The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!
0 votes

Liberty Day Challenge July 4th 2014

The ONE non-choice for life on Earth, currently, is crime perpetrated upon the innocent targeted victims by those who have stolen the power of money and therefore the power of voluntary association or government.

In other words, DEATH is the RULE.

Destruction is the RULE.

Torture is Legal for the counterfeit authorities.

Mass murder is legal for the counterfeit authorities.

The current number of innocent victims are abandoned until someone, somewhere, picks up the idea, the form, and the reality of genuine voluntary association, or government, whereby the innocent victims are not abandoned, and in between the targeted innocent victims and the criminals (who counterfeit money and authority), in between the victims and the criminals, are defenders of LIBERTY.

No, the skeptics say, the LIARS are "our" only option, we must obey, because they say so, and they make their dictates real if we so much as question those orders, and there are many examples proving that point.

The skeptics are half right, which is how fraud, crime made legal, works.

Yes, the skeptics are right, partially right, in accurately realizing that criminals do exist, and criminals do enforce their crimes upon their targeted victims, so that is true, painfully true.

One example stands out as proof beyond a reasonable doubt.


The criminals who counterfeit authority at the National Level have proven their criminal motives beyond any reasonable doubt, from 1788 with the Usurpation then known as The CONstitutional CONvention, on up to the present day, and on into the future.


The final nail in the coffin of Liberty could be understood as the two headed monster known as The Federal Reserve System of Fraud combined with The Internal Revenue Service of Extortion.

With Liberty securely dead and buried the Legal Criminals at the Bottom of the Crime Ladder to Hell let loose their Global POWER to extract all value from their innocent, and not as innocent, victims.


That is The Business Cycle at the highest magnitude or amplitude imaginable, and it is currently reaching for higher levels of BOOM and BUST.

World War III is being purchased as these words are being typed.

So now you know, the skeptics will never know, and now those who know are seeking remedy.

There is the ONE POWER.


What are the options?

End The FED
End the IRS
Bring the Troops Home.
Do so by July 4th, 2014, start now, finish early.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


This next message is offered as Public Notice.

This is my pathetic attempt to communicate the idea of a canary in a coal mine.

Public Notice

My earlier offers of an opinion from one of the volunteer jurists was, and remains to be, that I am backing off of a narrow focus. That means, in real terms, that I am not involving myself, my will, my energy, my time, my power, in forcing the issue concerning what John Darash believes about 1787, and how diametrically opposed I am to such Rule by Man, Might (supposedly) making Right, Do unto other's before they do unto you, Dictatorship, Tyranny, Monopoly, Monarchy, Earthly Kings, George Washington, Hamilton, and John Adams in particular, and their fraudulent Federalism, and their fraud documented as a false Constitution hatched as slave traders do, and did, in Philadelphia.

Backing off of that narrow focus does not mean that I give up on chipping away, piece by piece, all the other falsehoods that have obviously infected so many people, not just fearless leader. So I back off of a direct frontal assault, face to face, with fearless leader, because doing so can only, as far as I can see right now, cause harm.

So I keep my mind open. I keep studying, and I keep offering one viewpoint from one of the volunteer jurists; one who has experience on a jury.

In that are these words:

Time: 1:50

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

In context to our fate as Americans whose free market, voluntary, federation of autonomous, sovereign, self-defensive, separate, Constitutional, Republics (most with their own competitive versions of a Bill of Rights), were taken from us, by criminals, by criminals calling themselves the "Federalist" PARTY (a.k.a. political faction, a.k.a. organized criminals hiding behind the color of law, seeking dominance as the only power, as Earthly Kings) the CURRENT words spoken by the current whistle blowing reporter daring to report the facts, has, himself, been fooled.

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

That is the same message offered by the Federalists, in deed, not in words. Of course the criminals say one thing, and of course the words sound good, and of course the words end up opposing their deeds.

The pen being mightier than the sword cuts both ways too.

Lies cover up the criminal use of weapons of mass destruction, so lies are mightier (when lies are believed by the fools) than the sword.

So this reporter on this form of information linked, translated into English, repeats the same old, tired, unbelievable, lie, when someone cares to know the actual truth.

First, to repeat the monopoly, lie:

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

Next a competitively more accurate spark of moral conscience, formed into effective defense, realized in time and place:


Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.

Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government,the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely.

As soon as I read that for the first time the message quality was immediately recognizable. That is a concise explanation of free market, open source, voluntary, self-defensive, non-aggressive, non-criminal, able to defend against all enemies of Liberty foreign and domestic, as I have ever read before and to this day.

There are many other similarly constructed messages all through the records of messages offered by our true founders (those against the power grab of 1787, and those for The Declaration of Independence, and a Bill of Rights, and trial by jury according to the true common law), but that offer of words, in that specific context, in that book, sums things up as well as I've ever seen to date.

My pathetic offers of excessive, persistent, redundant, overly complicated, wordy, messages do not compete well with that message in those quotes above, but there is context.

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

Between 1776 and 1787, in America, there was, in fact, proven, demonstrated, something that has been, something most certainly was not the same old power grab, so claims that "there never has been any other" are false, since there has been, between 1776 and 1787 something other than abject belief in falsehood without question.

What was something other than abject belief in falsehood without question was powerful enough, defensively, to defend Liberty against the largest criminal organization then destroying all life on earth.

Now, unfortunately, those who taught the Nazis, those who taught the Communists, those who taught Pol Pot, and financed all of them, are our home grown versions of fearless leaders, cult of personality strong men redo, a standard fraud, the same old thing, dictators, whose strings are still being pulled by the same types of Money Changers that ruled, criminally, in the time of Jesus.


"In addition to imposing a web of hierarchy on the Continental Army, Washington crushed liberty within by replacing individual responsibility by iron despotism and coercion. Severe and brutal punishments were imposed upon those soldiers whose sense of altruism failed to override their instinct for self-preservation. Furloughs were curtailed and girlfriends of soldiers were expelled from camp; above all, lengthy floggings were introduced for all practices that Washington considered esthetically or morally offensive. He even had the temerity to urge Congress to raise the maximum number of strikes of the lash from 39 to the enormous number of 500; fortunately, Congress refused."

Does that sound at all familiar?

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

Military people know this stuff, perfectly well, as to how wars are won by defenders, and how wars are lost by stupid, dictatorial, wasteful, users of Cannon Fodder.

Users of Cannon Fodder must consume their own so as to "justify" their position as Strong Man, Cult of Personality, and Fearless Leader, or Fuehrer.

During the Revolutionary War the voluntary militia, combined with constitutional republic military units (some more voluntary than others in those 13 Republics), fought a mixture of gorilla warfare, taught in part by the Indians, and standard, dictatorial, involuntary Military Tactics.

If you care to know about Military Tactics, from one of America's best, then consider looking into the life, and work, of John Boyd.

Here is a start:

He was one who did not tolerate, stupid, dictatorial, false, authorities.

What about this:

Someone calling into the Monday Conference Call offered some very wise advice concerning the absolute necessity of finding original copies of wet ink documents so as to defend against the obvious methods of the criminals when the criminals counterfeit the official record.

Again, concentrating on deeds, not so much the words, of dictators, the events defined by the Federalists as soon as they stole power, including the conscription of an aggressive army of tax collectors, this so called Whiskey Rebellion, as that Watermelon Army invaded a formerly independent, sovereign, self-defensive, Republic, that was once Pennsylvania, BEFORE, the criminals incorporated it, monopolized it, cartelized it, took it over, by PEN, and then by violent aggression.

That was 1794.

What was done easily to the people in America, enslaving them with false belief in false leaders, is not so easily done in Europe.

"We are talking about a standard global order, in deed there has never been any other, in which there is a constant battle for the lead."

Those people have a much longer history dealing with what they are led to believe to be the only way.

The monopoly way.

The might makes right (tm) way.

Is there any evidence of another way?

Not if you don't look.

Back to the conversation in Russia at time 34:27

Note how those defenders defending against the slaughtering of innocent people are blaming the Americans who control Mass Media.


Common denominators:

Innocent people trying desperately to warn each other concerning their temporal salvation in the face of abject evil as innocent people are being tortuously, horribly, and massively slaughtered.


