8 votes

Rockefellers contact list via Anonymous - Have fun! Guccifer Hacks

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Whistleblower Hotline! ;-)

on Pg 3... 212-549-5535 Hah!

Dude looks like a pale reptile.


It's just a corporate directory

It's just a corporate directory of a bunch of financial people.

Also should we judge you by the mistakes of your family?

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

You have some homework to do, friend.

"...Should we judge you by the mistakes of your family?"

Well, no.

But I wouldn't refer to this family's enthusiastic leadership of and participation in that which has been a multi-generational and concerted effort to use wealth to stealthily impoverish, dis-educate, and manipulate people--never mind to seek and acquire disproportionate, undue, and unjust direct influence upon not only the financial sector but also our government (which is supposed to be representative of and responsive to the interests of society at large)--as "mistakes".

While I somewhat disagree with the exposition of their contacts' private information (How culpable *are* the cogs of a machine if they know not the scope of that machine's overarching mission? Age-old question. But I'd also be willing to bet there are some real bastards / more-than-willing henchmen on that list!), the Rockefellers are in no way victims. Consider this not-so-savory revelation by an arch Rockefeller:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years."

He went on to explain:

"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries."

-- David Rockefeller, Speaking at the June, 1991 Bilderberger meeting in Baden, Germany

See more:


What would the Founders do?

I actually know a lot about

I actually know a lot about them. Think about all those things you wrote, maybe there's other interpretations to them? Do you really think David Rockefeller wakes up every morning wanting to hurt people?

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

He actually wakes up every morning

wanting to fulfill his family's dream of a one world super-state powered and controlled by a good deal of their wealth. His dad (maybe grandad) was asked when was enough money enough, and his answer was just a little more.

David Rockefeller had this to say in the New York Times praising Chairman Mao:

"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

--David Rockefeller, August 10, 1973 in the New York Times
He made this statement after Mao murdered 60 million people! 
Go to the NYT archives and you willl see this for yourself.

Danger Will Robinson, if the grand wizard of the Wall Street Klan thinks that the Cultural Revolution was the bestest social experiment in history depite the middle class being literally starved to death and he (and his family) have enough money to influence happenings in this country, you might want to pay attention.


So you are saying the US shouldn't have international relations with China? Are you aware of what was happening in the 1970s?

Rockefeller was lobbying for US-China relations. Many many people have praised Mao for how he transformed China. Of course, Mao was a monster but should the US just not have relations with China?

Also here's the full article-

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying (eyeroll-sarc)

Calling a man out for praising one of the biggest mass murdering monsters in history does not equate to not having international relations with China. Are you aware what was happening in the 1970s? Had an unconnected businessman trotted about China as D. Rockefeller had done ( and yes, I've read that article fully before), he would have been clapped in irons and branded a commie pinko traitor and his business ruined.

Rockefeller doesn't have to lobby for what he wants, he only has to pay for it. Jon Rappaport wrote a recent piece on DR and Nixon that says a lot about how the world really works:

"Whatever Deep Throat, the man in the garage, was dishing out to Woodward didn’t really matter. Bradlee already had it in his pocket. Deep Throat was merely a contrivance to allow the story to expand and grow by steps, and to permit Woodward and Bernstein to believe they were peeling layers from an onion.

The man behind the curtain was David Rockefeller."


The Rockefeller family has been doing business in China for over 100 years. Antony Sutton has written how the multinationals working with governments will transfer technologies to communist countries, which are then used against Americans in these phoney wars. He points out that the Gorki plant, set up by the Ford Motor Company, in the USSR was producing tanks to used against American GIs.

The Rockefeller MO is to use "free trade" as a means to destroy the national sovereignty and the subsequent rule of law in every country via GATT, NAFTA, and CAFTA, etc. David has stated in his memoirs that his goal is a world superstate. He has no love for our Constitution.

Would those financial people

Would those financial people be part of the one percent, the cancer that needs destroyed humiliated, and harassed?

Yes those everyday people who

Yes those everyday people who work 50+ hours a week to support their families. They are so evil.

Check out http://ronpaulforums.com for activism and news.

Only 50? no sympathy here.

Only 50? no sympathy here.

Whatever respect that family had

....died long, long ago, if they ever had any in the first place!

Is'nt invading someones

Is'nt invading someones privacy legal now, let this be the precedent shall we.....whatever efforts, whatever departments they get to go after the guy who reprimanded this information, turn it around demand the same response, to the entirety of government staff, you now, blanket-ly, screw probable cause

edit:thats sarcasm by the way, i only call to point out the hypocrasy


I do so enjoy looking at this sort of thing.