http://911explained.blogspot.com/2013/08/premise-official-st...

Premise, official story: a few floors at the top collapsed, starting a
chain reaction in which the collapse of each additional floor made the
total mass heavier, and driving it faster and faster toward the ground.
This is why the towers fell at virtual free-fall acceleration (virtual
as in 'very close to.') Free fall acceleration is the speed any object
falls through thin air to the ground. It is 10 meters per second, per
second (for every second an object is falling, it goes another 10 meters
per second faster. So a baseball falling for 3 seconds attains the
speed of 30 meters per second.)

Problem: Things that are heavier do not go faster than things that are
lighter, discounting negligible differences in air resistance. In a
vacuum, even a feather and a bowling ball would fall at the same speed.
The towers "fell" at the same rate as they would have fallen through
thin air. But steel, even soft steel, is thousands of times denser than
air.

Therefore, mass does not accelerate as it accumulates. In fact, it can
only go much slower than free-fall acceleration as it meets resistance.
This is common sense and what would have happened on 9/11 if the upper
floors of the towers had collapsed. The upper floors would have met the
resistance of floors below them, slowed down, and stopped. The mass
could not have fallen through steel at the same speed it would fall
through thin air.

There are many things wrong with the official story. You've heard them
all by now. Wrap your mind around this iron law of Newtonian physics, proven by Galileo,
and you will see that the collapsing mass could not have gone faster as
the mass got heavier. Therefore the official explanation for how the
towers disappeared so quickly is false.

Congratulations. You are no longer a dumbed-down American. You know
what the rest of the world which gets a science education in high school
knows: that the official 9/11 story is impossible. Not suspicious.
Not full of questions. But flat-out, physically IMPOSSIBLE.

By the way, the debate over whether heavy things fall faster than light
things has been going on since Aristotle. Galileo settled it. Galileo
also settled that the Earth goes around the sun. That's how far into
the Dark Ages 9/11 has taken us.

Proof that all objects of different weights fall to the ground at the same speed;

http://youtu.be/Z789eth4lFU

Ball and feather race in a vacuum:

http://youtu.be/ndFXXasM6ZE

9/11 story problem: Which 15 story block will hit the ground first?

On 9/11 they both hit the ground at virtually the same time!

-If the 15 story section is falling at free fall speed ...

-All of its gravitational potential energy is converted to Kinetic Energy (movement)

-It is not available to do the work of "crushing" the building below!

-It would have to slow down in order to do any other work, i.e., "crushing 80,000 tons of structural steel below.

---------

Resources

Military Officers Question 9/11

"What we know and don’t know about 9/11," by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan.

Firefighters for 911 Truth

Pilots for 911 Truth

Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth

911Research.net

"Who Did It? Technology of Autopilot/Remote Flight on 9/11, Motive, Means, Opportunity"

"911 Case Closed: Aerial Photo Shows Towers Were Exploded Outward, Did Not "Collapse"

The Easiest Way to Understand 9/11 Was a Demolition: Free-Fall

911: Shock and Awe Master Deed. Prosecute Giuliani.

Trending on the Web

## Comment viewing options

### You said bldgs like that fall all of the time

in earthquake zones. Didn't know there was an earthquake that day!!!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

### Oh and the Lincoln quote at

Oh and the Lincoln quote at the end is pretty ironic, coming from the president who intentionally and with full knowledge of the results it would induce, initiated the War Between the States by sending a resupply fleet to Fort Sumter in the newly independent state of South Carolina. After the whole incident, a congressional investigation was blocked that would attempt to uncover the proceedings that led to that secret and tragic redirection of policy by the Lincoln cabinet. So secret that Major Anderson who commanded the garrison at the fort was furious he wasn't informed a fleet was coming after already begging the administration NOT to do it; that it would surely mean war.

### Any info. on

... the congressional investigation would be most appreciated

Life is a sexually transmitted disease with a 100% fatality rate.
Don't Give me Liberty, I'll get up and get it myself!

### I Wrote an Article Here on the Daily Paul on 9/11

I believe it would be fitting to put it here:

http://www.dailypaul.com/280404/its-time-to-put-this-9-11-co...

### thermate was used as explosive

Quote from Wiki: "Because thermate burns at higher temperatures than ordinary thermite,it has useful military applications in cutting through tank armor or other hardened military vehicles or bunkers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermate

This stuff was even found in the dust of WTC...how can somebody ignore that fact?
THERE WAS NO NEED FOR WIRES! Thermate can be ignited by laser pulse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano-thermite#Ignition

### Thank for posting

This reminds me that things were not hunk-dory when the republicans were in charge.

