16 votes

Weapon RFID System Bill – Mandatory Tracking Of Kentucky’s Gun Owners

"In a controversial move today, Kentucky law makers slipped a bill through the senate making the installation of a tracking device or “Weapon RFID System” in firearms mandatory by state law."

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


I bought it, so did Gary North and a lot of other smart people, we were duped, time to admit we were wrong and move on

Katherine Albrecht debunked this story on the radio yesterday, here are other headlines from this Satire site:

'NASA: Water On Mars Proves Planet Could Support Riverboat Casino and Hotel'

'Rick Santorum Voted People’s Sexiest Republican'

'Author of Gov. Jan Brewer Gay-To-Straight Hoax, Extends Sincere Apology'

'Michele Bachmann Dead At 63
Minneapolis, MN — Our thoughts and prayers go out to the family of Michele Bachmann who passed away in her sleep. I think everyone can agree she'

'Muslim Million Man March to Washington DC Huge Success for Those Who Showed Up,

I believe this story is a hoax.

This story is a joke. First, the idea will not work, and secondly, the author has put taunting, BS posts in the comment section. RFID does not have a range to make the idea practical and disabling an RFID chip is easy. It can be accomplished without disabling the firearm.
Don't get upset. Have a laugh at a stupid attempt to get you riled. It is the sort of thing Andy Kaufman would try. His jokes were always on his audience. He was out to entertain himself, not others.

Some banks are putting RFID chips in credit and debit cards. That is why companies are selling aluminum wallets to prevent the cards being read while they are in your pocket.

It is popular to keep firearms in a safe. Do you honestly think an RFID chip can be read through the wall of a gun safe if they can't be read through an aluminum wallet?

[F]orce can only settle questions of power, not of right. - Clyde N. Wilson

I think a mailing campaign is needed

Physically mail your representative a copy of the Colorado recall results and a blank recall form.

Mailing works!

Much better than phone calls!


"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

Update from Lew Rockwell:

Anyone who fails to do this could be fined or sent to jail.

The city chosen is Winchester. You think the politicians are not sending a message? If there had been a Kentucky city called Glock, they would have chosen it instead.

If the politicians get away with this, it is expected that the program will be imposed in every county in the state.


"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know Peace." - Jimi Hendrix

Gary North fell for

a joke article.

[F]orce can only settle questions of power, not of right. - Clyde N. Wilson



George Washington in response to a proposal for gun registration in 1790 said: "ABSOLUTELY NOT. If the people are armed and the "federalists" DO NOT KNOW WHERE THE ARMS ARE, there can NEVER be an oppressive government."


The ability for the Citizens to "bury their cannons", Cannon balls, Huge stocks Gun Powder, Rifles and other necessary arms in their fields and in other places, allowed them the MEANS to defend against their own oppressive government.

The "RIGHT to conceal" from the federal government or any government; The purpose clearly stated to have the power to put down an oppressive federal government. This is clearly in line with the 12th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence. This defines the Intent of the 2nd Amendment and the intent of the Founders.

President George Washington's statement presented his mistrust in the federal and other oppressive governments very clearly; and defined the "true intent" where the powers should lay, and that is in the hands of the civilians, without oversight from government.


We also can draw from James Madison as to:

The True Definition of "MILITIA":

James Madison - Federalist #46 (Paraphrased):

"The highest number to which a "standing army" can be carried in any country does not exceed one hundredth (1/100) part of the souls, or one twenty-fifth (1/25th) part of the number ABLE to bear arms. This PORTION would not yield, in the United States, an (standing) army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.

To "these" would be "OPPOSED" (APP: indicating that the "MILITIA" is to be a "OPPOSING force" to the standing army, as well as that of foreign enemies)

a (CITIZEN) MILITIA amounting to near half a million CITIZENS with arms in their HANDS,

"officered by men chosen from "AMONG THEMSELVES",

(not by government or the standing army - a indicator of the true definition of "MILITIA")

fighting for "their" (the citizen / militia's) common liberties and united and conducted by government"S" (local) possessing their (the citizen / militia's) affections and confidence.

It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a "proportion" (ratio) of regular troops (i.e. standing army).

Besides the advantage of (the CITIZENS) being armed, it forms a barrier against the "enterprises of ambition" (Banks, Corporations Foreign Interests), more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.

The governments of Europe are afraid to trust the people with arms. If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny, as America DID.

