Obama credibility ZERO.
This is a false narrative! Sure it's a message of anti war, but only because we're not overthrowing a regime aka full scale war. Pirro is towing the line that makes news and gives her something to track about. You know him McCain's line. There are two false premis es being disseminated, both chancellor's against the law known as the constitution.
She says so many trigger words, including that Obama had said "red line," Syria heard it, but they used chemical weapons anyway. She's saying misinformation. She's no Judge Napolitano, that's for sure.
"Hell is empty, and all the devils are here" (Shakespeare)
RP 2012~ Intellectual Revolution.
The federal government and all it's so called leadership flushed its own credibility with the American people and the rest of the planet down the toilet long ago. Fast and Furious, IRS, NSA, Benghazi, etc, etc and the constant lies, lies, and more lies. Those crazy psychopaths in DC have to be stopped one way or another.
There's no element promoting war in her rhetoric, quite the contrary, it's simply sarcasm while giving obama an cbvious black eye.
Maybe not for all the reasons one would like to hear, but cleary for the most obvious ones.
One thing for certain, this woman has more intestinal fortitude than many I've heard, in her open critique, and most certainly any of the 535 excuses that have publically come out against another bombing disaster in Syria.
Fox or not, I'll say well done, and deserves promoting.
I got no "pro war" agenda from her lips. Especially when she concluded about the peace prize. The word's "give it back" will ring in my ears for a long time to come... and certainly states the obvious want for a "No War" agenda. Bravo!
Never heard of her.
But no mention of the uniform policy of both Dems AND Repubs. It figures, coming from Fox, the controlled opposition.
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford
I hated the first half of her commentary (didn't watch the last half).
Was she trying to goad Obama into going into war?
The only way Obama could make her happy would be to nuke Syria (that would show her he's not indecisive).
How can she call him indicisive when it's Congress' job to declare war?
Don't be fooled: this was partisan political sport, using the deaths of people as a football. I'm sick of politics as sport. I'm sick of them playing with our lives.
What do you think? http://consequeries.com/
"Didn't you win the Nobel peace prize?, yeah.. you'r the one, well Give It Back!".
Wow! What Feinstein said. Even Ron Paul talked about that. She said something like once the decision was made, we need to "back it up." Dr. Paul talks about how if we make a wrong decision, we shouldn't continue making a wrong decision to "save face."...that it takes a strong, courageous person to admit they are wrong.
Damascus, Syria - Islamic Empire History. 10 minute travelogue. You'll find painted caves with visions on Paradise!
Syria!: Paradise. Science. Religion. So much to choose from.
Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul ☑
was a good look into Syria. That is not a country I want any feud with. In fact, I wouldn't mind visiting Syria. After this obama nonsense though, they probably won't welcome Americans =(
I couldn't handle the whole thing, but apparently her point is we should have been more aggressive so Obama would have more respect?
Not exactly what our movement is about.
bashing obama, that's good. But she is definitely no friend of liberty.
she makes me sick .. such horrible acting
All paper money eventually returns to its real intrinsic value, zero. - Voltaire
Lebanese women are easy on the eyes.
“...taxes are not raised to carry on wars, but that wars are raised to carry on taxes”
Thomas Paine, Rights of Man
but her hair looked better before.
However its nice to see her put him in his place. The establishment is attempting to make the general public think these problems are "Obama-Based" and move the public into the arms of establishment republicans. This is why we need to expand our influence in the GOP, the more the general public moves into the arms of the republicans; the more we can get our message out there and break the 2 party paradigm. The future is ours, I just hope its not too late by then.
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift
I don't buy it. It's times like this that I am grateful that Romney lost. If he were President right now, the bombing would already be done, and the Republicans would be cheering. This is Fox News, and she's a paper mache doll, like the rest of them. Shiny on the outside, nothing on the inside.
to watch hawks awkwardly 'shift' towards an anti-war position..
Anti-war rhetoric by those without the philosophical underpinnings.
We see it more and more now...
Know what I mean?
She argues from political and current events positions
than from the philosophy of non-intervention.
We will take what we can get... but we still have a LOT of work to do.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul