-1 vote

More evidence of FBI complicity in 911-Was Anwar al-Awlaki a government asset?

"“Why would al-Awlaki get the attention of the FBI Director? … Why would a warrant for his arrest be pulled when he’s trying to reenter the country” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “All of that, you know, put two and two together. It seems like he was protected. … And it’s about time this administration and the government generally come clean about their relationship with al-Awlaki. It’s screaming for further clarification.”
Former Sen. Bob Graham, who led the first investigation into 9/11, known as the Joint Congressional Inquiry, told Fox News in 2011 that he wanted access to al-Awlaki but was told the cleric was out of the country and unavailable. The new documents make clear the FBI was aware of the cleric’s travel to the U.S. before the Joint Congressional Inquiry was complete in late 2002.""
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/02/why-did-fbi-allow...

More on al-Awlaki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


It's interesting that you posted that info. I was already under the impression that Al-Awlaki was an alphabet soup asset. I actually thought that was somewhat established (at least amongst those who don't get their news from the MSM). But again, I find it interesting that you posted this info. I'm curious to know your current thoughts on it and on 9/11 in general.

fireant's picture

This further shows obstruction of the Joint Commission.

They requested testimony from Al-Awlaki and were denied because he was "out of country". This also puts the AG in the loop. There is much much more showing connections with the planning and financing and the FBI, which was all withheld from both commissions, but enough glimmers came through the redacted FBI files. Bob Graham has been screaming about it for years, and Phil Marshall covered much of it in his book, "The Big Bamboozle". He was hot on this trail and writing another book when he became victim of "suicide".
As for your other question, I have been clear that I think "controlled demolition" is a smoke screen, intentional or not, to distract from this route. It is obvious from available data the FBI and CIA were cozy with the planners and financiers of the operation. To what extent and why is not known, but we know the Bush Adm obstructed both commissions on this account.
In the end, it makes sense to take the path of least resistance to find the perps. Here we have concrete evidence of government knowledge at minimum. Meanwhile, everyone is arguing about CD, which cannot be proven, and this evidence just sits there virtually unnoticed. If you have not read Marshall's book, you should. There are many many connections most people are simply not aware of. I have a few extra copies and will send anyone with genuine interest a copy for free.

Undo what Wilson did