LET US NOT INSULT the free and gallant CITIZENS of America with the suspicion that they would be "less able to defend the RIGHTS" of which they (THE / ALL PEOPLE) would be in "ACTUAL POSSESSION" than the "debased subjects" of "arbitrary power" would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors."


Mr. GEORGE MASON. "Mr. Chairman, a worthy member has asked who are the militia, if they be not THE PEOPLE of this country, and if we are not to be protected from the fate of the Germans, Prussians, by our representation?

I ask, Who are the militia? They consist now of the "whole people", except a few public officers. But I cannot say who will be the militia of the future day. If that paper on the table gets no alteration, the militia of the future day may not consist of all classes, high and low, and {426} rich and poor; but they may be confined to the lower and middle classes of the people, granting exclusion to the higher classes of the people.

If we should ever see that day, the most ignominious punishments and heavy fines may be expected. Under the present government, all ranks of people are subject to militia duty. Under such a full and equal representation as ours, there can be no ignominious punishment inflicted. But under this national, or rather consolidated government, the case will be different. The representation being so small and inadequate, they will have no fellow-feeling for the people. They may discriminate people in their own predicament, and exempt from duty all the officers and lowest creatures of the national government. ..."

Read the Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 in FULL: http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/americanpatriotpartynewsl...

American Patriot Party.CC

Get Educated and Educate Others.

Know the FOUNDATIONS on which you stand, so that you will know that your actions will have the power of RIGHT.

So when you hear either the Left or so called "Right" (who often "sound" like they are for the Constitution but actually only to those things that benefit them)... say that there should be "some" government regulation, correct them and say, no, there should not.

Arms are not limited to rifles and pistols. And if you hear someone say, "they didn't have weapons like that back then"...Remind them: Without any application to any government, Numerous Cannons could be bought & mounted on ships with enough powder and munitions to level a coastal town. Grapeshot in a cannon or other device could stop a charge of armed men or fend off attacks simply by it's presence on a field. Anyone who could afford could own & bare.This gave us our Liberty. APP

RichardTaylorAPP - Chair - American Patriot Party.CC

John Locke #201, 202, 212 to 232; Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions 1798; Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788; Rights of the Colonists 1772.

We're here to help you

find your stolen gun, right? Yeah, sure. They will now know where to find ALL weapons so that confiscation can begin. Burying them will not help, only some type of RFID shielding. http://www.lessemf.com/

If They Pass This

Just happen to put a lead or cooper lined sleeve/sticker around the RFID tag area


Or stick it in the microwave oven for about 20 second.

or wrap it in aluminum foil.

[F]orce can only settle questions of power, not of right. - Clyde N. Wilson

Political Suicide

Challenge everyone that voted for this, and then defeat them.

lots of Patriots up in Kentucky.

Something is wrong here...

I have been looking for more info on this story and every article goes right back to the National Report article by Jane Agni. I looked on kentucky.gov...Not a word about this.
I just don't believe it.
Where is the NRA? Where is the GOA? Someone besides the commenters should be screaming bloody murder.
Ms. Agni's piece reads as though it could be on The Onion!
If anyone knows what the Bill number is, then by all means share it with us.
UPDATE:Someone from Kentucky commented, "Kentucky's General assembly is NOT in session. It was recently called for a 5-day extraordinary session for one topic: redistricting. That was the only thing considered, or could be considered under state law."

"Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"- Homer Simpson

The 2nd Amendment is a joke.

And not a very funny one at that.

please explain

2nd amendment is just writing on a piece of paper. No piece of paper should be able to tell anyone if they can own a fire arm. Fire arm ownership is a liberty we were born with.

If that is the point you are getting at, then I would agree.

Either way it doesn't matter.

What good is a right if people are too afraid to utilize it. So what if we have a right, given or natural, to own weapons. If the weapons are not used to defend our inalienable rights as intended then it is useless.

It is no secret that the right to bear arms was intended to defend against a tyrannical government. Like I said What a Joke. "We may loose everything but we still have our guns to play with."

Do you understand what I am saying?

I would say that we chip every

Kentucky rep who wants this insanity. Then we follow the RFID trail they leave and show it to everyone. Bet the trail leads to some payoff from a ROths-Zio cabal member.



Recall s'more legislators perhaps?

What would the Founders do?

Just ignore the government.

All their laws mean little, as they have not the capacity to enforce them. As one Pope taught the Polish, there are more of us than them. Keep that in mind when you buy the gun without the chip, from your local Militia Leader. What wonderful free enterprise.