55 votes

9/11 Truth for Dummies: Wrap Your Head Around One Thing


Premise, official story: a few floors at the top collapsed, starting a
chain reaction in which the collapse of each additional floor made the
total mass heavier, and driving it faster and faster toward the ground.
This is why the towers fell at virtual free-fall acceleration (virtual
as in 'very close to.') Free fall acceleration is the speed any object
falls through thin air to the ground. It is 10 meters per second, per
second (for every second an object is falling, it goes another 10 meters
per second faster. So a baseball falling for 3 seconds attains the
speed of 30 meters per second.)

Problem: Things that are heavier do not go faster than things that are
lighter, discounting negligible differences in air resistance. In a
vacuum, even a feather and a bowling ball would fall at the same speed.
The towers "fell" at the same rate as they would have fallen through
thin air. But steel, even soft steel, is thousands of times denser than

Therefore, mass does not accelerate as it accumulates. In fact, it can
only go much slower than free-fall acceleration as it meets resistance.
This is common sense and what would have happened on 9/11 if the upper
floors of the towers had collapsed. The upper floors would have met the
resistance of floors below them, slowed down, and stopped. The mass
could not have fallen through steel at the same speed it would fall
through thin air.

There are many things wrong with the official story. You've heard them
all by now. Wrap your mind around this iron law of Newtonian physics, proven by Galileo,
and you will see that the collapsing mass could not have gone faster as
the mass got heavier. Therefore the official explanation for how the
towers disappeared so quickly is false.

Congratulations. You are no longer a dumbed-down American. You know
what the rest of the world which gets a science education in high school
knows: that the official 9/11 story is impossible. Not suspicious.
Not full of questions. But flat-out, physically IMPOSSIBLE.

By the way, the debate over whether heavy things fall faster than light
things has been going on since Aristotle. Galileo settled it. Galileo
also settled that the Earth goes around the sun. That's how far into
the Dark Ages 9/11 has taken us.

Proof that all objects of different weights fall to the ground at the same speed;


Ball and feather race in a vacuum:


9/11 story problem: Which 15 story block will hit the ground first?


On 9/11 they both hit the ground at virtually the same time!

-If the 15 story section is falling at free fall speed ...

-All of its gravitational potential energy is converted to Kinetic Energy (movement)

-It is not available to do the work of "crushing" the building below!

-It would have to slow down in order to do any other work, i.e., "crushing 80,000 tons of structural steel below.



The real 9/11 report, the Toronto Hearings (NIST invited to participate and debate but it declined.) Here at Amazon.com

Colorado PBS Runs 9/11 Film Sponsored by 9/11 Families: Experts Reject Official Story, Present Evidence of Demolition

Military Officers Question 9/11

"What we know and don’t know about 9/11," by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan.

Firefighters for 911 Truth

Pilots for 911 Truth

Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth


"Who Did It? Technology of Autopilot/Remote Flight on 9/11, Motive, Means, Opportunity"

"911 Case Closed: Aerial Photo Shows Towers Were Exploded Outward, Did Not "Collapse"

The Easiest Way to Understand 9/11 Was a Demolition: Free-Fall

911: Shock and Awe Master Deed. Prosecute Giuliani.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Money Trail

I always thought the most direct path to the truth of this day was following the money trail. It becomes apparent why only certain buildings and certain computer systems within those building were destroyed for a very specific purpose.

But about myself I will not boast, except as it concerns my weaknesses (2 Cor 12:5). Let the unbelievers seek praise from each other; I wish that which is from God alone.

Excellent point. ALWAYS

Excellent point. ALWAYS follow the money, no matter what the situation.

In addition, I think the buildings were also used for the Patriot Act legislation.

If you walk blindly through life, you will run into a lot of walls.

9/11 is the LITMUS TEST

The facts as you've laid them out here, and as presented in countless YouTubes is so UTTERLY FULLPROOF evidence of demolition, that to deny it


No rational human could ever defend the official story - ANYONE who does -- is part of the cover-up.

And I'm not surprised AT ALL to see rhino down below trying his best to fight for the Government's Cover-up, I mean THEORY, backed by ZERO laws of physics, not to mention the laws of the land that demand a crime scene remain UNTOUCHED.

Well-structured article.
Nicely Done.

Re Bldg 6, (also) not hit by a plane.

