8 votes

The Zimmerman Riots

All seems to be rather quiet on the home front despite the media hyping up the likelihood of widespread rioting that would follow the not guilty verdict of the George Zimmerman trial. It can even be argued that the media is trying to incite such rioting. It has been reported by Judicial Watch that the Department of Justice, which is headed by Eric Holder, has actually used taxpayer money to help coordinate protests against Zimmerman. However, this shouldn’t be viewed by the African American community as support for them or for the memory of Trayvon Martin. The government is for itself and its cronies, only.

Attempts by governments to use poor or subjugated people for their own ends is nothing new. George III – the king which Americans defeated in the War for Independence – tried to maintain British control of the original colonies by trying to incite slave rebellions as one measure. However, like the current US government, George III did not care about those folks. This can be made clear by considering a paragraph that was written in the rough draft of the Declaration of Independence:

[King George III] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them to slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportations thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the Christian king of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms against us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.

Continue Reading

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wouldn't it be more correct...

Wouldn't it be more correct to call them the Trayvon Martin riots. Why name the riots after the victim and not the aggressor?

RickStone

I've heard another name.

It is already being called the "chimp out" by most who don't have our concern for respect for individuality and don't bother with group think.

great read

Solid analysis as usual.

This should be a non-story

Yet the media has blown it up, and Zimmerman getting off the hook is probably the best news that the DOJ has gotten. Now they can get involved and further try to distract the populace with a big show so that we ignore the broader attacks on our liberty.

bump

for a day when people at large stop looking at every event through a racial prism.

http://lionsofliberty.com/
*Advancing the Ideas of Liberty Daily*

That day will come when

That day will come when mainstream media race baiters are removed from behind the camera.

Wow

that's was fucking racist dude.

That is a very critical comment you made here.

I don't understand your 'fucking racist dude' intent.

Please let me know what was fucking racist!

I'm serious.

If you don't care about what you spurt, I will follow your posts on this site like everyone that stands for the American Constitution will do.

Don't assume a community people that formed around the Respect for Truth won't notice propaganda.

It was a joke dude, relax.

obviously there was nothing racist in your statement.