What we're up against - a progressive lets his guard down.Submitted by ironman77 on Tue, 05/28/2013 - 19:35
An Obama supporter responded to a post of mine criticizing Obama's Drone policy. This is the kind of person we are up against. I think we should expose this thought, which they rarely come clean with publicly.
Being a progressive puts 'progress' in the game. Standing with Tibetans, Islamics and Evangelicals is standing with regressive, conservative, mysogynist, homophobic, xenophobic, feudal anachronisms that hurt their people first and foremost. When China takes Tibetan children away from prayer, dead language and non-existent economy to a classroom to learn Mandarin,
Math, Science that gives the child what progress leads to 'a future'. Monks setting themselves on fire is a distressing photo-op, but a decent solution to their obsolescence.
Israel is a place that is friendly to modernity and secularism, that produces and manages its own role. The idea that 9/11 where I buried 9 friend's and watched buildings my
Mother worked in for decades come crumbling down on brokers, clerks, messengers and security guards innocently trying to make a living is somehow our fault because cult like lunatics wish to operate oppressive hate factories over a quarter of the Earths surface with impunity is not cause to blame the moderns. Shall we blame America and its Government for the deaths of OKC federal bldg since the aggrieved killer lashed out at secular, immigrant, taxation and other elements of modernity that cramp the style of race specific faithful in American heartland?
Of course not. The three dangers to modernity are Islam, Evangelicalism and Feudalism which is fueled, literally, by carbon interests.
Identifying the difference between a man, Dubya, who believes in the 'clash of civilizations' nonsense and wants to expand the reach of faith and carbon and Barack, a secular man of law who wants to kill those who kill innocents and give the citizens of Islam and Heartland both a chance at the wonders of Modernity is to be data-refusing hide bound dogmatic.
So what do you think