6 votes

Ryan Dawson Straightens Out Damaging Disinfo About 9/11

http://youtu.be/VAfGC47SgD0

I'm aware many here have seen this and are aware of Dawson's work. It appears that many here haven't seen this and need to so here you go.

Work his regular video posts into your repertoire. You'll see how valuable he is to honest journalism. His content is extremely high quality while his production quality is admittedly low. If info is what you value then Ryan Dawson is your man.

Youtube channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/Rys2sense

Twitter account
https://twitter.com/RyLiberty

9/11 and War By Deception (April 2013)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK6VLFdWJ4I

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

bump

Because this is a currently trending topic

"I'm Ron Paul." - Ron Paul

Gee I`ll never set foot in a steel frame building again.

All The steel frame buildings in the US should be condemned because they can free fall into their own footprint with office furniture fires.
By the way the hole in the Pentagon was no more than 14' in diameter right after the blast - check it out Mr. Engineer.

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people that pay no price for being wrong.
Thomas Sowell

Look at the size of the hole

Look at the size of the hole AFTER the smoke cleared. It was clearly large enough for a plane. Ryan is right.

He sounds like a "Know it all" type of guy

I won't watch the rest.

What does he clarify?

Don't have time to watch video

Watch it when you have time...

It's 10 minutes. You aren't limited to watching only when it's inconvenient. Watch it while on the toilet or listen while driving. He points out how Alex Jones and Loose Change exaggerate things which discredits the questioning of the official story to those who bother to investigate these possible charlatan's claims. If you watch the most recent version of War By Deception you'll find yourself asking why in the hell Alex Jones and his team fail to document or discuss in detail and at length what is in that film. It makes zero sense why they refuse to if they're honest. Whatever the reason they've failed to do it and they should explain why. If the info is faulty then Jones and co. should calmly debunk it instead of ignoring it which invites theories about them but they refuse. Why? War By Deception seems so concrete with zero holes.

duplicate

duplicate

He doesn't clarify anything

He doesn't clarify anything. He simply claims that the fires were worse than some people claim, and that there were plane parts around the pentagon and WTC (he doesn't explain they are for the incorrect aircraft). He does concede that the WTC7 shouldn't have collapsed symmetrically.

He clearly hasn't done the necessary research. Net: it's not worth the time to watch.

Wrong...

Loose Change has people thinking that WTC 7 only had a few small pockets of fire. Not true. It has people thinking that a or some of the planes did a switcheroo in Ohio and that the people on those flights are faking their deaths with their family and friends complicity. Alex Jones has people on who say the planes were holograms. Alex Jones omits all of the info about Israeli involvement in 9/11 and has single handedly created the kosher 9/11 movement. That's just a small sampling of the things that Ryan Dawson's work clarifies.

so misleading, not sure where to start

Arguing over WTC7's fires is like arguing whether a kid threw a water balloon or a snowball at a stop sign. It's irrelevant. The sign is wet, and still there.

Alex Jones has nothing to do with anything, other than that he made some documentaries and publicized other people's ideas. Good for him I suppose. Pilots for 9-11 truth and operators at Boston Center blew the whistle on the false targets injected into the radar tracking system as well as others (false radar targets (drill) are an admitted fact). What really happened with the planes, and which planes were used? Nobody knows. It would be very unlikely that commercial aircraft were used in NYC due to the very high airspeed tracked before impact - equivalent to a 757 going mach 1 at 10,000 ft. It would have ripped a commercial plane apart, Additionally many reports came out that the planes were "black". We just don't know exactly what happened.

If you haven't looked at the pilots for 9/11 truth sites, you really should.

Were the Israelis involved? possibly, but we don't know anything for sure.

Were the Saudis involved, very likely, but we don't know anything for sure.

Did you watch the video I posted. Don't lose the forest for the trees. A real investigation needs to be done, that IS for sure. Facts are in short supply and there is much speculation and unneeded squabbling over unimportant details. Focus on what is empirically provable, you can't answer every question, there's simply not enough data.

Did you even watch Ryan's

Did you even watch Ryan's video? He thoroughly shows Israel's connections to 9/11, not with speculation, but hard research.

This kid has no clue what he is talking about: FAIL

Ignorance isn't a crime, but why anyone would watch this guy, who has no expertise in anything, baffles me.

He looks and sounds like a complete idiot.

I recommend people watch Dr. Daniele Ganser's analysis from the University of Basel. It's an unbiased, and well formed academic argument: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fUT7XgLiTY

His work on Europe is very well done as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AajcK6DXI2g

There's plenty of good quality research that has been done. There's no need to watch some kid with no perspective or analysis skills rant and rave about topics he doesn't understand.

Love Ryan's work, even though

Love Ryan's work, even though he is dead wrong on the TM/GZ trial controversy.

haha!

BUMP!!!!!

This guy has it called. I give him props for revealing himself the way he does.

A true flower can not blossom without sunlight and a true man can not live without love.

Gratuitous self bump because

I posted this in the middle of the night when everyone was asleep.

Any unbiased rational investigator...

"The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode.

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government's theoretical version of what actually caused the total destruction of the buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft..."

George Nelson
Colonel, USAF (ret.)

http://rense.com/general64/prec.htm

Best get busy reading friend...