-75 votes

Why People Should Be Outraged at Zimmerman's 'Not Guilty' Verdict

This is exactly how I feel about this whole mess.... I don't agree with many of Cenk's politics but I do respect him for speaking honestly about his beliefs. He seems like an honorable man.

The reaction of many of my fellow patriots regarding this tragedy really disappointed me and the reaction of the scumbag opportunist across this country who are now destroying their own cities is even more disappointing.

It appears that many of us are falling for the same old divide and conquer routine.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Disagree...

If somebody came up to me, cold clocked me in the face, breaking my nose, I would probably reach for my gun also.

Lets be real. IF SOMEBODY JUST BROKE YOUR NOSE, YOUR EYES ARE PROBABLY ALL TEARED UP, YOU TRYING TO BREATHE AND ON TOP OF IT, SOME KID IS NOW ON TOP OF YOU TRYING TO BASH YOUR HEAD INTO THE CONCRETE AND KILL YOU, I THINK IT WOULD BE JUSTIFIED TO SHOOT IN DEFENSE OF YOUR LIFE.

What would the headline read if Zimmerman was killed by Trayvon? Oh, that's right, there would be no headline.

All this stupid talk. This is not about race, but about the right to defend you OWN life. And if it comes down to my life or someone who is beating the living piss out of me trying to kill me, TRUST ME... IM SAVING MYSELF!

Not to mention, Zimmerman only fired ONE SHOT, that's it... he didn't appear to be trigger happy. If he was, he would have dumped the whole clip into the kid, but didn't.

Love Liberty, be Vigilant

"Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty" (2 Corinthians 3:17)

Faith in God will prevail all things!

so true

hundreds of teen deaths in Chicago; white baby shot by teenagers in the head when mother doesn't have mom to give; white mother gets the shit kicked out of her on a baby cam while baby sits. A flash in the news.

The news makes up that a WHITE (non-white) living in a GATED community that can't afford a security system b/c it's actually lower middle class and in a high crime area AND the victim lived in it as well!!!!!... some people can't not see the racism the news puts out b/c they can't use their brain. Zimmerman wasn't any different than Martin, a minority living in a high crime neighborhood. Oh wait, he was different, he tried to act to make his neighbors lives better as a watch. He was different, he tried to impact positively youths by tutoring them. Name me ONE other 29 y/o that just does that. And standing up for homeless people????? Yeah, he's a bad guy just looking to shoot people....

Also ignoring the above makes you see how hateful and far anti-gun people will go to wreck someone to pursue a misguided policy.

Agree w you

you are correct in your analysis...

Zimmerman is NOT white and this case was made to look black and white, no pun intended.

But be it as it may, many don't understand the circumstances and ONLY see a black teen getting shot by a (white) guy, even though he's not white.

Then we wonder why racism continues.... Geez...

Love Liberty, be Vigilant

"Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty" (2 Corinthians 3:17)

Faith in God will prevail all things!

Just and correct verdict

Although tragic as it was, no one likes taking a life, if anything is leared you never know who is a CCW citizen! They have every right to protect their life by using their firearm. I believe thie Zimmerman verdict was just and correct. I applaud the jury for following the law, examining all the evidence, forensics and testimony. I'm a loving and caring parent, my heart goes out to the mother and father of TM. I will hug my kids tonight and explain the details of the outcome of this case. As parents we should continue to Love, educate and teach are children to be respectful inteligent citizens.

Cenk rewrites the facts

Zimmerman did not "pursue" Martin, at least there is no evidence of that. And the dispatch didn't tell him not to follow Martin, the said we don't NEED you to do that. As to the allegation of racist talk in the family, it is unsubstantiated.

The stunning thing about the case is the way the media is reframing this, and using social intimidation to force that narrative into history. There is Divide and conquer going on here, as well as political one uping. The point is to get more votes for the democrats in the next election.

a critical point is

made by ironman77. The exact wording of the 911 dispatcher was "we don't need you to do that". That phrase is legal code protection of the 911 system. They didn't instruct Zimmerman to do or not do anything. That way if their instructions lead to a bad outcome, they can' t be held liable.

Media did repeat that Z was told not to follow or get out of his car and up until this week I felt that in not following instructions, he was at least partially culpable for the outcome. I've learned again, don't judge until you know as much about a situation as possible.

