18 votes

Hillary Mann Leverett: Awesome Lady hitting the Airwaves AGAINST Syria War = Advisor @ Ron Paul Inst. for Peace & Prosperity!

Special Edition of The Robert Wenzel Show: Hillary Mann Leverett on U.S. Foreign Policy

Robert Wenzel
Published on Sep 10, 2013

Direct .MP3 DownLoad: http://traffic.libsyn.com/economicpolicyjournal/Leverett.mp3

** Because events are changing so quickly in Syria, this week's show is being published today instead of on Sunday **

This Week's Guest: Hillary Mann Leverett

Co-Author of Going To Tehran, U.S. Foreign Policy Professor at American University, Academic Board Member of The Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity

Prof. Hillary Mann Leverett

Prof. Leverett is Senior Professorial Lecturer at the American University in Washington, DC and a Visiting Scholar at Peking University in Beijing, China. She is co-author of Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic (2013).

Does Doctor Ronald Ernest Paul know how to pick 'em, or wha?

It's like, his close circle of friends and colleagues must be the biggest open, hidden secret in DC!

These great individuals didn't just come out of nowhere! If you look at their CV, they've been involved in and around DC politics for years; if anyone needed any more proof that great voices are always intentionally being drowned out, look no further than almost everyone on that "About Us" list of advisors at the Good Doc's RP Institute page.

Y'all excited?

The seeds that Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul has sown, are literally bearing fruit, right before our eyes: the fact that "false flag" and broad multi-coalition anti-intervention sentiments can even become widespread, and even better, the fact that under the simple prevailing cultural zeitgeist of public pressure the Ruling Class and their sycophantic MSM hacks are even 'forced to allow' these voices to be heard, for fear of losing what little semblance of 'legitimacy' they enjoy in the public's eyes, is a testament in it of itself!

Furthermore, the fact that individuals like Ms. Leverett who must have been pounding away on these messages in private and in smaller circles for years, can now finally gain much wider public acceptance?


Here are her other noted, recent interviews, courtesy of MoxNews & others:

Hillary Leverett "The Focus On The Chemical Weapons Is A SIDE SHOW! AND MAYBE EVEN A PRETEXT!" pt.1

September 10, 2013 Al Jazeera

Hillary Leverett "The Focus On The Chemical Weapons Is A SIDE SHOW! AND MAYBE EVEN A PRETEXT!" pt.2

Published on Sep 11, 2013

"This Is A Joke! Colin Powell Had More Evidence! It Was Wrong... But He Had More!" Hillary Leverett

Published on Sep 3, 2013
September 02, 2013 Al Jazeera News

The now infamous P0wnage that 'put her on the map:'
I LOVE Watching MIC Presstitutes Get SMACKED DOWN By A Real Journalist :)

Published on Sep 1, 2013
September 01, 2013 MSNBC News

Syria intervention: necessary action or grave mistake?

CCTV America [FYI: the Chinese Govt's Official State-run TV]
Published on Aug 31, 2013

Hillary Mann Leverett, Professor from American University and Matthew Brodsky, Director of Policy from Jewish Policy Center, joined anchor Mike Walter to have a heated argument on whether the U.S. strike on Syria would be a legitimate one, or a grave mistake.


Here she and Flynt (her husband who is also on Ron Paul Inst.'s academic board of advisors; they were both policy mavericks within the GWB's own NSC!) talking to AntiWar.com/HuffPost/TruthOut/AmericanConservativeMag contributor Gareth Porter (he's since repented for his grave mistakes, about the Khmer Rouge), about their book, Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran (2013):

US Iran Policy Can't Abide an Independent Middle East State

Published on Jun 17, 2013

Hillary Mann-Leverett and Flynt Leverett: American policy based on hegemony in the Middle East - a major regional player not within the US system of supported states is a target

See more videos at: http://therealnews.com

Support Daily Paul by buying the book!

Click on the book cover picture to be redirected to the Daily Paul Amazon.com Store

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

As I have said many times, there is a great debate among

Israeli's and Jewish people regarding the direction of Israel's government.

Thank you Prof. Hillary Mann Leverett

And this should be another nail in the coffin of those who would call Dr Paul an anti-semite. He is so anti-semetic that he'd have a Jewish lady represent his institute for peace.

In your face race baiters!!