Vickie

### also they dont account for

newtons 3rd law. when the 15 story block makes contact with the lower floors. both pieces are constructed the same. so the damage done to the lower piece should be almost identical with the top piece. the top piece would eventually loose its momentum and stop.

### According to Newton's 3rd

According to Newton's 3rd law, what would one expect to happen if a steel wall weighing roughly 175 tons travelling at 550 mph slammed into an aluminum airliner? Would the plane punch a plane-shaped hole in the steel wall without any deceleration of the wall until the plane was through to the other side (where the plane would mysteriously vanish leaving no recognizable debris)? Or would the plane be flattened? Obviously the 3rd law is invalid, or else the planes would have flattened themselves against the buildings, not pass through them without any deceleration or deformation of the plane.

recommend listening to first few minutes, then when you get bored, jump to minute mark 43:44 - worth the time

O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

### It takes months of planning

It takes months of planning and weeks to install explosives to bring down a large building. Miles upon miles of detonating cord are put down.

http://www.controlled-demolition.com/article/jl-hudson-depar...

The WTC complex had security cameras every where. After 1993 security was doubled. Security guards crawling all over the place. People working in them 24/7/365.

I'm sorry, but you have to be divorced from reality to think the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition.

### Opportunity?

According to the World Trade Center Occupancy data revealed by this FOIA request (showing the occupancy rates for the years 1972-2001), much of the building - and many floors - remained unoccupied for very long periods at many times for most of it's life, up to and including the period running up to the event.

Evacuations:

Ben Fountain, 42, a financial analyst with Fireman's Fund, was coming out of the Chambers Street Station, headed for his office on the 47th floor of the south tower.

How could they let this happen? They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we'd been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual. I think they had an inkling something was going on.

http://web.archive.org/web/20010914230312/http://people.aol....

Power downs and security prior to the event:

http://youtu.be/rbhZCqNZP2U

Of course, you are correct, it does take "months of planning and weeks to install explosives to bring down a large building" in the way the three buildings disintegrated on that fateful day.

But apparently - according to the official story - there was no planning involved at all, total collapse can also be achieved in exactly the same way by ramming two buildings with airplanes and small office fires where heat (that normally rises) can weaken the steal structures below to allow total and instant collapse to ground level.

--------------------------------------

### lmao

ok dude...that's the only way it could of been taken down, you are the only one divorced from reality to think it wasn't taken down that way.
No one knows exactly how it was done ...but it was! wiring?? um that's old technology. im sure remote was used and some people even think that explosive paint was used, yes that's right their is explosives you can paint on!

Our founding fathers are rolling in their graves...the land of liberty needs a regime change!

### You are correct, but don't know how the towers were built

so there is an entire explanation which is completely feasible.

If it meant the difference between having a constitution or not would you examine structural facts about the towers?

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?

### So the towers were

So the towers were constructed with the explosives in place and the tens of thousands of workers never even made a peep about it? Feasible and plausible are worlds apart my friend. Learn the difference.

"In reality, the Constitution itself is incapable of achieving what we would like in limiting government power, no matter how well written."

~ Ron Paul, End the Fed

### Oh noes

Here come the zealots!!!,

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

### They had years, not months, to plan it ...

... and also had control of the security company, as well as access to the strike zone locations.

http://www.dailypaul.com/303743/9-11-how-they-did-it

### tell me

in your world, is the sky blue? Is water wet?

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

### First, you are resorting to the poor logic of attempting

...backwards deduction. You cannot address the iron-clad argument of the post, so you simply ignore it and change the subject to the logistical challenges of doing the deed, inferring that one invalidates the other. Which, if you are Marvin Bush and hold the security contract, as he did, are no challenges at all. When you hold the security contract you control the security cameras (right, like all that Pentagon video we will never see) and have 24/7 access to the building.

BTW det cord is passe. RF triggers are the way to go.

Thank you for conceding that the post is unassailable, as are the laws of Newtonian physics.

Release the Sandy Hook video.

### Yep....

Where in the hell would they git months for plannin'? Damn, ya need months and there ain't no place to go fer months. They only had a coupla hours after them there planes hit. Ain't no way they coulda worked that fast! Ya gotta have months!

Hell jess look at them Mooslims trying ta learn how ta fly...man...even they needed months!

