23 votes

Why You Should Never, Never, Ever Talk To The FBI

"See something. Say something." -- Edward Snowden :)


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Ask a stranger

You meet by chance if they are law enforcement. I did before I hired a handgun Instructor.

To my Liberal Trolls:
"Really Don't mind if you sit this one out. Your words but a whisper, your deafness a shout. I may make you feel, but I can't make you think."
Ian Anderson 1972

We're suppose to worry

We need to worry about what we say to the FBI or any Federal employee.
What about when Government workers lies to "The People" or even "Congress"?
What about James Clapper of the NSA? He lied to Congress.
What's going to happen to him?
What's going to happen to the IRS employees or their supervisors that targeted conservatives?

there will be lots of...

Hand slaps.

Homeland security statement: patriotism is now considered terrorism.
I love www.isidewith.com shared it with everyone I know. If anything they realize its not just a red and blue idiot running for reelection.

Union Lawyers?

Is that adviser a member of The Bar Association and is membership in The Bar Association an important consideration when seeking generous help from Friends of Liberty in the fight against Tyranny?

If it is sound, reasonable, important, wise, knowledgeable, and affordable advice in defense against Tyranny by Tyrants to have an accurate account of what happens when Tyrants Target Victims, then that hold true in each case?

FBI arrives and interviews a target.

Get a record, get a witness, make sure that no information is offered to the FBI, at all.

Any information offered to the FBI will be information used to injure the targeted victim.

If that is true, which sounds very reasonable, or at least worthy of further, accurate, Federal Bureaucracy Investigation by any potential victim, then how about using the same advice on any member of The Bar Association?

Union Lawyers, or members of The Bar Association, are members of one Monopoly Source of Legal Advice according to False Federal Laws, which are demonstrably false, if you care to look.

Union Lawyers, from The Bar Association Monopoly, contract with people in Federal Commerce and therefore those contracts are subject to Federal Regulations, which, as may be the case, or not the case, in any case, are wavers of rights, assumed to be wavers of rights made by members of The Bar Association, and unknown as wavers of rights made by those who are contracting with members of The Bar Association.

Who has rights that can, or cannot, be waved?


So, knowing may be better than being ignorant, and therefore knowing that liars may assume that someone looking for help in the fight against Tyranny is someone waving their rights, and therefore someone looking for help in the fight against Tyranny ought to consider having a durable record, with witnesses to help keep a record recorded, whereby it is expressed in no uncertain terms that no Friend of Liberty ever gives up inalienable rights.

Is that unclear?


If it is unclear to anyone, that no Friend of Liberty ever willfully gives up any inalienable rights, then what is the problem?

You, please, tell me.


Networks Rising?


Why can't we, in essence, hold the criminals with badges to account for their crimes while they are so busy perpetrating those crimes upon their targeted victims?