10 votes

Explaining to a 10 Year Old the Prison a Mind Can Not See

This thread about registration relates to the picture below:

http://www.dailypaul.com/303372/how-are-any-rights-or-privil...

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

LoL

An inferior animal species possesses no such power.

Sit boy!

FYI

The two flags on your cargo boat are blowing in opposite directions.
Was that intentional?

The intention was not to illustrate two flags.

The intention was to draw a sail in the middle but I suck at drawing.

No problem

Wasn't criticizing your art - your intent is much more important.
I just thought maybe you did it on purpose to show the conflict of interest between personal property (sail) and regulated property (us flag) in opposition to one another - Guess I was trying to read too much into an art concept.

I will say that your post has pointed out

something I had not considered to incorporate into the drawing which is the concept of dual citizenship where there would be two flags ...

...

Citizen - Ship

All rights reserved and no rights waived.

looks correct to me

those should be sails catching the wind which should be blowing from right to left.

??

The 2nd boat (cargo boat) with "2" flags -
the triangle sail is blowing left to right -
the us flag is blowing right to left...
they are blowing opposite of each other on the same boat.
No big deal but wouldn't the wind blow the sails and the flags the same direction?

maybe you're thinking of a windsock at an airport

I see a mast, and a boom and although it's not exactly parallel to the water surface in his drawing it is there, and if he would have drawn the rigging you would have seen that holding the boom more aft to catch the wind....which in both examples would be blowing from right to left as indicated by the direction of the flag.

http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/sailboat-parts.gif

Scientifically plausible explanation

The two boats are on opposing sides of a rare gibberish tornado

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

...

inherent power.
The doctrine that the federal government has sovereign and inherent powers in addition to the powers given to it expressly or impliedly by the United States Constitution; a doctrine refused recognition as law by the United States Supreme
Court. Kansas v Colorado, 206 US 46, 51 L Ed 956, 27 S Ct 655.
- Ballentine's Law Dictionary, 3rd Edition, William Anderson, 1969

All rights reserved and no rights waived.

Woooohoooo

Thank you for citing a legal proposition that is so obvious that absolutely no one can disagree with it!

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

...

people of the United States.
The sovereign people. Citizens. Boyd v Nebraska, 143 US 135, 36 L Ed 103, 12 S Ct 375.
- Ballentine's Law Dictionary, 3rd Edition, William Anderson, 1969

All rights reserved and no rights waived.

DrBatshit vs. the chickenator, Round 2

LMFAO, you guys need a show

“Although it was the middle of winter, I finally realized that, within me, summer was inextinguishable.” — Albert Camus

lol

I see pay per view cage matches in the DP's future

They should

kiss and make up. It is much like a marriage, or not.

I do enjoy reading their 'debates'. It does provide insight, either way :-)

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

No kissing dr. Batshit

But the Granger seems like she might be a go-er, nudge nudge wink wink

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

...

"A citizen of the United States who has constitutionally renounced his allegiance does not become a subject of a foreign power as long has he remains domiciled within the United States." Talbot .v Jansen (1795), 3 Dall. 133, 1 L.Ed. 540.

All rights reserved and no rights waived.

So what?

What's your point?

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

nice date

If we were back in the 18th century this might hold some weight. But seeing as we are not, and that legal concepts have changed since then, it doesn't. But before I so hastily dismiss it, what point were you trying to make? One could make several from the case cited and even a few from your quote. What was yours?

I suspect it's more of the "the world must be the way I imagine it, because I found a quote from 1795 that, taken out of context, sounds remotely like it must support my theory."

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

So much for precedent

...

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...

Dicta vs holding

This is a very strange case, in that each justice wrote his own opinion. Haven't read the whole thing, but this seems to be just dicta and not the holding. So, it isn't really precedent, but is certainly fertile ground to quote mine due to all the text.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

...

"There are three concepts of especial importance in connection with the presence of a person within a state: residence, domicile, and citizenship. Residence implies something more than mere transient visitation. It involves a more or less fixed abode but ignores the intent of continuance or political affiliation. An alien may have residence without domicile or citizenship. One may have more than one residence at a time. Domicile implies civil status. Many civil rights depend upon it-e.g. the course of descent of personal property is governed by the law of the person's domicile at death. Every natural person has a domicile, but only one. His domicile of origin persists until a new one is acquired by choice. A domicile of choice is acquired by the concurrence of physical presence (usually residence) and an intent to make the place his more or less permanent home. No particular length of previous residence is essential, nor need one affirmatively intend always to remain there. But there must be no present intent of going to live elsewhere…. Citizenship implies political status. It may or may not confer suffrage or any other particular incident but it does imply incorporation into the body politic. The requirements vary from state to state. Often they involve much the same qualifications as does domicile. But the two should not be confused." THE NATIONAL LAW LIBRARY, published by Collier, Volume III p. 358 footnote.

All rights reserved and no rights waived.

That is exactly why as soon as you show them their issued ID

you are screwed. You have, in their eyes, already enslaved yourself through your own consent.

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...

deacon's picture

you say consent

I say enslaved by lies,fraud and coercion
And none of which has ever been disclosed per true
lawful commerce

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

That's why I explicitly said "in their eyes"

I know it is fraud. I tell them its fraud and am even seeking a jury trial to have them (the criminals claiming to be "court" personnel) brought to justice by a proper jury and thrown in prison for their crimes.

We are on the same page.

I am not playing nice with these criminals anymore. I even disclose to every member of the "court" that obstructing my path to a criminal grand jury will result in obstruction of Justice criminal accusations against those men and women claiming to be officers.

Justice through our juries is the path to remedy from this tyrannical police state. Those who play politics are wasting vast amounts of time and resources on working to lose everything. Anyone thinking politics will ever be a solution to crime are nuts.

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...

...

Notice how your ID has your name printed in Capitis Diminutio Maximus. (All capital letters)

All rights reserved and no rights waived.

Whoa whoa

...nothing is "printed in capitis deminutio maxima." That makes no sense. Capitis deminutio maxima is a legal concept. Saying that something is printed in capitis deminutio maxima makes as much sense as saying something is printed in patria potestas: i.e. none whatsoever. Capitis deminutio maxima has nothing to do with the capitalization of letters.

"Alas! I believe in the virtue of birds. And it only takes a feather for me to die laughing."

Analysis please

I've showed I.d. A lot of times and next been charged with a crime or,infraction.

You're believing sov cit nonsense. It's sad.

Sorry for iPad induced spelling and grammar.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

incomplete cite

can you perhaps get out your blue book citation manual (which you've quoted elsewhere) and give a complete citation?

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein