5 votes

Treason

The word is thrown around a lot, but what acts "officially" constitute treason? The answer can be found at 18 USC 2381:

"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381

If it is true that Barry & Hillary were running weapons to al Qaeda forces from Libya to Syria, and Ambassador Stevens was the guy making the deals, and former CIA Director Petreaus was sacked because he would not go along with the false story, then Barry & Hillary could face the death penalty. Maybe this is the reason for all the distractions away from Benghazi specifics.

On a side note: Notice how the definition says "... to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies..." Just an interesting observation about the language of that particular statute.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The feral government has been

The feral government has been levying war against the American people for decades! Everyone of the bastards should be tried and hung!

-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!

Get Prepared!

Considering its the " corporation of "

The United States, the statute is written to indicate that whomever " the corporation doing business as the United States " deems to be " them " or " Enemy of " is entirely dependent upon those who control the " corporation " and not upon those who are " property " of said " corporation " .
In simple language, the Globalists might plug and play " anyone " and " everyone " at their will, dependent upon their whims and who's in opposition to them.
This statute may not be applicable to Hillary or Obama, considering they get to choose, or rather they are specifically told whom to choose that fills the " Them " or " Enemy " blocks of the statute.
The only way to insure that those blocks " them " and " enemy " contain names of those who are our enemies, that is the enemies of Divine providence in Liberty is to be the ones filling in those blanks ourselves.
Otherwise it is far more likely that our names, and Liberty will fill those inoceous frames and we then be guilty of defending that which they have hijacked through intrigue and crass fraud, named traitors for defending right by those usurping it for mammons gain.
And with today's selfish, unstudied sheep at propagandists mercy ( MSM ), who then would know truth but those put to the sword in Liberties defense ? And those sleeping sheep would wonder after the beast, and may even willingly participate against us, thinking they are doing right.

Mercy, that's one ambiguous statement, fought with unkind endings.

God Bless
Stēkō

Drew, by the very grace of GOD through the blood of Christ Jesus.
"there shall come after us men whom shall garner great wealth using our system, and having done so shall seek to slam the door of prosperity behind them." George Washington

By that definition

http://www.dailypaul.com/286222/rand-paul-my-colleagues-just...

Rand Paul:
"You will be funding, today, the allies of al Qaeda. It's an irony you cannot overcome."

it's treason.

Hows that for irony? ;)

Just open the box and see