0 votes

Assad is War Criminal- Try Him at ICC?

Slate asks: why is Assad not on trial in the International Criminal Court:

"Given the allegations currently being leveled at Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, readers might be wondering why Assad and his senior commanders have not been charged with war crimes by the International Criminal Court like leaders such as Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi and Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir. After all, the court was specifically set up to “have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of international concern......

....Unfortunately, international law is once again protecting Assad’s violations of international law. Syria is not a state party to the ICC (neither, for what it’s worth, is the United States) and therefore its prosecutors don’t have jurisdiction over crimes committed there. For Assad to be charged by the ICC, he would have to be referred by the U.N. Security Council which, as with an authorization for military intervention, isn’t going to happen as long as Russia and China have seats. Marc Lynch discussed a few other possible avenues for Assad’s prosecution a few weeks ago, but for now, a prosecution seems extremely unlikely, even as the Syrian government commits exactly the sort of crimes the court was set up to deal with."

Read on:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_world_/2013/09/05/assad_s_war...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Shouldn't We Put on Trial

Shouldn't we put on trial the people who supplied chemical weapons to the rebels? I think the short list for the investigation includes, Prince Bandar, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, John McCain, Linsay Graham, and Peter King.

Alternatives to War

Include some mock trial.