The Mass Media controlled by the opposition (Americans blame the Communists, and the Russians, who are no longer communist a.k.a. no longer Bolsheviks, the Russians blame Americans) spin the news by offering half truths, which sound really cool, believable, but the actual facts turn out to be quite the opposite.


Back to here:

That book has to do with the buildup of armies on two sides, financed by ancillary, capillary, veins, branching out from a root power, or Central Monopoly of Control. The book has to do with mounting antagonisms born out of a Dirty Compromise that began in Philadelphia 20 years earlier, that book has to do with a man named Madison, a Federalist, who parted ways with the criminal Monarchists, and joined forces with one of the so called Anti-Federalist, or Democratic Republicans, in opposition to the Involuntary Union.

That book offers this:

But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.

To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter.

Born out of 1787, and the Dirty Compromise, in America, where the slave traders divided up the spoils of their victory, the slaves, dividing, sharing, but only temporarily sharing, as honor among thieves is as counterfeit as the money they offer to their victims, the result was the inevitable clash of Monopolists, each seeking to dominate their respective slaves, and as always there is an aggressor initiating the violence, and as always the first casualty is the truth, as to who fires first.

The first shot was a bunch of criminals signing a document in Philadelphia, sealing the fate of millions.

Born from that Dirty Deal was control over legal money, as envisioned by countless criminals since, again, at least the time of Jesus.

Hamilton's First Bank of the United States was defeated, in part, by the work of someone named Jackson, no friend of the hated Indian, friend of genocide, but certainly not a friend of the Roman Catholic Jesuit Order, their Bank of England, and their subsidiary, ancillary, arm in these Colonies hidden behind this false Federation.

So Jackson kills the Central Bank in America, and someone shot Hamilton.


Divide and conquer.

The only way. The only way.

Unless one cares to look, and unless one cares to question their firm belief in the only way.

A time of Wild Cat Banking ensues, and again animosities over who owns which lot of victims resumes, but what ever did happen to those papers penned, in ink, by Madison and Jefferson?

I wonder what the unabridged, un-doctored, un-spun, un-edited, versions look like.

Here are some official looking copies:

"Furthermore, the Federalists were passing numerous controversial laws, including the Whiskey tax (which led to the Whiskey Rebellion), a law establishing the First Bank of the United States, and finally, the Alien and Sedition Acts."

So, history buffs, in need of some entertainment, not that the information could do anyone any good, ever, but what wrongdoings were done in Massachusetts whereby those wrongdoings inspired Shays's Rebellion?

Can I offer a quick summary?

The wrongdoers tried to enslave peaceful people in Canada, going out on a war of aggression, and these people lost, so the money they spent to pay for the criminal army was gone, spent, consumed, no more, and they had nothing to show for their efforts, no spoils of victory, no plunder, no loot. So what do do, what to do, what to do? How abut this idea? An idea at least as old as Jesus!

Why don't we print even more fraud money to pay ourselves for our trouble, we pay ourselves in gold, but we pay everyone else, not in our group, with fraud money, and in order to get the gold, we tax those idiot farmers for daring to create their own money, in the form of whiskey, and we tell them that they have to pay us in gold.

Wonderful idea?

So that works out as expected. The idiot farmers start using the same tactics used to fight the criminal British, same tactics, peaceful tactics, using facts, using networks of volunteers, using accurate accounting, gaining currency by inspiring a Spirit of Liberty, and when that does not work, the idiot farmers move in more forceful ways to shut down the Chancellery Courts where the bankers are enforced debt collection. When that doesn't work there are ex-Revolutionary War veterans leading the way to follow their duties declared in that independence document signed back in 1776, July 4th.

As expected, thousands of people joined forces on the Revolutionary side, and as expected the criminals worked effectively to crush that Spirit of Liberty in Massachusetts.

So, as expected, the tax on whiskey, payable in gold, whereby there was no gold because the fraud money drove out the gold (Gresham's Law) resulted in violent conflict between those who are lead by such things as The Declaration of Independence, on one side, call them Rebels, Levelers, Rabble, Insurgents, Terrorists, and Revolutionary Friends of Liberty, or call them by their names, but know what happened, please.

So that happened.

So why did someone come up with the bright idea to do the same thing again?

Why did, after 1994, when the Federalist Party Strong Man conscripted an army of tax collectors, invading a former Sovereign Republic, why did, after that tax collection agency did its work, why did Madison, who actually helped sell off our Liberty in Philadelphia, combine forces with Jefferson in 1798?

So there were those Kentucky Resolutions, ink on paper, penned by Jefferson.

How about the Virginia Resolutions?'

That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

That the General Assembly doth also express its deep regret, that a spirit has in sundry instances, been manifested by the federal government, to enlarge its powers by forced constructions of the constitutional charter which defines them; and that implications have appeared of a design to expound certain general phrases (which having been copied from the very limited grant of power, in the former articles of confederation were the less liable to be misconstrued) so as to destroy the meaning and effect, of the particular enumeration which necessarily explains and limits the general phrases; and so as to consolidate the states by degrees, into one sovereignty, the obvious tendency and inevitable consequence of which would be, to transform the present republican system of the United States, into an absolute, or at best a mixed monarchy.

And the Federalist Party Leadership says bla, bla, bla, where are my spin doctors?

Basically, you can take your Liberty and firmly, rigorously, stuff it where the sun don't shine?


Nearing that time again.

This effort repeats.

Some evidence of events that constitute a Liberty Day are reported here:

Another record of events that constitute a Liberty Day are reported here:

I am relatively sure that Liberty involves the power individuals defend, on their own authority, to nurture their own God given moral conscience.

I contend, if needed, that trial by jury is a competitive method for ensuring that defenders help each other defend the innocent from the guilty in time and place.


Unified Defense if Liberty when?

Work Group Proposal

Blame or credit as you wish, on your own authority, me, Joe Kelley, for my offer to you.

Membership Roster:

Joe Kelley

That is all?

If you are interested:

1. Reply in writing right here in this Topic
2. e-mail or
3. Phone Joe Kelley 760-447-7139

If you are not interested:

1. Reply in writing right here in this Topic
2. e-mail or
3. Phone Joe Kelley 760-447-7139

Brief Explanation:

Our common defense of every one of the people, including the criminals, and more importantly including the innocent victims, depends upon our common ability to deter crime through written words offered as a vital part of our common law.

If we are too ignorant to read and write common law, then it may be a good idea to band together into a work group whereby those members of the work group learn from each other in a precise, focused, competitive, adaptive, improving, methodology that begins with the assembling of the volunteers into at least 25 members.

If you don't like the idea, if the idea is rejected, at least consider voicing your complaints to one of the National Liberty Alliance Common Law Grand Jury Administrators, Organizers, and Coordinators in this Constitutional Republic of California.

If anyone has any complaints on other subject matter, other than this proposal, consider contacting me too.

1. Reply in writing right here on this Forum
2. e-mail or
3. Phone Joe Kelley 760-447-7139



Combining membership names here in this investment of coordinating California State Common Law Documentation is now one. One name.

I all of California there is one name on the Unified California Common Law Grand Jury Work Group.

That is not to say that there are not advocates of common law working to pick up our common due process and begin defending people effectively, case by case, in any case.

I think it would be a good idea to document those cases, as success is earned, and as failure are realized, along the way.

Let it be known, please, there is at least one Unified California Common Law Grand Jury Work Group Member.

I have an adviser, who happens to be the San Bernardino County secretary, elected during the constituting meeting, which is a provisional San Bernardino County Common Law Grand Jury, as you can see, few people in California, let alone San Bernardino County, are willing to volunteer, at least with me, to work on our first case, in this Work Group.

That is not to say that nothing is happening in California.

Two days ago I was called by Rob. Look here:

That could be The Unified California Common Law Grand Jury Case employed in all counties in California, or it can be the one case employed in one county.

Which is better?

Is it better for all the people in California to be divided and fighting all their own separate battles in their own turf, seeking what they alone think is justice in that single case, or is it a better idea for all the people to slay the biggest dragon first?

Is it necessary that everyone, ever single one, has to face Goliath on their own, hoping that God is backing each one of us in our case against Goliath?

If it is necessary, then I am pissing in the wind, of course, but I think it may be a good idea to form a Unified Californian Common Law Grand Jury Work Group, and we the defenders in California can work on our first case unanimously. We the people can form a unanimous judgment on our first case, a case that leaves absolutely no room for doubt as to who are the victims and who are the criminals in our first case, and our first case can be replicated in every county in California, all at the same time.

