9 votes

"I can prove a plane didn't hit the Pentagon on 911"

Those of you who still say that our own government did not plan and carry out 911 have your heads stuck in a very tight smelly place.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

really lame

I'm gonna start a new thread saying "I can prove that Obama is from Mars" and then post a bunch of nonclusive stuff including a rambling interview with a senior citizen. Then when anyone says "what proof"? I will downvote them. I will then feel all powerful and be able to go on about my day.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

2 trillion went missing..

more fantasy..the pentagon had two million in cash or in bookkeeping ..really where does the 2 trillion come from Social Security bonds that are likely non negotiable as a fungible tangible asset..get a horse..the more that folks grasp upon these phantom notions the more that the truth will not emerge .. so that is the point of the 911 topic at the DAILY PAUL????

Fantasy? Wow! Misinformation... Here is Rumsfeld himself:


Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

fireant's picture

Note he said it couldn't be accounted for. He never said it was

missing. He was talking about the inordinate amount of bureaucracy and the antiquated computer systems which did not interface, making the accounting issue a clusterf...
joepast is correct to call this a "phantom notion".

Undo what Wilson did

Well, if so, where's the proof then?

If this guy has the proof, where is it? All I see is opinion and a little supposition, based on the same things the rest of us have seen. Maybe he got high on his daily prune drink that day and hallucinated some things. Who knows. But the title is misleading.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

The Pentagon thing is a

The Pentagon thing is a distraction. It doesn't matter one way or the other really, cause we know that the three towers fell due to controlled demo.

I believe it WAS a plane, remote controlled in, but again, it doesn't really matter.


I believe a plane hit the Pentagon. Still a truther, though.


It was a missile... and it matters a lot...

There is actual video of the missile hitting the pentagon.

The interesting thing is that on Sept. 10th, 2001, the day before, Donald Rumsfeld gave a speech about pentagon black-budget spending, among other things, and announced that $2.3 Trillion, with a "T", went missing from the pentagon. The exact spot the missile hit was the area of the pentagon where the financial records and employees were located. All the offices, much paper work, computers, and most importantly the individuals who knew, were destroyed.

Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

The real story.......

The government can not prove that a jet liner hit the Pentagon.

Pictures of wreckage here

I know you will not believe them but I thought I would post them. Loose change was a fraud, perpetrated by wanna be film makers. http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html

You can search around and find the pictures of several burned and charred bodies in the pentagon, if you want. Here's one pic.


You have no proof and never will have any proof.

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Lamb of God - As the Palaces Burn

Uh no, you're just reiterating tired old canards

Frequently Asked Questions: "Weren't there photographs of plane parts taken inside and outside of the Pentagon on 9/11 and shortly thereafter? If so, don't these photographs prove that Flight 77 hit the building?"

Frequently Asked Questions: "Didn't rescue workers see dead bodies inside the Pentagon? How do you explain that?"

Regarding the debris, see also Operation Northwoods...

"At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found." --Joint Chiefs of Staff, Operation Northwoods (Declassified), talking about their plan for a faked/staged plane crash to justify war with Cuba (Read more here)

The proof that you claim we "never will have" has been public for years: http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/


People should look at that.

I was fooled by "In Plane Sight" for a few months and was so embarrassed when I realized I'd been had.

ecorob's picture

Sorry, I thought everyone was "vaporized".

So, your picture of wreckage and a charred body is an OUTRIGHT lie. I have been on to this story since the day it happened and this is the FIRST time I have seen ANYONE show a charred body among plane wreckage (that was NEVER there).

You are either an idiot or a troll. eff you

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Two Facts

My little sister had a girl show up to her class explaining that her family was in town to buy a house and she would be joining their class. A few days later, she was on the plane that hit the pentagon. Obviously never attended class.

I know a couple of people who were driving to work on that highway (I350?) and saw the plane fly towards the pentagon.

The biggest evidence that it wasn't a plane lies in the confiscation of video evidence. But this is standard for military - they'd do it anyway - why would they want people to see video of their headquarters' structural weaknesses?

So, I believe it's POSSIBLE a plane did hit the Pentagon - I think I have seen pictures with the plane tail.