Dr. Mike Vasovski
South Carolina Campaign Chairman, Ron Paul 2012
The SINGLE vote in the SC delegation for RP, GOP Convention, Tampa, FL
2010 Candidate, US Congress SC-03
Past Chairman, Aiken, SC County Tea Party

There seems to be

a whole lot of very nervous pro second amendment rights advocates down voting anyone who questions the motives and actions of Zimmerman on the night he shot Martin.

The jury may have found Zimmerman innocent, but there is a lot of room for doubt as to what really happened that night.

Zimmerman changed his story several times. Zimmerman was also taking stimulants and benzo's. (bad combo)No one checked to see what his blood levels were that night.

There is also the video that showed Zimmerman entering the police station after the shooting. There did not seem to be a mark on the guy.

He refused medical treatment that night. Are there any X-rays to show he had a broken nose?

Zimmerman was a known wanna be cop. He put loaded a bullet into the chamber according to the 911 dispatcher. What was he contemplating.

Zimmerman was chasing Trayvon. Nothing Zimemerman stated happened that night can be refuted so we are all just going to take it as gospel even though Zimmmerman changed his story several times.

The only reason Zimmerman got off was because there was no one that could refute his story.

I believe it was in the original police report that the shooting could have been avoided if Zimmerman had not pursued Martin. Martin had not committed any crime that night until as you are all convinced he attacked Zimmerman.

The Media turned this whole thing into a race war. The prosecution was overzealous in their charges against Zimmerman. The prosecution was totally corrupt and should be held accountable. None of this changes the fact that there is man George Zimmerman walking around with a loaded gun just looking for a reason to use it.

Why that doesn't scare the shit out of you is beyond me.

I will try and explain.

a whole lot of very nervous pro second amendment rights advocates down voting anyone who questions the motives and actions of Zimmerman on the night he shot Martin.

Not that I have seen, only refuting those who fabricate the official story to support their own narrative. If someone would provide valid evidence versus what we do have, then it needs to be presented, but thinking that one can make up a story, and others should support it is silly.

The jury may have found Zimmerman innocent, but there is a lot of room for doubt as to what really happened that night.

I agree, and I am sure Zimmerman told the story that would put himself in the best light, as would I, and you, and anyone whose life is on the line.

Zimmerman changed his story several times. Zimmerman was also taking stimulants and benzo's. (bad combo)No one checked to see what his blood levels were that night.

Was there a reason to check? Did he seem intoxicated to officers responding? Where is a link or any proof that this is correct about taking meds?

There is also the video that showed Zimmerman entering the police station after the shooting. There did not seem to be a mark on the guy.

And the media once again got caught with their pants down. There are many articles explaining how the photos and video were doctored, as well as the NBC editor who was fired for "getting caught" doctoring the 9-11 call. Works both ways Peggy.

He refused medical treatment that night. Are there any X-rays to show he had a broken nose?

He was treated by paramedics on the scene, and even a doctor right out of medical school can pretty much tell if a nose is broke, is the fact of whether it was broken or not relevant to the back of his head?

Zimmerman was a known wanna be cop. He put loaded a bullet into the chamber according to the 911 dispatcher. What was he contemplating.

Please provide a link with proof, as this is news to me. I would dare say were I carrying, then a bullet would have already been in the chamber, but I have never seen or heard evidence of what you claimed there, also chambering a round in a legal firearm is legal as well, it doesn't show intent, only that he was ready to protect himself.

Zimmerman was chasing Trayvon. Nothing Zimemerman stated happened that night can be refuted so we are all just going to take it as gospel even though Zimmmerman changed his story several times.

You can take it how ever you want, it is how the law works based on what we find credible enough to consider to be true and factual. Zimmerman was following Martin as any responsible neighbor would, and no need to take it as gospel because as has been said a thousand times, following someone is not a crime, it is not stalking, and no where in this nation is it illegal. It's ok, I will play that game and state that Zimmerman was running after Martin the entire time, lets say he was wearing a miners helmet carrying a box of dinner napkins and screaming "SNOWCONES"!, still not illegal or deserving of assault.

The only reason Zimmerman got off was because there was no one that could refute his story.

The reason Zimmerman got off is because the prosecution was under pressure from special interests, anti gun, and race groups demanding he be tried for 2nd degree murder. They charged him with a crime that could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt over pressure, and it was the prosecutions job, with investigators from the local sheriff's office, the FBI, and others to prove he killed Martin, evidence proved differently.

I believe it was in the original police report that the shooting could have been avoided if Zimmerman had not pursued Martin. Martin had not committed any crime that night until as you are all convinced he attacked Zimmerman.

And an earth quake could have prevented it, an out of season Florida blizzard, a plane crash in the neighborhood, herpes, Santa Clause, and George Carlin, the fact is it did happen, and while Martin or Zimmerman had neither committed a crime to our knowledge that night, all evidence points to Zimmerman's story being viable. I did not say factual, only viable.

The Media turned this whole thing into a race war. The prosecution was overzealous in their charges against Zimmerman. The prosecution was totally corrupt and should be held accountable. None of this changes the fact that there is man George Zimmerman walking around with a loaded gun just looking for a reason to use it.

You are correct about the media, the prosecution did everything they could and attempted to use every trick, racial attack, media photo shopping, 9-11 recording manipulation, and so on and still could not get Zimmerman on even a man slaughter charge. Many of us think justice was served, but your emotional anti gun shines when you say "George Zimmerman walking around with a loaded gun just looking for a reason to use it." Where in the hell did you get that? When had Zimmerman ever shot anyone before? Why if he was such a mad murderer did he not unload a clip into Martin reload and repeat? There is no basis for your last statement other than emotion, no fact, no credible evidence, only your glowingly bright biased opinion that accounts for naught.

Why that doesn't scare the shit out of you is beyond me.

Because just like Zimmerman I carry legally to protect myself and my family. In the South carrying a pistol, rifle, or shotgun is not a big deal, and we enjoy one of the lowest crime rates in the nation here. What scares me is people that have no history with firearms trying to dictate to the law abiding that they are a danger, but as we see even when evidence points to justifiable homicide there are those who will demonize people only trying to protect themselves. While Zimmerman might be a terrible person, a wife beater, a racist, or a pervert, none of that played out in this event or was relevant in this case. from the time he got hit (as he claims) to the time that the gun went off was 45 seconds. 45 seconds of taking a beating with your head bouncing on concrete is all I need to hear. The rest of the story factual or make believe is of no matter.

Always remember:
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." ~ Samuel Adams
If they hate us for our freedom, they must LOVE us now....

Stay IRATE, remain TIRELESS, an

People like you scare me Peggy

Zimmerman does not. I would have had no problem with Zimmerman had I been in Trayvon's situation and would have handled it fine.

Appears to me you are a very scared "anti-second amendment" person.
That scares me.
It is also difficult to deal with people who cannot reason using evidence and facts but whose decisions rest on "speculation" about the unknowns or unprovables .
That scares me.

Or hypocritical people who speak against intentional division of people yet personally fan the fires of discord themselves by posting their very own anti-zimmerman thread on this site (full well knowing it would cause discord) - then totally ignore hundreds of fair, intelligent, reasonable responses to your thread.
That scares me.

Lastly, the knowledge that you are on the same side as the MSM, anti-gun groups, and people such as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Harry Reid, Eric Holder and Obama is very, very, very scary.

Your totally wrong

I am pro gun rights. I don't believe Zimmerman was racially motivated in any way.

I can't stand Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Harry Reid, Eric Holder, or Obama.

I don't even care that much for Cenk but this time he is correct accept for the fact that he thought Zimmerman profiled Martin for being black.

Zimmerman would have done what he did if it was a white guy in a hoodie.

Zimmerman is a moron, with a gun. That's what scares me.

Be careful of the insults you fling just because someone won't jump on your hero worship for Zimmerman bandwagon. Your sounding a lot like a liberal loon.

That would be you're - not your.

However, you're the one who is totally wrong - I think you won the award for the thread with the most down votes.
I'm not on a bandwagon - but you're beating yours to death.

Let see, this time you have become a fortune teller and can actually predict people's behaviors - kinda like a thought crime investigator. "Zimmerman would have done what he did if it was a white guy in a hoodie - darn, it must be the "hoodie" !!!
Wow, the prosecution should have used your "evidence" during the trial.

Note: Zimmerman carries a gun - and had made many other 911 neighborhood watch calls in the past without any problems - guess he just didn't meet anyone with a hoodie.
Your reasoning sucks and you call me a loon ??? LOL

PS - I don't have heros (Maybe Ron Paul) and I'm about as far from liberal as one could get so don't attempt to psycho-analyze me like you have Zimmerman. You just make stuff up.