A rock solid case, such as the case already formed well by Rob.

The story does not stop there, in California.

Yesterday I was called by a beautiful woman named Grace. She happens to be on a similar case as the case documented by Rob. Grace tells me she is a typical Jewish mom, from New York, a small harmless, lady, and she just happens to be able to defeat Goliath all on her own. This is not legal fiction, as Grace, or Gracie, can explain in great detail, step by step, how the crook banks (at least those who prove to be crooks in those counterfeit banks) are working to steal the homes out from under innocent victims.

So there are two sources of the wealth of the people in the form of well document knowledge as those two people work to go up against Goliath on their own separate, divided, paths.

Why are they not working together? Why do they not have at least 25 people in a Unified California Common Law Grand Jury Work Group to help them if they need help?

They called me.

I pointed them to this place. How can I get them together and what will I suggest that they do in moving their cases into ONE case that cannot lose?

One case that cannot lose because at least 25 people unanimously agree that the victims named in the cause of action are victims, and that the criminals who are also named in the cause of action are criminals, and the evidence is so solid that no one in their right mind, no one on any jury, and no one not on a jury, no one at all, could refute, in any way, the facts, or the law, in the case, whereby there is no reasonable doubt, at all, as to guilt in that case.

And that case can work in every single county, in this place we call California.

I can try to get Pete in Orange county on this case. I can try to encourage everyone to constitute, and then reconstitute, and then reconstitute, their counties, it does not require excessive costs to constitute, and if constituting can be done once, by some people, then constituting can be done twice by other people, who stops anyone from picking up common law due process and moving the cart down the road defending innocent people effectively?

Who are the gate keepers baring the door and forbidding the people from our common defense of each other?

We the people.

We the people either defend we the people or we WILL be run over by enemies foreign and domestic.


Chipping away

I do not have the power to control this Forum in a way that arranges the information according to my sense of coordination or organizing, so the flow of information will be haphazard, from my own view, let alone someone else who drops into this stream.

Grace called me and sent me onto the trail of very important information. Some may say that my duties as National Liberty Alliance California State Coordinator are thereby neglected as someone outside of our common law divides my attention, my focus, away from Constituting California Counties.

I say no. I say the carrot is much more POWERFUL than is the stick.

Assembling our first case in California can inspire people to add their own names to the list of victims, to the list of defenders, to the list of jurists in the pool, to the list of organizers in the county, to the list of administrators in the county, to the list of secretaries in the county, to the list of grand jurists in the pool, to the list of petit (pronounced petty) in the pool.

Hold on:

Listen to that pronunciation a few times, say the word right, it may be a good idea in court to say the word right. It is not necessary, but we are not going to allow ourselves to go back to sticks and stones as our defense, so there may be reasons why things are done a certain way and this is one of those things that may begin to make sense on this path.

I think about a Red Coat, a British Mercenary who looks down upon the people in our country, and looks down upon our common law trial by jury. The funny part about such a notion, this looking down upon our common law, or petit jury, is that the effective method used by the people to defend the people once worked in England, so those High Brow, Brown Nosers, HAD a defense. They lost it. We have not.

We are the true blue bloods, those in the blue coats, those who are not having fun rioting in the blood of our own countrymen, and women, and babies, running amok torturing, murdering, and enslaving the weak for a bag of silver or gold coins.

We are the people of America and if we use the words in unison, we are on the same page, so Gerard and John say Petit one way, and the Dictionary says it another way, so which way is our way?


"From the day on which an accommodation takes place between England and America, on any other terms than as independent States, I shall date the ruin of this country. a politic minister will study to lull us into security by granting us the full extent of our petitions. The warm sunshine of influence would melt down the virtue which the violence of the storm rendered more firm and unyielding. In a state of tranquillity, wealth, and luxury, our descendants would forget the arts of war and the noble activity and zeal which made their ancestors invincible. Every art of corruption would be employed to loosen the bond of union which renders our resistance formidable. When the spirit of liberty, which now animates our hearts and gives success to our arms, is extinct, our numbers will accelerate our ruin and render us easier victims to tyranny. Ye abandoned minions of an infatuated ministry, if peradventure any should yet remain among us, remember that a Warren and Montgomery are numbered among the dead. Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say, What should be the reward of such sacrifices? Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, and plow, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom--go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!"

Inspirational music?

So...rolling up sleeves and getting to work WHILE the gun battles are not yet consuming everyone. The common law battle is a paperwork battle, and those words are straight from John Darash, so I think I am in good company.

Before I set out on this case in the middle of the incuplatory evidence, before I am sent down the rabbit hole into those bits and pieces offered by both Rob and Grace, I want to regain my proper footing, my common law, common defense, paperwork, footing.

I need not go all the way back to ancient Germany, and I don't need to go all the way back to ancient Rome, or England, or back to Magna Carte, or even back to The Declaration of Independence. All I need to do at this point is establish the common law acknowledge as the law of this land at the time the Voluntary Union of Federated Republics were formed into a common law basis, as a Federalized Union of those Constitutionally Limited Republics numbering 13, or so, at that time. That time was a time when Republics were forming, such as the Republic (a.k.a State) of Franklin, which was not accepted into the Federation (Union), and instead the Republic (a.k.a. State) of Tennessee was formed in roughly the same area of ground on Earth.


Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury

I will not add the fine print because the fine print allows too much room for what is known as "construction" of "opinion" concerning the meanings of words.

Remember the tactics used by our enemies, and here are 4 examples that should not be too far outside of your common law memory (in my opinion):

Enemies LIE BIG:





In that last reference Hamilton in the so called "Federalist Papers" claimed that it was a good idea to create Executive POWER to Tax the people directly to pay off National Debt, so as to increase National Credit, which was the classic bait and switch, and once in office Hamilton as Secretary of the (stolen) Treasury immediately ordered Washington into forming an aggressive army for profit to crush what was a money competitor in Pennsylvania; that was later written into history (falsely) as The Whiskey Rebellion.

The common law method by which people are injured by the power of government is ONLY by common law trial by jury, which is ONLY by presentment or indictment by a common law Grand Jury.

The assembling of a conscripted army of slaves taken out of all the captured Republics (captured by a money fraud and tax extortion racket) to invade one of the former Republics so as to then crush a money competitor and enforce extortion payments is our history of our country, or our Nation, even if you refuse to see it.

Do not get far from our true founders words, please:

"Mr. President it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth - and listen to the song of the siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and to provide for it."

We the people of California (so far just one of the people named Joe Kelley) is building a case on SOLID FOUNDATIONS.

Back to here:

Amendment V

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

The beginnings of the fraud and the extortion were already written into place at the time of the founding which was 1776 and The Declaration of Independence, then The Articles of Confederation formed out of a Continental Congress (NOT A CON CON) and then the CON CON after the Revolutionary War whereby traitors infiltrating our number were smelled as RATS and smoked out of their hiding places, as the true Founders turned on the lights of truth, but alas, the power of the Major Media at the time fooled enough people into adopting the so called Constitution, but not without a fight, and out of that fight, as the record shows, are The Bill of Rights championed by our true founders.

That rich history is all over our World Wide Web for anyone to study such as:

Don't lose sight of the need to construct the common law framework by constituting common law grand juries in each county, step, by step, according to the methods already well done (not perfectly well done) here:

Every time a group meets you can quickly reconstitute as a beginning to your meetings, after prayer if no one objects to prayer, I do not object to prayer, I just have my own way of praying, something I have as my own connection to God, having no one at all in between me and God, no books, no advice, no commands, from no human beings whatsoever, just me and God, connected at his exclusive say so, or hers, and the connection in my case is fuzzy, so I try to listen, but again the connection I have is fuzzy, and I don't need any help making the connection worse.

Building a foundation, constituting, making our first case real, is multitasking, but I can chew gum for a minute, walk for a minute, chew gum for a minute, on and on, and I can get down the road.