I never saw this before, molten steel pouring from Building 6.

MSM Accidentally Airs Incriminating 9/11 Evidence?

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

That's no surprise to me, they packed the mechanical floors

and core beams with so much thermite some of it was bound to wind of on adjacent buildings and melting cars on the street when the towers were blown. That's why Judy Woods is disinfo. She knows that thermite would have melted anything it touched or got near at 5,000F reaction temperature, no energy beams necessary. She is out to make 9/11 truth look like kooks.

BTW I still think Galileo is the best single smoking gun to convince someone the official fairy tale is impossible. It takes a little thought, but once grasped there is no going back.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

I don't think Dr. Woods

is disinformation. But I'll grant you that she does not address the molten steel issue in a realistic manner.

As to the heat generated, however, it's not just an issue of high heat. There are some real fluky things that happened, such as tires being melted off cars and much of their interior *but* not burning papers in the car. There's also cases where "half" a car is burned, as if there were a vertical line drawn down - destroyed to the left of the line while remaining intact and with a showroom shine to the right. There were a lot of anomalies re melting and what she calls "toasted cars."

I agree re Galileo!

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

woods is disinfo.

don't be fooled.

What then explains the anomalies

with the cars? There are so many pictures showing scenes that simply do not make sense. It was not just a matter of heat. Whatever caused the damage had the ability to be selective. I don't know that she has all the answers. But she lays out the only way that we'll ever get to the answers, namely, beginning with a thorough and objective analysis of *what* happened before even venturing any hypotheses as to *how*. And (for one), something very peculiar occurred on the streets around the towers.

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

Building 7 to Me Isn't Even The Smoking Gun

The smoking gun to me was actually not perpetrated on 9/11 but a week later when someone mailed Anthrax around with the note

"Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is Great"

Were they sent by a crazy Muslim terrorist? Nope actually it is suspected they were sent by a US government worker, Christian extremist, by the name of Bruce Ivins. When he heard the FBI was coming to get him he committed suicide or so they say he did as no autopsy was ever done.

The Anthrax to me is the smoking gun that links it all together as a set up.

That being said, I agree with Mr Racerboy below, this isnt the fight we should be having. We need to get freedom loving people elected first, and then we can fight this battle.

It only takes disproving the official story re the Twin Towers,

Building 7, or the Pentagon for the whole narrative to fall apart. I used to think the case re Building 7 was the easiest to prove until (thanks to LibBerte's comment below) I've now watched this presentation by Barbara Honegger:

Behind the Smoke Curtain (The 9/11 Fable of the Pentagon Attack)

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

Behind The Smoking Gun Curtain

Uncommon knowledge and common sense.

"Now cast your nets wherever you wish,—
Never afraid are we!"

Thanks,mdefarge,for taking the time to highlight.



"In reality, the Constitution itself is incapable of achieving what we would like in limiting government power, no matter how well written."

~ Ron Paul, End the Fed

Pearl Harbor, Oklahoma bombing, and now...

911...what is next! Thanks Sue...I appreciate it!

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."

The only truth in the 9/11

The only truth in the 9/11 truth movement is that by connecting it to the liberty movement you make yourselves and the rest of us look crazy. It doesn't matter if you are right or not, with literally thousands of much easier items you can actually prove to talk about, you know, what Ron Paul does, to stick on 9/11 truth is just idiotic. So you're either selfish fools or shill plants here to wind up the fringe.

Win the war first, then all the truth will come out. Instead you can't see the forest through all those pesky trees. You create an uphill battle for the rest of us by turning people off with your eye roll deseving nonsense.

Of course you're selfish and emotionally invested in your pet nonsense so winning the war never even registers with many here. It's easier to downvote than to take a long hard look in the mirror.

"In reality, the Constitution itself is incapable of achieving what we would like in limiting government power, no matter how well written."

~ Ron Paul, End the Fed

I sort of go back and forth

I sort of go back and forth with this issue but I must admit that the Building 7 issue is EXTREMELY compelling. Does anyone have a link to any at least semi-legit contrary view or explanation on Building 7? I'd like to see the other side of things a bit too, assuming they even HAVE a plausible explanation.

That said, $60 for a freakin 2 DVD set? Come on now.

fireant's picture

I'm writing a book on it, and it's free

Bones Don
I post chapter at a time, as I finish it, and let the evidence speak.

