65 votes

Rand Paul: Beyond the Left-Right Paradigm

Rand Paul is rising.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

$50 says RNC will try to rig

$50 says RNC will try to rig the election again to keep him out.

2016 is not that far away

2016 is not that far away folks. We need to stay ahead of the game. Ron did us a huge service by waking us up and motivating us all to get involved. We now have the tools needed to succeed in putting a worthy candidate up in the White House. We have our own people in position in the GOP. We worked hard for this moment. Now is the time to rally around someone. Rand needs to be our guy. I know some of you are skeptical as we should be but I'm telling you...the apple does not fall far from the tree. This man is his fathers son. Look at who he grew up with as his mentors. He has been surrounded by extremely wise people his entire life...prepping him along the way to perhaps be one of the best presidents this nation has seen in a very long time.

We should all be feeling the same sense of urgency right about now for the next election. There is no time to "feel around" for a better candidate. and we all should know by now that voting 3rd party is a "waisted vote" (cringe) as weve seen with GJ's 1% vote. Rand is our guy. We need to put this guy in the White House is 2016. Meanwhile...keep electing our peeps in the house and senate.

Rand Paul "libertarian" propaganda

is still propaganda..

How about A LOT LESS instead of a LITTLE LESS

Aggressive foreign policy? Other than that I support Rand 2016. He needs a stronger position, like Ron's, because there is really no middle ground when it comes to foreign entanglements.

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent."
Thomas Jefferson

Wow Rand is gonna end being

Wow Rand is gonna end being as flip floppy as Romney, May godbeless.

sharkhearted's picture


He's fukking incredible. Cut from his father's cloth.

Just like his father, not perfect, and with faults...but still his own man.

God bless him...and the guy currently in federal detention that originally turned me on to the Paul clan, Adam Kokesh.

Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Senator Rand Paul could spell

Senator Rand Paul could spell the end of Puppet Politician leaders of our country.


The minute I heard that moron Frank Luntz, that ruined the video for me. MEH.

Jane Aitken, 35-Year Veteran Teacher
Ron Paul 2008 Consultant
GOP Woman of the Year 2009
Founder NH Tea Party Coalition (NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY FAKE 2009 GROUP)
Founder USPEINetwork @ Yahoo (Nat'l Edu Activism Group)
Board Coalition of NH Taxpayers



Not left-right Not up-down Not out-side Yes In-side

See inspirational video http://relate4ever.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/left-or-right-up...

Positive support for Ron Paul ideas! Support from the Restoration and Liberty Movement on http://cristianpaduraru.com

I know who he is

Its pretty clear what kind of person Rand Paul is, and it's pretty much all good.

He's got my support and my vote.


I just had this idea, running over, and over, and over, again, and again, and again, these powers at work in our world.

The idea I have concerns the stark differences between Ron Paul and Rand Paul.

Let me know if this sounds true to you, I know what I know, but I want to find if someone else can help me know better.

I know that a very large number of people are required to make everyone do anything as one.

One person can't do it alone.

One person cannot make everyone suddenly jump through a hoop at 12 noon tomorrow exactly at the same time, regardless of Time Zone, as if everyone just had to do it, had to do it at that time, because one person says JUMP.

The Problem facing Ron Paul, Rand Paul, you, me, anyone, exists in the form of each individual who willfully injures innocent people, and those people who are knowable as criminals, perpetrate those crimes for their fun, and their profit, at the expense of their innocent, targeted victims.

Many people who may be called anarchists, or pacifists, or any word that works when calling these people according to their belief that nothing can be done to avoid crime, so they do not invent things to do to avoid crime, and they do no actions that effectively avoid crime.

How many people are those in that group who will do absolutely nothing effective in avoiding crime, nothing to protect any innocent babies, nothing to protect any innocent toddlers, nothing to protect anyone, anywhere, because those people have their reasons, including the reason that says nothing can be done, and nothing should be done, and doing anything would be a crime anyway, so their advice, and their actions, are do nothing positive (while some pay Federal Income Taxes, which is, measurably, aiding and abetting criminals).

How many people are in another group, and in this group these people have been led to believe that the commission of a crime, upon an innocent person, is perfectly acceptable as a means of supposedly arriving at the goal of avoiding crime.