When the case is going to involve the interests of the counterfeiters who run the counterfeit (foreign) banks, then it may be a good idea to build the foundation on SOLID GROUND, which does involve the original founding of the counterfeit Central Bank here in America. Remember, please, that the concept of a Central Bank Fraud (combining an involuntary tax extortion racket or "IRS") is older than Communism, so the Communists merely stole the blueprint and copied it into their Communist Manifesto. We the people in America allowed that to happen here despite the wise advice offered by our true founders that can be easily explained to anyone who cares to know in those Anti-Federalists Papers and those RAT-ification documents from Virginia, if not, you can go back to the Con Con Con Job whistle blowing blown out in that document written by the true patriots who attended that Con Con Con Job.

Continental Congress (assembly of representatives from each Constitutional Republic)
Con Con Con Job (infiltration of RATS that are easy to smell and smoke out from their dark places merely by turning on the light of truth and they scatter like roaches and RATS)

Patrick Henry was not the only one smelling the putrid rat smell.

The Rats were after a Money Fraud (Central Bank) and a Nation Wide or Country Wide Extortion Collection Cabal.

They got it, and we are building the case against it.

I sure hope Rob and Gracie, or Grace, can help here. I may call them later, Meanwhile the case must be built by someone.

What do we have so far?

Grand Jury presentments and indictments as the ONLY lawful way the people can actually punish anyone according to our common defense against criminals, also knowable as our common law.

Common law is named, in fact, into the law of our land, as an established matter of fact, right there in The Bill of Rights, right there in the 7th Amendment thanks to our tried and true Founders, and no thanks to those who work to make slavery legal in this world, and this country, and this Nation, and in each Constitutional Republic in this Federation, in each county, in each city, in each corporation, in each church, in each town, in each family, in each of their targeted, individual, souls, as they capture each one of us at birth, sell our productive capacity on their counterfeit markets, and they rake in the wealth, and they spend the stolen loot, and they laugh all the way to their fraudulent banks as they increase their rate of pay at their exclusive pleasure, as their victims fight over the remaining scraps of meat, which is a pound of flesh taken from each other, as they make rats out of all of us.

Case in point:

"I beg to differ. Although understanding the text is difficult, it helps the reader if they know their Greek mythology. When Patrick Henry says "We are apt to shut our eyes against the painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she turns us into beasts." he is refering to the Greek storyteller Homer and his story of "The Odyssey". Sirens were these creatures who's song could temp any man and lure them away from their courses. TO which these sirens would eat them after they sunk the men's ships. Henry was referring to Circe and how she lured the men into her home, fed them and then turned them into pigs to eat them."

That from this:

News travels slowly? That was way back in time, way back, but here, now, we have a battle to fight on paper, so as to avoid another pogrom.

That is a useful word:
"1880–85; (< Yiddish ) < Russian pogróm literally, destruction, devastation (of a town, country, etc., as in war), noun derivative of pogromít’, equivalent to po- perfective prefix + gromít’ to destroy, devastate, derivative of grom thunder "

Have you constituted your county yet?


I may be able to help, but you have to get in gear.

I want to build the case, you may be able to help.

Gracie, or Grace, already knows how to slay Goliath on her own. Rob already has a very large volume of legal documentation on the case.

The case is simple.

Here are a number of victims, all of which have be fooled into borrowing money so as to then gain obsession of a home. Little did all those people know about the trap being set upon them.

Well, I think that Gracie, and Rob, need help too. They may slay their Goliath on their own, but what about the rest of the victims in California?

What about the rest of the victims all over this Nation, or this country?

How about this:

There is a lot of wealth in that information, and here is a condensation:


Free; not holden of any lord or superior; owned without obligation of vassalage or fealty; the opposite of feudal.
as found in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.


Land held absolutely in one's own right, and not of any lord or superior; and not subject to feudal duties or burdens.
as found in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

When property is held in allodium, all police powers are removed from the property. There are no building permits required and there are no property taxes (feudal duties) due. When property is held in allodium, the title is called a Land Patent.

The central banker criminals, going all the way back to Hamilton, not going any further back as further back goes back to England, were after our souls, not our land, they can wipe us off the land as they please, they are after all criminals, rather than wipe us off our land, they capture our souls instead.

They make us believe that they have our authority to defend ourselves, and we no longer have that authority once their lie captures us, but we do not come from that foundation.

We come from another foundation.

"When property is held in allodium, all police powers are removed from the property. There are no building permits required and there are no property taxes (feudal duties) due. When property is held in allodium, the title is called a Land Patent."

That is our true foundation. We the people are kings and queens in our castles on our land, end of story, period, go back to the criminals who hatched you, lizard, rat, whatever, go from us in peace, and forget something. I did not forget, but the words ought to be understood as good advice, so here I go again reaching for relevant quotes in building the case:

"From the day on which an accommodation takes place between England and America, on any other terms than as independent States, I shall date the ruin of this country. a politic minister will study to lull us into security by granting us the full extent of our petitions. The warm sunshine of influence would melt down the virtue which the violence of the storm rendered more firm and unyielding. In a state of tranquillity, wealth, and luxury, our descendants would forget the arts of war and the noble activity and zeal which made their ancestors invincible. Every art of corruption would be employed to loosen the bond of union which renders our resistance formidable. When the spirit of liberty, which now animates our hearts and gives success to our arms, is extinct, our numbers will accelerate our ruin and render us easier victims to tyranny. Ye abandoned minions of an infatuated ministry, if peradventure any should yet remain among us, remember that a Warren and Montgomery are numbered among the dead. Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say, What should be the reward of such sacrifices? Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, and plow, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom--go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!"

Beware, please, as any one of us, in time and place, may be offered a deal, a deal offered by the sounds emitting from the sirens, a deal too good to be true, a something for nothing plan, and if we take that deal, then may our chains sit lightly upon us, and may posterity forget that we were our countrymen and women.

The deal is a lie, and the trap is set, and the souls are captured, and the way it is done is fraud, so all that has to be done is to follow the paperwork back to the source, and there will be the fraud, caught red handed with hands firmly planted into the cookie jar, and unfortunately for a lot of poor innocent children, those criminals are going to be also caught with their pants down, working on those children, as The Franklin Case should suffice to wake up any parent here in this country.

I do not want to divide, divert, misdirect, or otherwise get too far off of this mortgage fraud case, but that should inspire any parent into right action, if we go after the criminals at the end of this dark rainbow, we will find those criminals too, the paper trail left by the criminals goes all the way back to the International Monetary FUND and those stolen funds are how those foreign troops are paid for their services, in rioting in our blood.

The same "that depends upon what is is" Clinton, married to the other Bengazi Gate Clinton, if that can be remotely considered a marriage, common law or otherwise, was in on the cover-up of those autopsy reports in that case where children were experimented on no different than the so called doctors in Nazi Germany, so all that is coming to a theater of operation near you, already in Nevada, just barely averting another pogrom in that so called stand-off, and so get out of your slumber and constitute a grand jury in your county now.

What is the cost of doing so?

What is the cost of not doing so?

Here is how well the Counterfeit Courts work:

No, that is relatively minor, that is not minor to the minor who was thereby ruined while the so called "law" destroyed that family right in court, right in front of the camera, and right in front of the so called judge.

When the so called President (is is Clinton) presides over the torture (for months) babies, experimenting on babies, and burning to death those babies, and then presides over a court case whereby the survivors of the pogrom are tried by a jury as to their guilt (guilty of surviving the order to be burned to death) and the jury fails to convict, the so called judge orders punishment anyway. Trial by counterfeit jury cannot be more precisely exemplified in the case where the survivors of the pogrom in Waco were punished for failure to be burned alive at that stake, where the criminals have staked a claim on the souls of everyone born in this country, or this Nation. Those criminals are both foreign and domestic, and if anyone thinks they are going to invest in a fair trial in a counterfeit court run by criminals at the top, and ignorant people in the lower levels, then they are sadly deluded.

We the people have our common law, our grand juries, our presentments, our indictments, and we can win this battle on paper, or the shooting starts, and we lose our Liberty as that shot is heard around the world.

Sorry to say the shooting has already started, few are listening.

How can someone not hear the shots fired in Waco?

I don't know, I heard, and I ended up on the ballot in California for Congress (Continental Congress in my case, not Con Con Con Job if elected in my case) in 1996.

Proof (for those who are wise about checking evidence carefully):

JOSEPH T. KELLEY U.S. Rep in Congress District 40 Libertarian
RESIDENCE ( ) - BUSINESS (619) 256-2649

Now 760-447-7139

If the goons are coming to get my guns, or take my children, they know where to find me, so why should I entertain some nebulous false sense of security as I pretend to hide under a rock?

