23 votes

"This is a matter of National Security"

It seems that the line, “this is a matter of national security” has been used to the point of scripted and prompted commentary in order to pacify the people of concerns they may have. Whether we are discussing Benghazi, aid in arms to terrorists in Syria, the IRS persecution of conservative political groups, the NSA’s mass disregard for constitutional liberties in privacy, the BP oil debacle, the hammering of minds to fear cyber attacks from foreign countries, the collusive support of GMO agendas, the denial of Sandy Hook intelligence, the Boston bombing cover-up, or any other scandal to disgrace this current administration, one thing is clear: “these definitely are all matters of national security”!

But don’t expect anything to be done voluntarily to assist and remedy these matters of national security, because as we all know here our national security would be genuinely affected should the truths behind these scandals come evident. That is exactly why national security is used as the vicarious redeemer for us all. Whatever you do, please understand “National Security” is here to protect and keep you all safe. Do not question matters that have been labeled as national security matters. Please just keep your questions and inquiries to yourselves.

“National Security” has become the scapegoat rather than the genuine precedent. The ONLY matter of genuine national security is that the American people are being denied transparency on all levels, with the complicity of the media and the collusion of the government.

Peace and love first.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Define National Security?

Define National Security?
What does National Security even mean?
What is your understanding of what the words National Security mean?
What really is National Security?

What percentage of national

What percentage of national security is at risk that will cause the nation to fall to another power? Lets say China and Russia team up to conker the US, perhaps 51% of our national security may be at risk, and the country falls to another power.

According to my calculations, only .000001% from terrorist threats is a risk to our national security. Nothing to be concerned about.

If the Gunvernment

hadn't jeopardized our national security in the first place by a dishonest, secretive, meddlesome, impartial, immoral and interventionist foreign policy over decades - none of this surveillance would have even come up for consideration.

We used to be the model in the world.

They screwed that pooch, too, didn't they?

This is a matter of national security?

The United States is actually powerful enough to not have any secrets and be able to take on any power against us and beat it. The truth is, we don't even need national security except to become a power over it's own people and most of those who are for the national security are probably supported by the government.

The term "national security" makes keeping secrets against it's own people very easy to do and doesn't serve any other constructive purpose.

Nike Reebok or Adidas?

We're intercepting your private communications to determine which type of sneakers to market yo you. This is of course a matter of the strictest national security. Especially if we find out you don't wear sneakers!

Addidas forever!

Unless you're offering Saucony as a choice...then I'd have to flip a coun :)

Michael Nystrom's picture

Bump

.

All art is only done by the individual. The individual is all you ever have, and all schools only serve to classify their members as failures. E.H.

The tidal wave is on the horizon...

isn't it wonderful!? I have been waiting for so long to see corruption fall.

Father - Husband - Son - Spirit - Consciousness

"National Security" is

"National Security" is another way of saying keep your mouth shut and submit.
For a previous job, I was required to hold a secret clearance. What was so vital that be kept secret? Well I have to say I found it all kinda childish because alot of stuff could have been logically reasoned and was easy to see. Do you know what was ironic? The dummies were sooo darn interested in security, yet refused to put a basic password on their damned wireless "secret" network! Instead of putting a password on the network, they simply said you cant use any computers you bring(or basically dont bring any at all). Now tell me how secure this is? Someone who was interested enough could have brought a computer anyway and connected because no one was watched 24/7 and they didnt search our bags.

To climb the mountain, you must believe you can.

TwelveOhOne's picture

Agree bump

To make something "classified" means, generally, that one is hiding evidence of crimes.

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)

deacon's picture

what national security?

are you speaking of the nation,that never was one?
a nation that was never free,a nation owned by debt,is nation not owned by the people
we are nation owned by banksters,who control and hand pick
the officials ( see,they are not reps)they are law makers
them reps,including the sitting prez,is hand picked by foreign powers
to do their bidding
but on paper,this land is still owned by the vatican, england,and the rothschilds
so,does it really matter what a foreign entity does to their own land?
deacon

setting your expectations to high,can cause depression

So, we're supposed to believe that 99.99% of us who are

INNOCENT AMERICANS.....need to be tracked, listened to, watched, pestered, harassed.....for the less than 1% who are a problem?

These Political Criminals, who have not one shred of respect for our rights per the Constitution, would just as soon set up a FASCIST HITLER DICTATORSHIP, rather than tell the truth & respect we Americans.

Jerks. And, to think the New York politicians want to make us more transparent & take away our total right to privacy when we make comments---well, that is the most disgusting thing I've ever heard of. Their answer to all their NSA mischief is---to clamp down on us even more.

deacon's picture

did i say i liked it?

did i mention anywhere that it was cool for them to do the things they do?
no,i do not agree with anything any gov does,but it is what it is
the fed gov,is not ours,it is not for us,they are not hired to rep us
they are hand picked by the ones in charge,and they do their bidding
they are the foreigners,using their own created so called laws against their slaves
now let me ask,has anything at all been done,as far back as you can remember,has congress stood on the principles known as the dec of ind
or the const?
have they tried anyone for anything?
or have they in fact let it all slide
and again i have no love for them,but i do have a little understanding
of why they do and can get away with what they do
deacon

setting your expectations to high,can cause depression

What percentage of national

What percentage of national security is at risk that will cause the nation to fall to another power? Lets say China and Russia team up to conker the US, perhaps 51% of our national security may be at risk, and the country falls to another power.

According to my calculations, only .000001% from terrorist threats is a risk to our national security. Nothing to be concerned about.

Lighting striking people poses a greater threat.

Pool drownings pose a greater threat.

We Must Eradicate The Classification System

The government has proven it can't be trusted with it.

___________________________________________________________________________
"Bipartisan: both parties acting in concert to put both of their hands in your pocket."-Rothbard

Awesome post!

:-)

2014 Liberty Candidate Thread: http://www.dailypaul.com/287246/2014-liberty-candidate-thread

2016 Potential Presidential Candidates: http://alturl.com/mt7tq

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul