27 votes

Peter King: Hillary Clinton would destroy an isolationist like Rand Paul or Ted Cruz

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Cyril's picture

"... destroy an 'isolationist'..." Yeah, right.

"... destroy an 'isolationist'..."

Yeah, right.

And "interventionism" works SO WELL that the U.S. Empire had to start "intervene" in Afghanistan, and spread their forceful interventions in the middle east ever since the 1980s (to train Al-CIAda, et al.) ...

... and they're still BREEDING REBELS, COUPS D'ETAT AND WARS AT THE SAME PLACES, 33 FREAKING YEARS LATER : TODAY, GOD DAMN IT ! And now with the help of their European bitches, 'coz otherwise that's not fun.

That's the evidence INTERVENTIONISM WORKS ! Of course, how dare we question that ?!


We must be COMPLETE MORONS, since it's the same HAPPY MEAL these U.S. "administrations" have been serving us, on recommendations of their CFR and U.N. Supermen friends.


Did I miss something ?

Or, how about...


"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius


The fact that he states that he's know Hilary for a long time and seems to admire her, more than Rand and Ted, should turn every republican, that he claims loves Reagan and Eisenhower, against him. No real conservative would listen to him say that and agree with him. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised.



meekandmild's picture

how can any one argue

that minding your own business is detrimental?

With nearly 900 military bases in 135 countries, its fair to say

in almost every case our military in that country is stronger than that country's military which means we are actually OCCUPYING almost every country on earth. How then can anyone way we are isolationists?


How do you guys elect these war mongering buffoons? Check this guys donor list, betcha Halliburton et al are all over it. Sadly some Americans like war mongers, first question to him should be, did you serve? Secondly, do your children? Third, if neither a or b is true, what business of it is yours sending kids to die? Lastly, do you support a bill forcing military aged offspring of yours to war if you vote for it. With 0 deferrals except I'm cases of mid pregnancy, retardation, or missing limb? This guy likely will answer no to all & should be politely told to fuck off.

Democrats don't like war but blindly trust their "leaders"

Republicans think war keeps us free (ignoring the obvious lack of freedom) and love the idea of killing people with fancy expensive weapons. Those of us who question war and dare to bring up the fact that we are less free after a lot of wars are just nutjobs; democrats call us names and say we're misinformed and republicans want us locked up and tortured.
There's a country song that breaks into a slow,sentimental bridge that thanks the troops for wonderful freedoms like jeans that fit, radios and beer. And if you are looking for republican programming, you needn't look much further than your local country station.


like a true Democrat imo.


This guy

is a nobody. The media is throwing up turds to see which ones stick.

This loon is beyond a piece of sht.

He is one of the more obvious sellouts out there.

Who died....

and made King "king?"

You want the same foreign policy of meddling in other county's affairs and unconstitutional wars....elect this prick....or the other prick Hilary Ram-rod Clinton.....

President King Now theres an

President King

Now theres an onimous*spelling* sounding name

I feel dirty putting those words together, as if king himself just smiled

you feel dirty

but just look at that 8 year old child like grin on his face for the first 55 seconds of the interview when the interviewer says it... oh... baby want a serious office... how cute... baby will be pwesident someday

he answers with as much grace, honesty, tact, and vocabulary skills as an 8 year old. i know 12 year olds that would have more thoughtful responses.

Rand Already Decimated Hillary!

Remember this?


and a great parody of the whole mess:


"Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern." ~~C.S. Lewis
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

stop name calling...

you isolationists will cause WW3 with a nuclear Iron! Stop your name calling a pandering to the nations fears!

In the same sentence he makes himself a hypocrite twice. My lord! Will Rand sweep the floor with this guy.

On a serious note, you want him to get in. He'll show everyone what a douche his line of thinking is, and those that present themselves better but have the same policies will be shown to be frauds.

seriously though...

i really am not as angry as some of you. consider supporting king. i think he's so conceited and over the top, he'll only help our cause.

btw - is it just me, or does having so many pictures of yourself with others (assuming celebrities and politicians Mr. King admires) all over the wall seem to speak to some sort of inferiority complex. i stopped putting posters on my wall when i was 8; no need to idiolize anyone else in this world. we've all got our flaws. i'd understand a few, but come on.

that's exactly what it means

and anyone who has such things all over their office is a dickbrain

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

I've met famous people too,

I've met famous people too, but I don't plaster their pictures all over my walls. You're definitely on to something there.


