33 votes

The latest round of callers to C-SPAN asking about bldg 7 and 9/11. Gotta love it!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Most Powerful

Truther Movement to date!

Three Cheers for www.911FreeFall.com

I salute you, American Patriots!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I especially feel the power in the former marine who frequently indentifies himself as a veteran, and as speaking on behalf of veterans sharing his concern. That man has some weight - and they all have balls!!!!!!!!!!

Go F'ers Go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! For all of us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

Did someone say Sean Duffy?

Already owned him


Too much editing of his response for me to take this seriously

Please post the whole thing.



Southern Agrarian


Gotta love the persistence in the face of resistance~

Daughter of 1776 American Revolutionists

Nice compilation of

Nice compilation of 9/11callers. I don't think it's an organized effort, I think it's a random effort. Maybe one of the next 9/11 callers can correct C-Span on this point.

I love this effort!!!

However, I must make a suggestion ...

Each caller has to think of this as a chess match where each player only gets one move, and the caller has the privilege of making the first move. You *must* make this move very carefully. You have to do it in such a way that their only move is to address your move, otherwise it will look so obvious to the listening audience that the CSPAN folks and their guest are cheating.

Let me explain ...

In this latest video, I saw the same pattern happening over and over. The caller would call in and ask why nobody would address the overwhelming evidence of demolition, and explosive material found and in some cases the caller would mention building 7 and some cases not. The host would then immediately mention the organized effort to discuss 9/11 "twin towers" and/or "plane hijackings" ... etc. What the host is doing is a chess side move ... i.e. a move that totally does not address the callers move, and in most cases it was okay, because the caller didn't fully box them in.

What you have to do, is completely *BOX* them in (Think Hannity here ... as much as you all and I hate Hannity, you have to admit he's the master at crafting his interview questions to box the interviewee in). You have to say that you're not asking a question about the twin towers or the hijackings. You then have to say that you want the guest to address building 7 *specifically* (And again, stress *not* the twin towers or planes hitting the buildings or pentagon etc.), and stress that that building was not hit by a hijacked airplane but still collapsed, at free fall none the less. You could even mention that the BBC reported on its collapse *before* the actual collapse (Which is an undisputed *fact* where there's video evidence all over the internet, so easily accessible) and ask why haven't these anomalies been addressed. At that point, if they say anything other than talk about building 7, then it's obvious they're dodging.

You have to really stick with building 7, it's so key to waking people up. I was a true neocon and Bush die hard and ridiculed anybody who'd talk about 9/11 not being what the gov't has told us. What woke me up *was* building 7, and later on what sealed my belief in cement such that there was no going back was BBC reporting on it 20+ minutes before the actual collapse. So IMO, those things have to be driven home!!!! I cannot stress that enough! Explosive material found and engineers' peer reviewed documents is not going to persuade someone who's completely blinded by gov't propaganda. All it takes for a die hard non-believer is to have a look at BBC reporting on the collapse before the actual collapse, and *that* my DP friends will plant the seed of critical thinking about 9/11 in their head!

Upvote 1000!

If I could I would! I LOVE these videos. If the person who makes these is a DP member, I just want to let you that you're awesome!

This is absolutely...

beautiful. Keep this up.

The height of ignorance..

The callers are asking about building 7 SPECIFICALLY and emphasizing the fact that it was not hit by a plane..then these asshats make a standard yet predictable rebuttal about how 2 hijacked planes were flown into yadayadayada...they are completely avoiding the question of why building seven could have fallen at freefall speeds when not even being hit by a plane.

Organised effort...?

AT 11:30 C-Span Stooge says "there is an organised effort to ask this question" . This is making a statement of fact to the masses. My question is where do they get off making remarks like this for this one issue only, & where is the proof of the statement?

I believe these are sincere concerned Critical thinking citizens. My suggestion is callers should make a disclaimer prior to asking their question on building 7 that they are "NOT" a part of any organization, or organised effort to ask their question.

I was

I was thinking the same thing Disclaimer

SteveMT's picture

Guest propagandist: "it's one of those mysteries of history."

They are now rhyming their lies.

The Truth Will Be Known

All in time. All in time. Tic tock. Tick tock.

We are winning the infowar on this issue

We are definitely winning. These people are twisting around like little worms. I believe that even the host of this show realizes now that 9/11 was indeed an inside job. Keep pressing forward. You could tell that everyone of these people knew the truth but were too afraid to say.

Now as far as James O'Keefe goes, he is a fraud and his book Breakthrough is not worth buying. I promise you this because I bought his book and if I could get Amazon to take it back, I would send it back. He is not a Journalist but rather should be working for some porn magazine. Project Veritas is worthless so don't donate to this fraud.

As far as 9/11, everyone I talk to knows it was an inside job now. Just a few years ago they would argue with me but now they drop their head and admit it was an inside job. We are winning this argument hands down.

scawarren's picture

Grayson's remark is the only

Grayson's remark is the only one that didn't make me see red :(
Thanks, go213mph

It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. – Mark Twain

Project Veritas?

The investigative journalist of project veritas is an ally.

His eyes are wide open

He knows the truth and so do the host of the show. They have seen the light as well. People do not want to live under people who would kill almost 2,000 of their fellow citizens.