25 votes

Video Update: Rand Paul is on CNN's new Crossfire show-Newt is a host

Thanks to BoothM for the YouTube, which captures most of it:


http://youtu.be/KFtoBPKqTmE




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is not a setback for the Elite but a con job.

Every foreign relations argument is about how to approach Assad and his chemical weapons. Unless I missed something there is more evidence that the gassing of those victims was done by the Al Quaeda rebels. The weapons were gotten from Saudi Arabia's Prince. In several interviews the Rebels admitted to it; and recently it has been written that the children gassed had been kidnapped weeks before. Also, the UK announced that as far back as January there was an article in their newspapers that America was planning a chemical attack on Syria as a false flag, blaming it on Assad so America can attack on humanity grounds, playing once again the white knight on the white horse.
All these arguments are merely a minor step back from attacking Syria, but a major step forward in building up support that Assad must be stopped with "his" chemical weapons, which was the goal to begin with. So the elite may end this with a coup, getting enough support to oust Assad diplomatically to avoid a punishment bombing.
Everyone not complaining about these so-called debates that do not first determine the perpetrator of the chemical attack is a dupe or complicit. We are being led by the nose to slaughter.
And here I must say I will not vote for Rand Paul for president for this reason. While Rand takes the stand for caution, in every argument he supports the idea that it was Assad who gassed his own people, not to mention he was a wus when confronting nazi Kerry. Until there is evidence to the contrary, it should not be a foregone conclusion that Assad is the guilty party.

Wow

Stephanie Cutter is so obnoxious and rude and will not listen or allow Rand Paul to talk. She is of course an Obama apologist if you read up on her (as with most CNN reporters).

"Once you become knowledgeable, you have an obligation to do something about it."- Ron Paul

I couldn't finish watching

Whats her face is snide and condescending. This is why CNN is one of the worst propaganda outlets. Sickening.

Ron Paul - Intellectual hero

metalhed19's picture

Don't watch this, it will

Don't watch this, it will make you ill. Rand gets to talk for about a sentence at a time before he is cut off, Newt is actually kind of okay, the other 2 terrible. War drums a beating

*Wisconsin Constitution* Article I, Section 25 "The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security,defense,hunting,recreation or any other law-abiding purpose"

Debbie's picture

I'm glad that Rand set Menendez straight at the end that the

president is NOT authorized to take us to war without Congressional approval, and that the Constitution forbids just that! Go Rand!!

Debbie

Skip to 11:23

You will see Newt try to get a word in edgewise, but the blonde tyrant touches his arm to signal to Newt that Newt should not interrupt their warmongering guest. Newt smiles and obeys his female co-host. She has an ugly spirit about her.

I'm not sure I've seen a more rude host than that blonde lady. Completely sophomoric!

And Mendez, or whatever his name is, deserves to be sent over to Syria along with the other hawks who insist on more killing. He is what a murderer looks like in an expensive suit.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a rEVOLution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford

I noticed that about her too

She is so annoying to watch, condescending and juvenile. If this show is going to make it, they will need a different co-host.

Drone strikes!

Drone strikes!

it was two against one but I

it was two against one but I thought Rand held his own.

emalvini's picture

Senator Menendez Is A 'Faccia Sporca'

I don't trust this degenerate bastard!

...and so is the "Neutered Grinch"

dont watch this cra*p. its

dont watch this cra*p. its annoying and bad for your health.

Why in the world does Rand

Why in the world does Rand concede that Assad did this? We have no idea who did it, cause we have yet to be shown the hard evidence. We haven't even seen the full intel of the biased Israelis. Justin Amash and Alan Grayson and others have seen the so called evidence, and it is not conclusive. In fact, it points to the rebels. I am so frustrated by Rand's oh I am afraid for Israel argument. The US govt has lied Rand. We need leaders to admit this!!!!!!!

Menendez is clearly advocating for Israel here. Like Israel really has any legitimate worry about Iran nuking them. So tired of this AIPAC controlled agenda.

Principle

In regards to the question (to bomb, or not) it doesn't matter who committed the act.

Completely Annoying Format....

Everybody cutting each other off..
too many Cheshire grins and playing verbal ping pong.
Could not finish after 12 minutes...
and I'M a patient person and a listener.
Menendez continuously re-packaging his statements...
and SHE as moderator cutting off Rand was intolerable.
Disgusting.

It appeared that the woman

It appeared that the woman and the Democrat were supposed to be on a team and Newt were also on a team.

I agree the format seems like something from Fox or MSNBC, especially the woman who kept laughing and interrupting Rand Paul. Please show some respect and let your guest answer your questions. I am disappointed in CNN for stooping this low with this kind of show. The woman was hardly listening. She seemed more focused on the format of the show where she is supposed to be "hard hitting" against Rand. I am not against hosts who ask "hard hitting" questions, but please show some respect. Nobody wants to watch people act like their in middle school.

Agreed. I made it about 8

Agreed. I made it about 8 minutes and was rather turned off by the way they were going about it.

The show stinks.

There was consensus between all there, that Assad used chemical weapons. Not even Rand spoke up to say hey wait. Your evidence is inconclusive. Looks like one battle Obama had has been won. They said it enough, (Tell a lie over and over .. they will believe it) that Assad and the Syrian government where responsible. No one is challenging it.

. . . . . . _ . . . _ _ .
. _ . . _ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . _ . . _ . .
. _ . . _ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . _ . . _ . .

It was obvious...

Rand Paul was continuously interrupted by Stephanie Cutter constantly and then when the DemocRAT from NY spoke - he was allowed to ramble on and on and on without interruption. Newt was respectful towards both D and R. Down vote for Stephanie Cutter...

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"
GANDHI

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."
BILL3 of DP

Menendez is the Senator from New Jersey,

schooled by Sen. Lautenberg. He has the same backing and funding as Lautenberg had and has risen up the ladder because of it.

I'm glad to know that I was

I'm glad to know that I was not the only one that noticed that. Plus Newt was going to interrupt the Dem at one point and Cutter stopped him. Really biased. Not surprising though, this is scripted MSM.

It is better to look dumb and not be, than to look smart and not be.

Menendez

is a democratic senator from Florida.

. . . . . . _ . . . _ _ .
. _ . . _ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . _ . . _ . .
. _ . . _ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . _ . . _ . .

Here's most of it

They could only come up with ONE

person who isn't a shameless, posturing pig?

I give Rand Paul alot of credit for staying composed and effectively communicating in their midst.

“Give a man a gun, he can rob a bank. Give a man a central bank, and he can rob a country and the world.”
www.dailypaul.com/donate

Please

post video when found!!!

You just got PAULED!

Just saw the

tail end of it. Rand looked good from the brief time that I saw him. The "other" side basically asserts that we can't allow this to go on (though not addressing that we have purveyed the use of chemical weapons quite a bit I might say) as this will allow future uses.