16 votes

Louis Farrakhan warns white people

I was rather surprised when I saw this video this morning, and I'm wondering what you folk think of it.

Is he right? Is he wrong? Does it matter?



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Notice how Farrakhan

didn't mention obama's ear. that boy's ears is cracker 100%

Do we want the white race to continue?

White people elected the white politicians who created the welfare state, the warfare state, the police state.

White people elected the white politicians who created the income tax, the sales tax, the property tax.

White people gave us the "smart" meter, the NSA, the TSA, the CIA, the DEA, the ATF, the FBI, the DHS.

White people gave us the UN, the G8, the G20, NAFTA, GATT, the Small Arms Treaty, Agenda 21.

White people gave us Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, predator drones, WMDs.

And white people have the nerve to call themselves more "civilized" than the other races?

White people have a lot of bad decisions to undo.

I think the problem is, you're not taking the time to think

I don't have the time to give your post its just response but hopefully within the next couple of days I will have a response that will merit the kind of response that it deserves.

LOL!

You got downvoted, but I see the humor and, sadly, the truth.

and I am 94% white--

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Rubbish

The Human Race Trumps all the BS sub-race division that people of all colors attempt to make important.

People, not White, Black, Red, Yellow, or Brown have a lot of bad CENTRALLY PLANNED decisions to undo.

Along with all the bad you point out that was done by Light Skinned HUMAN BEINGS, a great deal of good has been done by Humans of all skin tones.

If you choose to focus on skin tone and the ills of the world, then your life is most likely going to end up pretty miserable.

Yes there are problems, but when looked at as opportunities for improvement, the meme changes dramatically.

Libertarians believe in making those improvements, just not via violent actions or behaviors.

Why is it important to

Why is it important to preserve panda bears, spotted owls, and wolves from extinction but not my race, the White race?

In 1914 Whites were about 35% of the global population.
Today...8%.
Of that number, around 2% are women, capable of reproducing...

Genotype absolutely has an influence on cultural psychology and development. Look around.

I'll take you on--LOL!

For the most part, even now, human beings have the right to control whether or how or when they create other human beings.

I'm not trying to get into whether it is right or wrong to protect animals--

but animals are dependent, by and large, on human beings for survival--

they can't choose to move; they reproduce by instinct, not by choice--

they can't provide more food for themselves.

It's not the same thing.

If 'white' people are diminishing, it is because more 'white' people have chosen to have smaller families. Whether *they* have done this for monetary or selfish reasons or whether they have been influenced by people like Paul Erlich and his zero population propaganda--

they have chosen. Animals can't choose.

I know people who are both black and white--

or I should say I know people in each group--

(in one family one parent is completely black, the other one mixed race; in the other family both are white)--

who are friends--

who have decided to have large families.

Each family is capable of providing everything that those children need; the parents are dedicated, hard-working and very nurturing.

These people made a choice to counter the trend--

but the harrassment they have endured, because they each have large families--

(nothing like the Duggars); I don't think either has more than eight children, at the most 10; I haven't heard from one of them in a while, but a common friend reports that they are doing well--

is amazing. Each of these 'young' couples has endured name-calling and derision for choosing to have children--

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

yeah...you get to choose where you live

Then the LAW comes in and DESEGREGATES you.
This is assimilation and ONLY happens in White countries.

Look at Detroit. Taken over by liberals, goes into economic
and cultural decline, which leads to White Flight.
Detroit attempts to incorporate unincorporated suburbs...

If you want to mix, more power to you.
But, there is no escape for Whites who do not want to be assimilated.

And, if you speak out, you are called a "racist" or "naziwhowantstokillsixmillionJews".

You are invited to research Inclusionary Zoning Ordinances and how they pertain to combating "racism".

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

you are correct; there are too many laws--

for everything. Too many for anyone to keep track of.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

It ain't about where you come from

It is about where you are going.

Tell you what, you keep your panties in a wad about preserving your 'race' or whiteness, and the rest of us will Restore Liberty.

Peace.

The wolves among you wear sheep's clothing

Yes, but people of color are not calling for your extinction. It is your own white, rich, powerful, globalist, elite bankers who control the NGOs and your government who have been calling for your extinction for a hundred years.

You are correct.

If white people are concerned about their extinction they only have to look at themselves, they are the ones making most of the decisions.

If they were serious about it they would get a backbone to stand up for what is right and also make sure they stand up for the freedoms of other peoples so that those other people will support them.