Personally, I've always found the term "Anti-Semite" itself

to be hilariously ironic, especially when invoked by those who'd politically, physically oppress and discriminate against their own genetically Semitic brethren: the Palestinians.

The shared genetic heritage of Jews and Palestinians

What they revealed was that Arabs and Jews are essentially a single population, and that Palestinians are slap bang in the middle of the different Jewish populations (as shown in this figure).

By Tomas Rees on Tuesday, January 20, 2009

The Times recently carried this unusual report on an Israeli Jew (Tsvi Misinai, a retired computer expert) who's hoping to prove that Palestinians are descended from Jews. Apparently, he thinks that proving this will help to stop the bloodshed. His idea is that modern Jews are descended from emigration in the first few centuries of the Christian era. The Jews who stayed put in Palestine converted to Islam, and became Palestinian Arabs. There's hope that genetic tests might be able to prove this.

Well, there is good news and bad news on that score.

The good news is that the genetics of Arabs and Jews have been pretty extensively researched. The classic study dates to 2000, from a team lead by Michael Hammer of University of Arizona. They looked at Y-chromosome haplotypes - this is the genetic material passed from father to son down the generations.

and, from one of the most respected science journals: NATURE

Jews worldwide share genetic ties
But analysis also reveals close links to Palestinians and Italians.

Alla Katsnelson

Published online 3 June 2010 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2010.277

Different communities of Jews around the world share more than just religious or cultural practices — they also have strong genetic commonalities, according to the largest genetic analysis of Jewish people to date.

But the study also found strong genetic ties to non-Jewish groups, with the closest genetic neighbours on the European side being Italians, and on the Middle Eastern side the Druze, Bedouin and Palestinians.

Researchers in New York and Tel Aviv conducted a genome-wide analysis on 237 individuals from seven well-established Jewish communities around the world, hailing from Iran, Iraq, Italy, Greece, Turkey, Syria and eastern Europe. The team then compared these genetic profiles to those of non-Jews in the same geographic regions based on data from the Human Genome Diversity Project, a database of genomic information for individuals from populations worldwide. Each group of Jews is genetically distinct, but similarities between the groups weave them together with what the researchers describe as "genetic thread".

Then, more recently, from the Jewish Paper "FORWARD," May 07, 2013, issue of May 10, 2013:

'Jews a Race' Genetic Theory Comes Under Fierce Attack by DNA Expert
Israeli Scientist Challenges Hypothesis of Middle East Origins

Science Feud: Johns Hopkins geneticist Eran Elhaik says his research debunks the long-held theory that Jews are a single race. Photo: Rita Rubin

”It’s so obvious for me,” Sand told the journal. “Some people, historians and even scientists, turn a blind eye to the truth. Once, to say Jews were a race was anti-Semitic, now to say they’re not a race is anti-Semitic. It’s crazy how history plays with us.”

Dr. Eran Elhaik's paper in question: The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses (as published in December 14, 2013, in the online journal Genome Biology and Evolution)

By Rita Rubin
Published May 07, 2013, issue of May 10, 2013.

Scientists usually don’t call each other “liars” and “frauds.”

But that’s how Johns Hopkins University post-doctoral researcher Eran Elhaik describes a group of widely respected geneticists, including Harry Ostrer, professor of pathology and genetics at Yeshiva University’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine and author of the 2012 book “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People.”

For years now, the findings of Ostrer and several other scientists have stood virtually unchallenged on the genetics of Jews and the story they tell of the common Middle East origins shared by many Jewish populations worldwide. Jews — and Ashkenazim in particular — are indeed one people, Ostrer’s research finds.

It’s a theory that more or less affirms the understanding that many Jews themselves hold of who they are in the world: a people who, though scattered, share an ethnic-racial bond rooted in their common ancestral descent from the indigenous Jews of ancient Judea or Palestine, as the Romans called it after they conquered the Jewish homeland.

But now, Elhaik, an Israeli molecular geneticist, has published research that he says debunks this claim. And that has set off a predictable clash.

