Is there room for occasional RP doubters (even though they believe in RP's issues) on this site?

0 votes

Ron Paul has a great message and terrific integrity.

But, does his weakness as an executive ....

(how the campaign has been run -- illustrative examples not included to avoid my being spammed as a troll --)

. . . . mean he wouldn't be a good president, even if most of his ideas and principles are right? This question really bothers me and I have not reached a conclusion on it yet.

Is there room on this board for me and my question or will I be shouted down by troll-hunters?

I have the feeling its time for me to move on to another website.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The troll issue was blown

The troll issue was blown out of proportion because of the debates over blimp fund raising and disappointment over the early primary results. I suspect that a number of people thought that Dr. Paul was going to do much better in Iowa and NH. When he didn't a few people started saying that the sky is falling, and that they were leaving the campaign etc. This seemed to cause a bunch of people (including myself once) to start becoming defensive to keep things positive on the sites so the campaign didn't collapse.

I think now we are much more realistic. Most of us now understand that its unlikely that the good doctor is going to get the nomination without some big swings (possible), so I expect that troll accusations will drop over time.

I have little doubt that there really are trolls around the Ron Paul boards (and the other candidates boards) but I think we are learning how to deal with this issue. This is something we need to figure out.

"Freedom suppressed and again regained bites with keener fangs than freedom never endangered." -- Cicero

Real vs Fake.

You get a real person on TV in a circus like that and that's what they look like. You have to be full of crap and worry about nothing about but how you are perceived, to look good in that environment. Look at the morons who succeed in Hollywood and Washington. Did you see the "I feel Pretty" you tube? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q That's what I'm talking about. I for one am sick of those type of people being taken seriously. I want substance, and Dr Paul has it in spades.

Listen

its the message he wants to get across. If anything he want people to be aware of whats going on in america, and for us to stop it. That is Ron Paul's main goal, even if he doesnt win. Win or Not its the message of freedom he wants to get across. So even though things dont look like it going great, even though things don't seem well. Keep going, and never give up, never give up the message!!!!

The question IS a valid one... and one that I have asked myself

Indeed, two weeks ago I became VERY despondent about not only the campaign, but any possible Paul presidency as well.

An executive has a "trustee" relationship that he accepts on behalf of ALL of the stakeholders in an organization.Thus, he cannot allow personal loyalties to cloud his judgment in regard to decisions about selecting appropriate managers working underneath him (note that this ALSO includes the opposite... not simply rejecting a good candidate simply because you have a good working relationship with them, like them personally, or have some external loyalty to or with them -- but even at that it is better to err on the side of caution).

BUT.... and it is a BIG but... this would be a reason to choose a candidate with Ron Paul's platform AND more extensive management experience. Absent that other person (and there is none in sight, not even on the horizon) -- it is NOT a reason to reject Ron Paul's candidacy.

The reason why is that our executive branch has "gone native" and taken over the reins of ALL THREE branches, and additionally, assumed and taken control away from the various States, as well as extensively usurped and destroyed nearly ALL of the rights of the people. The BEST way to reverse this trend is to put someone like Ron Paul in place -- someone with the intestinal fortitude to forgo the temptations of power and to reverse the nearly 100 year trend towards fascism. I can think of only one or two such men to ever inhabit the American Presidency, and while there may have been problems in their administrations (which, sadly is what history books focus on... a bit like our current news, always loving scandals), but it also does NOT lessen the substantial achievements they made in reversing very damaging trends.

Such men are RARE indeed.

That they are not PERFECT in every regard is to pick over nits.

Overall, Ron has done an excellent job as an "executive" in running his own medical practice, as well as choosing people to run his Congressional office (what other congressman, EVER, ran his office UNDERbudget?). That there were a few employees who caused problems (Rockwell) or left in a snit (Dondero) over the coarse of a 20+ year career is truly a remarkable accomplishment.

And while the evidence we have seen SO FAR in this campaign does NOT engender a lot of confidence in the campaign staff (how's THAT for an understatement?) -- we have not seen the whole campaign run its course, and there may yet be "tricks" and "trumps" hidden up the campaign sleeves ("Make fun, buddy...[hint... hint... While you can! Because there's a freight train coming and it's got your name printed on the cow-catcher!]"). It may have been necessary to have US think they are incompetent in order to more fully hoodwink, blindside and rout the other campaigns when time comes (one has to have some hope, no?)