We know you work closely with Hitlary. You both are on the same team. Sure, let's put another neocon clone against another neocon. That way it doesn't matter who wins. Doesn't resort to name calling, and then calls them isolationists. These traitors are so transparent it's disgusting. Thank you Dr. Paul for waking me up. Go Rand. What you're doing is obviously working.

I'd hardly call Hillary a Neo-Con

It's even worse than that.

These people are Globalists, Elitists, and very possibly occultists.

A good term that defines their entire ideology no matter what form it takes is "Authoritarian Collectivism".

Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

I said it once i said it again

The neocons are sending king out to destroy any chance of Rand Paul being president. They'll use him in debates, they'll use him in newscasts. We need to shut this clown down. We need a scandal now more than ever.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."

Click Here To See The Candidates On The Record

Normally I wouldn't do a triple post...but

I cant help myself.

What King seems to be saying is that we need a GOP nominee that will agree with Hiltery on foreign policy?

Seems like King loves Hitlery and would support Hitlery over Rand or Cruz.

Sounds like King needs to join the democrap party and campaign for Hitlery. Makes no sense.

Also Reagan's motto was Peace through Strength not Peace through never ending War.

And Eisenhower? He was the guy that warned us about the MIC encroaching on our freedom.

King is a dope.

Eisenhower? lets re-wrire some history Mr King

Eisenhower refused to get involved in the Persian gulf, Eisenhower was a non interventionist. How do these idiots get elected?

"The Anglo-French-Israeli invasion of Egypt in 1956 was a foolish scheme, based on deceit and rooted partly in pique and archaic colonial thinking in London and Paris. President Eisenhower was entirely correct in firmly opposing it". Wiki

Re-writing history just a little bit yourself, maybe?

Through the UN Eisenhower forced Israel to give up the Suez Canal, which was fairly captured in that war after Israel was attacked first. So much for Eisenhower being a true 'non-interventionist'.

Dr. Paul on the other hand is true non-interventionist, supporting not intervening in Israeli sovereignty when Israel bombed Iraqi nuclear weapons sites in 1981. Reagan, like Eisenhower chose to condemn Israel's sovereign decision to defend her interests through UN sanctions.

Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

OK we are reffering to 1956 not 1967, Israel was attacked first?

that's not exactly as I have understood it, however I have been educated in a public school system where all history has a certain "spin" to it. It appears that the French and British along with Israel attacked Egypt to control the Suez Canal. Eisenhower opposed it and did refuse to back the attack. Who attacked Israel first? I am thinking "fairly captured" is in the eye of the beholder.

Eisenhower was not the pure non-interventionist that Ron Paul would be.

One more thing...

How would Hitlery defeat Rand? Will Hitlery's base come out in droves to support more wars? I don't think so. I think the opposite is true.

You'd think that would be the case...

You'd think that would be the case BUT Hillary's constituents don't care about anything except the fact that she is a woman, a feminist, a democrat, a Clinton, etc.

"Villains wear many masks, but none as dangerous as the mask of virtue." - Washington Irvin

It is time

to take off the gloves with these neocons and say plainly who they are and what they serve.

These freaks are Zionist and that is who they serve.

They are not harmless or misguided. They are pure evil.

They need to be exposed.

They do have a record now and it is not a good one.

Can you please define what you mean by Zionism?

I cannot stand Peter King. I may support Israel existing but I am an American first and foremost and Peter King is a traitor to the constitution & a NWO sellout in my opinion. I cannot see how America falling into a dictatorial police-state could possibly be good for Israel.
I believe Israel has the right to exist. I believe that is what Zionism is. If that is not the definition of Zionism, please explain what is.
I can see how the NWO elite would employ Task-master "jews" like him and Bloomberg to take over Israel and the US, and then cry anti-Semitism when anyone speaks up. That doesn't mean you should fall for their scapegoat, and blame Israel.
What you are calling Zionists, I would call Satanic occult New World Order Elite. They are not Jews. And they do not have the best interest of America, or the nation or people of Israel in mind.

Whatever the case, he is bad for freedom, in America, Israel, and everywhere I can think of.

Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?