14 votes

Actress loses 100,000 twitter followers because she advocated for gun safety rather than gun confiscation

Crazy Nutjobs, she is totally correct.

I'm sure we can send her some nice tweets of encouragement.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/06/11/actress-kate...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

She better drink her own urine to get them back!

Take a page from Kesha, rescue her career by drinking her urine.

Call it gun control or confiscation.

Gun safety is the new government-speak and a misnomer.

Real gun safety is how you clean and handle your weapon, what safety equipment you would wear, along with any other safety measures you might use when firing on a range or when hunting.

The term gun safety is absolute crap, it's a Liberal term and has nothing to do with reality.

Half the followers

doesn't make sense. She was exaggerating, probably meaning she lost enough to notice or even just that she noticed the negative comments. That many of her followers are unlikely to even be logging in that often. I haven't checked my Twitter in a couple weeks and even then I'm usually looking for something specific, not reading every tweet of everyone I follow.

Is there anyway to check if her following was ever double it is now.

Defend Liberty!

THEY WERE FAKE

And this is a publicity stunt. Clearly.

Ron brought the Liberty movement together, Rand is expanding the crap out of it! :)

Right

You're going to tell me 100k sheeple got 'outraged' all at once?

Enough to bother to drop anyone?

Sci fi geeks gonna drop a cute sci fi babe?

Sci fi geeks for gun control?

Nope. Not remotely possible. They were sockpuppets to begin with.

Someone should tell her.

my online marketing friend says 95%of twitter followers are fake

he says they can be purchased by the tens of thousands and am guessing they can be taken away just as quickly.

clearly her publicity manager has pulled a stunt. either through malice or for publicity.

it would be easy to delete her imaginary followers, leak the "news" to FOX through friends, and reap the benefits of this "bad press." (remember bad news is good news)

ultimately, she loses 100k fake accounts and gains a large chunk back in real accounts who are sympathetic to her situation. that's good publicity.

i didnt know who this girl was until today...

That would not surprise me,

manufactured popularity for the sake of manipulation.

Thin the

Herd.

To my Liberal Trolls:
"Really Don't mind if you sit this one out. Your words but a whisper, your deafness a shout. I may make you feel, but I can't make you think."
Ian Anderson 1972

I'm with those that think we are seeing a 'lot' of polls about

what we are supposed to be thinking.

What about the poll of people voting with their money buying guns and ammo?

Follow the money.

Just to be clear...

"Just to be clear...I NEVER said automatic guns should be legal!"

Now allow ME to be clear: No, I will NOT send her some nice tweets.

Shall not be infringed!

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

Ah liberty folks sometimes

forget how to use fire against fire.

How do you pull people to our side, it's by sticking up for people that do the right things, no matter how small.

We have lots of purists, problem is 75% of the people are somewhat contaminated, to bring those people over you don't diss them, you give them props, and let them know we don't have automatic firearms, that's its a media driven fantasy.

just my 2 cents

Here is the problem with your flawed logic:

For more than 100 years, people tend to compromise. Each time compromise occurs, Liberty, Freedom takes yet another 2 steps back. LOOK WHERE WE ARE TODAY.

You can carry on your way and give credit to the lessers of evil [they will love you]. I will stand my ground and educate/speak the truth, using facts, in a tactful way.

That movie star was all about her 'popularity' rating. She back treaded and doesn't give a crap about you, or 2ndA.

FYI: Some people DO have automatic firearms, though heavily regulated and licensed. Using your and that movie star method would eventually criminalize them too.

Just my 2 bits of silver.

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

the indoctrinated sheep are

the indoctrinated sheep are the ones following celebrities on Twitter.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

and we're suppose to just

let them stay indoctrinated, I think not, thats not how you spread the message of liberty. Unfortunately in the real world most people don't watch US House debates on CSPAN, they are watching the Voice, using FaceCrook etc.

If the government creates 100,000 sims.

What government gives it can take away.

Those that are left are loyal followers or following a different government agenda.

Free includes debt-free!

Isn't twitter just another

Isn't twitter just another CIA/NSA front for the purpose of gathering useless information? It's like facebook on steroids, only dumber.

The actress did not do as she was told by her Hollywood management, and so "loses," 100,000 more than likely fake followers.

Psychologically, the CIA/NSA apparatus helps give the perception and false impression that gun safety is unpopular with a few key strokes.

See how that works?

On a side note, I would just like to say that I think twitter is a useless piece of crap and should be in the same category as soap operas.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.