Why would a Rand 2016 end up any different than a Ron 2008 / 2012? MSM is still in full control.Submitted by tonym on Wed, 06/12/2013 - 08:46
Not to sound like a downer, but it's time to put on our big boy pants and look around. People aren't "waking up" at nearly the rate we would like to believe. Do you still plan on pouring your money into the msm's pockets via campaign contributions only for them to crown their agent in the end, or is there a new strategy in the works?
Personally, unlike last time, I will not be donating a dime next time around. The Internet has obsoleted msm election "reporting". The future dictates that they are not to be "worked with" or persuaded but simply to be ignored by voters AND CANDIDATES. Sadly, even most DP'ers still don't seem to recognize this paradigm shift and are more than willing to play the old game, hoping that maybe simple persistence is the magic key.
Working in any direction that doesn't preclude total msm abstinance is a losing, expensive, pointless battle. Once we can swallow that pill, maybe that can free our minds to come up with some real, clever solutions.
EDIT: A lot of wishful thinking in this thread. Scary stuff. It's just simple math, people. If your voting majority is drunk on msm, then msm's agent wins. Period. The msm can push whomever they want on their airwaves. And it ain't gonna be Larry Liberty and Carrie Constitution. So, it's everyone's burden to get the addicted off their drug. Everything else is a big waste of your precious time.