1 vote

Need help finding DP post analyzing Obamacare which references page numbers in the law

I think it was in the past month or two there was a post, reposted from another website, which compiled a large list of issues in Obamacare. Each issue referenced their associated page number in the law, so the claims could be verified.

If I'm remembering correctly, the person who originally authored the list gave everyone the ok to repost wherever they want in order to help spread the info.

I've been looking, but cannot find the post about it here on the DP. If anyone knows what I'm referring to, please post the link here. Thanks for any help finding that info.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I saw a video posted here...

in the last couple days fitting that description. It was kinda lame.

This is a bit better...
http://www.newswithviews.com/Lane/lauren104.htm

These ones? ( I always wanted to say that, like a gen y or z)

Top Fifty Threats From Obamacare By Lauren Lane
TOP FIFTY THREATS FROM OBAMACARE

By Lauren Lane
April 27, 2013
NewsWithViews.com

A special thanks to Greg Kellogg for posting this on Facebook and sharing so many interesting articles and news-stories to help wake up America. Permission was given to share this. Please feel free to send me your stories and news that moves you. Also, if you would like a free guide on 25 tips that will save your life, order your complimentary guide at: www.OregonHealthNews.org

1) Pg 22 mandates that the Government will audit books of ALL EMPLOYERS that self insure. So every employer in the United States will be subjected to a health insurance audit just as all taxpayers are subject to audit. Of course, we will have to pay for an entire new bureaucracy to do this–the Internal Health Revenue Service?

2) Pg 30, Sec 123 states that there will be a government committee that decides what treatments you are allowed and what your overall benefits are.

3) Pg 29, lines 4-16 basically mandates the rationing of health care as is being done in Canada.

4) Pg 42 recognizes the power of the Health Choices Commissioner to determine your health benefits. You will have no choice.

5) Pg 50, section 152 states that free, taxpayer-paid health care will be given to the 30 million non-citizens in the USA, even illegal aliens.

http://www.dailypaul.com/300511/top-fifty-threats-from-obama...

The link in Jill's post

Is very accurate. I read the final version after it was passed and confirm accuracy:

http://www.dailypaul.com/301160#comment-3217254

If I disappear from a discussion please forgive me. My 24-7 business requires me to split mid-sentence to serve them. I am not ducking out, I will be back later to catch up.

That's the same list that I

That's the same list that I posted and it's filled with exaggerations and falsehoods.

I'm not so sure

Because what I found when reading the law was that what was written was not the problem. The problem was what was missing in the writing such as any set limits of power. It is limitless in jurisdiction and enforcement. Way to broad.

If I disappear from a discussion please forgive me. My 24-7 business requires me to split mid-sentence to serve them. I am not ducking out, I will be back later to catch up.

I just looked through the

I just looked through the text to give you some examples (I looked at this before), but it seems that this was written before the final version was created and the page and line numbers don't even seem to line up anymore.

BTW, this is my 1,000th post :)

Try this version

http://housedocs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf
the page numbers there seem to line up.

So many of them are so badly wrong, how does it get past anyone's bullshit filter?

Wow, very cool !

Post 1000, Member number 8226, lol. You know what? I think I tried to get everyone here to divide it up, read a few pages each then make notes of sections that needed attention and everyone was too lazy to help at the time. Why is it they always wait until the last minute to care?

If I disappear from a discussion please forgive me. My 24-7 business requires me to split mid-sentence to serve them. I am not ducking out, I will be back later to catch up.

I think you are referring to

I think you are referring to this:

http://www.coachisright.com/special-reports/50-dangers-from-...

Although I would be careful when using this, because I don't think they are all accurate / some are blown out of proportion / not put into context.

Edit: Actually the more I look at this the more inaccurate it seems. I would not rely on it.