4 votes

Model gay adoptive ‘fathers’ sexually abused 6-year-old for years: offered him to pedophile ring

SYDNEY, July 3, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Police in Australia have described as "depraved" the case of a six-year-old boy who was sexually abused by his adoptive homosexual "fathers" and other men who were part of an international child-porn syndicate known as the Boy Lovers network.

Authorities in Australia and the US worked together to arrest and charge the men after it emerged that the boy had been offered to men in Australia, the US, France and Germany for sexual exploitation and the production of child pornography from a very young age.

Last week one of the men, an American named Mark J. Newton, 42, was jailed in the U.S. for 40 years and ordered to pay $400,000 in restitution to the child, while the other, Peter Truong, 36, from New Zealand, awaits sentencing in his home country.

"None of these cases are very good," Detective Inspector Jon Rouse, who heads Australia’s Queensland Police Taskforce Argos, which investigates online child exploitation and abuse, told the AFP news agency.

"What's pretty sad about this one is the way this child came into their lives. It's just really a tragedy. It's extremely depraved."

According to reports, Newton and Truong, living in Cairns, Australia at the time, began looking for a surrogate mother to give birth to a child in 2002.

Read more here...

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/model-gay-adoptive-fathers-...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Being a Christian is great.

The problem is when you force your beliefs on others or you lobby your government to force on others. The problem i have with social conservatives is they want big government regulating my private life telling me how to live. I am 43 and my mom and dad did a good job. I don't need government to tell me how to live a moral life. JESUS DID NOT FORCE PEOPLE , He gave us a choice to follow him or not. Jesus was the first Libertarian.

@Matt schutter,

You should read my post above. If you did, you miss the point completely. Government legislation is not adequate. A society left to a political ideology (and lacking in transcendent moral Truth) is doomed to failure. I agree with you that we cannot force people's consciences one way or another. But this does not dispense us as human beings from the moral obligation to protect human life from corrupt individuals and evil government practices.

Your sophistry is hardly convincing that Jesus is the equivalent of a modern 'individualist-libertarian.' That is absurd. Take his statement, which displays the contrary:

"Whoever causes one of these little children to stumble, it would be better for him to have a great stone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea. Woe to the world because of things that cause sin! Such things must come, but woe to the one THROUGH whom they come!" (Mt. 18:6)

This is hardly the John Lockean/Rousseauian philosophy which has become 'libertarianism.' As a free man in the authentic sense, Jesus understood that 'human freedom' is not ultimate in and of itself. There is a Truth 'greater' than any individual that we must all be held accountable to. This Truth is intelligible and discernible under the signs of goodness and beauty. The deception that Jesus calls "sin", in contrast, is knowable under the signs of ugliness and vice.

It is a despicable thing, in my opinion, to lobby for something that is going to destroy the lives of countless children and desensitize the coming generations to what is true, good, and beautiful.

"To live without a steady struggle for the Truth, that is not living but merely existing" -Piere Giorgio Frassatti

Gay Man Opposes Gay 'marriage'

Assess the testimony of Mr. Mainwaring, co-founder of "National Capital Tea Party Patriots":

Video: http://youtu.be/V-g8NvHHmfM

Article: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/im-gay-and-i-oppose-gay-mar...

"To live without a steady struggle for the Truth, that is not living but merely existing" -Piere Giorgio Frassatti

Diamond Dog's picture

Were all those Catholic priests gay too?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases

Those guys should be outlawed.

The Diamond Dog is a real cool cat. | Reporting on the world from an altitude of 420.

they weren't true Catholics

they weasel their way into the system to take advantage and corrupt little boys.

Nasty

yes they were. That was the

yes they were. That was the problem. There are many cases of priests leaving the church because of them falling in love with a woman - these priests are not gay.

Simple you like your same sex = gay.
You like the other sex = straight.

Klar???

Wow, even gay people can do horrible things?

It's almost as if they're just like everyone else!

More downvotes for me please, the seedy, bigoted underbelly of this website has been giving me much amusement as of late.

You don't say?

Everyone is bigoted about someone or something. Christians are bigoted towards gays, gays are bigoted toward Christians, evolutionist are bigoted toward creationist. Everyone is bigoted, get over it. A mature adult realizes that people are people and people have the right to be bigots, racist, hater, hmesexuals who believe they came from monkeys. That's america

Disparity is the problem

Maybe I haven't been here for all that long, but it just seems odd the amount of tolerance this specific brand of bigot seems to get around here. I don't see dozens of people speaking openly of being racist on this website. Once in a blue moon I've come across the obvious anti-semite, but I've never seen people overtly hating blacks or hispanics.

