77 votes

Alan Grayson "We Are NOT The World's Policemen!

Alan Grayson informs Alex Witt


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How about by not financing

How about by not financing them nor providing availability of chemical warfare (you know like agent orange used in prior wars) in the first place.


Dammm straight!

Of course we are and have been for a long time.

Must listen: http://youtu.be/LaTbI7FCLl0 (and check out the comments, too)

Amazing, isn't it?

“It is the food which you furnish to your mind that determines the whole character of your life.”
―Emmet Fox

SteveMT's picture

We need more dems. like this, and more repubs.

The fact that few in Congress are embracing what Obama has already said is evidence that many feel the same way as Grayson. Good.

Saw a good comment on youtube

"So now all we have to do is sit back and wait for a false flag attack on Jordan, Turkey, Israel or any other US interest, blame it on Assad and VOILA! Grayson and friends will be for the war".

That...seems a likely scenario because how else would they increase support for this? How would they repackage it and sell it?

"I am Troll fighter, number one"





Tweet, email, facebook!

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

Debbie's picture

Signed it -

Thank you!


I have posted the info on freedomworks.org and email contacts

Spread the word!

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

What kind of message does it send when

we let a dictator gas his own people and get away with it? Do you mean like when Bill Clinton approved the CS gas that led to the death of over a hundred innocent people, including children, at Waco?

“The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants.” — Albert Camus

Obama is such a hypocrite!

Obama is such a hypocrite! What message do we send by allowing a dictator to use chemical weapons? First, we don't know who did it. 2nd, he's a "dictator wannabe" and has been drone striking innocent civilians for some time now. I can see the message we already have been sending to the world with this jerk's actions.

Wow... I wish Grayson agreed with us on more issues.

The clarity of his answers is so unusual that the news reader barely knows what to do with him.

Educate yourself

The more I hear this guy

The more I hear this guy speak the more I like him. Democrat or republican doesn't matter he says it like it is. His four reasons not to attack are plain and simple and his answers are no, no and no. No sugar coating no additional b.s. just the straight forward answers.

It is better to look dumb and not be, than to look smart and not be.

Grayson could be very tough

Grayson could be very tough for Rand in 2016.

Back In U.S. History,

When the ORIGINAL plans were not yet formulated for the false dichotomy of the 'two-party system', every party would nominate, and then elect, their candidates. the contest would then take place, until two were chosen as the most popular. Those two would go on to debate each other, and the one who gained the 'popular vote' would become president, with the loser in this contest becoming vice-president.

Most of Grayson's platform is 'socialist', and a large part of Rand Paul's platform could be easily defined as 'Corporatist' (down to his backing of Romney in the '12 selection). Neither of these belief systems are in alignment with the original Fathers' idea in the crafting of this Constitutional Republic. 'Democracy' was a reviled idea, and the Corporation was also a hated thing, to ALL of them (in fact, it was UNLAWFUL to establish one, for a period of time).

Grayson, or Rand?
Charlie Romeo Alpha Poppa.


I'd rather see him give Rand

I'd rather see him give Rand a hard time than Hillary. That would be a real improvement over what we had in the 2012 elections.

It is better to look dumb and not be, than to look smart and not be.

What A Hag

why doesn't she just say ... "how dare you be a Democrat and come on MSNBC and speak against the President"

Thank you Mr. Grayson - keep on keepin' on!

I had the same conclusion

I don't know if the Democrats have a, "party loyalty oath", like Granger signed to be in the Republican party, but if they do, I doubt Grayson signed it.

I don't always agree with Grayson, but his logic here is indisputable.

That is one disgusting

interview. They're trying as hard as they can, against common sense, and world opinion. That woman is a beast.

Thank you for sharing. Your

Thank you for sharing. Your clips are always relevant. This interviewer's personal annoyance for Grayson and his position on Syria is clearly noticed. I like his clear responses and logic.Perhaps it is his crisp intelligence that bothers her.