3 votes

The New York Times takes down the Clinton Foundation. This could be devastating for Bill and Hillary

The New York Times takes down the Clinton Foundation. This could be devastating for Bill and Hillary

Is the New York Times being guest edited by Rush Limbaugh? Today it runs with a fascinating takedown of the Clinton Foundation – that vast vanity project that conservatives are wary of criticising for being seen to attack a body that tries to do good. But the liberal NYT has no such scruples. The killer quote is this:
For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.
Over a year ago Bill Clinton met with some aides and lawyers to review the Foundation's progress and concluded that it was a mess. Well, many political start-ups can be, especially when their sole selling point is the big name of their founder (the queues are short at the Dan Quayle Vice Presidential Learning Center). But what complicated this review – what made its findings more politically devastating – is that the Clinton Foundation has become about more than just Bill. Now both daughter Chelsea and wife, and likely presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton have taken on major roles and, in the words of the NYT "efforts to insulate the foundation from potential conflicts have highlighted just how difficult it can be to disentangle the Clintons’ charity work from Mr Clinton’s moneymaking ventures and Mrs Clinton’s political future." Oh, they're entangled alright.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I wish people...

...would stop using dramatic overstatements for the titles of their articles/posts.

This article on the Telegraph claims the NYT "took down" the Clinton Foundation. No. They didn't. This won't even be news tomorrow. The Foundation will continue doing what it has been. Everyone tryin' to be Greenwald and write something explosive. But just giving stupid titles to articles without backing them up in the article texts does not a Snowden story make.

Work for pay, pay for freedom
Fuck 'em all, we don't need 'em