The light is on, and I do not run like a RAT or a ROACH.

Not me. Not on my watch. I am not perfect. I am much the sinner from a Religious viewpoint. But I stand up to be counted as one of those who will not stand down.

Music time (I play the guitar now so I like music, yes, thanks for the ear):

As anyone can see, I need help building this case.

Here are many victims. How many?

How did that start? What was the founding of it? How can we defend against it if we do not know how it started?


How many slaves are there in this Nation?

How much can we the criminals get from each slave, realistically?

What happens when the plan runs out of time?

Before I offer the bad news as to the answer of that last question it is appropriate to offer the solution to the bad news. The solution to the bad news is to build the common law case against it, and then pull that plug.

The bad news is that the criminals take everything out of any area on earth, anything that can be stolen, and they move that power as Capital flight, investing into the next winner of the next World War and that winner is China.

Who do you think is behind the land grab in Nevada?

Sorry about the bad news, really I am, it was very hard for me to get past my unwillingness to know the truth, I can sympathize, really I can, but that doesn't do much good, does it?

Step by step, and constituting a grand jury in your county is one step involving another step.

Compete, throw your hat in the ring, do better, teach me, please, show me how I can do better, please.

As John says we are running out of time, and we are, many of us, right at the gates of hell, and some of us have already been burned alive, or sent to prison for failing to be burned alive, so stand up, be counted, start counting, as you are already spoken for, you are already claimed, you are already sold, and you are being marched off into a torturous existence and an unnatural death, even if you absolutely refuse to acknowlege the painful truth.


Judge who?

Nuts, I must be insane. Outside digging, a decision to plant tomatoes, instead of working for more Federal Reserve Notes to pay the bills being demanded to be paid in Federal Reserve Notes, and while digging found a root obviously leading back to tree about, I don't know, about 5 meters, or about 15 feet from the place I decided to finally dig a hole to move the plants out of the pot.

I'm thinking about the guy who is in jail for the crime of what, the crime of questioning the order to obey without question, now a crime here in good ole' U.S.A., and I'm thinking, hey.

Hey yall, hey you, anyone, does the farmer ask the dirt for permission to move out of its place so as to make room for a tomato plant?

Am I going to wait for permission?

Does the victim ask for permission from the criminal to please, pretty please, take less from me so that you are weaker and I am stronger?

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.

The dirt says no, and the dirt says never ask that stupid question again, or the dirt is going to consume me, and the dirt is going to send me the bill charging me for all the trouble I've caused the dirt?

I can't get out of my mind the attack dogs trained to attack on command and instead those attack dogs refused to attack innocent people in Nevada.

I have to find that video as that video was one of those events that transpired in real time, and I was witness to it. Which reminds me of something my mother told me about her watching Kennedy as he was slaughtered in Texas some time ago. She saw something live that she never saw again, but her memory was not an accurate account, not as is a video taken live, and a video that is not counterfeited by the counterfeiters among us.

So I can look for that video, not as a distraction away from constituting grand juries in every county in this country, this Nation, this Constitutional Republic of California, not as a diversion from building the case against the worst evil cabal ever to disgrace our kind, not to distract me from growing some food that can compete with the GMO crap, but to highlight a very significant event I was not witnessing on the spot, but a very significant event that I witnessed live during a live feed through this World Wide Web that connects so many people like a tree trunk.

Our common law can be aided by our ready connection to each other.

The event, in words, not in video, not unless I can find the video, was an attack dog ordered to obey the order to attack an innocent victim, and the attack dog found the moral temerity, the moral courage, to disobey that criminal order.

Suppose, for a minute Joe, as I have no one else here working in this Unified California Common Law Grand Jury Work Group, just me, just insane little ole' me, the crazy conspiracy theorists who stupidly ran for congress, and other stupid things done by this crazy, stupid Joe, me, now talking to myself, wait a minute, suppose you, Joe, did not actually see what you saw, and suppose you are wrong?

Suppose, for a minute, that the commander of the attack dog was not more of a beast than was the dog.

Suppose, for a minute, that I am making this up, and it is not true that a dog, a canine, a beast, was NOT, in fact, more moral than the beast ordering the dog to attack the innocent victim.

OK, Joe, suppose you are making this up, and with that in mind, I think you, Joe, ought to check it out, because you, Joe, should not be so quick to judge.

The picture is easy to find, but the video record may not be as easy to find.

Here is the picture:

That is a clear case of a crime in progress, by the way, but that does not actually prove my case concerning which species, in that case, is proving to be more beastly.

Now, think about that please, what can a victim of a mad dog do in cases where a mad dog is running amok among the regular old people in this country.

Here is a mad dog.


Here is a mad dog, see the mad dog, there is the mad dog, look there is a mad dog, got it?

OK, Joe, come on, I'm not stupid, so right, there is the mad dog.

Here are innocent people, perhaps your child, perhaps a child down the street, and there is a mad dog, there is your child, there is a mad dog, there is a child, there is the mad dog, there is a child.

Joe, did you get stuck in a loop?

No, the mad dog and the child are separated by you.

Do you ask the mad dog to please, please, please, not eat me?

Please don't eat me, dog, I know you are a mad dog, obviously, the evidence is clearly foaming at your mouth, so please, please, don't, don't, stop, don't, stop, don't, stop, don't eat me.

Ok, so that works, and the dog runs past you, onto the child, so you reapeat, don't, stop, don't, stop, don't, stop, to the mad dot.

That don't work either.

So, what do you do now, you go back to work as the mad dog finishes up on that child, moving to the next one, and you earn so many debt notes from the Federal Reserve System of Fraud where they have this International Monetary FUND, and then you send roughly half of your earnings, your hard earned life blood, so to speak, your blood, sweat, and tears, your wealth, you send roughly half to this Protection Racket, and you expect to be protected in that investment opportunity of a life time.

Meanwhile the mad dog is chewing up more children.

Got it.

Ok, what does that have to do with anything Joe?

Asking the mad dog to stop chewing me up does not work. Sending my power to defend myself to those who are worse than dogs, worse than mad dogs, is a good idea?

Asking those who are worse than mad dogs for permission to stop paying them everything of value produced by anyone, including innocent children, is a good idea?

What can be expected on this investment in people who are worse than mad dogs path?

Should I plant tomatoes or just go insane?

You be the judge.


Compounding errors?

My mistake. I can admit to making mistakes when evidence is overwhelming.

Please excuse me. Forgive me, please.


Ron Paul on target as usual

Look people, please, there is a very serous falsehood working to divide us so as to make us very weak, and ripe for our torturous demise at the hands of very seriously insane psychopaths.

The way out of this is simple and easy compared to all the many ways we the people can be est against each other in time and place.

Even if only one case is tried according to Grand Jury presentment and indictment, proceeding according to the common law, as acknowledge in The Bill of Rights as the law of this entire land, the law of the land, that precedent diffuses this whole institution.

Allow the psychopaths to proceed and all the land will be controlled, and all the value of the land will be controlled, and thereby all the people will be controlled by the psychopathy who are investing in World War III, to back them up in case their plan to enslave us goes awry.

This is so simple, a child can see this, a dog may be able to see this, I'm still not sure about my judgement after looking closer at that video of the criminals commanding a well trained dog to attack an innocent man, and an innocent woman.

It was as if the dog was looking back at the criminal asking: "Are you sure, dude, are you really commanding me to attack that woman, really? Like man, really, I'm not a mad dog, seriously dude, I'm not what you think I am, really, I don't obey every criminal order without question, like man, really, do you think I'm a beast? I'm a dog for Christ's sake, come on dude, really?"

So the criminal order to attack innocent people, in a common law grand jury investigation, leading to presentments, to indictments, traces back the order from the dog, who didn't obey the criminal order, to the BLM stooge who did obey the criminal order, back to the next criminal, to the next, and the case goes all the way back to China, from China all the way back to The International Monetary FUND, and the whole thing goes down.

Now, think, would it be better to get ahead of this crap and return all those units of earnings stolen from all of the people so that the people are then secure in their homes, in their property, and they can afford to start businesses and employ all those people who are no longer going to be warehoused in the system of fraud and extortion?