And, of course, the usual, the Predictable Party No.1; the now de rigueur ensuing AIPAC/Likudnik/NeoCon attacks, and counter-attacks:

Israeli Researcher Challenges Jewish DNA links to Israel, Calls Those Who Disagree 'Nazi Sympathizers'

Jon Entine, Contributor
Op/Ed | 5/16/2013 @ 4:26PM |11,135 views

The Genetic Literacy Project reports that the ongoing conflict between Israel and its neighbors over the origins of the “Jewish people” has surfaced again as an issue of great controversy—with science in the crosshairs.

It’s particularly troublesome when a scientist—in this case, an Israeli molecular geneticist whose motivations appear more personal and ideological than scientific—stokes the contretemps. The current brouhaha arises over a recent study by Eran Elhaik and is accompanied by his personal attacks on more mainstream scientists who have eviscerated his work. In the face of overwhelming evidence from dozens of studies over twenty years from geneticists and historians around the world, Elhaik is aggressively stumping on behalf of his belief that most Jews trace their seminal ancestry not to the Middle East but to the Caucuses and Eastern Europe.

Elhaik, who is now a post-doctoral researcher at Johns Hopkins, is recirculating the debunked “Khazarian hypothesis” promoted by journalist Arthur Koestler in his 1976 book, The Thirteenth Tribe, written before scientists had the tools to compare genomes and challenge his conclusion.

And, the Predictable Party No.2, the official Iranian-state Media: Press TV; of course whether valid or not, a predictably more sensationalist headline:

Zionists design myth of Jewish genome to usurp Palestine
On Decemever 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down. But he went even further. The young Israeli-Ameican geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.

Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:37PM
By Jim W. Dean

How could those those eminent Jewish scientist before him have been so wrong? Easy says Dr. Elhaik, “First these researchers decided what conclusions they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it.” I was not bashing Jewish scientists. What Elhaik has described is a slam dunk fraud.

But why? Why would Jews who take such pride in the academic achievement risk exposing themselves to a group deception which was bound to be discovered later? Dr. Elhaik does not delve into the quicksand of the politics, but I will gladly do so.

They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood. They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.

Now, the question and now historically and scientifically factual, emerging theory of Khazari genetic lineage & origin of modern Jews aside (if the Google AFP News link doesn't work, simply StartPage.com an AFP article dated Jan 16, 2013 "Gene study settles debate over origin of European Jews"), how did they find out that Palestinians are in fact 'Semites,' as well, long before Dr. Ehaik's findings?

Well, long before Dipshiit Cheney & co promoted the use of gene-specific bioweapons, as cited on page 60 of their public PNAC paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses:


Information systems will become an important focus of attack, particularly for U.S. enemies seeking to short-circuit sophisticated American forces. And advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.

the apartheid govt of South Africa was deluded in their desperation, actually sought to genetically eliminate the entire black population, regardless of the fact that all humans are about 99% similar, biologically, so the markers would have to be those ONLY existent in their target 'races,' which as you may have guessed, a bit daunting.

And whom did they hire to pursue this post-Hitlerian eugenicist task? Irony of ironies, and apparently heirs to Wannsee acolytes: Israeli, Jewish geneticists.

Only if Mengele could see the fruit of his labors...

Seriously, HOW FCUKED UP IS IT, that those who cannot finish a sentence without reminding the world about "the six million," would turn around, sit, take time to convene a meeting to discuss a "Final Solution" of their own, vs. their own perceived enemies of a specific genetic lineage??

But, what did they find, when those same assholes were hired by the Israeli govt to do the same (Yes, The Sunday Times of London, UK, NOT the Nat. Inquirer, mind you; of course now they want to erase it's ever been reported by putting up a pay-wall)? Palestinians and Jews are genetically, almost identical: to murder them with bio-weapons, would mean dooming themselves.

Cosmic Karma, I'd say.

Oh, and of course, those dutiful AIPAC-whores in denial, would pen a denial.

But then, what about the London Times? UCLA studies? Established WaPo's actual investigative journalists (.MIL link, "Find" "Washington Post in April 2003": it's referring to Joby Warrick and John Mintz's article “Lethal Legacy: Bioweapons for Sale,” dated April 20, 2003"), South Africa's own Reconciliation Commission's records? Known thinktanks?

But...but...but...it's all an internet "conspiracy!" because if you scream and claim and pretend something's BS long enough, it become real! Yay!

LOL: WTF is reality, when the first thing they tell themselves whenever someone criticizes them and their eugenicist worldviews, is deny, deny, deny?