I think there's an obvious trend of coopting the idea of liberty as a facade for someone's favorite flavor of hate. Want to get rid of the jews for being greedy? Blend in with the anti-zionists. Want to espouse the idea of homosexuality being wrong in God's eyes? Stand next to the people who want the government out of marriage. They know the US isn't going to stop being Israel's dog any time soon, they know married couples won't stop getting tax breaks tomorrow. All they want to do is to use this platform to throw stones from, and when it can make the rest of us look like we're all throwing rocks, you should be concerned. Unless of course you're the type of person to cast first anyway.

I don't see the word "hate" up at the top of this website, but I see too much hate in the comments. It's not the kind of hate a person has for getting their freedoms taken away. It's hating people for being different, not because of what the person is or isn't, but because the one hating has been taught to hate them.

I don't see "war" up at the top of the website, but I watch people proclaim their war on gays in the posts and the comments almost daily. It's not the kind of behind-closed-doors, "if they leave me alone it's fine" kind of war. There's no door preventing people from seeing it here, this is a public forum after all. The very action of posting it here speaks volumes. Maybe the lighter consequences is what draws these people to spill vile onto this site instead of their own workplaces, not that I wouldn't be surprised to find someone in a DailyPaul t-shirt picketing against gay marriage.

I do see "gold" up there, these people are pure comedy gold so I'll give you that one.

They think it's okay to degrade others, that's fine. When they do it, they will be called out for what they are. If given the choice between chasing off homosexuals to Hilary 2016 or sending the bigots home to their backwood, good ol' boy virtual crossburnings at GodHatesFags.com, I hope the fact that I just gave you the link makes my choice obvious.

What did Jesus say about gay?

The answer is nothing. He said to love others like you love yourself. His followers or so called Christians do a good job at hating people. It not their fault because they are only sheep of their hateful church. Christ warned us in the last days there will be many false churches ran by the evil one. Hate is evil Love is of God!

To love God and good, one must hate evil.

just the way it is.

Christians should not be warmongers! http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html

i like to remind folks god

i like to remind folks god didn't write the bible man did. In faith the bible is great but in fact it has always been manipulated by man and written by man. Do not Trust man.

For those that say but they were inspired by god? No they were inspired by power just like dnc/gop failed leadership.

Have Faith in God but do not trust Man!!

SomeMen hate gays but God Loves All, any reference to hating gays or gay being a sin was written by man not god.

I believe in a loving god not a hating man.

Ron Paul 2016

@CarCrash,

to make a distinction between truth and error, or to question the well being of children- is not "hatred," but love!

In 2004, Ron Paul said on the House floor, “I oppose federal efforts to redefine marriage as something other than a union between one man and one woman.” In August of 2004, Paul repeated, “I think that marriages should be between a single man and a single woman."

There are reasons that Ron Paul held this position, and he has a right to voice his position in the public sector just as much as you do. His words are not hate propaganda, it is free speech. Would you rather have that people who believe that children deserve a real family life be banned from public discussion? You sound more like Obama than like someone who believes in a message of 'tolerance.' True tolerance should not shun critical dialogue with others..

"To live without a steady struggle for the Truth, that is not living but merely existing" -Piere Giorgio Frassatti

"The problem

"The problem we have faced over the years has been that economic interventionists are swayed by envy, whereas social interventionists are swayed by intolerance of habits and lifestyles. The misunderstanding that tolerance is an endorsement of certain activities, motivates many to legislate moral standards which should only be set by individuals making their own choices. Both sides use force to deal with these misplaced emotions. Both are authoritarians. Neither endorses voluntarism. Both views ought to be rejected." ~ Ron Paul

He believes that marriage is between one man and one woman... the difference between him and you is that he does NOT believe that his opinion on that gives him the authority to define marriage for everyone else.

Ron Paul convert from the Heart of Dixie

Many more "straight" guys

Have sexually abused boys than gay men. Not saying what this guy did wasn't disgusting, but it's clear there's bias trying to pigeonhole gays as molesters. Most gay men are looking for other gay men.

Many more straight guys have

Many more straight guys have sexually abused boys... Incorrect statement. You could have said:
Many more straight guys have sexually abused girls.

Both cases are really bad.

I think we need to weed out and expose these people regardless of their affiliation - straight or gay. Groups and families tend to defend their own regardless of their behavior. However, if you belong to my group - e.g. Catholics - and you misbehave I have the duty to point that out. Many problems arise because we stick with our pack. Human nature.

I also think that pornography has done a lot of harm. People get addicted to it and act out - again gay or straight.