But, why does it matter?

The fact is, if there was firm evidence - despite what you say about proof - then more people would be awake.

I think it's perfectly possible that a missile hit the Pentagon, but a plane could have too.

And if a plane did hit that doesn't mean it wasn't planned.

The problem is that if you don't have solid proof, but call what you have 'proof', so it discredits your argument for people who are skeptical.

Er...except in ALL probabilty...

An airliner attempting this maneuver would have crashed before hitting the Pentagon (while not disturbing a blade of grass) or even may have suffered structural damage from the G-force of the maneuver.

Top Gun level Air Force pilots claim it would be impossible let alone an amateur 'terrorist' who never flew and airliner ever!

The Pentagon walls are not a VAGINA that constricts after penetration!




...for common sense.

Top Secret Military

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care.

Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft – no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

The 9/11 Commission reported that "by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77 was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center."

Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?


Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance

Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.

Say WHAT?!?!? I've never had a security clearance but from extensive reading I know that getting a security clearance requires fingerprinting, background checks, etc., especially for anyone working in the Pentagon on top secret documents.

So to call this amazing is an understatement. It is, we might even say, too amazing to be true. Clearly the baby *already* had a security clearance. We're being told that the security clearance was given immediately on arrival, which we know isn't possible, but that's just to throw us off the scent.

So here's an infant who has already gotten a high-level security clearance, clearly some kind of government operative, who normally would have been under cover that day for a mid-morning nap at the Pentagon day care center, but was instead *on September 11 only* ordered to an office that barely escaped destruction. Clearly they were afraid the baby was going to squeal. The only question is ... about what??

BTW, the blog you linked there is a *goldmine* of information. Well done.

Personally, I remember her

Personally, I remember her saying this at the time it happened. She walked out of the Pentagon through a hole and there was NO plane there. I remember her interview.

Bush cousin presides over

Bush cousin presides over 9/11 suit against Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers

April Gallop’s lawsuit went ahead this week with George Bush’s cousin sitting in judgment. He’ll play a major part in deciding whether the case goes forward or dies. (http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com)

No, it’s not a joke.

A 9/11 lawsuit against former high officials in the Bush White House is being presided over by a cousin of former president George W. Bush – a shocking and blatant conflict of interest that should embarrass even believers in the official story.

Please watch the video National Securtiy Alert

It features detailed on-camera interviews with Pentagon eyewitnesses who explain exactly what they saw that day. It conclusively proves that 9/11 was in fact a false flag event. There was a large plane on the scene (not a missile), but it approached on a path that makes it impossible for it to have hit the light poles or generator trailer or caused the directional damage to the building itself. It was seen flying away by multiple eyewitnesses. That is why the damage does not look compatible with a 757 impact.

Watch it here: http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com

After 9/11, woman who was at Pentagon remains skeptical

After 9/11, woman who was at Pentagon remains skeptical

Ten years ago, there was no contrail of derision attached to her name. That was before she had fought with government agencies and private charities and school systems and she hadn’t yet sued airlines and banks and Osama bin Laden and the highest officials in the United States.

Before she had formally accused her government of making up that story about an airliner crashing into her Pentagon office.

She holds up her hands.

“All I’m doing is asking questions. When you walk out barefoot and you don’t step on any plane parts. . . .”

The hands come down, tired.

“Lord, help me make sense of this.”

Things stopped making sense on that brilliant September morning just as she pushed the button on her computer to start the day. In that moment, everything secure and understandable in the world fell on her head in a deafening avalanche of ceiling tiles and body parts.

I don't

see the proof here. Sorry. What proof here would hold up in the court of law?

Don't get me wrong...i'm sympathetic to an independent investigation. I'm all for it as I have many questions surrounding what happened. But this is not proof..and to say so makes the movement look bad.

The Pentagon walls are not a

The Pentagon walls are not a VAGINA that constricts after penetration!


i watched the whole video...i didn't see any proof presented. What it does offer is perhaps another high profile person exposing the questions about the incident.

I agree with your overall

I agree with your overall sentiment, but it is not possible to prove a negative.