16 votes

When 'Scientists' go Wild: Global Warming just HALF of Their Claims; Blame Their Computer Models based on Erroneous Presumptions

Global warming is just HALF what we said: World's top climate scientists admit computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong
- Leaked report reveals the world is warming at half the rate claimed by IPCC in 2007
- Scientists accept their computers 'may have exaggerated'

How 36 out of 38 most important climate computers forecast doom that NEVER was"!

By David Rose
PUBLISHED: 16:01 EST, 14 September 2013
UPDATED: 03:21 EST, 15 September 2013

A leaked copy of the world’s most authoritative climate study reveals scientific forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong.

The Mail on Sunday has obtained the final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the ultimate watchdog whose massive, six-yearly ‘assessments’ are accepted by environmentalists, politicians and experts as the gospel of climate science.

They are cited worldwide to justify swingeing fossil fuel taxes and subsidies for ‘renewable’ energy.

Yet the leaked report makes the extraordinary concession that the world has been warming at only just over half the rate claimed by the IPCC in its last assessment, published in 2007.

H/T: LewRockwell.com



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

oopsie

These guys aren't the smartest knives in the lightbulb drawer...

If you get my meaning.

Defeat the panda-industrial complex

I am dusk icon. anagram me.

There is a book on this

From the reviews it seems very good, I actually picked up a copy as a gift for someone last year.

The Hockey Stick Illusion: Climategate and the Corruption of Science (where hockey stick referrs to the giant spike in predictive climate temperature increase which proved to be wrong)

http://www.amazon.com/The-Hockey-Stick-Illusion-Climategate/...

robot999's picture

LMFAO

Blame "computers" hahahahaha. Um, I think most people understand that computers need PROGRAMMERS to make them operate. Programs created by programmers - who are govt. paid shills are to blame "."

BTW, this is/was already widely known when the actual source code (with the bogus programmed assumptions) were release a few years ago.

"Government is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex". - Frank Zappa

The climate is very much like

The climate is very much like the economy.

The famous buttery-fly effect/chaos theory principle was originally observed when making weather predictions. When computer models were forced the same data with extra precision digits the final prediction was radically different from the results of the initial iterations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect#Examples

Today's mises.org article is about statistics and math models in mainstream economics. It is no wonder that mainstream economicists with their obsession for statistics got every economic policy and prediction wrong.
http://mises.org/daily/6528/Science-is-More-than-Mathematics

I think these computer models can be abused by anyone with an agenda.

bingo! hence, the "erroneous presumptions"

to build a working model based on the wrong premise would be akin to polishing a small corner of a prison cell, and calling it an Italian marble floor tile.

It's like as if continually polishing shiit makes it something it's not? Not to mention, as per the above scenario, you're still a prisoner pretending you're free at home, cleaning the floor, like everyone else, to fake yourself into a sense of delusional normalcy.

yeah, it's like what good are all fancy Keynesian mathematical models & formulae, when they discount the most important variable: human behavior?

This is why all control freak centralizers LOVE collecting data: it's the sociopathic nerds' way of feeling like king of the world: you adjust x based on data-set Y amassed, you get z, and that means you just predicted and/or controlled an outcome! yay! even if was already a pre-determined outcome! double yay!

humans, humans...

thank god dogs don't know how to rationalize bullshiit: they just walk around it, and even if they step in it, they don't call it T-bone.

but a quackademic 'scientist'?

He/she'd say: well... they're essentially constructed out of the molecular building blocks; they're just arranged differently...so you can argue, technically, that the T-bone and cow dung's the same thing, just arranged differently at nano-levels, which yield completely different looking outcome at the macro.

LMFAO!

but..oh...wait..I just rationalized that myself...what does that make me??? omg! omg! omg! I must be one of 'them'... eew! xD

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

SteveMT's picture

Keep bumping this until hell freezes over. (a little humor here)

Great post about this hoax from hell.