Now, those are just a few words, or many words to some people, whereby my idea is taking shape as to the difference between Ron Paul and Rand Paul.

I think that Rand Paul leans too far into this area of behaving in ways that willfully injure innocent people under the false claim that doing so will eventually, someday, supposedly, avoid crime.

I don't think that Rand Paul actually goes too far in that direction.

Call it the benefit of doubt.

What proof exists to prove the case either way?

One way, an obvious way, is to compare Rand Paul with Ron Paul,and in my opinion Ron Paul avoids abuse of power with a brain surgeon's precision.

Now, please, can I put this idea of mine into a more obvious viewpoint, by illustration?

I can try.

There can be a time in the future of this Country whereby The Revolutionary War, The Civil War, and The Great Depression are viewed by those in this Country who are suffering, in that illustrated future, with fondness of the memory of better times, better conditions, higher standards of living, and lower costs of living, if only, if only, we could go back to those wonderful days when all we had to content with were British Troops, the largest army on the Planet, invading, occupying, raping, pillaging, the American Countryside.

If only, if only, if only, we could return to those better days when half of the States were cutting the throats of the other half of the States, because one half of the people wanted to enslave the other half.

Oh, if only, we could return to those wonderful days when all that was to be worried about was brother shooting brother over who gets to enslave the other.

If only we could go back to a time when our own Government took everything we had, and demanded even more, as was the case in The Great Depression, if only, if only, if only, of only we could turn back the clock to those happier days.

If we enter into times, in this Country, where The Revolutionary War, The Civil War, and The Great Depression look like paradise on earth compared to where we may be soon, then looking back at this situation, this comparison, between Rand Paul, and Ron Paul, may be different in degree, if not in principle.

I don't know how close to the wrong side of the tracks Rand Paul can get, and still be on the right side of the tracks, and I mean morality, I don't mean politics.

The Single Monopoly Power is the problem, not the solution, and the solution is self-government.

If more of the self governors choose to be criminals by targeting and destroying innocent people, volunteering to be criminals, and "volunteering" targets to be victims, despite objections by the innocent victims, in other words, if more of US become that which we supposedly abhor, that which we claim to abhor falsely, then our collective goose is cooked, with or without Rand Paul, or Ron Paul.

If more of us self governors STAND in between the criminals, with or without their badges, and more of us Stand to protect the innocent targets being targeted, then more of us will tip the balance in favor of not needing any help from anyone who volunteers to spend their lives doing that which we all should be doing naturally, which is to protect the innocent from those who desire to destroy them.

Cases in point are ubiquitous, and that is the point.

What can be done, by who, without becoming the problem, instead of securing Liberty, which is the solution?

Moves to End the FED, obviously, measurably, fix the problem.

Moves to End the IRS, obviously, measurably, fix the problem.

Moves to Bring the Troops Home, same thing, each one, each time, including each self governor who may have foreign ideas, unjust ideas, criminal ideas, invading, and occupying their brains, and to get home, those troops need to spend some time in the mirror.

Rand Paul may be moving into what I call Crime made Legal, if Rand Paul employs deceit, threats of violence, or violence upon the innocent, and then claims that such things have to be done, to ensure Liberty.

Is that the case?


Not as inspiring to me as Ron

But I know he's trying to appeal to a larger audience so I guess it makes sense I don't find him as inspiring as his dad. I still would absolutely vote for him and donate time and money should he run for prez in 2016.

Good One !

Great video...Rand Paul 2016!...

"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
Samuel Adams

This is good!

Nice vid.

Rand Paul 2016


"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

Rand is stating the truth, voting for our rights

and filibustering bad appointees! GO Rand 2012!

"Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern." ~~C.S. Lewis
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

"voting for our rights"


A signature used to be here!

We couldn't get Ron Paul in 2012

but we very well could get Rand Paul in 2016, if Obama doesn't destroy the Republic first.

We can ram Rand Paul right down the RNC throat and make them choke off politically.

What a excellent vid, Rand will have my support if he chooses to run.

Gold standard: because man can not be trusted to control his greed

I don't know if choke off is

I don't know if choke off is the right way to look at but I can agree with the sentiment.

If we can win with Rand then the hope would be that the party would be in our control and choking it off would be the last thing we would want.

I wonder what the party would look like today if Goldwater had won the presidency?

Principles before Party.

+ 1


LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15