-1 vote

Ignoring OJ's false theft conviction makes ignoring accusing Zimmerman of Gross Racism

I was bothered that the person who set up OJ Simpson by suddenly banishing a gun after talking OJ into trying to get his own clothes back, wasn't even charged with a crime

Ignoring this spreads the idea that guilty people should be framed.

If one is thoughtful but thinks this the verdict should stand, question where was the mud that certain Zimmerman idealizes claim. Point out if was wrong for him not to mention town-watch whenTrayvon twice asked why were you following me? And that Trayvon feared what looked like a hoodlum finding out where he lived.

As far as the Constitution in the wild-west a sheriff could post “Guns must be left outside of town”. If Philadelphia until the 20th century had passed a law no guns allowed in the cities many public squares no one would stop the city. The logic that one must compromise rights in pursuit of security is what is driving us toward dictatorship, the President the most persuasive spokesperson for this argument.

Perhaps those who want gun control or who want the 99% not to get together is spreading overly shrill arguments.

Ignoring False Thief Charges on OJ Simpson helps people ignore false exaggeration in Racism Against Trayvon Martin

I am suddenly very upset about not speaking out on O J Simpson framed for armed theft, and the person with the gun not even charged. Loosing ones clothes was not before part of a civil suit. And evidence wasn't stated that O J Simpson even knew a gun would be used during the robbery. We keep getting fed the end result (putting someone in jail who deserves to be is what counts).

I think thoughtful bloggers don’t automatically use the “+” and “–“key”, unless a “+” to represent overwhelming praise. Sadly the future may depend on us joining this petty nonsense. I don't have time to go through every comment especially since I won't minus a comment I differ with but helps me think.

If one is thoughtful but thinks this the verdict should stand, question where was the mud that certain Zimmerman idealizes claim. Point out if was wrong for him not to mention town-watch when Trayvon twice asked why were you following me? And that Trayvon feared what looked like a hoodlum finding out where he lived.

As far as the Constitution in the wild-west a sheriff could post “Guns must be left outside of town”. If Philadelphia until this century had passed a law no guns allowed in the cities many public squares no one would stop them. The logic that one must compromise rights in pursuit of security is what is driving us toward dictatorship, the President the most persuasive spokesperson for this argument.

Perhaps those who want gun control or who want the 99% not to get together is spreading overly shrill arguments.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Fix ur post

The last few paragraphs are duplicate

-quiet engineer