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

### Hmmmm...edit...

IN TYPICAL COMMERCIAL DEMOLITIONS THAT HAVE BEEN OBSERVED, WRITTEN ABOUT AND FILMED FOR YEARS, It takes months of planning and weeks to install explosives to bring down a large building. PRIOR TO THE TECHNICAL REVOLUTION OF THE LATE 20TH CENTURY, WHENEVER SUCH PROJECTS WERE CONCERNED, Miles upon miles of detonating cord are (HAD TO BE) put down. THEREFORE, THERE HAD TO BE REPEATED ACCESS FOR ANYONE PREPARING FOR SUCH DESTRUCTION, EVEN IN THE CASE OF NEW TECHNOLOGY THAT MAY ALLOW A PERPETRATOR TO CIRCUMVENT THE NEEDS ASSOCIATED WITH PAST METHODOLOGIES, CERTAINLY SOME REPEATED ACCESS MUST HAVE BEEN GRANTED TO A DEMOLITION TEAM(S).

AS TO THE THEORY THAT NEW AND COMPLEX METHODS WERE USED TO BRING DOWN THREE SKYSCRAPERS ON ONE DAY WITH THE USE OF TWO JET AIRLINERS, IT MUST BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT THAT The WTC complex had security cameras every where. AS DID THE PENTAGON...HIGH DEFINITION CAMERAS PLACED IN CONSPICUOUS AREAS OF PUBLIC ACCESS AND CONTROLLING INGRESS POINTS TO THE STRUCTURES. WE ARE TOLD BY THE SECURITY COMPANIES INVOLVED IN GUARDING THESE STRUCTURES, THAT After 1993 security was doubled. SEEMINGLY AND PURPORTEDLY, Security guards WERE OR HAD TO HAVE BEEN crawling all over the place ALTHOUGH WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF THIS IN TESTIMONY FROM THOSE THAT WOULD BE PHYSICALLY BUMPING INTO THESE VAST AMOUNTS OF SECURITY PERSONNEL. AND GIVEN THEIR NATURE WHEREIN People WERE KNOWN TO BE working in them 24/7/365, EXCEPT OF COURSE WHEN POWER WAS SHUT OFF IN THE WEEKEND PRIOR TO THE ATTACKS, IT IS THEREFORE PLAUSIBLE AND A RELIABLE FACTOID TO LEAN UOPN THAT EVERYONE WAS ALWAYS ON THEIR GAME AND WOULD SURELY QUESTION ANY STRANGE OR UNKNOWN FACE OR HARD HAT IN ANY OF THE BUILDINGS...AT ANY TIME AND THEN ACT TO INVESTIGATE THE TRUTH TO ANY SUCH STATEMENTS MADE DURING INQUIRY.

I'm sorry, [WE CAN TELL] but you have to be divorced from reality to think the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition. [SEE ME REMOVING RING AND PLANNING A DIVORCE CELEBRATION PARTY].

Wha? .....hey....who stole my country?

### LOL yea, I love the argument meant for hicks who have never been

to NYC, who think they roll up the sidewalks at night like in their little hick towns. At the WTC you had work crews, cleaners and maintenance coming and going at all hours, WTC was a small city unto itself. And no one gives a crap what anyone else is doing.

Hicks don't understand "The city that never sleeps."

Release the Sandy Hook video.

### I'm sorry, but my employer

I'm sorry, but my employer had offices on the 36th floor in the North Tower. For over 20 years I visited the New York offices once a month. It would have been impossible for a team of demolition experts to wire up the towers without being detected.

### Ever see an HVACTech or an Elevator guy?

we work in those rooms marked "Authorized personnel only"

### that's it!

ot was a squad of hvac techs, a group long known for low morals...that and pizza delivery guys...

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

### "Authorized personnel only"

quite to the contrary. we have access to the most sensitive and dangerous places in the building.

the mechanical equipment and the elevator equipment are frequently right next to each other, and YES!
they are also near the core of the building.

you have revealed what you know about the HVAC/R industry as well as the operation of high rise buildings.

### Indeed!

I know absolutely fricking nothing about the HVAC industry. But I hear those guys all like to molest sheep and they hate cute puppies and worship Satan, so no big loss.

But thanks for explaining that elevators and mechanical equipment are, amazingly, "right next to each other"!!! Whodathunkit.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

### I hope that a MOD notices this response.

I will let it stand on it's own merits.

First of all, it is obvious satire, and as such you miss it entirely.

You post pages and pages of personal attacks on me, because a) you don't like my career, or b) you don't like my opinions on things I have specialized knowledge of, but which you have exactly zero knowledge of.

Then when someone turns the tables on you, for one post, and does it tongue-in-cheek, you immediately start whining like a little girl who lost her favorite My Little Pony doll. Big tough guy screaming for the moderators. Go ahead, Eastwood, make my day.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein

### you turned the tables on me? Oh, thats rich!

our lawyers, practice Law as it is known today.
if you look at the top of this website, you will find that we are here to RESTORE something.

here is an example.

"...I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

article 1 section 8. mentions the "Law of Nations" care to define that for me?
(that was a law question)