In short... one can choose to have faith, and hope... and get down to work (go get some CommonSense my friend) -- OR one can become totally despondent, and go hide in a cave awaiting the end of all things.

I've been in that cave... and there is nothing there.

It's the toll of great execution

We've got a great set of organized supporters that execute better than any of the other candidates'. After doggedly focusing on execution for weeks, it can be frustrating for the group to see a post that doesn't directly affect getting RP elected.

We have to fight hard for each and every supporter. Campaigning can be very trying, and it takes a toll. Individuals are human and will become disenfranchised at times. We don't want disenfranchised supporters turn away from the effort. Because we have to fight so hard for each supporter, I believe that we would be wise to lend an ear to the disenfranchised from time to time.

Stay

Join the party.
The revolution is here!

www.ronpaul2008.com

There is life at the end of the tunnel my friends!

***********Ron Paul for POTUS 2012***********
*************Obama Is A Communist!************
**********Repeal the 17th Amendment**********
Double the size of the House of Representatives
$$$$$$$$$AUDIT THE FEDERAL RESERVE$$$$$$$$$$

This site can sometimes operate like Fox News

RP came around and threw some fire into the Republican debate and completely changed the landscape of the debate. Fox News called RP a troll and tried to shut him up. They said he wasn't helping the cause of Republicans. The meaning of Republican has completely changed in the minds of many people.

Every candidate on that stage has now completely changed their message because of RP. Many positive things have come from the grassroots being critical of Ron Paul including the new HQ blog.

Ron Paul has been incredibly brave. Its easy for us to be critical from our couches. I don't want to see negativity, but self reflection is important. Sometimes I hear RP make a point about the war or the Fed that is extremely eloquent. Other times, he wanders a bit while getting to his point. I wouldn't mind seeing him stick to the most effective wording, but I think his intelligence makes it hard for him to not completely tailor his answer to each question.

I'd also like to add that whether RP gets elected or not, this movement is huge. In the last three weeks, the news is taking RP's ideas seriously. This is going to be a 10 year fight. Getting RP elected will not acomplish much if we don't keep fighting for senate and congress seats.

Very true. And if you turn

Very true. And if you turn negativity into a question, you may just find an answer.

Asking questions is GOOD for the movement. If you have concerns by all means ask away.

Casting doom and gloom about in a random unproductive manner is BAD for the movement. We like free speach around here, but don't expect a good response to random doom and gloom.

Ask a question and people will try to answer the best way they know how.

dont worry

Any comment or concern is easily identified as being helpful or hurtful to the campaign. No one is perfect so any constructive criticism is welcome. I've noticed that those who have contributed the most to the campaign often offer the harshest criticism because it's THIER effort on the line if we fail. I like what someone else said, Gilmore, Brownback, Tancredo, Hunter, and Thompson are all behind in our rear view mirrors. We are passing Huck and Rudy. The field is getting slimmer and we are still in it. Obviouslly we are doing something right.

Dr. Paul is into long distance sports.

He is leaving the sprinters behind. McCain is a survivor, that could be why Dr. Paul directed a question to him. Romney just wants everyone to like him, this is why he changes opinions so easily. Romney is a threat, but only because he is so wealthy.

If you have concerns, phrase

If you have concerns, phrase them in the form of a question and submit them to the community.

WARNING: You will get a WIDE variety of answers, some of them may come off as a bit crazy at first. But there are plenty of "sane" people around who would be happy to answer any honest questions you may have.

Have confidence that the man

Have confidence that the man will pick a good VP and surround himself with good people.

I don't think he would try this if he didn't think he had the resources to get the job done. The man doesn't like doing things you don't have the resources for.

But if you have honest questions that you think need some sort of sane public discourse, that is not negative.

Having questions is not negative.

We are in a fight..

negativity spreads.. you can think it but keep your pie hole shut soldier.

This is a war, there is no honor in the man / woman who backs down.

Who shows fear to the enemy.

Yes there is room for the ocasonal Ron Paul Doubter. But, don't spread your doubt.

