99 votes

VIDEO: This Lady Has Got It!

VIDEO: This Lady Has Got It!

Short Video


http://youtu.be/CsnfQLmWM8o



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

She was great.

Who was the smirking twat in the background? Very rude.

Lord Acton, Lord Chief Justice of England, 1875 - "The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the People v. The Banks."

On top of that...

The guy with the Ron Paul hat comes in and sits next to her. Nicely done.

I am Ron Paul

of course the criminal politicians

know they cannot protect us. The politicians only want to control us. It's all about control and that is all that it is about.

Dd you see the smug polly

Dd you see the smug polly sitting behind her smirking all the while, thinking Nora was on the fringe and he was in the majority?

One of the best parts is when the room erupts into applause for her and he realizes he is the fringe minority. Winning

You should add this video

before the video you show, because it shows the arrogancy of the chairman, who seems to believe he is given a 'god' status over the non-government 'titled' serfs. Nora, in return puts the arrogant SOB chairman in his place, which was priceless!!!
http://youtu.be/CsnfQLmWM8o
Both videos need to seen together, because as it seems, your video is when she returns after being cut off by the 'godman', to state her point of our Constitution granted 2nd Amendment rights. The first video, along with your video, really shows the broad courage of this women refusing to allow the corporatist/communists to trample on her.

Did you paste the correct

Did you paste the incorrect link, or did someone already update the post?

It should be this link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qz7mDLB9JzY

http://kidsresourcecenter.org
Fun, educational projects to inspire young minds...

Oath of office for federal & military

Federal:
The first Congress developed this requirement into a simple, 14-word oath: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States."

The current oath was enacted in 1884: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgovernment/a/oaths_of_offic...

Military: The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commissioned officers are as follows

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
http://www.history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html

She sure does get it

I love that line "if my dogs don't get him, I will"

Guy who sits behind her is wearing a RON PAUL hat

Props to him.

fireant's picture

Yes, she does, but one caveat.

Only the President is Constitutionally mandated, by oath, to defend the Constitution. All other Constitutional officers are charged to support it. There is a difference.

Undo what Wilson did

See my posting above.

Both federal and military "defend " the constitution.

fireant's picture

True, but it is not the Constitutional oath.

It is oath by statute. There was no amendment to alter the oath. They are, of course valid, in that they do not take away from the Constitution, but add to it. In my view, there was a reason the authors made the distinction between "support" and "defend" for the different offices.

Undo what Wilson did

Play on Words...Support? What Does That Mean?

What does it mean to support the Constitution? Does that word "SUPPORT" mean one does not have to follow the Constitution?

DOES THE CONSTITUTION PRESCRIBE RULES FOR
ITS OWN INTERPRETATION?

Nora Craig

Her name is Nora Craig

Nora Craig
Local Coordinator, Franklinville Tea Party
Franklin Township, NJ

Nora Craig is a retired Information Technology executive with 25 years experience in various industry settings.

She has been published in security management strategy guides and served on IBM strategic advisory councils, and local government planning and environmental boards. In 2005, she organized a Katrina Aid drive and received a congressional citation for her work. She has served on several boards of directors of non-profit organizations.

Currently, Nora farms in Franklin Township, New Jersey with her husband and family. She is a U.S. Navy veteran, serving as an Air Traffic Controller from 1970-1973. Jessica, her daughter, is currently serving in the New Jersey Air Guard.

Here is her Facebook if you want to give her an ATTA GIRL!!!
https://www.facebook.com/nora.craig.10

goldenequity , I Used The Youtube Link You Provided..

Thanks so much... Love This Gal Nora Craig...

For Liberty,

"E"

Excellent

Right to the point. Everybody should see this one.
I'll be sharing it.

Since it is Sunday

Amen