The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!
56 votes

IMPLODING Obama Presidency Set To Trigger World War 3

Amid the myraid of presidential scandals, President Obama and his monster of a secretary of State, John Kerry (Skull & Bones) is steering America headlong into World War 3.

Russia has already evacuating 90 civilians and sending in ground troops into Syria as we speak. You can bet nuclear missiles will be brought into the country as well.

It is anticipated that Jon Kerry's little freaking war with Syria will bring Russia, China, Iran and Israel into the fray.

The result of this foolhardy act by the Obama administration will be thermonuclear war and annihilation of the entire middle east.

If the U.S. congress had done its job and impeached the incompetent president all of this could have been avoided.

This is the greatest American crisis since the 'Cuban Missile Crisis' in 1961, except this time there is no president John F. Kennedy to stop it..

Bye bye America. Nice knowing you..


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

On The Hydrogen Bomb

Made me flip my lid:

“...taxes are not raised to carry on wars, but that wars are raised to carry on taxes”
Thomas Paine, Rights of Man

And then there's the Ukraine.

Will somebody please bring peace to this world?

(said with heavy sarcasm - me thinks this is the goal - but just who will that somebody be???)

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul looking for matching funds.

Keep the news flowing, help eradicate ignorance.

Free includes debt-free!

After the 1905 Russian uprising

Czar Nicholas said start the war with Japan.

Stupid petty men send men to die.

Free includes debt-free!

BOOM you have no idea what you're talking about

Basically... what happened to your WWIII? Can't have a world war without the russians, brits or germans. They're all out. :)

"The result of this foolhardy act by the Obama administration will be thermonuclear war and annihilation of the entire middle east."

Oops... guess not

robot999's picture


And you know this how? Seems to me that you're doing the exact same thing the poster did... stating your opinion and adding a supposed conclusion. Well (more) time will tell.

I find it odd that you would choose to bring this thread back up while we are witnessing a massive uprising in the Ukraine. Additionally, there is clear evidence of US prodding of this uprising. And here you are, saying WWIII can't happen? Wow.

Do I know what will happen, or when? No. Do you? No. Is it possible that WWIII could happen? Yes.

"Government is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex". - Frank Zappa

5 months ago

and not yet... good enough for me. And I find it odd that you'd post on my comment from August and say it's odd that I bring it back up. Do I need more proof that you're careless and easily confused? Nope.

What or Who is driving this?

All logic is against an attack...

25 Quotes About The Coming War With Syria That Every American Should See

Here are just the first 10:

1. Barack Obama, during an interview with Charlie Savage on December 20, 2007: "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

2. Joe Biden, during a television interview in 2007: "The president has no constitutional authority ... to take this nation to war ... unless we're attacked or unless there is proof we are about to be attacked. And if he does, if he does, I would move to impeach him."

3. U.S. Representative Ted Poe: "Mr. President, you must call Congress back from recess immediately to take a vote on a military strike on Syria. Assad may have crossed a red line but that does not give you the authority to redline the Constitution."

4. U.S. Representative Kurt Schrader: "I see no convincing evidence that this is an imminent threat to the United States of America."

5. U.S. Representative Barbara Lee: "While we understand that as commander-in-chief you have a constitutional obligation to protect our national interests from direct attack, Congress has the constitutional obligation and power to approve military force, even if the United States or its direct interests (such as its embassies) have not been attacked or threatened with an attack."

6. The New York Times: "American officials said Wednesday there was no 'smoking gun' that directly links President Bashar al-Assad to the attack, and they tried to lower expectations about the public intelligence presentation."

7. U.S. Senator Rand Paul: "The war in Syria has no clear national security connection to the United States and victory by either side will not necessarily bring in to power people friendly to the United States."

8. U.S. Senator Tim Kaine: "I definitely believe there needs to be a vote."

9. Donald Rumsfeld: "There really hasn’t been any indication from the administration as to what our national interest is with respect to this particular situation."

10. Robert Fisk: "If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida."

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

A surgical strike air attack

That lasts about an hour or something, would probably not start WW3. But it would damage US interests in the region, again, and endanger the national security of we the people. Doing it without any proof at all will be even worse, so I suspect they may wait until inconclusive results from weapon inspectors on Saturday. Egypt has sided with Syria, likely to contain Israel, if the region explodes. My theory has been, that former pres. candidate and general Wesley Clark (D) probably wasn't lying when he disclosed there have been military plans drawn up to overthrow most of the Middle East. I think the goal each time, especially in Iraq and Pakistan, has been to see if we ever get a response from neighboring countries or regions, and literally trigger a regional war.

At this point in time, the US defense industry and the ultra-nationalists controlling the military industrial complex seem convinced that this is the only time in history that we will have a chance to place a firm grip over the Middle East. If that grip (permanent rights for troops, inclusion in some pro-western coalition) cannot be established, they would prefer destabilization than to see regional hegemony take firm grasp by one nation. Iraq gave Iran the powerhold in the region, outside of Israel, even though they're not even Arabs they're Persians. Our misunderstanding of Middle East politics is very dangerous - perhaps our military posture towards it even more so.

This only opens the door for American interests when we take down these nations. For example, has taking out Iraq really made anyone safer, at all, on this planet? Instead, the nation is destabilized and easily bought off by powerful interests. What threat did they ever really pose the US? Any sane person knew, before the war, this was propaganda. A quick search on Google showed their entire navy consisted of one or two speedboats, and they had been under total air domination and bombardment since 1992.

Reading the news seems to put blinders on for people. If we do strike Assad, and disable his regime, now you have chemical weapon stockpiles that may be easily seized or obtainable. If that is the goal, to take out these stockpiles, that should be easily explained to people. However, since Iraq, most common sense people would draw the conclusion the risk is not worth the reward. Syria hasn't attacked any neighboring countries so this would be another flagrant violation of international law.

