15 votes

Angus King educates warmongering "press" panel

These people occupying cable news shows are bloodthirsty! This one works as a team, to subvert the common sense of Angus King. You might be winning in the Syrian debate, if the opposing argument is "France".


http://youtu.be/jBjgzm0xHGs



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How is this common sense? He

How is this common sense? He asserts that 90% of his constituents want to avoid another war, yet he is willing to invade Syria, as long as certain other governments share in his desire to do so. This is neoconservatism pure and simple--he is only slightly less extreme than McCain and Lindsey.

Here's what Israel has coming to it.

I think Putin has it right

I think Putin has it right here. The US is saying that they have evidence the chemical attacks were carried out by Assad, but that the evidence is classified. If they can't present it to the UN security council, then all they are is empty words. The UN shouldn't just take America's word for it. If they president continues out with the attacks without UN approval, they are breaking international law. Just to be clear I don't support the UN and it's title of ultimate authority, but what's the point of having an international law, if you're not going to abide by it.

You are correct bro....

During the Cuban missile crisis we displayed the aerial photos of the missiles taken from U2 flights to the whole world at the UN.

If they had evidence they would show it.

I expect the cartoon drawings will be rolled out soon.

I'm sorry, but I don't trust this guy

Anybody who says he's not sure how he'll vote is just hedging his bets. Typical politician, probably a war monger in sheeps clothing.

winning

MSM and GovernmentYou've

MSM and Government
You've STILL not shown ANY substantial proof of those responsible, STOP falling back in the assumption of Assad has to be the guilty party, by then making plans, debating what you should, calling for war, saying to show a strong stance, etct fucking etc.....based on the ASSUMPTION that it is Assad, WITHOUT THE FUCKING EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP

Heres a god damn question, what will YOU do, if it so happens to be the ones you have or are, offering aid......im not accusing them, but seing as proof of guilt is not a requirement, i would like THAT question asked, and answered for every assad accusation....thankyou fucking much

By the way, proof of ASSAD personally veriviably made the call, not a regime, not someone else, ASSAD knowingly and purposefully, since you are laying blame at assads feet.......TWATS

I am stunned that so few are

I am stunned that so few are questioning the intelligence behind this! Have we such a short memory!

"Who appointed us policeman

"Who appointed us policeman of the world?"

nice

mashup