Twisting words again and false statements

You make a lot of assumptions.

NOTE, the jury didn't find Zimmerman innocent but rather not guilty. Martin was the aggressor and unfortunately paid for it. If he were not the "attacker" then there would be no confrontation.

"The only reason Zimmerman got off was because there was no one that could refute his story." True, and there is evidence which supported his story. You stated it correctly. Follow the logic and not your biases.

You want to make Zimmerman guilty without evidence? Because your feelings are not happy for some reason? The rest of us look at facts and the evidence and say you can't make assumptions and make someone guilty. The reasonable doubt comes in. It's not a perfect system and yet it is the best system for us.

The jury decided correctly.

The night is far spent, the day is at hand.
And those who have not heard shall understand.

are you suggesting treyvon

are you suggesting treyvon did not attack zimmerman, anything zimmerman did before this attack warranted no attack from treyvon. the only one to blame for treyvons death is treyvon martin.

If you are suggesting treyvon did not attack zimmerman first please show evidence. angle of bullet injuries prove that treyvon was not attacked and eyewitness saw treyvon attacking zimmerman. Then zimmerman finally shot in self defense just like the jury ruled.

If you have new evidence contact doj or da but there is no new evidence unless you creat it through media lies.

Ron Paul 2016

the jury did not find Zimmerman INNOCENT!

They found him NOT GUILTY. This shows how much you understand the legal system and the facts of the case. Even more scary and shocking your understanding of our Republic.
Please continue to educate yourself.

Stop attacking my patriotism Mike

What ever they found Zimmerman is irrelevant.

Based on all your opinions it was only Zimmerman that had rights that night. Martin had none.

He had no right to walk in his fathers girlfriends neighborhood. He wore a hoodie. When Zimmerman was chasing him he should have just kept running. He was in Zimmermans hood and didn't belong there.

Who's the real Gangsta here.

I hope the family does pursue a wrongful death lawsuit. If ever there was a wrongful death this is it.

Martin could have been a burgular, Martin was a punk, Martin wanted to be a gansta.

Martin did not go out that night looking for trouble.

Zimmerman did. He created the whole scenario in his sick mind, loaded his gun with intent to use it, targeted an innocent kid, created the scenario, created the chain of events, and killed a kid.

Too bad he is not the hero he intended on being. He never caught the would be robber. He got his ass kicked, and killed a seventeen year old kid.

Make up anything you want Peggy. YOU ARE WRONG!

And it takes an adult to be mature enough to know when they are wrong and admit it!

Every supposition you make is not supported by physical evidence PRESENTED TO THE JURY!

And now I do question your patriotism Ms. Provocateur. As you have said, which I did not before. Before, I questioned your understanding of the Republic.

Multiple individuals on this site have asked you to look up the facts as the facts were presented to the jury. And the surrounding facts of GZ past.

And instead of being a responsible adult in this time of irrationality, you have chosen to stick your head in the sand!

MY GOD PEOPLE AROUND THE COUNTRY ARE BEING ATTACKED AND POSSIBLY GETTING KILLED because of what you have just stated, "HE (Zimmerman) GOT HIS ASS KICKED,,"

Well isn't that a shame? There is dead troubled teen with pot in his system and a country on the brink because you do not want to admit to yourself that we might NOT have the most perfect court system, but it's basic framework is far better than anything that came before it or the Napoleonic system that emerge just years after it. If you do not think so, your patriotism is definitely at question.

Which, once again, I did not question in my original post. I question your understanding of the court system and the semantic "technically" INNOCENT vs. NOT GUILTY.

The bottom line regardless, is whether or not TM was Purple, Green or Orange he was not an innocent victim, he did not "stand his ground" he threw a punch and it costed him his life. And no matter what the situation is, VIOLENCE should always be the last act of desperation. TM did not feel that way and it is obvious by the facts!

God help you, because if you end up in the middle of a flash mob, no one else will.

And now I think, I don't question your patriotism, I questioned your sanity.

It seems to me

that its your point of view that is contributing to people around the country getting killed, not mine.

It was the prosecution and the political agenda they had that turned this into a racial issue. From the looks of some of the pro Zimmerman people posting on these threads there just may be some truth to it.

