1 vote

Libertarian Bill O'Reilly (CNN.com): The U.S. Dollar will Collapse

I wish titles could be purpled...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Dear Bill

I really wish your name was Richard....it would suit you so much better.

The Entitled Are Coming! The Entitled Are Coming!

Sound the alarms, the entitled are coming!

Notice how this apologist for

Notice how this apologist for the MIC never calls for massive cuts to Pentagon spending? Wonder if he realizes how much the stupid wars of the last decade have added to our debt. Entitlements get way too much blame from idiots like OReilly. And of course, does he even realize that our monetary system is debt based?

"I have to play Paul Revere here" ROFL... pah

we have our own BILL3 thanks anyway Fox

A true flower can not blossom without sunlight and a true man can not live without love.

Billy would've announced "The British are coming!"

after Yorktown.

Bill is the furtherest thing from Libertarian.

Voted down because of an inaccurate title.

The title was sarcastic.

It should have appeared in purple text like this.

It is a response to another article about 'libertarian' Jeff Bezos buying the Washington Post. While Jeff seems like a nice enough guy and may in fact be a libertarian, describing him as such in the title of a news story seems disingenuous if not outrightly deceptive.

A quick read of his wikipedia page revealed nothing about his political leanings but I did find this:
"He is also a member of the Bilderberg Group and attended the Swiss 2011 Bilderberg conference in St. Moritz, Switzerland.[28]"

Libertarians at Bilderberg? Possibly. But I wouldn't get all giddy about his WAPo purchase quite yet.

It was probably the pandas.

Why is

it all of a sudden all the Fox News clowns are talking smart? Is it just for ratings? When the election gets close will they sell them selves out again and pick the worst candidate on stage? Most likely.

In my opinion,

...it's because they've tried everything else to destroy libertarianism in the hearts and minds of their fans and critics, and are clearly failing. Now they're trying to blur the lines in order to make Rand less appealing to independent voters (yes, I believe it's aimed directly at Rand). Rand will get the Republican nomination if he doesn't fall prey to their e-voting machines before he faces Hilary. If he gets a bigger chunk of independents than Hilary, he'll be our next president. Again, if they don't steal it, which they will unless they plan to make the people suffer severely during his time in office in order to destroy ours as a viable political philosophy, root and stem, once and for all.

Imagine if Rand wins and they manipulate things in such a way that the middle-class is completely raped. Any time a libertarian runs for any office they'll be able to say, "do you people really want to risk going through THAT again?" and it will work, I think. Right now I think some people who don't necessarily want to vote libertarian, but vote libertarian anyway, will do so because they hope and pray for something better, and they've lived through several Republicratic administrations that have led to nothing but loss of one kind or another. The lack of bad experience with libertarian presidents works in our favor in these trying times. If you had to eat the same crap over and over, then you see something different—not good but not bad neither—you may give it a try, and it may taste great, but if you wake up at 3am sick to your stomach you will never try it again, especially if you have someone reminding you of how sick you were the last time you tried it.

I hope I'm wrong, but I think that's the environment we live in right now and that they may actually be setting us up for complete and utter failure before the number of people awakened is too large for their tricks to be effective; i.e. before the tipping point aims in our direction.

I pray that we already have the numbers, the momentum, the know-how and God's grace on our side. I'd really hate to have to start over (because I will never stop "teaching.")

Work for pay, pay for freedom
Fuck 'em all, we don't need 'em

This is still prescription news and preparations for .....

It's actually a little scary when I hear O'Reilly talk like this. To me it signals that TPTB are preparing us for the coming "austerity measures" ie.....haircut, savings, social security reform, higher taxes, new currency etc...

Perhaps it's even to save face since the inevitable is coming. Maybe it's time to start letting the sheeple know so the ones who created this mess can be the ones to save us.

Dang!

O'Reilly just said all that? I thought Hell would sooner freeze over or pigs would gain wings. Six years too late, but better late than never I suppose.

It's called...

..giving 'libertarian' a bad connotation through association with living feces known as 'Bill O'Reilly'.

The title of this post wasn't meant to imply that B.O. is a

libertarian.

Recent studies have shown that posts that start with the word 'libertarian' have a 41.6% higher readership level.

Posts that start with the word 'douchebag' have a 718.4% higher readership level but you aren't supposed to say the word douchebag on the internet unless it is an absolute emergency.

It was probably the pandas.

Bill O'Reilly deserves

the DoucheBag title.

King Douche still goes to the 49'ers Jim Harbaugh, though.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=rg723aHPUSw

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.