The whole Economic Collapse Theory is founded on as much fraud, threats, and aggressive violence as is the Counterfeit Banking System and the Extortion Tax (IRS) Scam, and the Admiralty/Maritime/Commercial Court System that work so well to BAR the gates into our common law grand jury due process.



What gives?

I must be going crazy. A dog knows common law better than people?

Who cannot see the next Waco happening while we watch helplessly?

Who cannot see the very real working accurately way to end this nightmare?

Here is ONE victim.

Here is ONE criminal.

Here is the dog that knows better, refusing to obey the order to injure innocent people at the command of beasts, for the pleasure and profits of insane psychopaths.

Here are people wondering what to do.

Here are people flocking to the place where the insane psychopaths could, conceivably, escalate up to the limit, which is what?

Did you not see what was done to those people in Waco?

Did you not see what was done to those people who had the unmitigated gall to refuse to be burned alive?

Can you not see how one victim tried according to our common law, presentments and indictments issued out of a grand jury, and the situation is time and place is diffused on the spot.

Take the one criminal ordering the dog to attack as the first case.

Stop being diverted into the game of claiming The FEDS, or any THING at all, it is even worse than blaming the DOG, the dog won't even obey the order to be stupid, so why would anyone blame a THING, for what that criminal did when that criminal ordered the dog to attack the innocent victim.

So the accurate account, the focus of all defensive action, the cause of action, is the crime, and the accurate account is that the criminal in the common law case is the criminal ordering the attack on the innocent victim.

So where is our common law court system whereby the grand jury produces the presentment, or the indictment, to end this very destructive display of inanity in Nevada?

The indictment moves from the grand jury, or the presentment moves from the grand jury, in that county, moves to the sheriff, and if follows the criminal order to obstruct due process, then he is added to the list of names on the list of criminals CAUSING this crime, causing this action, the cause of action, the reason for working effectively in defense of the named victim named on the presentment or indictment.

Look DOG, look, there is the actual criminal.

Do you see the DOG in the video looking around, wondering who to bark at?

We the people are worse than dogs?

Bark at The FED.

Bark, bark, bark.

The FED didn't do it. Someone with a name orders down the chain of command of their criminal organization, and the obedient minions follow the orders without question, and then on the scene the cooler heads prevail, and that cooler head is a dog?


Send me the bill, please.

I'm going crazy, but so what, I am here, I do what I do.


You, you, you, and yes you, can be a big help in saving our kind from mutual destruction, assured mutual destruction, hell on earth, torturous mental and physical death and the possibly worse, and all you have to do is follow some common sense common law processes that have been laying around for more than a few thousand years.

Is that not a big carrot?

What is the stick? Where does the stick come from? Who is ordering the use of this stick? Who is creating our assured mutual destruction?

Who orders us to commit suicide by cannibalism, and why are the people obeying that order without question?

Common law presentments and indictments by people assembled into grand juries whereby victims are named by name, criminals are named by name, the actual laws broken are named by name, and a deal is offered to victim and criminal seeking a voluntary, negotiated, settlement to restore the victim, deter the criminal, and if the offer is rejected, inevitably by the criminal, hardly likely to be rejected by the victim, but non-the-less, rejection of the peaceful, paperwork solution, sends the due process into trial by jury mode.

I am a fool? I get that a lot.

I can read, however, and I can understand the words written, so that may be foolish on my part according to some people.

I can read:

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,

Two cases in point.

Man bites dog. No wait, that is a funny story, and this one is not so funny. Dog refuses to obey criminal order to attack innocent woman. End of story? No, that is not the end of the story, so case 1 involves more than a Man bites Dog sound bite to entertain, divide, and conquer the people. There is an order to attack, so case one finds the perpetrators in this case where an order to attack an innocent women is a common law grand jury case in that county.

Meanwhile back at the ranch in every county in California, and who knows what is going on in other States other than New York, and if anyone wants to know precisely what is happening in New York, in forensic detail, then ask, and you will receive, but meanwhile back at the ranch in California the case against the criminals stealing all the land in California focuses in on at least one Jewish Princess in Los Angeles. I hope Grace can forgive my liberal employment of her good name.

In each case there can be an accurate accounting done because people demanding an accurate accounting in each case WILL result in a supply.

Basic Economics.

So the idea in California is to return all the stolen loot stolen from the Jewish Princess in Los Angeles and in that same act of moral integrity all the other victims of the same crime are made whole again too.

Now the POWER to purchase World War III, feeding all those foreign troops ordered by criminals to occupy our homes, no longer flows to them, and they go back home to find productive work, and meanwhile, back at the Ranch, we have demands for better lives, so we have the spending power to pay those who supply those things we now have the power to demand.

Well Joe, that is quite a story line you have cooked up in your pea brain, if only Joe was smarter than a German Shepard.

I'm none to smart but I can read.

Bark when told.

See how that works for you.

It is not news, it is history.

It is now in our faces.

Look away at your own cost.



The concept of people defending themselves against criminals is typically jerking knees into a belief in false authority without question.

Help, save me. I'm helpless.

Knees jerk all the time.

The concept of people defending themselves against criminals who make their crimes legal is less a product of deception and fear.

What does The Declaration of Independence mean, if the answer is not dictated by well paid liars?


In the Spirit of Liberty

In the Spirit of Liberty this Topic offers a Goal for 2014.

On the day of July 4th of 2014 may the Goal be reached.

The first innocent victim be chosen by the people of this country as a human being worthy of defending against a specific injury perpetrated by a suspected (but presumed to be innocent) perpetrator who occupies an office of our government of our country.

My reasoning for offering this Goal for 2014 can be explained in the effort to inspire like minded people in this country to focus some of their political power and some of their economic power toward this investment by which this goal is reached by this date.

It can be understood by many people in this country that the criminals have taken over the power of the people to such an extent as to render the people powerless in their own defense of their own innocent members of these same people.

I am speaking about children who are innocent.

When the criminals who have taken over government are kidnapping and abusing innocent children, with impunity, the remaining adults, who may not be as innocent as children, but who are not guilty of kidnapping and abusing children, WILL either stand in defense of such crimes, or such crimes will continue, grow, and become so numerous as to consume all innocence as all the children WILL be consumed by that complete lack of defense of those innocent children.

This Topic is not going to be a Trial by me, one human being among many human beings alive in this country, since the POINT of this Topic is to inspire ONE trial to be scheduled by a specific date in this Year 2014.

One trial, one beginning trial, will be put onto our schedule made by us, the people of this country, whereby the worst criminal imaginable is known to exist because a victim does exist, and the victim is an innocent child abducted by criminals who took over the government of our country; whereby that innocent life is ruined by at least one criminal in one office in the government of our country.

How many common law grand jurists, in how many common law grand juries, in how many counties, in this one country, can agree to place this one trial on the one schedule, whereby this one innocent child will be defended against at least one criminal, in one office of the government of our country, by July 4th, 2014?

I am one jurist. I think that the goal offered is agreeable. I know that the goal cannot be reached by one person alone.

Who would not agree to stand in defense against an innocent child who is now, or who will soon be, a victim of kidnapping and abuse, whereby the kidnapper and the abuser is someone who took an oath to uphold the laws of this country, and that criminal uses that false front to cover up their criminal abuse of a specific, innocent, child?

If by chance all the abusers of children flee from public office by July 4th, 2014, and there are no more cases to investigate concerning the abuse of children by public employees, including Members of Congress who pass laws that make the abuse of children a legal privilege they alone command, then the Goal is reached by July 4th, 2014, in the Spirit of Liberty.

Another goal could be placed on the schedule at that time.

What do you say in response to this proposal?



Fear of Aggreement



Indictment offered

Link 1:

Serious problems result from the misuse of words, and is there a willful intent to confuse people?

Media offer 1 from link 1:

Media 1

At time: 46:25

"You need to go from a competitive mindset to a creative mindset."

Gerard from Liberty National Alliance may read my competitive offer right now. I hope he does, I plan on speaking to him during the Monday 10/28/2013 Meeting Call.

The concept of competition is synonymous with the concept of creation. When the word competition is misused the result is confusion. Who is confused?

Consider a competitive version of the sentence offered:

Sentence offered (by the speaker in Media 1:
"You need to go from a competitive mindset to a creative mindset."

Competitive offer intending to create a more accurate (shared) viewpoint:
"You need to go from an antagonistic (destructive) mindset to a cooperative (creative/productive) mindset."