Hilariously, also from Salon, is another article that basically confirms the feasibility of the tech/its usage and the threat of its use is very real, so real that POTUS and those 'protecting' him are concerned about it.

LOL. Ah... it wouldn't be L vs. R bowel-'movement liberals' if they didn't contradict themselves, like every other minute, with cognitive dissonance.

But what else is new?

Humans, such ridiculously funny, weird creatures. But, suppose one day, they may outgrow their delusional worldviews...

P.S. 1: But for those of you who may have just recently taken the 'Red Pill' and think all this is crazy talk? I assure you, govt terrorist crazies and their sycophantic turd sociopathic nerds at DARPA are far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far more crazier, than you could even possibly imagine or fathom.

To wit, I schit you not, behold, the "Gay Bomb:"

BBC, Saturday, Jan. 15, 2005, 06:38 GMT:
US military pondered love not war
The US military investigated building a "gay bomb", which would make enemy soldiers "sexually irresistible" to each other, government papers say.

ABC 'News,' June 21, 2007:
Fringe Science Yields 'Gay Bombs' and Psychic Teleportation

WIRED Magazine Dec. 10, 2007, 3:51 PM:
The Gay Bomb Lives!

LiveScience.com via FauxNews, Dec. 11, 2007:
Scientists Make Fruit Flies Gay, Then Straight Again

Yes, "gay bomb"... 'your' tax dollars at work.

P.S. 2: Here's an insight into how the Vaccines, as they are today, are used as a soft-kill weapon, basically came to be; from the horse's own mouthpiece: the 'other' (un)official magazine of the CFR, "Foreign Policy"; note this is an article on bioweapons, NOT vaccines, and yet...

Biological Weapons

AUGUST 8, 2006

After 9/11, U.S. spending on defenses against biological attacks got a shot in the arm. Between 2001 and 2006, the budget for biodefense medical research and development at the National Institutes of Health increased from $50 million to $1.8 billion. Five years later, it turns out there might be some unlikely beneficiaries of this bounty: poor people in the developing world.

The extra money being poured into bioterror preparedness could result in a revolution in global public health -- to the benefit of the world's most vulnerable citizens. New vaccines, medicines, and techniques designed to deal with diseases unleashed by terrorists may also combat naturally occurring outbreaks. Tara O'Toole, director of the Center for Biosecurity at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and a former assistant secretary of energy, argues that "if we do what is necessary for biodefense... we could conceivably in a generation eliminate large-scale, lethal epidemics of infectious disease everywhere.

But here's the real reason:

Vaccines are notoriously unprofitable, so pharmaceutical companies have often shown little interest in developing them. But fears of a biological attack have led the U.S. government to fund new vaccine breakthroughs for ebola, the Marburg virus, and Lassa fever. This money will also speed the development of dengue fever and vibrio cholera vaccines. Scientists are also excited about the possibilities stemming from the military's bigger budgets.

So, for those who would deny to their grave the reality that part of the reason for the inclusion of the deadly toxin thiomersal aka mercury, as a 'preservative' and other adjuvants in the vaccines is in fact an intentional eugenicist soft-kill program, they should at least be honest enough to admit to themselves that it's about 'money' and selling shiit that don't work, and these corporatist contracts with govt are simply the BigPharma's way of making a portion of a biz that EVERYONE who knows anything about their industry do not deny that they're "notoriously unprofitable" (no profit in cure: products that 'treat' to continually maintain a perpetual state of sickness, but not enough to die, is their bread and butter biz model; for those that aren't even bright enough to figure that out? stick to talking about NFL) and evading financial liability.

Otherwise, even setting aside the reality that all medicine affect each individual differently (so it's hard to ensure 100% effectiveness), that said, still, IF the BigPharma and the Vaccine Industrial Complex were so certain as to the efficacy of their products, like any other company who manufacture goods that they truly believe in, they'd offer a lifetime warranty, let alone, a warranty of ANY kind. But of course. They don't. And, they can't.


So the question for those who consider themselves to be an honest skeptic (which would actually mean examining history, facts, and evidence, and not keep saying "no" for the mere sake of saying no), is: if intentionally packaging an unprofitable product that has been known to harm and often kill, yet even knowing this, intentionally decide to lobby CONgress for corporatist govt contracts, worse: to indemnify themselves of any medical to lethal liabilities for those dispensed via govt subsidized programs, all the while making sure that the govt buys those very same unprofitable and dangerous products on the taxpayers' dime/subsidy, what ELSE would you call that but an intentional evil plan?

