13 votes

Putin Says "World War" b/c of Monsanto ?

As though there aren't enough conflict "fronts" between the U.S. and the world. But who knew it could get to this level on poisoning the earth and killing the ecosystem ?

http://politicalblindspot.org/russia-suggests-that-war-may-b...

I think I need to go watch the movie "The Bee Movie" again ...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Dont wish for a nuclear war.

Dont wish for a nuclear war. Even a limited one will screw everyone over. So unless you have like an underground shelter city with enough supplies to last for several decades, just dont wish for one.

To climb the mountain, you must believe you can.

.

For the record:

Bee Movie is a bunch of Seinfeld zio-populist brainwashed garbage trivializing the real problems faced by bees (& due to it humans). In many ways, it's purpose is controlled opposition deception.

In reality, the problems are far more serious & no laughing matter. Nowhere does the movie even hint about real source of problems - neonicotinoid pesticides, Monsanto etc.

Immoral funding of Military Industrial Complex by Federal Reserve and US taxation system must stop!!!! End illegal/unconstitutional wars! Preserve US currency!
http://facebook.com/NoPropagandaZone
http://twitter.com/the_chiefe71

2 Choices: Death By Radiation Poisoning or GMO Food

WOW!! Two great choices aye... Heads You lose, Tails you lose...

Death by Nuclear Fallout or death by eating food pigs and rats won't eat..

Isn't it great to be alive to experience all that life in this world offers...

A nuclear WW3 would be very

A nuclear WW3 would be very effective as plan B, but I'd rather see a complete and total worldwide economic collapse that my money is on. Leave plan B on the table though, just in case plan A doesn't work.

makes me think about the mystery mass bird deaths

.

Wait wait wait hold up here a second

They mean people will fight to avoid being arbitrarily starved to death? I dunno man. I'm an American. Just don't touch my Starbucks.

Be brave, be brave, the Myan pilot needs no aeroplane.

The libertarian platform on environment

is wait until the damage is done then take them to civil court.

WHICH IS UTTERLY LAME.

Be brave, be brave, the Myan pilot needs no aeroplane.

It's not about damage it's about INFORMATION.

The free market REQUIRES truthful information. Econ 101.

If I sell you "beef", but substitute spent dairy cow or horse meat without disclosure and rely on your ignorance for my increased rent, that's called fraud.

If I sell you wheat, but it's really not wheat, it's what laywers defined as "wheat", it's the same thing.

It's called fraud. Except that it's been legally defined as "not fraud" by lawyers, who paid congressmen to turn black into white legally.

Well if no damage is done

Well if no damage is done then what's the problem???

Apparently Vladimir Putin doesn't share your implied denial...

...or lack of concern, nor does he seem to feel obligated to play sitting duck.

At the center of this dispute between Russia and the US, this MNRE report says, is the “undisputed evidence” that a class of neuro-active insecticides chemically related to nicotine, known as neonicotinoids, are destroying our planets bee population, and which if left unchecked could destroy our world’s ability to grow enough food to feed its population.

Well I was just asking

Well I was just asking SmudePot what's the problem if there is no damage? Then you answered that there is damage being done, so your answer obviously has nothing to do with what I was asking Smudge about. I don't really get how you can infer that 'I'm in denial or unconcerned' for asking a question?

I agree completely

It's probably the single biggest thing I take issue w/ Libertarianism about. The idea that we have to be reactive (as opposed to proactive) about the environment feels very dangerous to me. However, that's not to say there aren't groups out there that ostensibly have a "pro-environment agenda" but, in truth, have ulterior motives. I think the biggest environmental groups likely fall into that category.

Unfortunately, I don't have any proposed solution to the problem.

i can pass up a 5$ cup of coffee.

.

Maybe Headlines like this......

will get the American sheeple to notice this MonSatan thingy for once?

Naaa, doubt it. Since they all get they're news from the same MSM sources, the biggest news ever announced could take place and they'd never hear it, because the MSM never told them about it

THEN, if they should hear it from sources OUTSIDE of their staple news source, then IT'S STILL NO BIGGIE because CNN didn't tell them. (CNN tells them what's important and P.C. to talk about).

On another note, wouldn't it just be easier for Putin to go after MonSatan?

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks