40 votes

UPDATED: Video: Glenn Greenwald Update, there was much more of the interview than I posted.

Folks, Truth needs to be fought for.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Way to go lady, ignorant till

Way to go lady, ignorant till the end.......technology is very very logical, you cant politisize it, especially so, when your as ignorant to technology as you seem to be, not knowing 1 and 0 constants required in order to JUST work.......yes they MAY have the means to see the data, you never know, however, technology CAN be secured if DESIGNED to be, your ignorant to give the impression otherwise.......just so you dont lose the conversation, your not after truth obviously, and therefore i can NEVER trust you, that means i will not listen to ANY of your arguments, since the very basic foundation i expect from someone is truth, if you LIE, yes LIE about one thing, i cannot trust you to LIE about another, that is why conviction to truth is so very well respected, in the empire of lies

love that man. snowden

love that man. snowden coudn't have picked a better person.

This is what happens...

...when you have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

Another witless lame stream media talking head goes up against Greenwald,
and another one bites the dust.

With each passing encounter the distinction between reporter and journalist becomes more evident.
As evident as the distinction between a politician and a statesman.

Exercise Liberty!

America Rising.
The Constitution Stands.

"That the pen is mightier than the sword would be proven false; if I should take my sword and cut off the hand that holds the pen" - American Nomad

Greenwald wipes the floor with these types of people

This "interviewer" is a female Piers Morgan, I wonder if they were trained in the same schools.

BBC: @2:57 - "How can you be sure that your actions have not made it easier for terrorists ... you can't be sure of that, you can't prove a negative of that can you?"

Greenwald: "Well, I don't know why you're asking me to prove a negative that can't be proven." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance)


Presstitute Destroyed by Journalist

Should be the title of that YouTube clip.

that woman is

disgusting and horrible.

I'd rather have a bottle in front o' me than a frontal lobotomy

Why any

journalist would think they can challenge Greenwald with a leading/probing question is beyond me. He is so much of a quick thinker, they simply stand no chance of getting him to say anything other than the truth.

Dr. Mike Vasovski
South Carolina Campaign Chairman, Ron Paul 2012
The SINGLE vote in the SC delegation for RP, GOP Convention, Tampa, FL
2010 Candidate, US Congress SC-03
Past Chairman, Aiken, SC County Tea Party

the truth is obvious, the

the truth is obvious, the truth is powerful

Because she's not a journalist

Maybe she once was, but she was certainly not acting like a journalist!

Excellent interview.

I haven't followed this story closely but the points he made about Petrobras and the OAS succinctly encapsulated the significance of the Snowden information.

Of course the US and UK governments are trying to stuff the genie back into the bottle but the more they try the greater the damage they do to their own credibility when they interview someone like Glenn Greenwald who actually knows the message he wants to communicate and recognises at the same time the story the elites want to get out that conforms to their fear programming of the people.

However, the public is now being asked to trust the Guardian Media group who have encrypted the data released by Snowden and presumably will release it according to THEIR judgement of what best serves the "public interest". Or indeed it appears that Snowden himself may be releasing the data piecemeal according to HIS judgment. This is a different approach to Wikileaks who simply dumped the data into the public space and allowed anyone to access it.

Since Mr. Greenwald defends the transparency principle of democracy would it not make more sense to do as Wikileaks does and release all the data both Snowden and the Guardian Group have? After all they would still have access to it for their own purposes. Otherwise it raises questions as to the intentions and agenda of Snowden and the Guardian Group themselves.

Alternatively they might want to explain to the public why they are holding back on total release of the data and let the people themselves judge whether they deserve to be trusted any more than the government.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

I think Glen G

I think they are reading it and evaluate each document if it makes sense to the story or if it could hurt someone.

Seems like I heard something to that, in one of the interviews.

Yes they have a agenda!

Call the "Truth" something that seem to have gotten lost in the Government that most of US thought we fought for.

What comes to mind is all of us are humans before we get a country to love.
And rule they are made buy the same people that 82% of us distrust. Think about that.

Just want what seems to be missing, Truth and Justice for ALL
What is fraud except creating “value” from nothing and passing it off as something?

You make a good point.

The whole issue is protection of private communications and if these documents were made public then someone's private conversations would be compromised.

Quite a dilemma.

"Jesus answered them: 'Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin. The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.'" (John 8:34-36)

Truth and respect

Lays in all of our hearts.

The Evil Empire is being exposed.

Gee is he quick on the draw.

Gee is he quick on the draw. He thinks so fast and is able to smack down these gad fly newsreaders. I love how he shames them about their lack of journalism. Where do these do do birds come up with their talking points. I can't believe the world is circling the toilet like it is and people just go on with the Kabuki theater.

Why Watch Pro Wrestling or Ultimate Fighting...?

...when it's far more gratifying watching Greenwald smack down vicious guard dogs for corrupt states and other nefarious establishments?


I feel sorry for anybody who has to regularly get "news" from that station. What a stupid retarded bitch. Yap already answered 100x previously talking points much? Glenn mopped the floor with her then threw her out with the bucket's wastewater.

Right out of the gate she started

“Give a man a gun, he can rob a bank. Give a man a central bank, and he can rob a country and the world.”


It's nothing but sickening.

Google Journalism and CIA.

MSM is owned. They don't live there if they aren't supporting it.

The 'fake' dollar depends on the deception, it's going to be interesting to see how it plays out.

Yes I changed the Headline.

Granger has been an absolute hater of this man.

Others have shown up as well to do so.

I'm sick of their efforts to destroy the truth with labels and slurs.

I'm not a homo, nor a homo basher, but I respect Everyone that speaks for the truth.

Idiots supported Barney Frank to destroy America.

This woman is either a shill

or a complete dumbass.

I like how Glenn schools her on how to be media.

Freedom Lovers Unite : to bring in our last chance for what was a great country back again into the hands of the people.