30 votes

Ben Swan - Breaking: U.S. Cruise Missiles Preparing To Strike Syria

by Ben Swann | August 25, 2013

The U.S. military is now moving cruise missiles into position for a possible strike against Syrian government forces, reports CBS News Saturday.

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel says that this will give the President the position to move quickly if he decides to use a cruise missile strike against Syrian government forces. Sec. Hagel goes on to say that this is not an attempt to topple the Syrian government but to send a message to President Bashar al Assad that the use of chemical weapons will not be tolerated. Hagel went on to tell reporters that U.S. commanders have prepared a range of “options” for President Obama if he chooses to proceed with military strikes against Damascus.

That statement comes on the heels of the United Nations now investigating claims that chemical weapons were used in several battles between al Assad forces and rebel forces in Syria. Among the chemicals reportedly used, sarin gas. Reuters has reported that the nerve gas attack killed hundreds this week. The Assad regime has placed the blame on al Qaeda fighters who call themselves rebels. At this point, it is unclear who was behind the use of chemical weapons. It is important to note that the “who” and “what” behind these chemical weapons has not been established.

Read more: http://benswann.com/breaking-u-s-cruise-missiles-preparing-t...

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

more heart-breaking . . .

news today.

it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Linda Cross's picture

Doesn't our Dictator have to ask congress

for a declaration of war? When do we stop putting up with this mierda?

If you see something, say something, the government is listening.
Silence isn't golden, it's yellow.

Our Dictator asks Congress for declaration of war - NOT!!!

Linda - I agree with you. See my post at 19:50 (7:50PM)

Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

Can you say world war 3?

Russia and China will not stand for this. This is the beginning of the end. Lets prepare for another Cold War and horrible troubled at home! In case the web gets shut down, daily paulers need a meet up place. lol

Watch Out!

In the words of President Paul,
"This time, it's going to be MUCH WORSE!"
Our 'coalition of the willing' includes only TWO nations. Guess who the other one is?
"US military intervention in Syria can lead to WWIII: Analyst"
"Russia warns U.S. not to repeat in Syria past mistakes in region"
"Russia may reinforce naval grouping in Mediterranean in response to U.S. buildup – expert"

Starting to get the idea yet?


One of those nations

Told the US to mind their own business, don't need or want US help, don't see the as US help, don't want the US involved, say they can take care of themselves. Can you guess what nation?

Clue: The ONLY nation that did not sign treaties to be in a NWO UN Agenda.

Fact, That nation is fine and is going to remain fine. The US may lose it's entire navy and maybe that is Obama's goal? Sink the US. It will not be the nation you do not have the heart, mind or guts to name that will destroy the US. The US can do that all by itself.

U.S. vs Russia & China (Submarine Articles)



"I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."


There is no duration defined in the Oath

What's your point johncarter444?

That the USN is not producing or maintaining it's nuclear sub fleets (which seems to me the will of the American people, after all Obama campaigned as a pre-peace candidate). Furthermore, as the US advances on the UN Agenda and trains foreign toops from Russia and China with US troops on US soil, it seems to me the military of, by and for the US is declining while the US merges to become part of NATO. Most of our active subs are not patrolling US waters, but international waters for UN Agenda countries.

The way I see it, Iraq and Afghanistan do not need subs. CA is being set up to hand over the China to pay our massive debt to them, so what's the use of subs except to do the will of NATO and the UN?

yes . . .


it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

Well, Yes.

I am trying to follow the neocon 'granger', and it's comment about the 'other' nation who refused to sign a 'U.N. treaty'. Actually, it was a regional 'NON-PROLIFERATION' treaty, regarding the use or holding of NUCLEAR ARMS in the Middle East. As far as the 'other nation' not wanting or asking for 'U.S. help', well, I think that THIS is an obvious 'strawman'.
That chickie on 'democracy now' actually CHOKED when she was forced to report this!

So, well, yes...


Democracy missiles!

We will paint DEMOCRACY on them, so it will be OK.
Don't violent means usually create positive outcomes?


Seriously????I have not been watching the news but one simple question,Why?What has Syria done to the United States?Why do we have to be the policemen of the world??????????WHY??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????



F@ck Yeah!


Chuck Hegel is going to get us in deep...


2013 is having flashbacks from 2003..

Is anyone buying this crap this time around?

Support Liberty Media! http://benswann.com/ - http://www.bluerepublican.org/ - http://krisannehall.com/ - http://lionsofliberty.com/

We won't turn things around until we 1st change the media - donate to a liberty media creator today!

Only The Ones...

With the fingers on the buttons.
There was this one scene in a movie, where the second-in-command stated, 'You arrogant A@@, you've killed US!'

Perhaps, this time around...