17 votes

Louis Farrakhan warns white people

I was rather surprised when I saw this video this morning, and I'm wondering what you folk think of it.

Is he right? Is he wrong? Does it matter?

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Russia is more concerned

Russia is more concerned about globalist control of the internet than hate speech. Hate speech is just their excuse to get their agenda in front of the U.N. Not that Russian/German/Italian/Chinese control of the internet would be better for DP users, I just don't believe "hate speech" is really that much of an issue to Putin. He is pro-Russia and anti-Communist and has his hands full without worrying about global human rights.

I'm not saying Russia is our ally or that their government isn't as corrupt, albeit far less refined in its corruption, than that of the U.S., but Putin is an enemy, maybe the most powerful enemy, of the globalist bankers who have lusted after Russia since before the Bolshevik revolution. In that respect his handling of the global elite may bear some study and perhaps cautious emulation in the future.

Have a good read of this.

I would like your opinion on where it is heading.

I had already read this

I had already read this article, and several others on this subject, prior to my previous comment. I do not support U.N. control of the internet or anything else. It is my *opinion* that Russia's interest lies in a strategic goal of weakening Anglo/American globalist control of the internet more than any claims made with regard to curtailing hate speech. I believe these claims are tactics, employed in pursuit of international support for Russia's strategic goal.

I agree whole heartedly with what you say, but...

I believe that Russia is working to a plan, and is acting as part of a co-ordinated effort to bring about a Global agenda.
Have you noticed the explosion of Race and Gender topic in the Media lately? Everyone from Oprah to Bradley/Chelsey Manning, and Glenn Greenwalds spouse. Not to mention the media feeding frenzy with the Travon/Zimmerman saga. And now Russia call for UN control of the internet? I don't think ANY of this is coincidental. Do you?
Would love you thoughts on this.

My whole point is that white

My whole point is that white females won't usually get with a white loser male. The white+white thing is not something on the surface, it takes a while for the abusive white male to show his true colors. White females will, however, get with an openly abusive and loser non-white male. They'll pop out a few albinos, get fat, and take up Spanish or ebonics.

Please come join my forum if you're not a trendy and agree with my points of view.


Where do you come up with this stuff?

"One resists the invasion of armies; one does not resist the invasion of ideas" Victor Hugo

Why are you so blind to see

Why are you so blind to see how the world actually works?

Please come join my forum if you're not a trendy and agree with my points of view.

I shudder to think.

Think I will drop this topic now, it's not something I want to get embroiled in.


I have considered the fact that , eventually, there should be one race. I don't think it will be in m lifetime. But it may be in the next two centuries.

It's probable

that most of the world's various populations will eventually 'mix', but people will still be divided over this, that, and the other thing.

Two centuries from now, 'racist' will just be replaced with some other terms that describe people who don't like cyborgs, genetically altered humans, people born on the moon, sentient vacuum cleaners, etc.

A signature used to be here!

This is just dumb.

Why does Farrakhan care about who "mixes" with who if we're all human?

I just don't understand the race issue anymore. Seems like one giant distraction or something along those lines.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

This is a media driven

project for the United Nations to take control of the internet.
Russia is calling for this now.
NSA will look like a childs plaything once the UN gets control of the net.

How is this video anything to

How is this video anything to do with the United Nations?

It causes racial division,

which people then comment about on the internet, and with a little clever trolling, turns into "hate speech", the very type of speech that Russia is begging the UN to control.
If you had read the link I provided you would be able to put 2 and 2 together.

So you think the way we

So you think the way we combat censorship is by self-censoring out of fear of censorship?

There is a bigger 2+2 on this thread if you'd like to try addition yourself.

It's pretty bad when

Louis Farrakhan has to plead with whites to stop the destruction of their own race! But, you won't listen. You'll just protest that you're not racist, because after all there is nothing more important than not appearing racist. And that is exactly how you will go extinct.



Tarrant County (Fort Worth) TX Precinct 4261

LOL! As long as whites can benefit from affirmative action

in 2050, I'm cool! Haaa!

What would the Founders do?

yeah right

You'll be sitting there in your underwear, eating cat food because the Mexicans can't run the country.
Why do you think they are coming to America? Why do they leave their homogeneous societies, where they are in the majority, to come to historically White countries and live as minorities?
I am pretty sure it's not to hang out in the woods with a stone age tribe making pottery.
The speaker in the video recognizes the accomplishments, value, and beauty of the White children.
Race is real.
End White Genocide.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

That'd be nice, but I don't

That'd be nice, but I don't think it's going to happen. I don't think blacks and hispanics are going to turn around and give us "wicked white racists" a handout. They'll probably be pushing us harder than ever for all we're worth, and excluding us from everywhere they can.

He's right and wrong, IMO

He's absolutely correct that the percentage of whites on the planet is dropping, in large part because interracial marriage is so heavily promoted by other white people. I personally have no issue with interracial marriage and miscegenation, but Farrakhan makes a very true and very real point, one that most whites will never ever admit to themselves.

However, he's wrong that they'll be 'gone' by 2050. Even if no two white people procreated between now and then, it still wouldn't hold true. I've been hearing the same thing about the Japanese and redheads for almost twenty years now.

I've said it a million times already , and I'll say it again- most people automatically picture white people when they hear the word 'racist' So, how to get rid of 'racists'? Simple! Either tell them to intermarry to 'prove' they're not racist, or simply breed them out of existence!

Think it sounds crazy? Ask the Slavs, the Huns, the Mongols, the Nordics, The Jews, the Moors, The Sicilians, and just about every Native American tribe if it sounds crazy.

A signature used to be here!

I agree

A man need only to look at Halle Berry, Jessica Alba, Rosario Dawson, Beyonce and Salma Hayek to see the immense genetic advantages of mixed marriages. Actually....maybe it should be a law, get rid of ugly people.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

Funny you should say that

I have a relative who is Norwegian, Black, and Indian, and growing up all my male friends asked me to set them up with her. Her best friend, who shared a similar heritage, got/gets the same treatment.

That said, I've seen plenty of ugly bi and triracial people, so your proposal is flawed. >:(

Also! beauty, eyes, beholder, etc.

A signature used to be here!


I was just trying to point out the absurdity of "race".

40 years ago, a group of scientists tried to catalogue race based on skin, facial structure, etc... They stopped because they couldn't keep up.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

There are hot people in all

There are hot people in all colors, even being purebred. The view that mutts are exoticly attractive over purebreds is pretty subjective.

Please come join my forum if you're not a trendy and agree with my points of view.


I was being a bit coy. But, mixing genetics is definitely better in the long run. Beauty is subjective, somewhat. I saw a special on one of the science channels many years ago and they took a survey of men all over the world, including some primitive tribes, and they picked the same body shape and facial features as being attractive.

But yes, your purebred Aryan women are just as pretty.

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain

Yeah. I think he's probably

Yeah. I think he's probably wrong about the 2050 number, and perhaps he puts it so soon to scare people. I'd imagine more a 2100 to 2200 timeline. Though whites will probably be a minority by 2050 in the US.

Whites are already a minority

Whites are already a minority among children born in the U.S. and are the only major racial group actually shrinking in absolute numbers in this country. So it is a certainty that whites will be a minority overall by 2040.

I've heard the same about the Japanese

Something about how Whites in most western countries, along with the Japanese, don't reproduce enough to sustain their current numbers.

I'm not sure how true it is though, seeing how many white couples in my neighborhood have 4-5 kids...but I live in a rural, mostly low-income area, so I guess it comes with the territory.

A signature used to be here!