Just wondering, if a guy is straight,

why would they sexually abuse a boy? Doesn't sound very straight to me. How about if we just call them sick or evil regardless of whatever label they apply to themselves?

Someone who is sick or someone who is evil abuses another person.

Thomas Jefferson sought to take care of the problem this way:

http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendVIIIs...

"Whosoever shall be guilty of Rape, Polygamy, or Sodomy with man or woman shall be punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman, by cutting thro' the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch diameter at the least."

And that was in lieu of the death penalty in hopes of reforming, of which Jefferson said,

"And whereas the reformation of offenders, tho' an object worthy the attention of the laws, is not effected at all by capital punishments, which exterminate instead of reforming"

...

No matter how you look at it

These two men were liars and perverts who took the mind and physical body of this little boy and abused it sexually and used him for their own selfish purposes. They are two really sick individuals and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

And, the Social Workers, or whatever government employees they call themselves, who placed this child into that adoptive home should have charges filed against them.

This is so disgusting and so sad. We will never be able to recover the mind of this little boy and have him live a healthy, normal life the rest of his life. He will always be plagued by this experience, and I don't see him living any other life than what he's come from now, and that is truly a tragedy.

This is the exact reason why I have never understood how these social workers in America can place these innocent babies and innocent children into these type of houses. The risk of placing them in these kind of homes increases exponentially. Children are not safe in these homes, and yet, the Obamanoids continue to place them!

Ha ha ha...that politically correct BS

Have you ever heard of NAMBLA?

North American Man Boy Love Association

I rest my case.

While you may have child molestation from every persuasion, the far far majority of man on boy molestation is from homosexual men. It's not even close. The vast majority of man on girl molestation is from heterosexual men. I'm not even sure if I ever heard of a gay man sexually molesting a girl, but I'm sure it's happened.

While the object of molestation is control, it's wrong no matter what or who does it.

Gays are a tiny 2% of the entire population of the United States according to government numbers, I have no proof but I would guess they have a higher percentage do child molesters in their population than do heterosexuals.

Uh...Source please?

The poster has an actual source, you don't, so until I see some evidence I'm siding with the OP.

“My attitude toward progress has passed from antagonism to boredom. I have long ceased to argue with people who prefer Thursday to Wednesday because it is Thursday.” - G.K. Chesterton

Gays like boys straights like

Gays like boys straights like girls. What you are saying is totally false. Look at the news. The evidence is in your face.

Nope! You are flat out wrong

Child molesters molest whatever sex they get their hands on. Usually its through churches or boy scouts and done by "morally upstanding christians". women who molest usually have access to girls who they molest and men with boys...it has ZERO to do with sexual orientation. There have been studies done and you have access to Google if you are truly curious.

lol Are you kidding me?

Morally upstanding Christians molest children? Wow, this is news to me, I wonder why I never got in the habit? Oh wait, that's right, you're completely wrong.

There is nothing "morally upstanding" about anybody who does this stuff, nor is there anything morally upstanding about bowing to the Roman Papacy or allowing yourself to become some goofy independent Baptist/Pentecostal (ergo the two so-called Christian groups responsible for the lion's share of the abuse).

Also, have you actually research most of the perverted men that actually go into the Roman clergy. They pretty well all have a very singular preference and it's not for females.

“My attitude toward progress has passed from antagonism to boredom. I have long ceased to argue with people who prefer Thursday to Wednesday because it is Thursday.” - G.K. Chesterton

whether or not your statement

whether or not your statement is true in absolute numerical terms, i do not know. what i do know is that it is not logically correct to compare absolute numbers when citing two groups with vastly different proportions in any given population. if you are citing actual numbers, you need to cite them per capita, and you need to be using reasonably reliable statistics.

regardless, whats up awl! how are you.

It's generally an open forum here

but what are you trying to accomplish with this post?

This does not show in the

This does not show in the mainstream media. I think the person who posted this is for free speech. There are so many cases like this that you can only read about at the Daily Paul because they will not appear in the MSM

Thank you. that is precisely

Thank you. that is precisely why I posted it.

Christians should not be warmongers! http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html

OP is promoting A.the myth that gays molest B. incite hate

This is an outright attack on gay people and marriage equality. If you can't see that then, great. Have a nice night.

Hmmm.

So if I am understanding you properly, we should suppress any news that could potentially look bad for gay people, regardless to whether or not it's true.

And apparently you don't see a problem with your position here either. When you say "we're all screwed up", I think you mostly speak for yourself here.

“My attitude toward progress has passed from antagonism to boredom. I have long ceased to argue with people who prefer Thursday to Wednesday because it is Thursday.” - G.K. Chesterton