-5 votes

Is this the Year Paul Admits 9/11 an Inside Job?

What does he have to lose? He will never run again. His son Rand does his own thing. The mainstream media is reeling from alternative media's beating. Maybe Ron still believes the official government story though? If so, I question Ron's discernment.

Its time to ask the question... Is this the year Ron Paul admits that 9/11 was an inside job?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
tasmlab's picture

He's already got a great, clear and controversial take

Regardless of the truth, which may be impossible to divine anyways, Dr. Paul already blew the barn doors off with his 'blowback' story, which is highly relevant, enlightening, controversial and pertinent to the entire future of warfare.

And it's supported by the official story, what the CIA said and what Osama bin Laden said.

It's much more powerful in some ways and is completely defensible.

Currently consuming: Gatto: "Underground history of education..", FDR; Wii U; NEP Football

He already has publicly said

He already has publicly said he thinks a new independent investigation needs to be done. He will not come out and say it was an inside job or Mossad job or whatever else, because he does not have the evidence. If he did have the evidence, he would have presented it to Congress long ago.

...

Years ago Ron did mention 9/11 to a closed group of supporters. He said that the investigation was false and needed to be done right. He asked us to join him in the conspiracy.

And so I have. RP wants to keep his head. Give him a break.

All rights reserved and no rights waived.

We must all take the lead

in any initiatives that we want to pursue. Ron is the messenger, We are the People.

Riding coat tails usually does not work.

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

You know why Ron Paul doesn't

You know why Ron Paul doesn't talk about 9/11 truth? BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU LOOK CRAZY!

It doesn't matter if you are 100% right, 95% of people are going to roll their eyes at you. So if your goal is to bring people to the cause of liberty, you are shooting yourself in the foot.

There are literally hundreds of topics you can talk about every day where you can point to irrefutable evidence proving your case. This is what Ron Paul does every day.

So do you care about yourselves and your own sense of smugness, or do you actually care about advancing liberty overall? Do you want to come off as someone intelligent who should be listened to, or do you want people to call you Rusty Shackelford behind your back laughing all the while?

The 9/11 Truth movement is also fraught with disinformation agents specifically for the purpose of attaching it the main liberty movement. Why do you people insist on playing their game? They are playing chess and you are playing checkers. Grow up kids.

"In reality, the Constitution itself is incapable of achieving what we would like in limiting government power, no matter how well written."

~ Ron Paul, End the Fed

95% Eye Rollers?

Nope…In fact that number is closer to 35%…and that is in America. Travel abroad and see that this then dips into the sub-25% range.

I personally know few people who swallow the official story anymore and I find that the likelihood falls along age related lines with older people (Sept and Oct) being more likely to accept the official story than younger. I'd say that the 45-to 60 somethings are probably seeing a 55% believability rate. Here at the DP, the eye rollers drop into mid-single digits.

I ask people when appropriate and here it is obvious. But here's and old poll…

http://www.dailypaul.com/95953/poll-okso-lets-see-where-our-...

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

People like you are precisely the problem

Americans who still deny the possibility that elements within the US government were responsible for the 9/11 attacks are the reason why situations like Syria exist. http://youtu.be/vka7Da6e9LY

My latest Daily Paul article: How the U.S. Media Has Had a Big Hand in Helping Ron Paul Win the Republican Nomination
http://www.dailypaul.com/231491/how-the-us-media-has-had-a-b...

How Would Ron Paul Know Anymore About 9/11 Than You????

Rudy Guilliani would be much better informed than Ron Paul !

beesting

The same people who bought the Warren Commission lies

Until this generation wakes up or dies off it's going to be an uphill struggle. The damned teevee ruined this world.

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

911 Inside Job


There is an abundance of evidence to completely prove that 9/11 was an inside job.

Everything from stock market short selling before the event, to free-fall implosion of 3 different buildings, to eyewitness first-hand reports of Bombs going off, to Neil Bush's company being in charge of "building security", to the presence of Thermite and hot temperatures well-below ground zero, to no Airplane damage at the site of The Pentagon, to the amazingly poor response of NORAD and the FAA, to the explicit stand-down order given by Dick Cheney, etc.

But Ron Paul is not going to do anything about it. He doesn't question any of that.

He's probably hip enough to guess that the 9/11 Commission Report is not the whole story, but he is not trying to solve the problem of 9/11 himself, or in any way speak out on this issue.

