So Israel's Ready to Throw U.S. Under the Bus for its Middle East Project: The End GameSubmitted by Sue4theBillofrights on Tue, 09/03/2013 - 22:32
posted at Bodybuilding.com by "Vodoo101"
There is only one way in which an attack on Syria makes sense, since it is mostly many more civilians who will die in the process of avenging the use of chemical weapons on civilians, and we are not even sure who used them anyway. It makes sense if the real point is to murder, maim, poison as many Muslims in as many Middle Eastern countries as possible, and destroy their societies' infrastructure, in order to clear the way for Israeli geopolitical ambitions. General Wes Clark said as much when he revealed a memo in which Project for a New American Century Neocons were determined to attack "seven countries in five years."
The pattern of determined, relentless expansion of illegal settlements over the past decades shows that Israel is not, and never was, interested in peaceful co-existence within 1967 borders. Below, Jewish-Iraqi activist Dr. Dahlia Wasfi explains Israel's equivalent of "manifest destiny" in the Middle East.
The problem? It has cost America its economy, its Constitution, what's left of our military, and the blood of our fighting men and women, to accomplish. Now we are at the end game.
One thing to understand; this has been planned right in front of us for a long time. In 1982 Oded Yinon wrote:
"In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north." - Oded Yinon, Israeli intellectual and mentor to Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, "A Strategy for Israel for the 1980s"
Yinon was an important influence on Douglas Feith and Richard Perle, key Bush administration architects of the Iraq War, and members of Project for a New American Century, which really should have been called Project for a New Israeli Century. The idea was to use American blood and treasure to wipe out Israel's rivals in the region, starting with Saddam, who showed he would actually launch SCUDs at Tel Aviv during Gulf War I.
In 1996 Feith and Perle, both Americans, published a paper for Netanyahu showing how Iraq could be busted up into a smaller number of squabbling mini-states, exactly what has happened. The point was never to bring "democracy" to Iraq. Following is the History Commons entry on the publication of this important paper.
Richard Perle. [Source: Public domain]
The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, an Israeli think tank, publishes a paper titled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” [Washington Times, 10/7/2002; Chicago Sun-Times, 3/6/2003] The paper, whose lead author is neoconservative Richard Perle, is meant to advise the new, right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Other authors include:
- influential neoconservative academic and former Bush adviser Richard Perle, primarily responsible for the content of the paper;
- Meyrav Wurmser, the future director of the neoconservative Hudson Institute’s Center for Middle East Policy;
- her husband David Wurmser, the future chief adviser for Middle East policy for future vice-president Dick Cheney;
- neoconservative Douglas Feith, who will be the prime architect of the Iraq war;
- Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Jeffrey T. Bergner, Jonathan Torop, and Robert Loewenberg.
Rebuilding Zionism by Abandoning Past Policies - It advocates making a complete break with past policies by adopting a strategy “based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism.…” [Guardian, 9/3/2002]
The paper "A Clean Break" said the following:
"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions."
This is a key passage. How could Israel roll back Syria or remove Saddam? It doesn't have that kind of army. But America does. We are seeing Feith's and Perle's paper unfold almost exactly as planned, with American arms. And in Iraq, American blood. Israeli Mossad's role in 9/11 makes perfect sense in the context. Without 9/11, we never would have destroyed Iraq for Israel.
And destroy it we did, a bombed out, f***ed over country with a huge number of deformed depleted uranium babies, from the dust in the armor-piercing ammunition. This ties the hands of Iraqi society by forcing the care of these helpless babies so that it can never oppose Israel again.
Birth deformities in Fallujah, other Iraq cities up to 50% due to US use of depleted uranium weapons
This is what they want to do in Syria, a country with a formidable military which could put Israeli regional ambitions to an end, as could Persia. It doesn't matter who dies, or that it only kills more civilians even though that was supposedly the problem in the first place. Make everyplace in the region like Iraq, with back-up sewage everywhere, no electricity, all fighting among each other. Then in the next hundred years keep pushing out, manifest destiny, from sea to shining sea.
American aircraft carriers will be attacked and sunk. Iran has hundreds of small boats armed with Russian made anti-ship missiles designed to sink American aircraft carriers, including the N-22 Sunburn, the N-26 Onyx, and the Chinese made C-802. Syria's alliances with Russia and Iran risk world war.
But Israeli Neocons and their American counterparts don't care about that. Seven countries in five years was the plan, and they are behind schedule. After that America can be tossed aside. They'll have what they want.
Think the Zionists don't think this way? Just listen to one of our own hasbarat shills here on BB, pretending he's a Christian but he's probably Israeli. No Christian would drool over killing Muslims.
Originally Posted by LukeLissen View Post
Lots and lots of muslims have been killed and a whole lot more will be. The muslim world has been and continues to be turned upside down. Many muslim nations have been a**r**** and more will be, including Iran. We are winning in so many ways you don't even know it. And you are powerless to stop it. Gonna love me a new Iranian girlfriend, and Americanize her and convert her to Christianity.
We are having fun and its only getting started.
Where is your God now?
Wes Clark: Seven countries in five years
Former German Defense Minister Explains Why CIA and Israeli Mossad Did 9/11