Is the goal in the mind of the person creating the sentence, offering the sentence, an interest in, a desire for, and a intent to reach the goal of destruction?

Such as:

"I want to destroy your ability to produce, as I want to gain at your expense, as I want to take from you that which you have, as I want to consume you, since I have a parasitic mind, a mind that sucks the life out of other people, and in that way the infected, parasitic, antagonistic, destructive mind does end up destroying their own sources of economic power."

That is NON-COMPETITIVE in a real sense, in a sense of reality, in a sense of which ideas work to sustain life compared to which ideas work to destroy life.

Such as:

"I want to sustain life, therefore I want to sustain my ability to produce, therefore I want to help you sustain your ability to produce, therefore I want to compare my competitive viewpoint with your competitive viewpoint, so that we can share an accurate understanding of which parts of our shared viewpoints are less competitive, less productive, and which viewpoint of our shared viewpoints move away from destruction, move away from antagonism, and which viewpoint move toward more competitive viewpoints, moving toward viewpoints that sustain, rather than destroy, our lives?

Competition is the force that forces production toward higher standards of living and competition is the force that forces production toward lower costs of living, as competitors produce those products that the consumers of those products want, and no one, no individual person, having the power to choose (freedom) will choose worse over better, no individual human being, on their own volition, will willingly choose lower standards of living and higher costs of living because doing so defines the meaning of destruction on purpose.

Those whose purpose in life is to destroy life (hatred?) are those that willfully confuse (counterfeit) the mediums of exchange that are used by those whose purpose in life is to sustain life.

So why are people, anyone, you, the next guy, the next woman, anyone, why are people using the English word "competition" to mean the same thing as "antagonism" when the actual PROCESS of competition is merely a choice between better and worse, and as a matter of demonstrable fact, the competitive choice is always better over worse in the mind of each individual making each individual choice.

In Media 1 the topic for discussion moves to the concept of "Free Speech" (so called) and that too exemplifies the process of competition.

1. Monopoly Non-Choice = one single idea = Obey without question

2. Competitive Choice = many competitive choices = invent a competitive choice

Media 2

Not spoken in that discussion are the concepts of Voluntary Association and a Court of Record, and that may help those who are unfamiliar with the concept of Voluntary Association and Courts of Record.

The volunteers wish to maintain a process by which the process improves, so the process of improving the process of Voluntary Association includes the process of maintaining a Record by which errors are recorded so as not to repeat errors, and a Record is maintained whereby improvements (trial and error) are repeated because those currently working at Trial and Error have a Record by which past Errors are Recorded, knowable, and past successes are Recorded, knowable, and the Volunteers can choose, competitively, the successful processes instead of choosing to repeat the same errors, over, and over, and over, again, and again, and again, expecting a success when past Records show that every time the same error is repeated, the same failures result.

A Court of Record is merely a process by which a place is chosen by the volunteers to have, to maintain, to keep up, to finance, to repair if broken, to improve if possible, in brick and mortar, or wood and plaster board, or steel and asbestos (one obvious error not needed to be repeated), and the volunteers then have a place to process current Record keeping, and keeping past Records from vanishing out of human memory.

Allowing the criminals to take over the process of improving the process results in an obvious lack of success. Criminals are knowable, in fact, as criminals demonstrate the fact of a crime existing, as criminals create Involuntary Associations.

Consent of the governed, as declared in The Declaration of Independence, which was created in a "common law" Court of Record in Philadelphia, 1776, is what it is, when it is, and consent of the governed is no longer what it was, when it is no longer consent of the governed. How easy can it get to find the criminals? Follow the fraud money to the source of it, like following the dead bodies to the source of the serial killer.

Media 3:

Time 6:50

Note the subject of "securitization" of indictments.

That goes back to the information offered by Frank at UCADIA along the lines of "monetizing sin," (do not shoot the messenger please, the value of information is directly proportional to how competitive the information is among volunteers, in other words: if the information works for everyone without excluding anyone, then the information isn't JUST US having advantage over our targeted victims, which is the definition of a lie, or the definition of falsehood, since those who know it is a lie, and those who know it is false, have an advantage over those who do not know that the lie is a lie, or that the information is false, in other words: if the information is true, then it is valuable, if the information is accurate, then why shoot the messenger?), and along the lines of what became known as Annuities, or Bonds, whereby a new human being begins a new "bond" or "securitization" or "monetization" of that human being.

Think clearly people, what is the excuse being used to create Federal Reserve Notes?

The excuse being used is "The Good Faith and Credit of the American..." what?

If there are no people, will there be any Federal Reserve Notes SOLD to anyone?

When there is one human being born, there is then an excuse to "monetize," or "securitize" or "bond" or "Sale-able good," from which to profit at the expense of that "commodity" or that "capital" of human flesh.

Annuities, like guns, or like pointed sticks, is not necessarily bad, and when the "bonded" know that they are bonded, and that their potential to "make money" is being traded, then a "bonded" person can consent, or not consent, to such bonding, when government is based upon the consent of the governed.

When the "bonding" with "Annuities" is done fraudulently, secretly, covertly, by a few exclusive people in an exclusive group, then that is normally called Human Trafficking, Slavery, or Organized Crime, but when the so called "government" does it, by their "laws," then it is called what?


It is not the process of Annuities (voluntarily done among volunteers within a government based upon consent, which requires "full disclosure," and full knowledge) that is bad, what is bad is the practice of Annuities (or money, or government) processed into being by criminals who are willfully perpetrating crimes so as to "get something for nothing" at the expense of the targeted victims.

Time 13:12

Serious mistake: "We own you." The point at which the human brain becomes corrupted? When is the point at which a Voluntary Association (consent) becomes Involuntary? Note: The point was corrected, but the damage was done - on the record.

Time 25:20

Gerard is working on a point that may be understood easily as a method by which a human being declares themselves competent.

The idea there is to establish competency, whereby there is a Record maintained in a Court of Record, whereby the competent person records the fact that the competent person will proceed forward from that moment knowing that they are held accountable as a competent person. In other words, a person failing to establish competency can be someone who is not competent, such as an insane person, and therefore the ambiguity of an question concerning willful intent, or insanity, is not a question, not in question, once it has be established that Gerard, or any other person acting in service to the "public," has given his word, his bond, his oath, his "authority" (he is competent) and therefore from that point on, that person, that bonded person, that competent person, who has established competency, on the Record, in a Court of Record, will be held accountable for what that person does, that person cannot claim to "not know any better," and that person cannot claim to be "insane," as Custom (common law or common sense) is such that it is a good idea to avoid hiring insane people to be then given license to work on behalf of other human beings in a voluntary association.

So "raising up to" "the level of a higher standard" is a competitive way to communicate the actual facts, compared to, say, "raising up to the level of a public servant" which is an argument in itself.

The higher standard (thanks Gerard) means "not insane and therefore not accountable as a willful, thoughtful, premeditated, capacity to act, instead, the person is raised up from an ambiguous, possible, insane person, or infant, or dependent, raised up into the level all adults, all independent people, are at, whereby the independent people are accountable for what they willfully do, as each volunteer understands to be the most competitive way to maintain Liberty, Life, Economy, Politics, and other Voluntary Associations"

In other words, hey, look here, I'm not an infant, I'm not an insane person, I am not a criminal, I am here to declare my capacity to act willfully among the other volunteers, so as to serve our Voluntary Association, to maintain it, and to protect us from criminals who lie so well.

What if the person lies during the process of making an Oath, an Affirmation, and Affidavit, or any other customary way of declaring that "I will be responsible, and I will be accountable, for what I do."?

That is similar to the question of "What happens if someone becomes insane?" What happens if someone becomes corrupted after Oath taking?

There aught to be a way, a process, by which the criminals are found out, and the criminals are then avoided, and the victims are keep out of harms way as the criminals run amok.

What do you think Trial by Jury was, back in the days before it was corrupted by Corporate Common Law/Admiralty Law/Maritime Law/Commercial Law/Statutory Law?

When common law was first introduced in England at the time of Magna Carte the process was customary, anyone was processed, the same way, no one above, or below the law, and then the process was Incorporated into a Monopoly, as it was made into a Trademark, or exclusive right, a thing only these few can do, and only something that works for Just US.