Ron Paul is just not as bold as people think he is. Remember this is the guy who chose to unnecessarily concede in public 5-months early to Mitt Romney, while many delegates battles were not yet even resolved, and who refused to use his popularity to even request to speak at the convention (much less storm the gates). He just disappeared altogether.

Ron Paul primarily just wants to (passively) educate college kids, and sell books -- not actually stand-up and lead anything.

Those aren't bits of evidence.

Those are questions,coincidences and assumptions. Let me ask you this, if you were taking this case to court, who would you be prosecuting? and what evidence would you use to prove beyond a resonable doubt that they were guilty?

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).

Yes they are Evidence


Corroborated Eye-Witness evidence is evidence.

The Laws of Physics is evidence.

Dick Cheney's stand down order is evidence.

The fact that the perpetrators could not even fly planes to begin with is evidence.

The presence of Demolition Material (Thermite) is evidence.

We've got plenty of real, tangible evidence here. Only a blind man (uniformed), or an idiot could believe in the government's obviously phony story.


Everything you've listed....

...has been soundly refuted, but my guess is that you are unwilling to even accept the possibility that you are wrong so you have either not looked at the opposing side, or simply ignored it when presented to you. People love to be right, and they are afraid to be wrong. Sometimes, because they are afraid, they do "mental gymnastics" to avoid having to admit they were wrong.

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).

I hope not....

....I have already given him a pass on believing in Christianity for which there is no reasonable evidence. I'd hate if he continued that trend and began believing that 9/11 was an inside job, a position which would also be backed by no reasonable evidence.

Free market capitalism isn't right for America because it works better. It's right because it's free (and it works better).

The good doctor has made his position on this clear many times.

And that is that the 911 lead counsel and 911 counsel commission chair have both called for another investigation because, they said, not Ron Paul, but quoted by Ron Paul, that the commission was flawed, not all information was reviewed and some of the information was proven to be falsified.

Ron Paul said he AGREED with the commissions lead counsel and lead commissioner in calling for a new investigation because the people of the United States deserve to know what really happened.

So, why not SUPPORT RON PAUL, rather than passive aggressively trying to shove him into a position he does not agree with.

He is a wise man. Bluntly speaking, you aren't.

This assumes

Dr. Paul believes it was an inside job.

For some reason, a lot of people seem to like to projecting their personal views onto Dr. Paul when it comes to 9/11.

Maybe people could quit relying on Dr. Paul to spread the truth about issues X Y and Z and take on a more active role doing it themselves? Tee hee that'd just be silly though.

A signature used to be here!

Even if Ron believed 911 was a false flag

...as I do, I see no upside to it and it would be political suicide for Rand in 2016.

How many politicans have called it an Inside Job?

None. Including Dr. Paul. That is a national tragedy.

My latest Daily Paul article: How the U.S. Media Has Had a Big Hand in Helping Ron Paul Win the Republican Nomination
http://www.dailypaul.com/231491/how-the-us-media-has-had-a-b...

Cynthia McKinney & Jesse Ventura

.

___________________________________________________________________________
"Bipartisan: both parties acting in concert to put both of their hands in your pocket."-Rothbard

If he'd say anything to this effect,

I hope he would say it was a false flag, not an "inside job," since technically the drafters of the 911 false flag terror plot were not actual nations, but terrifically minute factions within nations.

"Inside job" implies that people within out government were complicit. Certainly some of them were, but not nearly all politicians, executive branch members, etc. Again, those aligned with this force which was responsible for 911 are only the minute faction within both political parties today, and the force is and has been serving foreign interests to say the least. It is clear who those involved from the government were specifically at that time. The so called "neocons." Presently those aligned with this force have a fairly equal distribution amongst both political parties, but this is detail.

I like that reasoning

False flag implies perhaps more than Inside Job, but when I hear false flag I immediately think of a military action. I don't think our military was involved, but rather nefarious types as you mentioned.

My latest Daily Paul article: How the U.S. Media Has Had a Big Hand in Helping Ron Paul Win the Republican Nomination
http://www.dailypaul.com/231491/how-the-us-media-has-had-a-b...

Ron Paul is too smart than to

Ron Paul is too smart than to touch it with a 10 foot pole. They call him the Father of Fringe on MSNBC just last week, and you want to know when he will admit it was an Inside Job?

