature of the conspiracy....If the guesses are wrong, then we know to look elsewhere. If we don't test possibilities, we'll never know.

I don't think everyone should turn their brains off because "mrbengal" saw a convincing CNN feature.


You are trying to tell me to keep up? Ha!


Meaning, track on the logic.

If you have an organization/group that will murder millions based on lies, then the idea that they would fake a domestic bombing is not even a slight stretch.

To get your panties twisted because you think some theories regarding how they might fake a bombing should be off limits, is not a very consistent position.

The only thing that gets me

is the 'actors' angle. If it were a false flag (don't know for sure but I wouldn't doubt it), then why not just have real people die/get hurt? Why go through the trouble (and risk someone squawking) of planning some massive staged event that, including hospitals and insurance agencies, hundreds, perhaps thousands of people would have to be in on for it to work?

I'm trying to look at it from a risk/reward perspective here.

Personally, I'd rather concentrate on the FBI's role in all this rather than focus on this 'actors' stuff. The actors bit feels like a distraction to me.

A signature used to be here!

Can't rule it out. There are

Can't rule it out. There are very advanced technologies available to mock things up and there is unlimited funding available to buy people off.

Actors would have the incredible advantage of having a bunch of "victims" who can promote the fascists' agenda, rather than risking people after Sandy Hook demanding less gun control, or people after Boston demanding we change our foreign policy. To control the victims would allow a lot of dangerous variables to be eliminated.

If you concede the actor strategy's advantages to the gov, then you have motive, and the only argument is whether it's possible from a practical/nuts & bolts standpoint...which takes us back to the first part of this comment.

wolfe's picture

And that is a logically consistent concern/reaction.

Whether true or not can be debated and researched, but that can at least not be immediately dismissed as logically impossible.

What I will say, the only that benefits from the "fake" angle is the government, because it can be so easily debunked and proven ridiculous, and the accusation itself doesn't even put them in a bad light since it shows that might have been willing to save lives by using actors. Interesting, eh?

So the reason that these people annoy me so much, is that they are either #1, so in love with the government that they will believe anything handed to them, so why are they here? Or #2, they are deliberately assisting in misleading people down insane paths for their own agenda (and I established who benefits from that).

Further, while I am not a "911 truther", some of their statements have had credibility in the past... But then the "diverted planes, still alive" theory started taking root. It makes me wonder where the absurd theories are getting planted from?

My mom was into conspiracy theories for a long time, and I noticed all the major "pushers" had two things in common, they knew more of the truth on certain things than average folks, and always managed to make it all sound ridiculous. Hmmm... Makes ya think.

The Philosophy Of Liberty -


Why no ambulances? Why no fire trucks? Why no stretchers? Why ZERO real emergency response?


Think about that.

The businesses lost a few windows because the scammers were jerks about the drill. However, if it had been real, the smoke was there for SO LONG that there is no doubt the fire department would have been called long before it dissipated, and EMT's with their ambulances would have mobbed the scene. The fact that this did not happen proves the bombing to have been a drill all by itself. In fact, the fire department and medical centers would have HAD TO HAVE BEEN TOLD TO STAND DOWN AHEAD OF TIME TO AVOID REAL CITIZENS CALLING THEM IN.

Mister leg bone had his fake leg fall off in front of a private security camera and the police put it back on;

Bomber 2 was chased away from his own "car jacked" Mercedes,

Mother crying that it was her son totally naked in the video ALIVE after being arrested, and then obviously murdered by the police,

Bomber 2 gets out of the boat unhurt and then suddenly cannot speak,

All victims being treated at the same medical center,

A restaurant saying it did not happen as stated,

Older brother showing up in kraft uniform with younger brother in civilian clothes (how did THAT not make news? the older brother was a freaking AGENT at that bombing,)

No emergency response to the bombing, NO FIRE TRUCKS, NO EMT's NO AMBULANCE


DHS web page found with job applications for Boston bombing, including requests for amputee actors, and for people to arrive with shredded clothes

Whistleblower saying ahead of time that this bombing was staged, and reloading powder and bullets would be restricted as a result.

Witnesses saying the police ran over the brother

Fake blood packs found at scene

Scene additionaly trashed afterwards to look better for the camera (look through the photos)

Mysteriously edited photos and vanishing evidence ongoing, even now (censorship)

And many more....

Let us disappoint the Men who are raising themselves upon the ruin of this Country. John Adams


are you saying there were no ambulances, security response, etc?

Why do you believe someone took off a fake leg and put it back on?

Why have you been eating lead paint chips?

Why does a bear shit in the woods?

Why is the Pope Catholic?

Why does a Pope shit on a bear?

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

Bears eat beets. Bears.

Bears eat beets.

Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.

It all makes sense.

booty boingo bonghit

booty boingo bonghit

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein



"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

Much of what you stated in

Much of what you stated in this post is false, but you have avoided my question. I am not going to turn this into a Boston was faked thread, I am asking what it would take to prove to you that real bombs went off and people were really badly hurt and killed.