Lord Acton, Lord Chief Justice of England, 1875 - "The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the People v. The Banks."

That's true.

There is no 'free pass' under international law for doing it to your own race.
There is no justification for Genocide.

what the hell does the color

what the hell does the color of a tyrants skin color make? A tyrant is a tyrant in my book, I don't care if they are white, black, brown, purple or pink.

Some people prefer their tyrants to be white

There are a lot of people who want to blame the welfare state on black people, the warfare state on red people, and the police state on brown people, as if white people HAD to create those things because of THOSE people. White Americans should not blame the other colors of the rainbow for their problems. When some white people are confronted with what their own race has done to them, they become defensive and claim that race "doesn't matter". If race truly didn't matter to them, they wouldn't get so upset.

I have a feeling that if another race tried to impose all those things in my list on the American people, white Americans would have taken to the streets to stop every single one. But because they were imposed by white people, white Americans stood down.

again, though you were downvoted . . .

I have to agree with you, as long as you concede that there are tyrants in every race--

but the truth is that most people, *I* believe think Obama is evil because he's half black and has some Muslim connections--though they are questionable.

I think he's 'bad', because he's bad--

because he's another puppet, like Bush.

But the reason you need to be listened to is that most white Americans did NOT call Bush on his evil, but they are calling Obama on his.

Inconsistency is frustrating.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Downvoted, but not out

I most certainly concede that there are tyrants in every race. I am 100% in agreement with all your points. I chose my language to try to jostle people to wake up. They have been programmed to point their fingers at "the other guy" but lose their clear vision when they look in the mirror.

yeh

I agree with both of you and Cyril, too.
We've been divided and all but conquered
and most people don't even know it.

I ask you to, please, read this article and think about it:
Why the British are free-thinking and the Chinese love conformity: It's all in the genes claim scientists

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2113350/Why-individu...
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

If the British were free-thinking, they would not have a monarch

CIA and MI6 disinformation, my friend. The British are barbarians who fought 2 wars with China to force China to trade opium. The British royal family is no better than any inner city drug pusher. Britain should be America's eternal enemy #1. When will Britain crawl out of the Dark Ages and crown a black queen? I forgot, Darwin theorized that his queen descended from a superior ape than you did.

"Pink politicians""Pink

"Pink politicians"
"Pink politicians"
"Pink people"
"Pink people"
"Pink people"
"Pink rabbits"
Yes, White people have a lot of bad decisions to undo.

You have a point.

While Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, and Idi Amin were not white, Hitler and Stalin (and FDR) were. There are tyrants and people of good will of all races and nationalities.

I frankly don't care whether 200 years in the future there are no pure white people left or not. I have found a beautiful mixed race woman to love me and we have been together almost seven years. We are all human, and despotism, as well as compassion, has no color.

So, the Genocide of the White

So, the Genocide of the White race is acceptable to you?

Do you know WHY White People are Light Skinned

and Blacks are Dark Skinned?

Do you tan in the Summer or do you hide from the Sun in order to prevent White Suicide? LOL

There are no purple Ferengi.

And they all bleed yellow.
http://www.startrek.com/database_article/ferengi

Defeat the panda-industrial complex

I am dusk icon. anagram me.

You're using the term "Genocide" incorrectly

Nobody is killing off people with white skin. Skin color is only a genetic trait that is not dominant and will not be carried forward into future generations in its' current form. So?

I have brown eyes. My wife has blue eyes. Brown eyes are dominant. Our son has brown eyes. Have I killed off blue-eyed people? No.

Your use of the term 'genocide' tells me more about your prejudices than anything.

Almost

Light Skin is an evolutionary development necessary for the creation of Vitamin D. If you were to relocate people from the tropics to Polar regions, their skin tone (over generations) will begin to lighten because the Sun's intensity is greatly reduced.

If you take light skinned people and relocate them to Tropic regions then their skin will begin to darken in order to reduce the destruction of Folic Acid (which UVB rays destroy) which is required for healthy pregnancies.

Very good point regarding eye color. Nature, or God as some prefer, has a knack for introducing diversity in both obvious and not so obvious ways.

In your opinion I have

In your opinion I have prejudices. You're only saying that because I am White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

I call you racist because you

I call you racist because you believe whiteness as a genetic trait is worthy of preserving. I could care less.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

So, as an anti-White, are you saying that the Genocide of the White race is acceptable to you?

From the 1948 Convention on

From the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article 3

The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.
Article 4

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.