Evil Dictator VS Terrorist Rebels and we are thinking..

Evil Dictator VS Terrorist Rebels and we are thinking of doing what and to what end?

Think about it.

Could it be that Obama has blundered again?

People find gassing people abhorrent, but with the suspicion that this gas attack was not done by Assad, it is entirely possible Obama will wind up with egg on his face for his false accusation. With the Associated Press and the NY Times casting doubt on the intel that Obama is using, and the British government pausing while the French government objects to any action, Obama and Cameron may be exposed for the incompetents they are.

Obama stands to lose even more credibility, if that is possible, for throwing his little tantrum and exposing the US to risk of WWIII.

"Bend over and grab your ankles" should be etched in stone at the entrance to every government building and every government office.

Just my 2 cents...

Does anyone one else see another "false flag" coming on US soil?

Wouldn't Doubt It

I wouldn't doubt it, as people haven't fallen in line supporting Obama's potential Syria strike. We are not behaving as predicted, so we must be re-conditioned.

I think a big false flag is coming. The powers that be are a bit concerned that America may be coming to their senses. Especially when Zbigniew Brzezinski starts making comments like this.... "the growing inefficiency of war due to the increased political knowledge of the public". He seems to have a new tact about how they need to go forward at this point, as what used to work isn't working as well as it did. So, I think they are going to shake things up in a different way.

Failing economy? Scandals

Failing economy?
Scandals hounding you day and night?
I have the solution for you ol'chap,
Start a War!

W. Wilson, F. Roosevelt, B. Obama

Southern Agrarian

Ok so I went ahead and wrote to my reps.

I know it's a waste of time, but here's what I wrote to both senators and the house rep:

Sir, it seems that our President is contemplating starting WWIII, and Congress is allowing him to do it through the AUMF. I am aware that bombing Syria is extremely unpopular amongst American citizens, and I am no exception to this line of thinking. I am also of the understanding that the bombing could begin any time, possibly within the next 24 hours. I respectfully ask what you are thinking and why you have not stopped him from using our honorable troops to commit what appears to me to be war crimes? Please introduce and pass the immediate repeal of the Authorization to Use Military Force and stop this right now. Signing a petition in protest is not good enough and does not alleviate you of responsibility for the President's actions that have been illegally delegated to him by Congress. Thank you for your attention to this crucially important matter.

That's what I wrote. At this point, I don't really care what these people think about me. They certainly don't seem to care what I think about them.

I can't keep up with watching both the left hand and the right hand these days. There is just so much going on that it's hard to tell what's a distraction and what's on purpose. This thing with Syria seems pretty serious to me. Thank you all for the information you've been posting today.

Fools, children and politicians

Looks like only fools, children and politicians (redundant, I know)believe two wrongs make a right and violence is ALWAYS the answer to violence.

All wars will end one day

The winds of war
The winds of war
Are blowing, are blowing

The winds of war
The winds of war
Are growing, are growing

No depth, nor ceiling
No heart, nor feeling
The winds of war
The winds of war

Like fire gone wild
Consuming mother and child
The winds of war
The winds of war

The earth does shake
The heart does break
The winds of war
The winds of war

Yet from above
Shall come that Love
To make all new
E'vn me and you

No more, no more
These winds of war
No, Never again
These winds of war

" In Thee O Lord do I put my trust " ~ Psalm 31:1~

they are lizards incarnate

they are lizards incarnate


what in the world does that mean? lol

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

metaphor perhaps?

A reference to our reptilian sub-brain, maybe, which is generally responsible for our "fight or flight" reactions. The hypervigilant have a tendency to react more than they think ("We have to do something anything!") and don't seem to grasp that sometimes the best thing to do is nothing.

dynamite anthrax supreme court white house tea party jihad
to be continued

skull and bones

means kerry is ..??? a graduate of yale..they are super powerful.

If there were any sane people in Wash., DC

If there were any sane people in Wash., DC, we could defang anybody who has ICBMs by building and fielding a few dozen (or maybe a few hundred) ABLs:

I really love it because its only possible use is purely defensive, plus, I've designed some of the tooling fixtures for some of the laser components. That gravy train dried up when the King George scuttled the whole project.


Freedom is my Worship Word!

Arbitrary sophomoric red

Arbitrary sophomoric red lines imposed on Americans by psychopaths, selective outrage on a relatively small loss of life and lying about the party responsible. The psychopaths need to be held responsible for treason.

to understand the world, study the psychopath

After I read a few books on psychopaths (and how to spot them), the world made a lot more sense to me.
Lincoln was probably the first psychopathic U.S. president, and there have been many more since.
e.g. Truman thought nothing of incinerating many thousands of innocents.
Nor will BlackBush.

Although I do know and trust

Although I do know and trust Protestant canon, none of us really know the immediate outcome of the current events in Syria. From merely rhetorical and historical animosities in the Middle East, I can safely bet that a properly placed spark could ignite an uncontrolled wildfire, though. This situation is potentially dangerous even IF none of the countries with nuclear weapons (including Israel) want to use them. When it comes to the FIRST country launching nukes, I'd place a bet on the state of Israel. Hopefully, I'm wrong and NO nukes will be used by ANY country.

Regardless, at this point the USA has absolutely NO constitutional argument for INITIATING war with Syria.

Cuckoo cuckoo

Cuckoo cuckoo

omg just chill

Every time someone sneezes, you say BOOM and claim the world is over.

We're not getting nuked over Syria. I don't think even Kerry or Obama are that f'in stupid. I know Putin isn't.


couldn't resist ;-)