I haven't changed my position for over 10 years. There is enough of us that can call it for what it is, lies filled.

The Doctor has another message, FREEDOM.

I think there are others that want to just keeping making the Paul's out to be kooks, by painting them in a corner, like that Wagner from MSNBC this week. Or the SPLC and their hit piece that he was addressing an Anti Semite crowd, when it was a Catholic group, and the catholics have had the issue with jewish people long before Ron Paul was in politics.

Bottom line, what kind of people would drool over such a conclusion drawn? Same people that wrote him up as the Father of Fringe, or the one to address the Anti Semites, such as the SPLC

Be Your Own Media!!!

What does he have to gain? Nothing!

9/11 is a very contentious issue, even among us "Ron Paul conspiracy kooks" where it causes heated debate every time it's mentioned. So it makes no sense for him to step into that mess unless the aim is to cause division.

Besides, Ron Paul has already stated previously that he would support a new and independent investigation. That's good enough for me and one that's hard to argue no matter what side of the isle you sit.

If men are good, you don't need government; if men are evil or ambivalent, you don't dare have one.

Ugh...

What does he have to lose? Well...All of his credibility in the eyes of the masses for one....Credibility that he's built for 40+ years, I'd say that is plenty to lose.

And how is he supposed to go about doing this? Does Ron Paul seem like the type of person to stick his finger in the air and declare "9-11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!" through a bullhorn? He's expressed doubts about the Kennedy Assassination, but did he get on a pulpit and scream "THE CIA KILLED KENNEDY!"

That's not the kind of guy he is, those aren't the tactics he uses. And he would want some NEW, CONCRETE evidence in his hands before he yelled out "9-11 WAS AN INDIDE JOB!" "I don't know WHO exactly did it, the information is so splintered! But all I know is that it's an INSIDE JOB!" C'mon man.

And last but not least...could you IMAGINE the insane, INSANE negative media blitz that would result in such a declaration? Ron Paul has worked for decades to reach the mainstream and open their eyes incrementally. Such a declaration would completely destroy that goal...in my opinion.

"I am Troll fighter, number one"

-Ernest

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxWb-ViejPg

Ron Paul and the Masses

As if Ron has any credibility among the masses. He doesn't anyhow, so what's the loss?

He has the attention of the media world though for some reason. Perhaps it was from people like us making him what he is with all our hard work where the media could not ignore us.

Americans who still deny the possibility that elements within the US government were responsible for the 9/11 attacks are the reason why situations like Syria exist. http://youtu.be/vka7Da6e9LY

My latest Daily Paul article: How the U.S. Media Has Had a Big Hand in Helping Ron Paul Win the Republican Nomination
http://www.dailypaul.com/231491/how-the-us-media-has-had-a-b...

Ron Paul and I had a fairly in-depth discussion about this

at Katy Taylor high school in 2010 when he was running for re-election to his Congressional seat. He doesn't believe the 9-11 Commission Report and he knows that there is more there and he does support a new investigation. He emphasized that a government-sponsored investigation will never reach the truth, however, and that a new investigation should be 100% independent.

Very Interesting

Of course he hasn't said anything since. Which is why I ask maybe this is the year.

My latest Daily Paul article: How the U.S. Media Has Had a Big Hand in Helping Ron Paul Win the Republican Nomination
http://www.dailypaul.com/231491/how-the-us-media-has-had-a-b...

I think he will never

say for certain it was an inside job, because if he was already certain he would have said it already. I suspect he's suspicious. For most of us, suspicion is all we can substantiate on our own. Maybe, you should rename your title to say "Is this the year Ron Paul reveals his suspicion that 9/11 was an inside job". Also, saying "admit" means he knows and refrained from saying so. That will get you down voted to oblivion for good reason.

I've never heard RP talk about wtc7

Thanks for the link. Also, WTC7 is the lynch pin in most people's suspicion, because it's obvious and most other things can have a tangible argument against them. However, evidence that I see being detracted from often is the integrity of steel. All these argument go into the structural properties of heated steel, the insulating aspects of the concrete, exposure to the burning fuel, etc. These arguments detract from the other obvious evidence, the presence of MOLTEN steel at the site. It's harder to speculate on the culminating effects of structural damage, but how do you explain molten steel? That's my second lynch pin, anyway.