Prov 7 list as one of the 7 worst sins. "he who spreads discontent among the brothers." It is a sin that "G-d" hates it is worse than adultery.

It is a vile evil. Spreading it makes it grow in you and plants it in another. It's like spreading aids intentionally.

Buck Up Soldier.

I agree, too much flagging and troll name calling.

Its unhealthy to our cause, afterall, this is not a cult.

So to that person below who responded, "go away little troll".... YOU GO AWAY !

You go worship at the alter of Ron Paul.

Meanwhile real discussion and constructive criticism should ALWAYS be welcomed.

As for me, that was the WORST Ron Paul performance simply because he did not show up to the debate with New Stuff and he was NOT aggressive at all...it is doubtful Ron Paul was even AT The debate...time and time again they talked about their records....why did not Ron Talk about his great record? and what looney question to McCain was that? Was that a "hit"? I am sorely disappointed in Ron Pauls performance, but I am delighted we patriots hit the text in poll and put Ron Paul up to 40%. The amazing fact is, Romney got his supporters together to finally beat us on Texting in our vote. Congrads to Romney.....

I can't stand that John McWaricain, I can't stand Rudy though he did give a good free market answer.....

You know, that homespun way of Huckabee may be JUST what we need to get the Democrats to agree to Abolish the Income Tax.

I think it would be easier for a black market to arrise to avoid the national sales tax.....so we may just get the ZERO tax we want in the end.

Romney did look the best, sound the best, but McCain has the nonothings all befuddled. Rudy failed to sway and now McCain "owns" the Iraq issue.

Should the party pick Romney, that amazing agile guy will no doubt be telling us all that yes HE Did support the Iraq war, but, when it came down to decide the issue as President, he choose life and return our Soldiers home to America...to make his economic plan work and pay for all those protectionist promises he made the auto workers in Michigan.

You know, I don't know who is the more amazingly slippery guy, Romney who looked and acted like a liberal to be governor who called himself NOT a Reagan Republican, who now is a lookalike Reagan Republican, who is now an "agent for change" like Obama, who now ...."now" is against the Iraq war, but what will he be the day after he takes office? ..... Or Hillary, the Liberal who votes for the Iraq war and nuking Iran and Patriot Act and suddenly "Knows whats wrong with Washington"....Or McWaricain who is a liberal but asks people to "look at his conservative Record" and so on..... the ONE thing about McWaricain and his long long record, it is ALWAYS FOR WAR... more war, more boots on the ground as he told Bill Clinton on Kosovo....more war, more more more..... Now Huckleberry, he just will get along to get along with the future Democrat Controled House and Senate, and we will see how fast he sells out the Flat Tax idea....probably faster than a one hour sermon.

Oh boy is THIS just a HORRIBLE bunch of choices....which brings be back to Ron Paul...the BEST ideas, the Best philosophy, the BEST record, the BEST character......but you would NOT know this from tonights debate, Ron Paul was Missing in Action...AWOL.

Treg / Tempe, AZ

Gosh th

Congrads to Romney?!

No wonder you would say, "too much troll name calling". Listen, I'm so happy for you that you enjoy complimenting the other candidates and insulting Ron Paul. This forum is TO GET RON PAUL ELECTED. It is not so that you don't get your feelings hurt when you come to insult and cut down our next President. You should have just posted your last paragraph and that would have sufficed.

"If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." - Romans 12:18

Brilliant article that explains why we love Dr. Paul:
http://lewrockwell.com/orig12/farber-r1.1.1.html

Ron's question to McCain was

Ron's question to McCain was both a tactical move and aggressively comical..

McCain is his biggest competition

Ron made him look like an idiot.

That being said, I could think of a million more things to ask him besides the very specific economy question that went a little over my head.

Luckily for us, it soared over Johnny boys'

No, there is not. This

No, there is not. This message board is devoted to getting Ron Paul elected, not debating his merits.

Lets not make it a Cult....

......and if we continue following that direction, it will be..... Criticism, of Ron, of us in the Grassroots, of HQ, is all good and very healthy.... I voted for Ron Paul in 1988, and frankly he was top notch then, .... the Ron Paul of 1988 would have eaten these phonies alive tonight... I miss that Ron Paul.

Bhaaaaaaaaaaaah!!!!!

"Four legs good, two legs BAAAAAD!"

"Luctor et Emergo" - Struggle and Emerge

Well

At the moment, I am suspicious of anything called "bank," but you were certainly gentle enough with your question.

I think the campaign headquarters is run by someone that is trusted that he turned it over to and is loyal to and I figure he thinks if that person cannot accomplish it, then no one can. Or that anyone else could be making worse mistakes. Then there is the certain truth that we are privileged to no information about what is really going on. Certainly the candidate does not have time to be actually running his campaign. He has a job and is handling it to the best of his ability. There are so many problems bigger than how the campaign is run that his head is probably totally swimming by now.

God bless him, he has his work cut out for him in so very many ways. The best thing we could do for him is do our job and let others do their job. Certainly the job I am doing is not without fault by any means. How about yours?

Well

I seem to be stuttering here!!

Well

ugh-repeats-slowness-

This is what I say.

Ron Paul is not perfect but he is simply the best one running.

Allot of people worship RP as a god or somthing, and will flame you for beign honest. Just do what you think is right and be open to learning new things. I agree with RP on just about every thing, I can not say that about allot of his supporters.

That weakness..

..is called libertarianism. It needs to be stamped out. There is nothing wrong with having a leader...so long as that person knows what they are doing...to follow. Lack of following experience is what got him in trouble in NH.

Wow

"...libertarianism...needs to be stamped out."

Wow....

I am literally aghast at your comment. For anyone who loves freedom, libertarianism is the only valid political ideology. All others are about control.

So tell me, which aspects of my life do you wish to control? I know you're active in the GOP, so I assume you don't want to control my finances. So that leaves the socially conservative stuff. Do you want to control my sex life?

Please detail which liberties you endorse, and which ones should be stamped out.

----------
Liberty for Dummies

The one thing I wished he had said......

if we had followed the Constitution for the last seventy years we wouldn't be in the mess we are today!

Nough said

For God and Country!

For God and Country!

Trolls welcome.....

if you can hang in there for an honest debate. Try posting a counter point to Hillary's economic plan. I did and it never got posted. I tried several times. Here, you will get a vetting of your beliefs. Ron Paul takes his marching orders from the Constitution. Everything else is just noise. The job of the Presidency is not rocket science if you just follow the Constitution. If it had been followed strictly for the last 70 years we would not be in the mess we find ourselves today.

For God and Country!

For God and Country!

No you are a real troll

No you are a real troll; but thank you for asking.

You cannot on this site dare to question the NHQ. If you do; you will a called a troll -- but now days -- they flag you pretty quick so your post goes away; usually within about five minutes.

I rank these flaggers as the real trolls -- on par with CFR folks.

You should go to another forum if you need to vent about the lack of leadership from NHQ, or offer constructive thoughts and ideas. This site is however a good place to see what is happening.

This site has been a real boost to volunteers -- if only their suggestions were followed.

After Feb 5th; the debate changes -- between staying in the race - which we cannot win for the Rep Nom -- or mount a fourth party effort -- it will be exciting again.

Weak executive/leader or different mgt style?

Vision:
- Foresaw the economic crisis we are heading into years ago
- foresaw the impending war on iraq brewing back in 1990s
- warned of the quagmire Iraq invasion will be
- supported fledgling Regan

knowledgeable leader (not shooting from the hip and making WAR decisions like dumb GWB):
- self-taught economic Austrian theory
- but head with a Princeton PhD (Fed Chairman Bernake)
- talk sense with financial analyst (Kudlow, Kramer, et al)

Integrity: ...

One who does not want to lead is he who leads best. Others are hungry for power to control your life and take away your liberty.

If you need someone to tell you what to do, he is not your type. If u love ur freedom and creativity, he is your only choice. He does not want to run your life, the economy or the world. He wants you to have your freedom and rule the country by law, not by men/women.

Welcome to the Revolution!

Very Well Put, Starcraft!

There is nothing weak about Paul. However, he doesn't rely on folksy charm and "heartfelt" messages, he doesn't blather on incoherently, he doesn't wave his arm and claim he is responsible for every perceived good in this country, and he doesn't glibly assert that he has always been for everything he has always adamantly been against. Don't confuse style with substance.