What, bills and corporatist contracts just get handed out, without an army of lawyers and series of meetings, conferences, whitepapers and 'policy lunches'??

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

didn't know she on affiliated with the RPI when i saw

that video of her on MSNBC last week

yup: the Doc surrounded himself with great people


which, again, drives home the point how woefully individuals like the Leveretts have been intentionally excluded from public dialog via the Ruling Class & their MSM toadies.

They even state in the above theRealNews.com interview with Gareth Porter that PRE-Iraq, as once, now former, members of upper echelon in the POTUS' National Security Council (the REAL shadow govt, within govt) under both Clinton and GWB with highest above-top-secret security clearance, they were constantly offered access to express their views, as Hillary stated: on an almost a weekly basis (well...I think she said almost weekly, y'all can correct me, if different) for OpEd column at the NY Times. But ALL that apparently stopped after they raised legitimate concerns about intel being manipulated to put America on a warpath vs. Iraq. But, the fact that they had the courage to release/publicly air their skepticism via writing WHILE still in govt under GWB admin, no less, shows the moral courage that drives them.

The Leveretts, at least as attested by their publicly available/verifiable info, are commendable patriot couple.

The Doc made an excellent choice coalescing with both of them as academic advisors for his RPI, me thinks.D

so then, the real question becomes, how many more prominent (in terms of intellect and moral fortitude) 'white hat' individuals toiling away behind the scenes IN govt, nudging and 'leaking' info to the public, for yrs, are there?

I hope to god, the Good Doc or someone keeps a list of "the Real obscure Good Guys rarely on camera" in case SHTF, and people acting rashly don't harass (or worse) those whom they don't know...

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Hillary Leverett

Wow, thanks for posting this, excellent perspective thats been missing in most of the MSM coverage on this.



Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Obama: "Even a limited strike

Obama: "Even a limited strike will send a message to Assad that no other nation can deliver,"

Yeah, that chemical weapons will not be used, but "limited strikes" are acceptable

Good thing we dont live in a world where politicians have secret interpretations of words, where EVERY resource can come under "limited strike", depending on its NEED, like, i dont know....CHEMICAL WEAPONS......its all a pony show, you call for an unjust offensive war, then you ARE the problem, YOU are the EXTREMISTS, the war mongerers calling for a culture of VIOLENCE.....you are the same counterpart to those you fight, you are no better then those you claim to fight

They cant fathom the

They cant fathom the opposition, in the face of an ever growing voice shouting as loud as one proverbalaly can, JUST to consider NO WAR, what do they do?

They turn the the conversation into, how hard or pin prick they should strike........

If the "opposition" does not give them pause on this, then they should be FIRED

The more they ignore, sweep asside, that JUST, the more the JUST from the PEOPLE turns into a DEMAND from the people........you do not talk on things of war, until you have decided wethr to go to war, you do not call through MSM for WAR, until the people see's one as JUST, in SELF DEFENCE.......when they speak of war, and their planned actions, they have decided it FOR US, for that is what it means in this day and age, with mainstream media influencing so many peoples decisions these days, where is the accountability of one person whose sole goal is to manufacture a "play" whose sole purpose is to influence the masses to call for war, or sevral folks doing there bit, realising or not, how the hell do they think that was gonna affect those opposed to war, being exposed to the msm narrative, and seing by contrast, that the opposition was nowhere to be found, or being willfully surpressed by slander, mockery, speaking over, interrupted.......i will say though, this time round, we've had a few beacons of light shine through, such as this lady........i gotta memorize her name dammit :)

This guy basically admitted

This guy (Matthew Brodsky) basically admitted that he doesnt care whether assad was the reason behind the chemical attack, and that regardless of the attack, they should have been more "involved" a long time ago

This is the mentality we all sense they have, but most of them have sense not to say it, what they dont realise, with this mentality, what are some of them willing to do to get that result, all sides have an "extreme", and i think the war mongerer's are the ones that need to be concerned about, especially those that hold power and influence, IN ANY NATION

Plus, this lady is a diamond, may liberty protect her

Debbie's picture

Fantastic compilation AnCap - thank you so much!

