26 votes

Witness: Child in Miriam Carey’s car was removed from vehicle before police “let loose” with gunfire on Carey, killing her.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Armed abduction? Who has custody?

Google "armed child abduction"

Free includes debt-free!

if the eyewitness' assertions are true,

then that means the armed state thugs clearly used her for live organism target practice.

If they had the time and the opportunity to remove the child, from an unarmed woman, that means with all the tools and oppressive tools available to them, from Taser, pepper-spray, 'less than lethal' 12ga loads, baton, to their lowest-common-denominator-compliance/choke-hold/faux-JiuJitsu joint-lock techniques, with that many LE vs. a single woman, they could've easily overpowered her.

But obviously, instead, they simply chose to shoot her dead: they murdered her.

As their saying goes: "Dead witnesses tell no tales."

PS. Worse: assuming the child was locked in the rear baby safety-seat, which still takes a bit of time to unlock, that means they had even more ample time to subdue Miriam, without resorting to murdering her!

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

She said after the child was taken from the car

she heard "a lot of gun fire" If she was in fact unarmed, whats up with the multiple rounds of gun fire?

as a former SWAT commander once told me in private, bluntly:

"Dead suspect? No lawsuit."

It's the unspoken truth about 'modern' police 'training.'

We, their employers, are seen as the enemy. Enemy combatant, that is.

They have a saying among cops in the old days "Every [stray] bullet has a lawyer attached to it."

Well nowadays, EVEN THAT doesn't matter, when they can practically 'legally' get away with murder by delusionally invoking and hiding behind the 100% legal FICTION shield of "qualified immunity" (along with their insurance companies who underwrite it all for each respective municipal corporations, aka. "government") and statist-brainwashed juries who moronically, routinely let govt terrorists get away with this scheisse, when these type of cop-on-citizen-murder cases reach the courtroom.

Plus, all 'modern' police trainers want their kids to become SWAT-lite: they're taught instinctively to "shoot until slide-lock, then reload."

They ADVERTISE that they're taught to "shoot until the assailant is not a threat"/"shoot to stop the threat"/"shoot to 'save lives'," but in reality, it's "shoot until your gun's empty"/"shoot to kill."

ALL cops know this.

As in, until your gun has fully expended ALL cartridges in your magazine, then reload with a full-capacity mag.

Which, by nature of modern sidearms, that means unless their department issues, or okays a gun chambered in .45ACP which will be limited to 8~10rds on average (unless it's a Glock 21, then it's 13rds), a cop will normally carry anywhere between 13~17 rounds in their duty sidearms (13 & 15 on average for guns chambered in .40S&W and 15 & 17 on average for guns chambered in 9mm)+ 2~4 backup mags & anything else non-standard-department-issue/protocol they individually decide to bring along in their EDC/go-bag/bug-out bag, etc.

So, doing the math: 1 round in the chamber + empty mag + reload = 27~35rds can be expended per cop (though rarely do they do more than 1.5 mag's worth of ammo). Add in his friends, then you get the "An unarmed suspect was shot 50 times by NYPD yesterday. In another news, Summer's here! 20% off at JC Penny. Coming up next, Bronx Zoo is getting a furry friend from China; the Pandas will be on loan from blah blah blah' - in the news.

This is what they're taught and trained to do; worse they're constantly reminded that 'their' legal system will back them up, after each such officer-initiated shooting encounters with paid vacations ("PAID administrative-leave"/desk-duty), and a nice little PR package (heavily pro-police biased MSM 'reporting'/pre-packaged news), followed by throngs of favorable police worshipping sheeple drones, sometimes cop's own family & friends, but others just vicarious-bullies cheering section in the online boards.

It's like a CrackerJack box full of Pressto Instant Auto-Tyranny Defense PR-candy.

Again, rarely are there any "lobby" for the citizenry, but always plenty for state-thugs and govt terrorist scums, because it's 'their' system; plenty of FRN's to go around to keep that system 'legitimized' and bolstered whenever possible.

It's always sickening and disgusting watching these lunatics fap-fap themselves into a tyrannical orgy.

absolutely disgusting.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

And there are these

http://www.naturalnews.com/039177_gun_range_targets_pregnant...

If I disappear from a discussion please forgive me. My 24-7 business requires me to split mid-sentence to serve them. I am not ducking out, I will be back later to catch up.

yep, aware of that one; saw it on when it made the headlines;

Though, in all fairness, I think they forgot to include hot chicks, celebrities, dogs/puppies/cats/kitties, quadriplegics in wheelchairs, Middle Ages jesters, elephants, tigers, horses, turtles, flying monkeys, aliens, vampires, werewolves, unicorns and dragons.

Hey, you know you never know when the Game of Thrones CGI rejects will get desperate and rob a bank or something, and get caught with their flappy wings at the mainlobby door, as they're trying to flame out DHS nazis. LOL, meh.

DHS Desensitizing Targets No More Hesitation for people who really should learn TO hesitate

http://youtu.be/8EBgTMrcj1M
MAINEPREPPER
Published on Feb 21, 2013

Folks the last thing you need is some hotshot cowboy trained NOT to hesitate, to "SEE GUN/SHOOT".

WWW.LETARGETS.COM

I have seen these targets, they are outrageous and we need to find everyone involved in this and have them fired.

Are there REALLY so many pregnant women pointing guns at DHS officers that they feel the need to train up so they won't hesitate to shoot one down? How about little children and elderly people?

Our government is supposed to SERVE us, not practice crushing us under their heel.

The above video is by a good, r3VOL-leaning former USMC sniper instructor (if I recall, but not 100% certain; it's been a while since I saw his 'bio' video) and an OathKeeper, and all-around good prepper, MainePrepper putting things into perspective about his experience guarding a roadblock overseas when a child came up on him, in regards to DHS' "no hesitation targets."

Bad instinctive defaults always build and leave you with horrible training-scars, ESPECIALLY if one's goals are to train a unit to deal with any threat, any unknown threat, or even uncommon ones, like a pregnant woman, a child, or grandma 'assailant' etc.

While I DO 'get' that there are certain instances, where one's 'normal'-societally accepted perception of 'what a bad guy should be,' runs counter to what one may encounter in their niche jobs, ie REAL Hostage Rescue Teams, and specific counter terrorists units like DEVGRU & Delta, etc. but, the problem with DHS (aside from their Nazi origins & name, their Delta/SEAL-operator wannabe-ness, as well as their utter UnConstitutional abominable existence...) is that they were/are socially engineering their thug-drones to normalize the acceptance of dehumanized lowered morals, BY DEFAULT, when factual prevalence of such instances are the rarest of rarities, especially with that particular agency.

And as with all military units: you train against whom you're likely to encounter, and will encounter/'take care of 'bidnez' against.'

Which means, there's no doubt that they were using those target to train their drones with the specific intent of making them shoot kids, pregnant women, and elderly with guns, literally: "without hesitation."

Shooting a pregnant woman, a child or grandma, just because they're holding a gun, should NEVER be a default, instinctive shoot-'training scars.'

The PROPER training would be to train their units to be aware of hands, pockets, muzzle direction, eye movement, body language shift in ANY potential assailant, WHOMEVER it maybe.

Then, it doesn't matter, whom the assailant is: it becomes principally clear: assailants using tool-X to do harm with, period.

Unfortunately, most cops have worse muzzle/trigger discipline than you'd ever expect to find in almost any 'untrained' countryboy from hills of W. Virginia. And you see their lack of tactical discernment all the time, as if they're a bunch of 5yr olds with guns and kneejerk 'training,' when news of 'accidental discharge' by cops, and cops shooting kids, elderly, 'by accident' becomes more and more routine, when that should never be.

In fact, considering the growing number of incidents in which more and more PD routinely shoot kids and elderly, don't think they're gonna be needing these DHS targets to train themselves to shoot kids and elderly, any more quicker, instinctively! LOL...er .o/

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

The child appeared to be about 3 yrs old instead of ! yr. old

as previously reported, If it was even the same child. Nothing would surprise me anymore about CNN reporting and video accuracy.

"A vote for the lesser of two evils is a vote to keep things the same", Buckminster Fuller..
A choice for liberty is always a choice for liberty.

Nice catch

...as always

They tried to bury us, they didn't know we were seeds. -mexican proverb