Because I don't believe Zimmermans version of what happened that night I should be held responsible even though I do not believe that any of Zimmermans actions that night were racially motivated.

"Now I do question your patriotism" You can question anything you want. So can I. It's our right isn't it Mike.

You and your pro Zimmerman mob are exhibiting the same Mob mentality that these violent protesters are exhibiting. You think justice was served, they don't. They think they can sway public opinion with violence, you think you can do it with insults.

I think Zimmerman is a very sick individual that happened to get off because the Jurors followed the law, they could not prove otherwise.

Zimmerman was acquitted because there was no one to refute who started that altercation that night.

I see it this way Mike. There is Zimmermans rendition of what happened, there is the politically motivated rendition of happened, and then somewhere in the middle of this tragic mess is the real truth.

I know one other thing for sure. Had Zimmerman been sick in bed that night with the flu, Trayvon Martin would still be alive.

Blount you have dialed it in very well.

Not many have. Not even myself

Peggy, you are now making no sense.

I have not read one comment (and I have read them all) that even hinted that Martin had no rights. Please give an example of whom is stating this.

Nor have I read anyone state he had no right to walk to his fathers, only that Zimmerman had the same right to walk where Martin was walking, or are you saying you don't think Zimmerman had that right?

If by chasing you mean talking to 9-11 watching where he went and then Martin suddenly fleeing (as fact on the 9-11 call) then your perception of chasing is strange to say the least. At the point where you asked no one was a gangster, no one had violated the law, only Martin acting suspicious towards someone who was tasked by his community to watch for suspicious people.

Your scenario that Zimmerman went out looking for trouble is based on what? There is no evidence of that at all, none, nada, zilch, a fabrication you continue to regurgitate it without any foundation whatsoever. This is the reason you are being attacked, you fabricate a story that goes against what we know and what we speculate from the facts and make up a wild, unfounded, and ridiculous claims. You are so emotional that you have resulted in creating narratives not even the prosecution thought to present, and doing so might have been illegal as they are without basis.

I thought at one time that we might disagree and come to a rational consensus with you, but it is now apparent that you will stop at no lengths to lie to yourself and others in an attempt to make a man protecting himself into a child murdering mad man, against police, FBI, and months of investigations, a jury, and in doing so you have lost all credibility at this point where this case is concerned.

I hope you recover from this tragedy, and are able to get things in order, but this is not the place to come to have a discussion and challenge people who know the facts if your argument is going to be anything you can make up in your mind at the time.

Always remember:
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." ~ Samuel Adams
If they hate us for our freedom, they must LOVE us now....

Stay IRATE, remain TIRELESS, an

"If the innocent honest man

"If the innocent honest man must quietly quit all he has, for peace sake, to him who will lay violent hands upon it, I desire it may be considered, what a kind of peace there will be in the world, which consists only in violence and rapine; and which is to be maintained only for the benefit of robbers and oppressors. Who would not think it an admirable peace betwixt the mighty and the mean, when the lamb, without resistance, yielded his throat to be torn by the imperious wolf?" - John Locke, Of the Dissolution of Government, Second Treatise of Civil Government

“Among the natural rights of the [People] are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature." - Samuel Adams, The Rights of the Colonists

Zimmerman lawfully carrying a loaded weapon isn't an issue in the case that can be examined in a negative light. It is the most basic right to be able to protect yourself. Most of your contentions are right, Trayvon had a right to do all those things, but Zimmerman had the right to do what he was doing as well. The idea that you believe that Zimmerman went out specifically with the intent of murdering based on him carrying a loaded, chambered firearm is absurd. I hate to say it, you are looking at this case and transferring your emotions to it.

We don't know the exact events that led to the physical altercation. So the benefit of the doubt, based on our republic is, by default, always going to go to Zimmerman. He may very well be guilty and responsible, but there isn't any evidence to the contrary. And based solely on that, he has to be found to be justified - if he wasn't God will judge his appeal to heaven accordingly.

Objectively, Trayvon Martin played a role in his own death.

The issue please....

Who cares who went where for what reason? Whether to get skittles to get high or to go and see who's staking out his neighbors. Who cares!

Martin attacked Zimmerman. That's illegal.

Zimmerman feared for his life. Justified, witnessed and evidence.