So the confusion is this:

The process is due to all the volunteers, each one, as each volunteer volunteers to be held accountable for what each volunteer does, in fact.

The process is used by those who use the process to exempt themselves from it, and they do as they please, which is to exempt themselves from accountability for what they do, as they punish other people for doing exactly what they do.

When the process is 1, it is competitive, anyone can do it, and the best ones at it raise themselves, volunteering, to be working in that process, to reach that goal. What goal?

Defense of the innocent from the criminals.

When the process is 2, it is monopolistic, only those doing it allow only themselves doing it, and the best ones lower themselves into criminal thoughts, criminal actions, lies, threats, and violence, to reach that goal. What goal?

Offense against the innocent, or the guilty, just so long as they reach the goal of subjecting everyone but themselves to their will.

Time 25:12

"Dear servants..."

A possible source of the confusion concerns the term "servant," as it may be easy to make the mistake of thinking in terms of an Employee owned by an Employer, in much the same way as a Master (or Criminal) owns a Slave (a victim), while the actual common law, customary, rule of law, type thought is the opposite, whereby each Volunteer is volunteering to serve mankind, to serve Liberty, to serve the process by which the innocent victims are separated and protected from the criminals.

So the concept of a "Public Servant" is NOT someone enslaved by "The Public" whereby the actual Master is a person (judge/jury/executioner) "serving" a presentment/notice/indictment to a Slave.

That is a serious error in thinking, and a serious error in speaking, and a serious error of action if an innocent person is ever enslaved by a criminal, in mind, body, or spirit.

So...the idea is to get past the false crap and go forward as volunteers serving the cause of Liberty.

Do you serve the cause of Liberty?

The Oath is meant to establish a Court of Record by which the answer is officially yes, yes I do, I serve the cause of Liberty, so from this moment forward, that is on the Record, and it is therefore more difficult for me to claim otherwise at some future date when I'm caught red handed with my hand in the cookie jar.

Time 25:12

"Dear servants..."

A possible source of the confusion concerns the term "servant," as it may be easy to make the mistake of thinking in terms of an Employee owned by an Employer, in much the same way as a Master (or Criminal) owns a Slave (a victim), while the actual common law, customary, rule of law, type thought is the opposite, whereby each Volunteer is volunteering to serve mankind, to serve Liberty, to serve the process by which the innocent victims are separated and protected from the criminals.

So the concept of a "Public Servant" is NOT someone enslaved by "The Public" whereby the actual Master is a person (judge/jury/executioner) "serving" a presentment/notice/indictment to a Slave.

That is a serious error in thinking, and a serious error in speaking, and a serious error of action if an innocent person is ever enslaved by a criminal, in mind, body, or spirit.

So...the idea is to get past the false crap and go forward as volunteers serving the cause of Liberty.

Do you serve the cause of Liberty?

The Oath is meant to establish a Court of Record by which the answer is officially yes, yes I do, I serve the cause of Liberty, so from this moment forward, that is on the Record, and it is therefore more difficult for me to claim otherwise at some future date when I'm caught red handed with my hand in the cookie jar.


Notes on Corporate Robbery

parens patriae

That term is cut and pasted from this link:

Here is some of the context of that term:

So why is it so important not to agree that we are a legal person? In most magistrate and local courts the answer is that under their system of summary jurisdiction, under that system since the 19th century, once the role of a legal person has been formed and established then the court is able to establish very quickly the parens patriae and that the person formed is a person of infant, a ward. Then they have the ability to treat us as a ward and ram through the charges and then the sentence. This is why in courts of summary jurisdiction you can watch incredibly one case after another, just ‘bang”, “bang”, “bang.” Are you such as such (JOHN DOE)? Yes? How do you plead? This is the sentence, so move on, and claiming all this to be perfectly lawful.

Here is an offer of a Legal Definition of that word:
parens patriae
A doctrine that grants the inherent power and authority of the state to protect persons who are legally unable to act on their own behalf.

In context of blind justice, or equal justice, or equitable justice, or fair justice, or anything other than a crime in progress, there may be cause for concern when agreements are difficult to realize as honest people meet and exchange ideas and things.

Criminals do exist.

Criminals do lie.

Criminals hide behind disguises.

Criminals may find their way onto Juries.

If a criminal finds their way onto a jury and you happen to be innocent, as it is right for the Jurors to presume, and you may be accused of some nebulous wrongdoing, that 1 criminal is only 1 out of 12 on that Jury that you face.

What happens if the so called Judge, the so called Prosecutor, and the so called Defender are all criminals, all three of them?

Summary Jurisdiction
Summary jurisdiction refers to a court's jurisdiction in a summary proceeding. It is also used to denote a court's authority to issue a judgment or order without the necessity of a trial or other process.

Has anyone ever found a Legal Definition for the word dictate?


Notes on National Debt Fraud

Example of why the words Public and Private are willfully confused?

Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

Private POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.


In the first case the claim is made that National Interest requires an expense, such as those expenses required when people in the country are being attacked by a foreign POWER. The example here is the attack by The British after The Declaration of Independence in 1776.

The people in the country, then called America, would either stand together and defend against attack or not, and there were expenses associated with defense against attack by The British.

We need to gain the power to defend ourselves, and so we do what is necessary to defend ourselves, and we do so voluntarily, and it is better to expend our power in defense now, while we have that power, rather than have all our power taken, including our power to defend.

So, having that in mind, the concept of We The People, being driven by duty to defend ourselves, as declared in The Declaration of Independence, are in need of cash. Enter zeros into the account, buy now, pay later.

So the Central Bankers claim that they are willing to stand in that role, as accountants, to keep the books on those expenses. OK. Who offers which supplies and services consumed in the defensive war effort? How much are they paid after the war is over, when productive, profitable, actions can resume and refill the stores of value that make up an actual power fund, or bank account, such as a silo full of grain, or a generator full of fuel, or a water tank full of water?

The public good is seen in this manner, as public service, as a pooling of resources so as to defend against attack as one, for if we do not stand together, we fall individually.

Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

At the end of the Revolutionary War there was Debt owed by each voluntary member of the voluntary Union of defenders, and the accountants hired to keep the books were charged with the responsibility of knowing who gave up anything of value, and who failed to give up anything of value, and here is where the concept of being a solider in time of defensive war is willfully confused.

Does the country, or the people in the country, owe a greater debt to the suppliers of boots used by the soldiers, where that pay rate to the supplier of boots is a no-bid contract, an absurdly inflated price, whereby the supplier of boots does not give up anything, where instead the supplier of boots actually profits handsomely by that contract, or do the people in the country, or does the country, owe more to someone who lost their arm, leg, eye, or a family that lost a husband, owing a greater debt to those who give all, instead of owing a greater debt to those who profit from war, who get initially paid with paper, and who are then demanding gold as payment, "on par", for their "service" during defensive war?

The Central Bankers claim that they need to add zeros to the Public account for National Interest.

There are two sides to this false coin.

Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

Private POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

The same people at the same Central Bank add those zeros to the Public account, in defense against attack, in "our National Interest" and then with those zeros in that account those people loan those zeros out at Interest, effectively making a profit from the bounty of collective delusion.

Does the "interest" go back to National Interest, or is there suddenly a change of heart whereby the Central Bank is suddenly no longer Public? Now, in point of fact, according to the people at the Central Bank, the Bank is now Private, and therefore the Bank is now required to show a profit, and therefore the Interest payments are filling the banking accounts of the private individuals who own the private bank.

The bail-outs are no longer zeros added to the account in desperate times to defend against an army of aggressive military force invading and occupying homes, churches, towns, cities, counties, and States in this country, rather, the appropriate HAT is switched by the Central Bankers, there is suddenly a need to be a private entity in need of balancing their own, individual, separate, set of books.

Public Fund, not ours, not in our own, private, interest. We are suddenly in need of our version of socialism.

Private fund, ours, not yours, exclusive, not public, for our own interest, for no one but our own interest, not your interest, not the public interest. We are suddenly in need of our version of capitalism.

Who do you work for, a public servant might ask, do you work for your own interest, or do you work for National Interest?

Some people say, with much in the way of authority, that we all now work for the Central Bank. We are all employed in the work required to fill up The FUND.

Follow the money to make sure that the person asked is answering factually.

Which money?

The fraudulent money?