Undo what Wilson did

if you don't want the dvd set...

Just watch or download it from youtube. Watch the pilots for 9/11 truth too, in addition to the "loose change" documentary on the pentagon. Another great video is Daniele Ganser PHD from University of Basel, CH.

The good news, it's all available on youtube. If you have any doubts, watch all those videos above I listed. Presented with the facts, there is no other conclusion one can arrive at other than this was absolutely made to happen by your own government.

WT7 is very interesting ...

and the CD crazies have a compelling case, but it only washes if you believe WT1 & 2 were CD also.

The reality is that NIST does not even explain WT7, supplied a last minute theory when pressed, and that is why there are so many, justifiably, conspiracy theories out there and is a key reason why all the evidence should be availible to the public.

The most reasonable explaining is that the footings failed.

The interior footings sat on pointed arch piles that were required to bridge a cavern void of any bed rock.

Those piles most likely failed or slipped off the bedrock due to the seismic activity created by the collapse of the 2 towers.

More than likely there was a level of liquifaction that occurred and it caused the piles to slip off the bedrock or it caused the pointed arch design to fail due to the natural earth buttresses liquifying.

more than likely

they announced the time it was to come down and BBC reported it TOOOOOO EARLY

wake the hell up bro


"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

Yeah you may be right.

That scenerio is pretty easy to keep a lid on all this time.

My bad.


it is with corrupt

it is with corrupt zionist media that dominates the airwaves and we know most americans watch TV , its the younger people in their 30's and under that get thier information from the web which is not ENTIRELY DOMINATED, you still have to use your discernment but hey its better that what the zio-corp-media wants you to believe

cough cough dan rather!

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

So it is a Jew conspiracy and that makes it plausible.

Here we go. 9/11 and Jews all in one thread.

Have a nice life.

God Bless.

LOL that's one of the more creative "bro-science" explanations

I've heard. If a kid in my science class came up with that one I'd give him a 'A' for creativity!

"Um um um..LIQUIFACTION! yea that's it! Um, it got really really HOT falling down and the foundation turned to liquid!"

Release the Sandy Hook video.

I am not sure what you mean.

Liquifaction occurs during almost all substantial seismic events.

It doesn't have to be hot and additional water is not required.

Being a science teacher you should know that or maybe you can have a lesson on it.

God Bless.

So now there was an earthquake too?

Oh wait: "The pieces of tower were so BIG falling on the ground that it was JUST LIKE an EARTHQUAKE!"

Those are the kids who make class fun, have to admit!

Release the Sandy Hook video.

1 million tons worth.

You have no idea what happens when that occurs.

I obviously do.

Take it from an expert.

God Bless.

Yes we do have an idea what it does

..because we have seen hundreds of demolitions also involving millions of tons of materials. Love how it always results in all that liquifaction of solid steel and smoking hot melted metal for months afterward. So once again you simply acknowledge that the post is unassailable, because you haven't addressed it once, just keep insulting everyone's intelligence with cartoon physics.

Release the Sandy Hook video.


Who is we?

And I never said anything about steel liquifaction and melted metal.

Let's get back to the we question.

Who is we?

Do you have multiple personalities?

When has there ever been, in the history of this planet, other than when the towers came down, a million tons of debris hitting the earth?

Hint ... The Barringer Crater was created by a meteor weighing approx. 300,000 tons.

Thing one: Manhattan is SOLID BEDROCK

Bedrock doesn't liquify you dimwit. You're a disinfo troll paid by the regime to spread lies. I wish Michael would post your IP and email address. You friggin people are everywhere!!!

For god's sake, how much money is the .gov paying for social media manipulation? How many people are employed? Is that what Obama meant by "creating jobs"?

I'd be interested to know where you trolls are crawling onto the Internet from.

Either way, if you're taking money to spread lies on the behalf of the us gov, you are guilty of TREASON. There will eventually be justice, and I pray to god, the lot of you are dealt with in the most extreme way possible under the law. There is no punishment strong enough for your kind. burn in hell.


"The reality is that NIST does not even explain WT7, supplied a last minute theory when pressed"

Yes, we know ... the most powerful nation on earth is unable to perform an investigation. Not the first time.

You did send your tax contribution in on time though right?