Martin didn't care to stop beating the man and had verbalized his death threat and proceeded.

Zimmerman's losing and not able to physically protect himself.

The weapon of protection comes out to end the ongoing attack.

There's no evidence to the contrary.

The jury decided based upon the evidence and facts.

Thank God for the 2nd amendment which allows the people to protect themselves.

Its dangerous to WE the People that you want to find guilty someone based purely on assumption and biases and ignore the facts. That's what unpatriotic and is the same thinking of our current POTUS. Otherwise, why has he not come out to support the decision and calm those who are threatening innocent lives across this nation? Pres. Obama pointed to this event in the beginning (If I had a son..) causing it to be in the entire nation's attention and now HE should distract from it any who seek to riot, kill, injure and destroy lives or property.

Where is Pres. Obama? He's watching and listening to see how many Peggy's there our out there and how may flame blowers such and this guy on "The Young Turks".

Have a blessed day.

The night is far spent, the day is at hand.
And those who have not heard shall understand.

again your hatred and ignorance is shown

"created the whole scenario in his sick mind."
No, you did that. You have created what you think happened. He was there, you weren't.
What if he actually did go ahead and break in to someones place. What if he did worse? What is it that neighborhood watches do? They see something that may seem odd and turn their backs? Because you know exactly what the situation looked like? Or are you "creating" a "whole scenario" in your "sick mind?"

"loaded his gun with intent to use it."
How ignorant do you need to let us know you are. Again, don't look at the person next to you at Starbucks. That gun they are legally carrying is loaded. Yet, this is the 1 in a 50,000,000,000 time it was used in an outing, he was so racist too; the guy who stood up against the police department's treatment of a homeless person of another race. Yeah, people join a neighborhood watch and spend their time protecting their neighbors property b/c they want to shoot people.

Sounds like someone created a scenario their sick mind. Doesn't sound like your story matches the reality of gun crimes or Mr. Zimmerman's character.

treyvon attacked zimmerman,

treyvon attacked zimmerman, so antoehr lawsuit will lose again by evidence. Why do you choose to ignore evidence? That is the real Question.

thank god you were not a juror!!

Ron Paul 2016

Zimmerman was found not

Zimmerman was found not guilty based of Florida State Statute 766.012, so based on Florida State Statute 766.032, his lawyers will file for and be granted immunity from any civil lawsuits brought against him based on his actions that night. There is a reason O'Mara practically goaded people to file a lawsuit - they will lose and they will be responsible for paying the legal fees.

So in short, if the Trayvon Martin family were to file a wrongful death suit against him, the $1.5 million they won from the home owner's association would be quickly eroded paying for the ambulance chasers that represent them and the Zimmerman defense team.

again not true

there appears to be a lot of people on this site that think concealed carry means you just might carry your gun. it's been interesting to see people attack someone legally carrying a weapon like you do saying he's "just looking to use it." like he just decided this one time to take his gun with him and he sought out someone looking like they were going to break into his appts again.

my guess is you don't believe most cc individuals don't always carry. they do.

tell me. with this being the first time you have heard of someone cc'ing, and the hundreds of thousands of people cc'ing every day with you. and multiply that time every trip they take to the grocery store, to get gas, to go for a walk, etc., and you have 1 event out of 50 bazillion. you have 1 event out of thousands in one persons life.

must wreck your world to know the person in the grocery line may be "just waiting" to shoot you. look in the mirror and see who is actually nervous about gun rights. the facts speak to the contrary.

simple solution for peggy if

simple solution for peggy if she is worried about someone shooting her. Do not attack someone unless you want to be shot.

Ron Paul 2016

would like to know

how many seconds most people would get pummeled in the face before defending themselves.

40 seconds is an amazing amount of time to get pounded on and call for help rather than reach for a gun.

The first act of unprovoked

The first act of unprovoked aggression would likely see me draw my weapon ... if Peggy was around and I saw that she was being attacked by an unprovoked assailant, I would probably take on the risk and draw on her behalf too.

no one celebrated

he's spoken about this for days and has yet to acknowledge other points other than to call everyone that disagrees with him a racist. standard tactic of the left as far as i'm concerned. speak to individuals that disagree with you like stephen molyenew and i'll respect you.

mind control

Distract and Divide cenk is bought, al gore owns his ass , let him cover the real stories not this tragic event that is being used by the MSM to divide us

.