So informative -




Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Here here, very thought

Here here, very thought provoking session, thankyou

I don't know why this woman

I don't know why this woman is being praised so highly here. She makes two significantly problematic statements in the first few minutes of the first interview. One, she says the united states of America are a democracy. Two, she claims that government under Bush was blindsided by the events of 9/11, and forced to abandon a humble foreign policy (the ridiculousness of this statement should be self evident to most DPers by now).

egg on my face After seing

egg on my face

After seing some more of the vids upstairs, i can see where your coming from, but in comparison to most, i can respect the no nonsense of her character, and i still do agree with the things i happen to agree with, but i will turn up my weariness none the less......we will see

Your right, theres nothing

Your right, theres nothing on that she says i agree with, no wait, there is

I dont know all her beliefs and i dont know if i'd gree with her on everything, but the few thing i agree with her on, i think she nails perfectly, and she is a new source of information to learn and digest in what she knows to the slumberred and awakening, in what is a sense, a heart, liberty influenced
I hope, HOPE, that the things she knows and see's will not be influenced by, greed, power, manipulation, war mongering agenda, i get the feeling she understands this, and i get the feeling she is in a position to recognise them in her heart and not succumb, that is what i look for, that understanding of it, seing it in their words and actions, and we know our pickings are slim in this regard, what i see her as is, a possibility......not a, i will support her completely over one or two interviews, she has to keep it, follow it, and understand it.........i think in terms of years, untill im in my grave essentially, i may like her today, but wether i like her by the time im in my grave, is up to her, in what she says, what she does, and how she keeps it......hell, i dont particularly know nor trust putin, but in one argument, i can agree with him, this is not about the person, but what is being discussed, when that same person says something you disagree with, i expect you to disagree with and so shall i, if its complete opposite to the ideals of liberty, i do not see hypocrasy in supporting a person on one argument then disagreing with in the next, unless that thing you dont agree with, is BEYOND the opposite of librty, for instance, like a war mongerers mentality of an OFFENSIVE war as a tool of CONTROL

Debbie's picture

Interesting - I didn't hear her say that at all.

I thought she did a great job.


Perhaps it would be

Perhaps it would be worthwhile to take another listen.


She is a pitbull! Outnumbered 3 to 1. She needs to be on Team Rand in 2016.

weekend watch update

the lady knows her stuff y'all.

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

LittleWing's picture

Indeed she does!

Thanks for the post!Just watched the first one and bookmarked the rest for tomorrow. She is really good and does not back down either.
related: http://www.dailypaul.com/299267/the-genesis-of-syria-s-conflict

If Wars Can Be Started by Lies, They Can Be Stopped By Truth.


she's FIERY!

She almost can't contain herself in the CCTV debate, next to that despicable chickenschit neoCon literally, like prattling off the same staid PNAC talking point LIES!

lol xD

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Yup Ancap!

I subscribe to his podcast but don't go to his page frequently. Great stuff, and an excellent post. TY

I did listen to this while walking the dog. John Williams interview.



thanks for the link.

didn't know John was on McAlavany recently!

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Debbie's picture

Thank you for the link to the John Williams interview!



Thanks for the smile Debbie

You point out what I find invaluable about DP. This place accomplishes so much.

It shows what has happened to the idea of America to the masses that appreciate it and want it back, it champions people in the MSM that are standing up for what we appreciate that educates more, and it exposes those that are enemies to freedom. Hopefully changing the minds of the deceived, that fight against it without understanding their position. And lastly, exposing those that stand absolutely against the idea, and support corruption.

Good people can't make good decisions without honest information. And I BELIEVE there are a Lot more good people than psycho's

In Freedom,

Debbie's picture

You are right Base!

I find it invaluable too!



I'm 1/2 way through the first of your compilation. She is culminating SO MUCH of what has been pieced together by so many others.

The deception forces are NO LONGER in the dark and know they are vulnerable.

Dangerous Times.


Great compilation



yup, me wonders how many more policy wonks who've been on the right side of history, who have been fighting these fights, behind the scenes, for years...

either way, a win for the time being; observing current zeitgeist of broad war-weariness, chalk one more up, for the good guys, and visible, but especially the Silent-'White Hat' Warriors the world over!

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul